Interesting…

http://skeptoid.com

nuff said

Chemtrails?
Read this:
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4027

“If the goal was to drug a population, you’d put the gas where it could reach people, you wouldn’t release a minute quantity into the jet stream where it’s going to be diluted to undetectable levels and eventually rain into the oceans. If the goal is to put reflective dust into the atmosphere to fight global warming, you’d need to plant it a lot higher than commercial jets can travel if you don’t want it to rain right back to earth (in fact you need to put it well up into the stratosphere, not just at the top of the troposphere), and you’d need a lot more than can ever be delivered with 50 gallon tanks. But then, the arguments in favor of chemtrails don’t appear to be based on any kind of logic. They appear to be based on nothing more than imagined conspiracies and sightings of visible contrails, which are well understood, and are being left by planes every hour of the day over every city in the world, and have been for over 50 years. It’s how the malevolent interdimensional entities remind us of their ominous presence.”

gary are you being paid to post on these boards?

ggalin – No I don’t think he’s bright enough for that. He’s just an unemployed loser with nothing else to do.

As previously discussed Skeptoid is a complete load of hogwash and is only believed by people without a brain to think for themselves.

Good to see it’s still the ONLY source you rely on to back up your weightless arguments.

Ad hominem attacks on Skeptoid prove only that you are unable to come up with any real counter arguments yourself.

Can you point out exactly where Brian has gone wrong in the following, instead of just trying to insult me?

““If the goal was to drug a population, you’d put the gas where it could reach people, you wouldn’t release a minute quantity into the jet stream where it’s going to be diluted to undetectable levels and eventually rain into the oceans. If the goal is to put reflective dust into the atmosphere to fight global warming, you’d need to plant it a lot higher than commercial jets can travel if you don’t want it to rain right back to earth (in fact you need to put it well up into the stratosphere, not just at the top of the troposphere), and you’d need a lot more than can ever be delivered with 50 gallon tanks. But then, the arguments in favor of chemtrails don’t appear to be based on any kind of logic. They appear to be based on nothing more than imagined conspiracies and sightings of visible contrails, which are well understood, and are being left by planes every hour of the day over every city in the world, and have been for over 50 years. It’s how the malevolent interdimensional entities remind us of their ominous presence.”

http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4027

BTW, I started working in 1972 and apart from 6 months holiday in Europe I have been in full time employment since then. I am currently employed as a computer technician and have been since 1982. I suspect that beats your employment record Lorraine.

Gary aren’t you clever. A computer technician since 1982, now that’s setting the world on fire. With your warped view of the world at least we should all be thankful you don’t deal with people all day. However you obviously don’t have enough to do by the amount of time you spend on this site. Does your boss know!

Now are you sure that you are not mixing up sitting at a PC all day with being a computer technician? You are probably the right age to be collecting the sickness benefit.

The sickness benefit? Is that how you get your income Lorraine? What do you do for a living Lorraine?

Ad hominem attacks prove only that you are unable to come up with any real counter arguments yourself.

Can you point out exactly where Brian has gone wrong in the following, instead of just trying to insult me?

““If the goal was to drug a population, you’d put the gas where it could reach people, you wouldn’t release a minute quantity into the jet stream where it’s going to be diluted to undetectable levels and eventually rain into the oceans. If the goal is to put reflective dust into the atmosphere to fight global warming, you’d need to plant it a lot higher than commercial jets can travel if you don’t want it to rain right back to earth (in fact you need to put it well up into the stratosphere, not just at the top of the troposphere), and you’d need a lot more than can ever be delivered with 50 gallon tanks. But then, the arguments in favor of chemtrails don’t appear to be based on any kind of logic. They appear to be based on nothing more than imagined conspiracies and sightings of visible contrails, which are well understood, and are being left by planes every hour of the day over every city in the world, and have been for over 50 years. It’s how the malevolent interdimensional entities remind us of their ominous presence.”

http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4027

I notice that the posts are time stamped an hour later than the actual time. Perhaps you need a visit from a technician to set your clock right. Or is day light saving another conspiracy?

I saw a jet plane leaving a vapour trail across the sky last evening. It reminded me of the following;

“If the goal was to drug a population, you’d put the gas where it could reach people, you wouldn’t release a minute quantity into the jet stream where it’s going to be diluted to undetectable levels and eventually rain into the oceans. If the goal is to put reflective dust into the atmosphere to fight global warming, you’d need to plant it a lot higher than commercial jets can travel if you don’t want it to rain right back to earth (in fact you need to put it well up into the stratosphere, not just at the top of the troposphere), and you’d need a lot more than can ever be delivered with 50 gallon tanks. But then, the arguments in favor of chemtrails don’t appear to be based on any kind of logic. They appear to be based on nothing more than imagined conspiracies and sightings of visible contrails, which are well understood, and are being left by planes every hour of the day over every city in the world, and have been for over 50 years. It’s how the malevolent interdimensional entities remind us of their ominous presence.”
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4027

-Just in case any of you missed it last time

“Ad hominem attacks prove only that you are unable to come up with any real counter arguments yourself”. Isn’t that a case of the pot calling the kettle?

Gary I am sick of providing counter arguments that you ignore -anyway ad hominem attacks are your specialty as a way of bypassing the truth and misdirecting the conversation. A classic technique by your ilk.

I am sure everyone is as bored of you as I am.

Hi, I’ve listened to the chemtrail interview and I’ve read the above. I’m from Amsterdam, Holland, Europe.
Here too, we see a lot of very strange cloudformation (after plains passing by) almost every day for I don’t know how many years.

I would be very happy if the trails would be just a natural phenomenon: watervapour being frozen in high altitude, but the fact is that these trails stay there for hours and keep on growing/spreading.

The interviewer is summing up 5 possibilities why the world is being sprayed. I don’t believe it is for the benefit of mankind, I think it’s to reduce the world population by poisoning/infecting or trouble the immunesystems of human beings.

The tekst Gary has taken:
“If the goal was to drug a population, you’d put the gas where it could reach people, you wouldn’t release a minute quantity into the jet stream where it’s going to be diluted to undetectable levels.

Well I’m sure it’s convenient for ‘the sprayers’ that it is not detected easily.

I’m not going into argumentation further because I’m (planning to stay) a ‘chemtrail-believer’ I think available time is best spend to do something about the problems caused by chemtrails (not to mention all the chemicals put in ‘food’).

One thing is to search for means to let the body get rid of toxins/heavy metals. I found chlorella for instance, another is ‘liquid zeolite’.

Infections/viruses etc.: to sleep enough seems to be very important…also a healthy diet with lots of (biological) greenery and fruit. Than there is vitamine c, you can take very much of that (preferably of a natural source).

Another thing I just found out is cheap enough: H2O2 or hydrogen peroxide (3%). You need to have ‘food grade’ (otherwise you’ll get more substances in your body you don’t want). Here you can see an older man demonstrating how to spray it in the mouth and inhale it.
It will kill viruses and bacteria and also give more oxygen in the blood.

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/hydrogenperoxide07feb05.shtml

http://video.google.nl/videosearch?q=how+to+inhale+hydrogen&emb=0&aq=f#

http://educate-yourself.org/cancer/benefitsofhydrogenperozide17jul03.shtml

Health problems associated with chemtrails can be respiratory complaints/allergic reactions etc.
Seems to me that the CT-believers should seek the information and sources how to protect themselves as much as possible (instead of trying to convince the sceptics of the truth that there is spraying going on). Perhaps that’s egoistic, but in the long run: you cannot help people if you’re sick or death can you?

Very good post, Dennis.

As much as I don’t believe in vaccines, readers should be “immunized” against the gainsaying of the willingly ignorant.

Chemtrail and 9/11 “debunkers” are some of the most stubborn and numbest people on the planet. Cannot tell the difference between a normal plane contrail, and horizon to horizon aerosol spraying of the skies? Not very bright people. Or, perhaps, they have an agenda; which includes keeping others uninformed.

You’re right, Dennis. Don’t try to convince them… don’t waste your time with them.

Let them enjoy their diet soda, in an aluminum can, made with fluoridated water; while their television keeps them company.

Thank you for the links.

Thanks Philip.
Unfortunately, these 9/11 and chemtrail “debunkers” can very well be our familymembers or friends…
You have to change your whole world perspective or paradigm to grasp the truth that (most of the) people in power support (your) destruction.

Well, for solutions: I just found out this information about H2O2, but perhaps another chemical compound is even more health beneficial, it’s called MMS;
Mineral Miracle Supplement. I am not easily buying into miracles but the story seems truthful to me, so I’ll give it a try.
More info: http://www.miraclemineral.org/
http://jimhumble.biz/

I did not have family members and friends in mind, but you are quite right, Dennis.

My thoughts were on people who go to the extreme of having websites dedicated to “debunking” 9/11 Truth or chemtrails.

Perhaps you saw the clip of Glenn Beck, when he was on CNN, deriding (his guest) Dave von Kleist for making the DVD: 9/11 In Plane Site.

http://www.911inplanesite.com

Recently, the same Glenn Beck did a show on Fox News (his latest perch), an “investigation” into the FEMA camps (it was supposed to be). And who does he have on to “explain” the FEMA camp issue? His buddy from Popular Mechanics magazine. That’s right, the same folks who did the 9/11 Truth “debunking” just a few years ago. Now here is an objective (useful idiot) to bring on Beck’s program to discuss the validity of the FEMA camp issue.

The “debunkers” who are so zealous to expose chemtrail researchers that they would start their own web sites are people with time on their hands. Or, perhaps, on a “debunker” payroll somewhere.

And who will debunk the “debunkers”?

I hope, Dennis, that the 9/11 Truth / chemtrail debunkers that might be amoung your family or friends would not be the tenacious kind who would have a special website for the purpose. If so, my heart goes out to you. Your patience will definitely be tried.

I am going to check the link for the mineral supplement that you mentioned. It looks like something that I read a little about within the past couple of weeks.

I wish you the best in caring for your loved ones, as we all endure the chemtrail assaults. If you have not yet read “The Methodic Demise of Earth” by Michael Castle, yet, you should. It’s an article that can be found online. Jeff has it posted at http://www.rense.com

Amy Worthington articles are also very good. Quite scary if someone just finding out about chemtrails though.

http://www.carnicom.com is an excellent site.