Quote:

“The main theme of this book is the invasive and dangerous introduction of communistic policy under the guise of a socialist agenda into unsuspecting countries – New Zealand being one of these countries – and the intention of the international bankers and elite to form a fascist world government as many people have been exposing for years.”

more leftover Cold War paranoia that equates any political policies redolent of ’socialism’ with communism and fascism.
The current economic collapse caused by Wall St financiers who formed the ideological poster boys for the new right is a pretty good advertisment for the glorious combinstaion of free-market capitalism and libertarian individualism aye? Whoops – I forget this is all a front and that they are really agents of the Communist-Zionist-Illuminati conspiracy for world domination…

Given Richard Prebble’s status in the 1990s/2000s as a convert to the new right and member of the ACT party I find it pretty funny that he is fingered here as a commie subversive…

“alex search” – Are you too lazy to do any research? You keeping recycling unsubstantiated rubbish in your comments. It is not “more leftover Cold War paranoia.” Pull your head out from your arse and stop regurgitating the same outdated political crap.

I got a call from friends last night who have been reading some of the comments on this site and they believe you are a disinformation agent, but recognised intelligent replies to your nonsense as an opportunity for others to learn about what is being set up by people like those Lorraine has written about above. Lorraine has written about the real world, as the site she posted shows:
http://www.pgaction.org

As I suggested before, “alex search” look into UN Agenda 21. There is a great little presentation here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJp0P6eggXU Hear them mention that Agenda 21 aims to break up the family unit and take away private property rights. Agenda 21 is referred to on government websites. I found it on the nz govt website.

May I suggest you watch this documentary by Dr Michael Coffman, PhD, called ‘Global Warming or Global Governance?’
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8147337841241405073
Dr Coffman, CEO of Sovereignty International, who headed a multi-million dollar research effort in the early-1990’s that studied the effects of global warming on ecosystems in the US, states that there’s a cadre of scientists on “soft money” who are out of a job if they “don’t show a global-warming connection.” He says the US government is pouring an astronomical US$4 billion per annum into this research because on an elite political level, where the real power lies, there’s an agenda to establish a fascist one-world government.

He says that the UN, which is controlled by the elite, is preparing to take over as the government for all the world’s nations under the pretext of saving the planet from “global warming.” It aims to implement Agenda 21, which is supposedly about “sustainable development.” On cursory inspection, 21 looks reasonable, however, as Dr Michael Coffman who has taken the time to read UN documents pointed out that the intention of the 40-chapter document is to reorganize the world around socialist, command and control regulation, as the elite view humans as earth’s primary contaminants. It will be a living nightmare for us if the elite have their way.

Furthermore, if you have a look at quotes from Richard N Haass of the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR), you may get a few useful insights into what is going on behind the scenes. Haass, the current president of the CFR, has stated that a system of world government must be created and sovereignty eliminated in order to fight global warming. (Before calling for one-world government in response to the manufactured economic crisis, British PM Gordon Brown stated that a “new world order” must be foisted on humanity in order to combat the tricked-up global warming scam.)

Read this article Haass wrote. See what the agenda is?
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2006/02/21/2003294021

Also, in regard to the global warming scam, read what Dr Vincent Gray has to say. He has worked as a reviewer for the IPCC since its inception and interestingly he has stated publicly that global warming is a scam and that the IPCC is a political organization.
Refer: http://www.nzcpr.com/midweek44.htm
Note also that the IPCC has been caught fabricating data to push the global warming agenda, thereby reinforcing Dr Gray’s claim.
Refer: http://www.prisonplanet.com/ipcc-scientists-caught-producing-false-data-to-push-global-warming.html
Also note ‘alex search’ that the UN building is built on land paid for by the Rockefeller family. Look into what the Rockefeller family believes in.
This is a quote from David Rockefeller which reveals that the mainstream media is controlled by the elite and that they have a plan for the world:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during these years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government which will never again know war, but only peace and prosperity for the whole of humanity. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in the past centuries. It is also our duty to inform the press of our convictions as to the historic future of the century.” David Rockefeller 1991, Germany.

Learn about what is being planned at Bilderberg meetings, which David Rockefeller is regarded as the kingpin of. Daniel Estulin’s book ‘The True Story of the Bilderberg Group’ includes information about what they talk about during their meetings. Refer: http://www.amazon.com/True-Story-Bilderberg-Group/dp/0977795349

In regard to the FEMA concentration camps, Google “Rex 84″ and try the Prisonplanet.com Forum for information, plus refer this information, which you can verify for yourself:
“The existence of FEMA detention camps is a well-documented fact. In January 2006, Haliburton subsidiary KBR announced that it had been awarded a $385 million contract to construct the camps for the Department of Homeland Security. In a press release issued on January 24, 2006, KBR said the “contract, which is effective immediately, provides for establishing temporary detention and processing capabilities to augment existing ICE Detention and Removal Operations (DRO) Program facilities in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs.”
Refer: http://www.infowars.com/glenn-beck-mentions-fema-camps-on-fox-friends/

Watch the documentary ‘Endgame’ by Alex Jones. The evidence that is presented therein is undeniable. Refer:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261

As you can see it’s not “a witless rehash of cold war conspiracy nonsense” and that’s why even the mainstream media is talking about it openly now, as the video clip I posted shows. Refer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPWziOmGNIM

What annoys me about most conspiracy theorists is that they present themselves as advocates for truth and justice – spokespeople for the average person in the face of the often inscrutable machinations of power – when more often than not they are right-wing ideologues and demagogues whose political beliefs are largely opposed to the lifestyles and interests of ‘the average person’ (the recent financial collapse in the USA caused by the implementation of right-wing monetarist economic beliefs the obvious example). Let’s check out the ideological background of the sources you provide here.

1 – Glenn Beck story – the work of InfoWars reporter Kurt Nimmo.
IPCC scientists fabricating global warming data story – from Prison Planet website.
Both Prison Planet and InfoWars are part of Alex Jones conspiracy news networks. Mr Jones’s reputation as populist proselytiser precedes him. The IPCC story derives from the British newspaper The London Telegraph, a paper of right-wing political sensibilities whose columnists like Christopher Booker are active ‘debunkers’ of global warming.

From
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jun/30/pressandpublishing.climatechange
According to an Ipsos Mori poll, carried out for the Observer this month, most Britons believe climate change is at least partially down to natural causes, and not solely to human activity. A majority also believe scientists are divided on the causes and more than a fifth say the whole thing has been exaggerated.
Now where would they have got those ideas from? One Channel 4 programme, claiming global warming is “a swindle”, has no doubt played a role, as have internet blogs arguing all the world’s scientists are party to a Marxist conspiracy bent on destroying western civilisation. But the press, though declining, still counts. It contributes to the framework within which public debate proceeds. It lends respectability to the opinions it highlights.
A study by the Environmental Change Institute at Oxford University found US newspapers have improved their coverage of global warming. By 2006, only 8% of what they published failed to reflect the scientific consensus: that human activity is more than 90% likely to be responsible. The UK tabloids – the Sun, Mirror, Mail, Express and their Sundays – show no improvement, with 23% of their 2006 coverage at odds with what nearly every climate scientist believes.
Happily, the Murdoch empire has gone green, thanks to James Murdoch, chairman of News Corporation in Europe and Asia. The Sun and the Times now rarely give space to deniers of man-made global warming. The latter was once full of sceptics but then a leader graciously announced “the planet deserves the benefit of the doubt”. But neither paper gives consistent and/or prominent coverage. The Sun is currently dominated by UFOs, with an “exclusive” last Wednesday about a 13-strong army of alien craft over Shropshire, and other recent front-page stories about police helicopters chasing little green men over Cardiff.
These stories didn’t include even a final-paragraph quote expressing scepticism – a “balance” newspapers observe scrupulously when they report evidence of global warming. It’s harmless fun, I suppose. But Sun readers could be forgiven for concluding that, as a matter of public concern, global warming is on the same level as extraterrestrial visitations.
Several other papers continue to give a high profile to global warming denial. In the Daily Mail, Melanie Phillips, Richard Littlejohn, Tom Utley and Andrew Alexander all scorn suggestions that we need to reduce carbon emissions. None has anything beyond a science O-level. Nor does the Sunday Telegraph columnist Christopher Booker, a former Private Eye editor. He gleefully reported this month that, since January 2007, global temperatures have fallen 0.77C. This figure, from satellite and balloon readings, is correct but, down here on Earth, where we happen to live, spring 2007 land temperatures were the highest on record (the figures go back to 1880) and those for spring 2008 tied with 2000 as the third highest.
Booker is the most plausible global warming denier among regular columnists because he packs his pieces with “facts” sourced to “experts”. But he is none too particular about his experts’ credentials. Take another of his campaigns, concerning white asbestos, which the World Health Organisation regards as a class one carcinogen. According to Booker, it is harmless (he admits the dangers of blue and brown asbestos) and claims to the contrary are attributable to commercial interests that make money from disposing of it.
The most quoted “expert” for this story is a Professor John Bridle who runs something called Asbestos Watchdog. In 2006, Radio 4’s You and Yours – in a 20-minute item denounced by Booker as “reckless” and “laughable” – reported Bridle had been convicted under the Trade Descriptions Act for passing himself off falsely as a qualified asbestos surveyor. He claimed connections to an impressively titled European body that couldn’t be traced. His professorship is an honorary one from Russia. As for Asbestos Watchdog – which, writes Booker, offers “honest advice” to an “ever larger number of people” – I tried to contact it last week and both its website and telephone number were inaccessible. Bridle went to Ofcom about You and Yours; this month, the regulator rejected all his complaints.
Dig deep enough and you find that, just as Bridle proved to have connections to the asbestos industry, so many of the “experts” journalists quote on global warming receive money, directly or indirectly, from the oil industry. There’s nothing wrong in newspapers challenging consensus views, and many scientists who have been proved right in the end – for example, those who warned of how lead in petrol could affect children – began as lone mavericks. But sceptics themselves merit scepticism, and journalists should give their scientific credentials and their relationship to vested interests the most careful scrutiny. Berating the EU, as Booker frequently does, or denouncing school standards, as Melanie Phillips does, won’t kill anybody. Asbestos is different. So is measles and, as Cardiff University research has shown, MMR vaccinations fell in step with press claims that they were linked to autism.
Global warming could kill millions. If Ipsos Mori is right, the deniers are gaining ground. Its polls show the proportion of Britons who are unconcerned has risen from 15% to 23% in the past year. Many politicians believe government action to arrest climate change is still a vote loser. It is likely to remain so as long as much of the press remains wilfully ignorant of science.

2 – NZCPR – set up by Dr Muriel Newman, ex-ACT party – a party supported by those who have a somewhat right-wing libertarian bent.

From http://hot-topic.co.nz/category/climate-cranks/ :
Muriel Newman, former ACT MP and doyenne of the libertarian right in NZ, has finally returned from New York where her NZ CPR was one of the “sponsors” of the Heartland crank fest. In the middle of her detailed report on the event, she quotes approvingly from the conference opening speech [PDF] by Czech president Vaclav Kraus:
To date, the only European Union leader prepared to take a principled stand on the global warming controversy has been the President of the Czech Republic, Vaclav Klaus. [...] In his keynote address to the conference [...] President Klaus, who is also the current President of the European Union, explained how the United Nations IPCC is a massive bureaucracy that is generously funded by those green businesses that have a great deal to gain from maintaining high levels of public fear over global warming alarmism. He also expressed his disappointment that no other leader was prepared to stand up against the propaganda: “A few weeks ago, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, I spent three hours at a closed session of about sixty people – heads of states and governments with several IPCC officials and ‘experts’ like Al Gore, Tony Blair and Kofi Annan. [...] It was a discouraging experience. You looked around in vain to find at least one person who would share your views. There was no one. All the participants of the meeting took man-made global warming for granted, were convinced of its dangerous consequences and more or less competed in one special discipline – whether to suggest a 20, 30, 50 or 80% CO2 emissions cut as an agreed-upon, world-wide project. It was difficult to say anything meaningful and constructive.” (my emphasis).
That rather nicely illustrates my contention that the real world is getting on with dealing with the issue, while the cranks — even Presidential cranks — find themselves marginalised.
The Heartland institute is an American right-wing ‘think tank’ affiliated with major fossil fuel companies that is one of the leading purveyors of the view that global warming is ‘junk science’ because its findings – massive exploitation of natural resources in the name of freemarket ideologies of unlimited economic growth may actually be having serious environmental consequences – signifies that the current system of freemarket capitalism/individualism as conspicuous consumption may have to be changed.
Oh yeah – NZCPR regular Dr Vincent Gray – scientist who works in the coal industry. No vested interest in debunking global warming then. http://www.desmogblog.com/node/1215

3 – Daniel Estulin. Spanish conspiracy researcher. Often crops up on Alex Jones shows. Not a good sign for his political impartiality. Writing for ‘Nexus’ magazine doesn’t do wonders for your political cred either.

From http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132×5576448

Conspiracy theories

Critics say the Bilderberg Group promotes the careers of politicians whose views are representative of the interests of multinational corporations, at the expense of democracy. Journalists who have been invited to attend the Bilderberg Conference as observers have discounted these claims, calling the conference “not much different from a seminar or a conference organized by an upscale NGO” with “nothing different except for the influence of the participants.”

The group’s secrecy and its connections to power elites has provided fodder for many who believe that the group is part of a conspiracy to create a New World Order. Radio host Alex Jones, a well known conspiracy theorist, promotes the claim that the group intends to dissolve the sovereignty of the United States and other countries into a supra-national structure similar to the European Union. Madrid-based author Daniel Estulin, writing in the conspiracy theory magazine Nexus, claims that the long-term purpose of Bilderberg is to “Build a One-World Empire”. He states the group “is not the end but the means to a future One World Government”.

Reporter Jonathan Duffy, writing in BBC News Online Magazine states “In the void created by such aloofness, an extraordinary conspiracy theory has grown up around the group that alleges the fate of the world is largely decided by Bilderberg.”

4 – Dr Michael Coffman of Sovereignty International. Also pops up on Alex Jones quite a bit. Let’s see what Wikipedia can reveal about his organisation and what it stands for:

Sovereignty International says of itself:
Sovereignty International Incorporated exists to promote the belief that best government is empowered only by the consent of those who are governed. The consent of those who are governed can only be expressed by free and open elections of officials who are exclusively responsible for enacting public policy. We believe this bedrock principle of government and societal organization is the foundation of individual freedom, private property ownership, free markets and national sovereignty.
It is run by CEO is Michael S. Coffman, chair Henry Lamb, vice chair Floy Lilley, and the director is Robert O. Voight (deceased).
It regards the theory of global warming as part of a media and United Nations conspiracy, saying:
“The media and the UN have conspired to orchestrate the most comprehensive propaganda campaign since Joseph Goebbels tried to prepare the world for Hitler’s brand of global governance.” [1]
SI also alleges that “In the 1970s … scientists predicted that the increase of carbon dioxide would cause a new ice age” [2].
It is generally opposed to any proposals connected with the idea of global governance or a strengthened United Nations.
So – modern forms of democratic government – bad. Individual freedom is equated with nationalism (national sovereignty) and capitalism (private property ownership, free markets). Because global warming is a global environmental issue that might require concerted action between the governments of different nations to ameliorate it, the real concern is not a potential environmental catastrophe on a worldwide scale but a potential increase in government power. Sounds like right-wing libertarian ideology writ large to me.

Conspiracy theories about communist takeovers as being outdated crap? Gee, it’s not like conspiracy theories blaming all the worlds ills on those of Jewish ethnicity as featured in the latest issue of Uncensored. They only go back almost 2000 years to the early Christian period of Western civilization…

Read your first line “alex search”. You refer to “conspiracy theorists” – and state that they annoy you.
That is interesting because conspiracy theories arise from evidence and everyone is a conspiracy theorist.

However, may I suggest that if we annoy you, that you don’t visit this site again.

I would rather you didn’t as I note that instead of addressing the facts, you try and tear down the personalities.

Learn about UN Agenda 21 – that is not a person, so you can’t tear it down. Good luck with your research.

The sell out of New Zealand from 1967 to 1987 is well documented in this link.

http://www.rense.com/politics4/opal.htm

Then there’s the old classic by Jim Keith entitled The Gemstone File published in 1992. Has a rather interesting article in there called The Kiwi Gemstone. – makes some valid points. Probably out of print now but am sure you could get in on a site like http://www.abebooks.com 2nd hand

One world government is one bland government. One mayor Auckland is one bland Auckland. And a very very depressing future.
I think of Devonport and its hunky fight to keep its antique character and similarly the Waitakere embattled green city. It is not acceptable that we allow pugnacious souls – little flawed Mussolinis – who wrested power via the deeply flawed engines of Talkback Radio and Television to take charge of the debate.
There it is folks – you are rushing off to ‘walmart’ your city and lose all the character that helps keeps us sane and different, – ’sides my traditional poetry will just dry up – it is already losing the battle with ’slam poetry’ from America and the manhired school of cubist wordsmiths, who escaped some scientist’s laboratory, I suspect.

brianjohnevans
http://www.apoem.com
Talkback Radio Terrorist of NZ

Anyone googled Parliamentarians for Global Action ? And notice who comes up? Ken Graham of the Green Party – “He subsequently ran the secretariat of Parliamentarians for Global Action (in New York)”

he is also apparently Chariman of the Institute of International Affairs – the British version known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs or “Chatham House”. Both these aorganisations seem to be heavily involved in the Onw World Govt movement when you do your homework and here is a Green Party member Kennedy Graham apparently involved or has been involved in both! Hmmmm?
http://www.greens.org.nz/people/candidates/kennedygraham

He is obviously one guy to “watch” and to read between the lines anything he says or writes.