News

HAARP: VANDALISM IN THE SKY?

Posted by: admin ⋅ November 1, 2005 ⋅ Post a comment
    Posted in: News

Technonet is the protest form of the
1990s-picketing on the information highways. For example, a fast-growing
assortment of men and women around the world are using the Internet (started by
the US military for information transfer and exchange that would never be
interfered with) to draw attention to a questionable military project in Alaska.
Now these Internetting, e-mailing, faxing folks are blowing holes in the US
Department of Defense secrecy wall by using the government’s own system.
The printed-word part of the protest started when Dennis Specht, an anti-nuclear
activist then living in Alaska, sent a news item to NEXUS on the topic of
HAARP-the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program. Then, an Alaskan
political activist and science researcher in Anchorage, Nick Begich, networked
with Patrick and Gael Crystal Flanagan, who are self-described "technomonks"
living in Sedona, Arizona, and was told to check out that same Australian-based
magazine. Begich was surprised to see an item from his home town in NEXUS and
immediately headed to the local library to dig out the documents cited in the
article.

That research led to articles and the book, Angels Don’t Play this HAARP:
Advances in Tesla Technology, which is 230 pages of detailed information on
this intrusive project. This article will only give highlights. Despite the
amount of research (350 footnotes), at its heart it is a story about ordinary
people who took on an extraordinary challenge.

HAARP BOILS THE UPPER ATMOSPHERE

HAARP will zap the upper atmosphere with a focused and steerable
electromagnetic beam. It is an advanced model of an ‘ionospheric heater’. (The
ionosphere is the electrically-charged sphere surrounding Earth’s upper
atmosphere. It ranges between about 40 to 600 miles above Earth’s surface.)

Put simply, the apparatus for HAARP is a reversal of a radio telescope:
antennas send out signals instead of receiving. HAARP is the test run for a
super-powerful radio wave beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere
by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce
back onto Earth and penetrate everything-living and dead. HAARP publicity gives
the impression that the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program is mainly
an academic project with the goal of changing the ionosphere to improve
communications for our own good. However, other US military documents put it
more clearly: HAARP aims to learn how to "exploit the ionosphere for
Department of Defense purposes". Communicating with submarines is only one
of those purposes.

Press releases and other information from the military on HAARP continually
downplay what it could do. Publicity documents insist that the HAARP project is
no different than other ionospheric heaters operating safely throughout the
world in places such as Arecibo, Puerto Rico; Tromsø, Norway; and the former
Soviet Union. However, a 1990 government document indicates that the radio
frequency (RF) power zap will drive the ionosphere to unnatural activities:

"…at the highest HF powers available in the West, the instabilities
commonly studied are approaching their maximum RF energy dissipative capability,
beyond which the plasma processes will ‘run away’ until the next limiting factor
is reached."

If the military, in cooperation with the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, can
show that this new ground-based "Star Wars" technology is sound, they
both win. The military has a relatively inexpensive defence shield and the
university can brag about the most dramatic geophysical manipulation since
atmospheric explosions of nuclear bombs. After successful testing, they would
have the military megaprojects of the future and huge markets for Alaska’s North
Slope natural gas.

Looking at the other patents which built on the work of a Texas physicist
named Bernard Eastlund, it becomes clearer how the military intends to use the
HAARP transmitter. It also makes governmental denials less believable. The
military knows how it intends to use this technology, and has made it clear in
their documents. The military has deliberately misled the public through
sophisticated word games, deceit and outright disinformation.

The military says the HAARP system could:

• give the military a tool to replace the electromagnetic pulse effect of
  atmospheric thermonuclear devices (still considered a viable option by the
  military through at least 1986);
• replace the huge Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine communication
  system operating in Michigan and Wisconsin with a new and more compact
  technology;
• be used to replace the over-the-horizon radar system that was once planned
  for the current location of HAARP, with a more flexible and accurate system;
• provide a way to wipe out communications over an extremely large area,
  while keeping the military’s own communications systems working;
• provide a wide-area Earth-penetrating tomography which, if combined with
  the computing abilities of EMASS and Cray computers, would make it possible
  to verify many parts of nuclear nonproliferation and peace agreements;
• be a tool for geophysical probing to find oil, gas and mineral deposits
  over a large area;
• be used to detect incoming low-level planes and cruise missiles, making
  other technologies obsolete.

The above abilities seem like a good idea to all who believe in sound
national defence and to those concerned about cost-cutting. However, the
possible uses which the HAARP records do not explain, and which can only be
found in US Air Force, Army, Navy and other federal agency records, are
alarming. Moreover, effects from the reckless use of these power levels in our
natural shield-the ionosphere-could be cataclysmic, according to some
scientists.

Two Alaskans put it bluntly. A founder of the NO HAARP movement, Clare
Zickuhr, says: "The military is going to give the ionosphere a big kick and
see what happens."

The military failed to tell the public that they do not know what exactly
will happen, but a Penn State science article brags about that uncertainty.
Macho science? The HAARP project uses the largest energy levels yet played with,
by what Begich and Manning call "the big boys with their new toys". It
is an experiment on the sky, and experiments are done to find out something not
already known. Independent scientists told Begich and Manning that a HAARP-type
‘skybuster’ with its unforeseen effects could be an act of global vandalism.

HAARP HISTORY

The patents described below were the package of ideas which were originally
controlled by ARCO Power Technologies Incorporated (APTI), a subsidiary of
Atlantic Richfield Company, one of the biggest oil companies in the world. APTI
was the contractor that built the HAARP facility. ARCO sold this subsidiary, the
patents and the second phase construction contract to E-Systems in June 1994.

E-Systems is one of the biggest intelligence contractors in the world, doing
work for the CIA, defence intelligence organisations and others. US$1.8 billion
of their annual sales are to these organisations, with $800 million for black
projects-projects so secret that even the United States Congress isn’t told how
the money is being spent.

E-Systems was bought out by Raytheon which is one of the largest defence
contractors in the world. In 1994 Raytheon was listed as number 42 on the "Fortune
500" list of companies. Raytheon has thousands of patents, some of which
will be valuable in the HAARP project. Twelve patents are the backbone of the
HAARP project, and are now buried among the thousands of others held in the name
of Raytheon.

Bernard J. Eastlund’s US Patent #4,686,605, "Method and Apparatus for
Altering a Region in the Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or
Magnetosphere", was sealed for a year under a government secrecy order.

The Eastlund ionospheric heater was different: the radio frequency (RF)
radiation was concentrated and focused to a point in the ionosphere. This
difference throws an unprecedented amount of energy into the ionosphere. The
Eastlund device would allow a concentration of one watt per cubic centimetre,
compared to others only able to deliver about one millionth of one watt.

This huge difference could lift and change the ionosphere in the ways
necessary to create futuristic effects described in the patent. According to the
patent, the work of Nikola Tesla in the early 1900s formed the basis of the
research.

What would this technology be worth to ARCO, the owner of the patents? They
could make enormous profits by beaming electrical power, without wires, from a
powerhouse in the gas fields to the consumer.

For a time, HAARP researchers could not prove that this was one of the
intended uses for HAARP. In April 1995, however, Begich found other patents,
connected with a ‘key personnel’ list for APTI. Some of these new APTI patents
were indeed a wireless system for sending electrical power.

Eastlund’s patent said the technology can confuse or completely disrupt
airplanes’ and missiles’ sophisticated guidance systems. Further, this ability
to spray large areas of Earth with electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies,
and to control changes in those waves, makes it possible to knock out
communications on land or sea as well as in the air. The patent said:

"Thus, this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented
amounts of power in the Earth’s atmosphere at strategic locations and to
maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed,
in a manner far more precise and better controlled than heretofore accomplished
by the prior art, particularly by detonation of nuclear devices of various
yields at various altitudes…

"…it is possible not only to interfere with third party
communications but to take advantage of one or more such beams to carry out a
communications network even though the rest of the world’s communications are
disrupted. Put another way, what is used to disrupt another’s
communications can be employed by one knowledgeable of this invention as a
communication network at the same time.

"…large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an
unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned
drag forces with resultant destruction…

"Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper
atmosphere wind patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric
particles which will act as a lens or focusing device. …molecular
modifications of the atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental
effects can be achieved. Besides actually changing the molecular composition of
an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or molecules can be chosen for
increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, etc. concentrations in the
atmosphere could be artificially increased…"

Begich found 11 other APTI patents. They told how to make "Nuclear-sized
Explosions without Radiation", power-beaming systems, over-the-horizon
radar, detection systems for missiles carrying nuclear warheads, electromagnetic
pulses previously produced by thermonuclear weapons and other "Star
Wars" tricks. This cluster of patents underlay the HAARP weapon system.

Related research by Begich and Manning uncovered bizarre schemes. For
example, US Air Force documents revealed that a system had been developed for
manipulating and disrupting human mental processes through pulsed
radio-frequency radiation (the stuff of HAARP) over large geographical areas.
The most telling material about this technology came from writings of Zbigniew
Brzezinski (former National Security Adviser to US President Carter) and J. F.
MacDonald (science adviser to US President Johnson and a Professor of Geophysics
at UCLA), as they wrote about use of power-beaming transmitters for geophysical
and environmental warfare. The documents showed how these effects might be
caused, and the negative effects on human health and thinking.

The mental-disruption possibilities for HAARP are the most disturbing. More
than 40 pages of the book, with dozens of footnotes, chronicle the work of
Harvard professors, military planners and scientists as they plan and test this
use of the electromagnetic technology. For example, one of the papers describing
this use was from the International Red Cross in Geneva. It even gave the
frequency ranges where these effects could occur-the same ranges which HAARP is
capable of broadcasting.

The following statement was made more than 25 years ago in a book which
Brzezinski wrote while a professor at Columbia University:

"Political strategists are tempted to exploit research on the brain
and human behaviour. Geophysicist Gordon J. F. MacDonald-specialist in problems
of warfare-says accurately-timed, artificially-excited electronic strokes ‘could
lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over
certain regions of the Earth… In this way, one could develop a system that
would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in
selected regions over an extended period…’ No matter how deeply disturbing the
thought of using the environment to manipulate behaviour for national
advantages, to some the technology permitting such use will very probably
develop within the next few decades."

In 1966, MacDonald was a member of the President’s Science Advisory Committee
and later a member of the President’s Council on Environmental Quality. He
published papers on the use of environmental control technologies for military
purposes. The most profound comment he made as a geophysicist was:

"The key to geophysical warfare is the identification of
environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy
would release vastly greater amounts of energy."

While yesterday’s geophysicists predicted today’s advances, are HAARP program
managers delivering on the vision? The geophysicists recognised that adding
energy to the environmental soup could have large effects. However, humankind
has already added substantial amounts of electromagnetic energy into our
environment without understanding what might constitute critical mass. The book
by Begich and Manning raises questions. Have these additions been without
effect, or is there a cumulative amount beyond which irreparable damage can be
done? Is HAARP another step in a journey from which we cannot turn back? Are we
about to embark on another energy experiment which unleashes another set of
demons from Pandora’s box?

As early as 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski predicted a "more controlled and
directed society" would gradually appear, linked to technology. This
society would be dominated by an elite group which impresses voters by allegedly
superior scientific know-how. Angels Don’t Play This HAARP further quotes
Brzezinski:

"Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this
elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest
modern techniques for influencing public behaviour and keeping society under
close surveillance and control. Technical and scientific momentum would then
feed on the situation it exploits," Brzezinski predicted.

His forecasts proved accurate. Today, a number of new tools for the
"elite" are emerging, and the temptation to use them increases
steadily. The policies to permit the tools to be used are already in place. How
could the United States be changed, bit by bit, into the predicted
highly-controlled technosociety? Among the ‘stepping stones’ Brzezinski expected
were persisting social crises and use of the mass media to gain the public’s
confidence.

In another document prepared by the government, the US Air Force claims:

"The potential applications of artificial electromagnetic fields are
wide-ranging and can be used in many military or quasi-military situations…
Some of these potential uses include dealing with terrorist groups, crowd
control, controlling breaches of security at military installations, and
antipersonnel techniques in tactical warfare. In all of these cases the EM
(electromagnetic) systems would be used to produce mild to severe physiological
disruption or perceptual distortion or disorientation. In addition, the ability
of individuals to function could be degraded to such a point that they would be
combat-ineffective. Another advantage of electromagnetic systems is that they
can provide coverage over large areas with a single system. They are silent, and
countermeasures to them may be difficult to develop… One last area where
electromagnetic radiation may prove of some value is in enhancing abilities of
individuals for anomalous phenomena."

Do these comments point to uses already somewhat developed? The author of the
government report refers to an earlier Air Force document about the uses of
radio-frequency radiation in combat situations. (Here, Begich and Manning note
that HAARP is the most versatile and the largest radio-frequency radiation
transmitter in the world.)

The United States congressional record deals with the use of HAARP for
penetrating the Earth with signals bounced off the ionosphere. These signals are
used to look inside the planet to a depth of many kilometres in order to locate
underground munitions, minerals and tunnels. For 1996 the US Senate has set
aside US$15 million to develop this ability alone: Earth-penetrating tomography.
The problem is that the frequency needed for Earth-penetrating radiations is
within the frequency range most cited for disruption of human mental functions.
It may also have profound effects on migration patterns of fish and wild animals
which rely on an undisturbed energy field to find their routes.

As if electromagnetic pulses in the sky and mental disruption were not
enough, Eastlund bragged that the super-powerful ionospheric heater could
control weather. Begich and Manning brought to light government documents
indicating that the military has weather-control technology. When HAARP is
eventually built to its full power level, it could create weather effects over
entire hemispheres. If one government experiments with the world’s weather
patterns, what is done in one place will impact everyone else on the planet. Angels
Don’t Play This HAARP explains a principle behind some of Nikola Tesla’s
inventions-resonance-which affects planetary systems.

BUBBLE OF ELECTRIC PARTICLES

Angels Don’t Play This HAARP includes interviews with independent
scientists such as Elizabeth Rauscher. She has a Ph.D., a long and impressive
career in high-energy physics, and has been published in prestigious science
journals and books. Rauscher commented on HAARP: "You’re pumping tremendous
energy into an extremely delicate molecular configuration that comprises these
multi-layers we call the ionosphere." The ionosphere is prone to catalytic
reactions, she explained: if a small part is changed, a major change in the
ionosphere can happen.

In describing the ionosphere as a delicately balanced system, Dr Rauscher
shared her mental picture of it: a soap bubble-like sphere surrounding Earth’s
atmosphere, with movements swirling over the surface of the bubble. If a big
enough hole is punched through it, she predicts it could pop.

SLICING THE IONOSPHERE

Physicist Daniel Winter, Ph.D., of Waynesville, North Carolina, says HAARP
high-frequency emissions can couple with long wave (low frequency or ELF) pulses
the Earth grid uses to distribute information as vibrations to synchronise
dances of life in the biosphere. Dan terms this geomagnetic action "Earth’s
information bloodstream", and says it is likely that coupling of HAARP HF
(high frequency) with natural ELF (extremely low frequency) can cause unplanned,
unsuspected side-effects.

David Yarrow of Albany, New York, is a researcher with a background in
electronics. He described possible interactions of HAARP radiations with the
ionosphere and Earth’s magnetic grid:

"HAARP will not burn ‘holes’ in the ionosphere. That is a dangerous
understatement of what HAARP’s giant gigawatt beam will do. Earth is spinning
relative to thin electric shells of the multilayer membrane of ‘iono-spheres’
that absorb and shield Earth’s surface from intense solar radiation, including
charged particle storms in solar winds erupting from the Sun. Earth’s axial spin
means that HAARP-in a burst lasting more than a few minutes-will slice through
the ionosphere like a microwave knife. This produces not a hole, but a long
tear-an incision.

CRUDELY PLUCKING THE STRINGS

"Second concept: As Earth rotates, HAARP will slice across
geomagnetic flux…a donut-shaped spool of magnetic strings-like longitude
meridians (on maps). HAARP may not ‘cut’ these strings in Gaia’s magnetic
mantle, but will pulse each thread with harsh, out-of-harmony high frequencies.
These noisy impulses will vibrate geomagnetic flux lines, sending vibrations all
through the geomagnetic web.

"The image comes to mind of a spider on its web. An insect lands, and
the web’s vibrations alert the spider to possible prey. HAARP will be a manmade
microwave finger poking at the web, sending out confusing signals, if not
tearing holes in the threads.

"Effects of this interference with symphonies of Gaia’s geomagnetic
harp are unknown, and I suspect barely thought of. Even if thought of, the
intent [of HAARP] is to learn to exploit any effects, not to play in tune to
global symphonies."

Among other researchers quoted is Paul Schaefer of Kansas City. His degree is
in electrical engineering and he spent four years building nuclear weapons.
"But most of the theories that we have been taught by scientists to believe
in seem to be falling apart," he says. He talks about imbalances
already caused by the industrial and atomic age, especially by radiation of
large numbers of tiny, high-velocity particles "like very small spinning
tops" into our environment. The unnatural level of motion of highly
energetic particles in the atmosphere and in radiation belts surrounding Earth
is the villain in the weather disruptions, according to this model which
describes an Earth discharging its buildup of heat, relieving stress and
regaining a balanced condition through earthquakes and volcanic action.

FEVERISH EARTH

"One might compare the abnormal energetic state of the Earth and its
atmosphere to a car battery which has become overcharged with the normal flow of
energy jammed up, resulting in hot spots, electrical arcing, physical cracks and
general turbulence as the pent-up energy tries to find some place to go."

In a second analogy, Schaefer says:

"Unless we desire the death of our planet, we must end the production
of unstable particles which are generating the Earth’s fever. A first priority
to prevent this disaster would be to shut down all nuclear power plants and end
the testing of atomic weapons, electronic warfare and ‘Star Wars’."

Meanwhile, the military builds its biggest ionospheric heater yet, to
deliberately create more instabilities in a huge plasma layer-the ionosphere-and
to rev up the energy level of charged particles.

ELECTRONIC RAIN FROM THE SKY

The military has published papers about electron precipitation from the
magnetosphere (the outer belts of charged particles which stream toward Earth’s
magnetic poles) caused by manmade very-low-frequency electromagnetic waves:

"These precipitated particles can produce secondary ionisation, emit
X-rays, and cause significant perturbation in the lower ionosphere."

Two Stanford University radio scientists offer evidence of what technology
can do to affect the sky by making waves on Earth. They showed that very low
frequency radio waves can vibrate the magnetosphere and cause high-energy
particles to cascade into the Earth’s atmosphere. By turning the signal on or
off, they could stop the flow of energetic particles.

WEATHER CONTROL

Avalanches of energy dislodged by such radio waves could hit us hard. Their
work suggests that technicians could control global weather by sending
relatively small ‘signals’ into the Van Allen belts (radiation belts around
Earth). Thus Tesla’s resonance effects can control enormous energies by tiny
triggering signals.

The Begich/Manning book asks whether that knowledge will be used by
war-oriented or biosphere-oriented scientists.

The military has had about 20 years to work on weather warfare methods, which
it euphemistically calls weather modification. For example, rainmaking
technology was taken for a few test rides in Vietnam. The US Department of
Defense sampled lightning and hurricane manipulation studies in Project
Skyfire and Project Stormfury. And they looked at some complicated
technologies that would give big effects. Angels Don’t Play This HAARP
cites an expert who says the military studied both lasers and chemicals which
they figured could damage the ozone layer over an enemy. Looking at ways to
cause earthquakes, as well as to detect them, was part of the project named Prime
Argus, decades ago. The money for that came from the Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency (DARPA, now under the acronym ARPA).

In 1994 the US Air Force revealed its Spacecast 2020 master plan which
includes weather control. Scientists have experimented with weather control
since the 1940s, but Spacecast 2020 noted that "using environmental
modification techniques to destroy, damage or injure another state [is]
prohibited". Having said that, the Air Force claimed that advances in
technology "compels a re-examination of this sensitive and potentially
risky topic".

FORTY YEARS OF ZAPPING THE SKY?

As far back as 1958, the chief White House adviser on weather modification,
Captain Howard T. Orville, said the US defence department was studying
"ways to manipulate the charges of the Earth and sky and so affect the
weather by using an electronic beam to ionise or de-ionise the atmosphere over a
given area.

In 1966, Professor Gordon J. F. MacDonald was Associate Director of the
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the University of California,
Los Angeles, was a member of the President’s Science Advisory Committee, and
later a member of the President’s Council on Environmental Quality. He published
papers on the use of environmental control technologies for military purposes.
MacDonald made a revealing comment:

"The key to geophysical warfare is the identification of
environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy
would release vastly greater amounts of energy."

World-recognised scientist MacDonald had a number of ideas for using the
environment as a weapon system and he contributed to what was, at the time, the
dream of a futurist. When he wrote his chapter, "How to Wreck the
Environment", for the book Unless Peace Comes, he was not kidding
around. In it he describes the use of weather manipulation, climate
modification, polar ice-cap melting or destabilisation, ozone depletion
techniques, earthquake engineering, ocean wave control and brainwave
manipulation using the planet’s energy fields. He also said that these types of
weapons would be developed and, when used, would be virtually undetectable by
their victims. Is HAARP that weapon? The military’s intention to do
environmental engineering is well-documented.

US Congress’s subcommittee hearings on Oceans and International Environment
looked into military weather and climate modification conducted in the early
1970s. "What emerged was an awesome picture of far-ranging research and
experimentation by the Department of Defense into ways environmental tampering
could be used as a weapon," said another author cited in Angels Don’t
Play This HAARP.

The revealed secrets surprised legislators. Would an inquiry into the state
of the art of electromagnetic manipulation surprise lawmakers today? They may
find out that technologies developed out of the HAARP experiments in Alaska
could deliver on Gordon MacDonald’s vision, because leading-edge scientists are
describing global weather as not only air pressure and thermal systems but also
as an electrical system.

SMALL INPUT, BIG EFFECT

HAARP zaps the ionosphere where it is relatively unstable. A point to
remember is that the ionosphere is an active electrical shield protecting the
planet from the constant bombardment of high-energy particles from space. This
conducting plasma, along with Earth’s magnetic field, traps the electrical
plasma of space and holds it back from going directly to the Earth’s surface,
says Charles Yost of Dynamic Systems, Leicester, North Carolina:

"If the ionosphere is greatly disturbed, the atmosphere below is
subsequently disturbed."

Another scientist interviewed said there is a super-powerful electrical
connection between the ionosphere and the part of the atmosphere where our
weather comes onstage: the lower atmosphere.

One manmade electrical effect-power-line harmonic resonance-causes fallout of
charged particles from the Van Allen (radiation) belts, and the falling ions
cause ice crystals (which precipitate rain clouds).

What about HAARP? Energy blasted upward from an ionospheric heater is not
much compared to the total in the ionosphere, but HAARP documents admit that
thousandfold greater amounts of energy can be released in the ionosphere than
injected. As with MacDonald’s "key to geophysical warfare",
"nonlinear" effects (described in the literature about the ionospheric
heater) mean small input and large output.

Astrophysicist Adam Trombly told Manning that an acupuncture model is one way
to look at the possible effect of multi-gigawatt pulsing of the ionosphere. If
HAARP hits certain points, those parts of the ionosphere could react in
surprising ways.

Smaller ionospheric heaters such as the one at Arecibo are underneath
relatively placid regions of the ionosphere compared to the dynamic movements
nearer Earth’s magnetic poles. That adds another uncertainty to HAARP: the
unpredictable and lively upper atmosphere near the North Pole.

HAARP experimenters do not impress common-sense Alaskans such as Barbara
Zickuhr, who says: "They’re like boys playing with a sharp stick, finding a
sleeping bear and poking it in the butt to see what’s going to happen."

COULD THEY SHORT-CIRCUIT THE EARTH?

Earth as a spherical electrical system is a fairly well-accepted model.
However, those experimenters who want to make unnatural power connections
between parts of this system might not be thinking of possible consequences.
Electrical motors and generators can be caused to wobble when their circuits are
affected. Could human activities cause a significant change in a planet’s
electrical circuit or electrical field? A paper in the respected journal Science
deals with manmade ionisation from radioactive material, but perhaps it
could also be studied with HAARP-type skybusters in mind:

"For example, while changes in the Earth’s electric field resulting
from a solar flare modulating conductivity may have only a barely detectable
effect on meteorology, the situation may be different in regard to electric
field changes caused by manmade ionisation…"

Meteorology, of course, is the study of the atmosphere and weather.
Ionisation is what happens when a higher level of power is zapped into atoms and
knocks electrons off the atoms. The resulting charged particles are the stuff of
HAARP. "One look at the weather should tell us that we are on the wrong
path," says Paul Schaefer, commenting on HAARP-type technologies.

Angels Don’t Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology is about
the military’s plan to manipulate that which belongs to the world: the
ionosphere. The arrogance of the United States Government in this is not without
precedent. Atmospheric nuclear tests had similar goals. More recently, China and
France put their people’s money to destructive use in underground nuclear tests.
It was recently reported that the US Government spent US$3 trillion on its
nuclear program since its beginnings in the 1940s. What new breakthroughs in
life science could have been made with all the money spent on death?

Begich, Manning, Roderick and others believe that democracies need to be
founded on openness rather than the secrecy which surrounds so much military
science. Knowledge used in developing revolutionary weapons could be used for
healing and helping mankind. Because they are used in new weapons, discoveries
are classified and suppressed. When they do appear in the work of other
independent scientists, the new ideas are often frustrated or ridiculed, while
military research laboratories continue to build their new machines for the
killing fields.

However, the book by Manning and Begich gives hope that the
military-industrial-academic-bureaucratic Goliath can be affected by the
combined power of determined individuals and the alternative press. Becoming
informed is the first step to empowerment.

The book, Angels Don’t Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology,
is available for USD$14.95 plus postage and handling (USD$1.50; USD$4.00
international) from Earthpulse Press, c/o Dr Nick Begich, PO Box 201393,
Anchorage, Alaska 99520, USA. It can also be ordered by Visa/MasterCard by
phoning +1 (907) 249 9111.

Be the first to like.

Like

Unlike