<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who will Stand Up To America and Israel?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/06/01/who-will-stand-up-to-america-and-israel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/06/01/who-will-stand-up-to-america-and-israel/</link>
	<description>Think for yourself</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:42:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/06/01/who-will-stand-up-to-america-and-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-3441</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncensored.co.nz/?p=4771#comment-3441</guid>
		<description>Very good question, Lorraine.

As you probably suspected when leaving your message at 5:47, the money will be funneled into the &quot;One World Government agenda&quot; (through the UN) as Barron suggests; or (much of it) directly into the coffers of the orchestrators of endless war, a fluoridated &amp; fully-vaccinated population, open borders, and perpetual debt. 

The &quot;global warming tax&quot; is nothing but a transfer of wealth.

Should the proposal become &quot;law&quot; the money will be extracted from the troll and the Israeli mole as well.

http://globalresearch.ca</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good question, Lorraine.</p>
<p>As you probably suspected when leaving your message at 5:47, the money will be funneled into the &#8220;One World Government agenda&#8221; (through the UN) as Barron suggests; or (much of it) directly into the coffers of the orchestrators of endless war, a fluoridated &amp; fully-vaccinated population, open borders, and perpetual debt. </p>
<p>The &#8220;global warming tax&#8221; is nothing but a transfer of wealth.</p>
<p>Should the proposal become &#8220;law&#8221; the money will be extracted from the troll and the Israeli mole as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://globalresearch.ca" rel="nofollow">http://globalresearch.ca</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barron</title>
		<link>http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/06/01/who-will-stand-up-to-america-and-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-3437</link>
		<dc:creator>Barron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncensored.co.nz/?p=4771#comment-3437</guid>
		<description>Lorraine, that is INDEED the question to ask!  May i be a tad presumptious here and answer that on his behalf? (Well, i will anyway!)
How about, &quot;to further advance the One World Government agenda through the auspices of the United Nations with Helen Clark playing a key role in that!&quot;  Anyone else notice how big a player NZ has been in donating money to the UN ans similar organisations under Clark&#039;s leadership through the New Zealand International Aid and Development Agency (NZAID) - visit http://www.pgaction.org/support-pga-current-sponcers.aspx
and other sites for like this for more info...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorraine, that is INDEED the question to ask!  May i be a tad presumptious here and answer that on his behalf? (Well, i will anyway!)<br />
How about, &#8220;to further advance the One World Government agenda through the auspices of the United Nations with Helen Clark playing a key role in that!&#8221;  Anyone else notice how big a player NZ has been in donating money to the UN ans similar organisations under Clark&#8217;s leadership through the New Zealand International Aid and Development Agency (NZAID) &#8211; visit <a href="http://www.pgaction.org/support-pga-current-sponcers.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.pgaction.org/support-pga-current-sponcers.aspx</a><br />
and other sites for like this for more info&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorraine</title>
		<link>http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/06/01/who-will-stand-up-to-america-and-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-3436</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncensored.co.nz/?p=4771#comment-3436</guid>
		<description>An interesting question to ask the likes of Key is what is the extra money that is going to be gathered in this &quot;global warming&quot; tax bonanza going to be spent on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting question to ask the likes of Key is what is the extra money that is going to be gathered in this &#8220;global warming&#8221; tax bonanza going to be spent on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barron</title>
		<link>http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/06/01/who-will-stand-up-to-america-and-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-3435</link>
		<dc:creator>Barron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncensored.co.nz/?p=4771#comment-3435</guid>
		<description>According to Ian Wishart&#039;s excellently researched latest book Air Con, this new carbon tax, it if goes ahead, and we will know after the leaders meet in Copenhagen in Dec of this year, will cost the average US household an average of US$2,750 extra per year in extra taxes to help prevent global warming.
And you&#039;re quite right, it will bankrupt our farmers too!  The executives at Federated Farmers are none too pleased with this I can assure you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Ian Wishart&#8217;s excellently researched latest book Air Con, this new carbon tax, it if goes ahead, and we will know after the leaders meet in Copenhagen in Dec of this year, will cost the average US household an average of US$2,750 extra per year in extra taxes to help prevent global warming.<br />
And you&#8217;re quite right, it will bankrupt our farmers too!  The executives at Federated Farmers are none too pleased with this I can assure you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorraine</title>
		<link>http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/06/01/who-will-stand-up-to-america-and-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-3432</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncensored.co.nz/?p=4771#comment-3432</guid>
		<description>New Zealand may go bust over Global Warming

No country in the world would risk as much for “global warming” as New Zealand if it goes ahead with the cap-and-trade energy taxation installed by Helen Clarke’s now-departed Labour Government. 

New Zealand’s economy is almost completely dependent on its farm exports:  lamb, dairy products, beef and high-end white wines. Half of New Zealand’s carbon emissions come from cattle and sheep. If New Zealand taxes its cows and sheep hundreds of dollars per animal for methane emissions and manure handling fees, Argentina would almost immediately displace New Zealand’s farm exports. Argentina has more grass, more cattle, the potential for more lambs, a surging wine industry—and no Kyoto obligations. 

Based on U.S. and Australian “discussions,” a 500-cow dairy might have to pay $250,000 per year for cattle emissions and manure handling permits, plus a hefty increase in its costs for low-carbon electricity and diesel.  An Argentine dairy would pay none of these increased costs—and every dollar of cost differential would be a further incentive for Argentine dairymen to expand their exports at the expense of New Zealand. 

That would leave Kiwi cities like Auckland and Christchurch without visible means of support. 

I said this recently to several New Zealand government ministers and business leaders at a private dinner in Wellington. My message was not welcomed.  John Key’s new government seems to understand that New Zealand’s economy would be at terrible risk from carbon taxes—but its voters apparently don’t realize it. 

The Clark government told New Zealand voters that the cost of “leading the world” with a carbon tax would be about $150 per year. That figure is laughably low. The British government now admits its new carbon tax law could cost as much as $27,000 per UK family. 

The Key government has temporarily suspended the cap-and-trade, but has not dared repeal it. Meanwhile, Australia’s Prime Minister Kevin Rudd is installing his own cap-and-trade, and playing footsie with President Obama on “solidarity” with a U.S. carbon tax. If Australia and the U.S. agreed on some benchmark carbon tax, most New Zealanders would expect their country to join in.  

Never mind that the earth’s global warming stopped after 1998 because the sun has gone into a startling quiet period.  That’s why New Zealand’s many glaciers have been growing recently instead of receding. Never mind that even full member compliance with Kyoto would “avoid” only about 0.05 degree C of warming over the next 50 years—by the alarmists’ own math. 

The urbanites in New Zealand don’t really appreciate the sophisticated management that juggles pastures and feed crops that produce milk, cheese and Merino wool.  They love the wine, but don’t understand the massive per-acre investments needed to turn their grapes into award-winning vintages. 

Meanwhile, Obama’s U.S. government has just punished New Zealand with trade-distorting dairy export subsidies--because our corn ethanol program has pushed our cost of dairy feed too high. World corn prices have doubled in real terms, and may go higher as our ethanol mandates keep rising. That jacks up the U.S. cost of “alternative fuels” even further--while New Zealand will have to file a well-justified case against America under the World Trade Organization rules. 

Ah, what a tangled web we’re weaving, rather than admit the Emperor of Global Warming has no clothes. 

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/11534</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Zealand may go bust over Global Warming</p>
<p>No country in the world would risk as much for “global warming” as New Zealand if it goes ahead with the cap-and-trade energy taxation installed by Helen Clarke’s now-departed Labour Government. </p>
<p>New Zealand’s economy is almost completely dependent on its farm exports:  lamb, dairy products, beef and high-end white wines. Half of New Zealand’s carbon emissions come from cattle and sheep. If New Zealand taxes its cows and sheep hundreds of dollars per animal for methane emissions and manure handling fees, Argentina would almost immediately displace New Zealand’s farm exports. Argentina has more grass, more cattle, the potential for more lambs, a surging wine industry—and no Kyoto obligations. </p>
<p>Based on U.S. and Australian “discussions,” a 500-cow dairy might have to pay $250,000 per year for cattle emissions and manure handling permits, plus a hefty increase in its costs for low-carbon electricity and diesel.  An Argentine dairy would pay none of these increased costs—and every dollar of cost differential would be a further incentive for Argentine dairymen to expand their exports at the expense of New Zealand. </p>
<p>That would leave Kiwi cities like Auckland and Christchurch without visible means of support. </p>
<p>I said this recently to several New Zealand government ministers and business leaders at a private dinner in Wellington. My message was not welcomed.  John Key’s new government seems to understand that New Zealand’s economy would be at terrible risk from carbon taxes—but its voters apparently don’t realize it. </p>
<p>The Clark government told New Zealand voters that the cost of “leading the world” with a carbon tax would be about $150 per year. That figure is laughably low. The British government now admits its new carbon tax law could cost as much as $27,000 per UK family. </p>
<p>The Key government has temporarily suspended the cap-and-trade, but has not dared repeal it. Meanwhile, Australia’s Prime Minister Kevin Rudd is installing his own cap-and-trade, and playing footsie with President Obama on “solidarity” with a U.S. carbon tax. If Australia and the U.S. agreed on some benchmark carbon tax, most New Zealanders would expect their country to join in.  </p>
<p>Never mind that the earth’s global warming stopped after 1998 because the sun has gone into a startling quiet period.  That’s why New Zealand’s many glaciers have been growing recently instead of receding. Never mind that even full member compliance with Kyoto would “avoid” only about 0.05 degree C of warming over the next 50 years—by the alarmists’ own math. </p>
<p>The urbanites in New Zealand don’t really appreciate the sophisticated management that juggles pastures and feed crops that produce milk, cheese and Merino wool.  They love the wine, but don’t understand the massive per-acre investments needed to turn their grapes into award-winning vintages. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, Obama’s U.S. government has just punished New Zealand with trade-distorting dairy export subsidies&#8211;because our corn ethanol program has pushed our cost of dairy feed too high. World corn prices have doubled in real terms, and may go higher as our ethanol mandates keep rising. That jacks up the U.S. cost of “alternative fuels” even further&#8211;while New Zealand will have to file a well-justified case against America under the World Trade Organization rules. </p>
<p>Ah, what a tangled web we’re weaving, rather than admit the Emperor of Global Warming has no clothes. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/11534" rel="nofollow">http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/11534</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/06/01/who-will-stand-up-to-america-and-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-3416</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncensored.co.nz/?p=4771#comment-3416</guid>
		<description>You have noticed, Lorraine, he has no intelligent argument.

He is truly a clone of the talking heads that supply him with the blanks he fires sporadically when the truth of an article is too much for him to bear.

Poor deluded establishment parrot that he is, he has no defense against the fine article by Texe Marrs; a much respected researcher who rattles the cages of head-in-the-sand NWO assets like &quot;alex search.&quot;

Where is his intelligent rebuttal of Texe Marrs&#039; position on who controls the major media in America? 

The *fact* that Texe Marrs uses the very words of &quot;jews&quot; themselves to prove his point must be a bitter pill for &quot;alex.&quot; So bitter, in fact, that he doesn&#039;t go there. No, insults are the best he can do.

Since his bag of tricks is becoming depleted, expect to see much repetition in the future. I think it was Cicero who said: &quot;if your argument is weak, attack your opponent personally.&quot;

&quot;Alex search&quot; is not only firing blanks, he has no solid foundation to stand on while trying to take aim. The shifting sands of establishment propaganda have &quot;alex&quot; desperately blasting in all directions.

In America, shills like Rush Limbaugh program their mesmerized listeners to behave like &quot;alex&quot; and come unglued over the mere mention of who controls the major media.

Limbaugh and Hannity have their comrades on the &quot;alternative&quot; left that do the very same thing. Attempting to make a mockery of those who expose globalist deception; they only succeed in making fools of themselves when readers see through their desperate character assasinations.

If &quot;alex&quot; is &quot;Jewish,&quot; why not come out and say so?

If he is not, then why is he so sensitive: and obsessed to the point where almost every other post is castigating *someone* for being &quot;anti-Semitic&quot;? This time I happen to be the one in the crosshairs. 

Expect no intelligent argument from him and you won&#039;t be disappointed.

Here is another source of information that is bound to produce another irrational and spiteful response from &quot;alex.&quot; His posts, when rattled, speak volumes. 
http://midnight-emissary.com/jews.htm 

Your post hit it dead center, Lorraine: 

&quot;Back it up with some facts, or is slander the best you can do&quot;?

He despises Congressman Ron Paul for a reason. Ron Paul has integrity, and a two-decade pro-American voting record. 

&quot;Alex&quot; has his handlers that feed him the embarrassing drivel that he attempts to foist upon readers of this website.

Once again, where is the intelligent rebuttal of Texe Marrs&#039; position on who controls the major media in America?

Zionism, Hollywood, and the Media 
http://rense.com/general85/ownh.htm

Anyone dealing with alex&#039;s snide posts in the future, may want to send him right back to this response and not waste any further time with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have noticed, Lorraine, he has no intelligent argument.</p>
<p>He is truly a clone of the talking heads that supply him with the blanks he fires sporadically when the truth of an article is too much for him to bear.</p>
<p>Poor deluded establishment parrot that he is, he has no defense against the fine article by Texe Marrs; a much respected researcher who rattles the cages of head-in-the-sand NWO assets like &#8220;alex search.&#8221;</p>
<p>Where is his intelligent rebuttal of Texe Marrs&#8217; position on who controls the major media in America? </p>
<p>The *fact* that Texe Marrs uses the very words of &#8220;jews&#8221; themselves to prove his point must be a bitter pill for &#8220;alex.&#8221; So bitter, in fact, that he doesn&#8217;t go there. No, insults are the best he can do.</p>
<p>Since his bag of tricks is becoming depleted, expect to see much repetition in the future. I think it was Cicero who said: &#8220;if your argument is weak, attack your opponent personally.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Alex search&#8221; is not only firing blanks, he has no solid foundation to stand on while trying to take aim. The shifting sands of establishment propaganda have &#8220;alex&#8221; desperately blasting in all directions.</p>
<p>In America, shills like Rush Limbaugh program their mesmerized listeners to behave like &#8220;alex&#8221; and come unglued over the mere mention of who controls the major media.</p>
<p>Limbaugh and Hannity have their comrades on the &#8220;alternative&#8221; left that do the very same thing. Attempting to make a mockery of those who expose globalist deception; they only succeed in making fools of themselves when readers see through their desperate character assasinations.</p>
<p>If &#8220;alex&#8221; is &#8220;Jewish,&#8221; why not come out and say so?</p>
<p>If he is not, then why is he so sensitive: and obsessed to the point where almost every other post is castigating *someone* for being &#8220;anti-Semitic&#8221;? This time I happen to be the one in the crosshairs. </p>
<p>Expect no intelligent argument from him and you won&#8217;t be disappointed.</p>
<p>Here is another source of information that is bound to produce another irrational and spiteful response from &#8220;alex.&#8221; His posts, when rattled, speak volumes.<br />
<a href="http://midnight-emissary.com/jews.htm" rel="nofollow">http://midnight-emissary.com/jews.htm</a> </p>
<p>Your post hit it dead center, Lorraine: </p>
<p>&#8220;Back it up with some facts, or is slander the best you can do&#8221;?</p>
<p>He despises Congressman Ron Paul for a reason. Ron Paul has integrity, and a two-decade pro-American voting record. </p>
<p>&#8220;Alex&#8221; has his handlers that feed him the embarrassing drivel that he attempts to foist upon readers of this website.</p>
<p>Once again, where is the intelligent rebuttal of Texe Marrs&#8217; position on who controls the major media in America?</p>
<p>Zionism, Hollywood, and the Media<br />
<a href="http://rense.com/general85/ownh.htm" rel="nofollow">http://rense.com/general85/ownh.htm</a></p>
<p>Anyone dealing with alex&#8217;s snide posts in the future, may want to send him right back to this response and not waste any further time with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorraine</title>
		<link>http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/06/01/who-will-stand-up-to-america-and-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-3415</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 02:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncensored.co.nz/?p=4771#comment-3415</guid>
		<description>Interesting how quickly Alex Search jumps out of the woodwork the minute anything related to Israel is posted.  I think based on the vile insults and language used in the post above we must have a hit a nerve.  What&#039;s wrong -is the truth getting out and all you have to counter is baseless insults.

I can understand given your views why a world where Ron Paul had some power would be a frightening thought for you.  

Why do you label anyone that has an opinion as a fundamentalist rightwing/ christian loon.  Are you that lacking in any other arguments?  Back it up with some facts or is slander the best you can do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how quickly Alex Search jumps out of the woodwork the minute anything related to Israel is posted.  I think based on the vile insults and language used in the post above we must have a hit a nerve.  What&#8217;s wrong -is the truth getting out and all you have to counter is baseless insults.</p>
<p>I can understand given your views why a world where Ron Paul had some power would be a frightening thought for you.  </p>
<p>Why do you label anyone that has an opinion as a fundamentalist rightwing/ christian loon.  Are you that lacking in any other arguments?  Back it up with some facts or is slander the best you can do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex search</title>
		<link>http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/06/01/who-will-stand-up-to-america-and-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-3414</link>
		<dc:creator>alex search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 02:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncensored.co.nz/?p=4771#comment-3414</guid>
		<description>My Jaw drops that you actually  post a link to an article by Texe Marrs - a bonafide fundamentalist Christian loon who sees the hand of Satan at work everywhere. By what state of delusion can you not see that this guy is f-n deranged? And yes, Marrs (and by association, you, for posting the link) blame everything once again on  &#039;the Jews&#039;.  Any more cliches left from the &#039;Conspiracy theory for dummies&#039; textbook that you haven&#039;t used?

I&#039;d really like to see the &#039;America&#039; that would result if your &#039;patriot&#039; community of Paulite conspiracy knobheads actually got some degree of political power. Undoubtedly those gigantic FEMA camps would make a nice holding place for all those evil conspirators at work eh? - Jews, Masons, Catholics, gays, feminists, most scientists, most doctors, most academics, most media professionals - well, pretty much everybody except yourself and your mates. Misanthropic, narcisstic arseholes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Jaw drops that you actually  post a link to an article by Texe Marrs &#8211; a bonafide fundamentalist Christian loon who sees the hand of Satan at work everywhere. By what state of delusion can you not see that this guy is f-n deranged? And yes, Marrs (and by association, you, for posting the link) blame everything once again on  &#8216;the Jews&#8217;.  Any more cliches left from the &#8216;Conspiracy theory for dummies&#8217; textbook that you haven&#8217;t used?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d really like to see the &#8216;America&#8217; that would result if your &#8216;patriot&#8217; community of Paulite conspiracy knobheads actually got some degree of political power. Undoubtedly those gigantic FEMA camps would make a nice holding place for all those evil conspirators at work eh? &#8211; Jews, Masons, Catholics, gays, feminists, most scientists, most doctors, most academics, most media professionals &#8211; well, pretty much everybody except yourself and your mates. Misanthropic, narcisstic arseholes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/06/01/who-will-stand-up-to-america-and-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-3409</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncensored.co.nz/?p=4771#comment-3409</guid>
		<description>&quot;Who is going to stand up to the American and Israeli governments?&quot;

The citizens of both nations need to hold criminals in their own government accountable for all of the treachery and unlawful activity done in their name.

&quot;Where is the media?&quot;  

Americans need to face who controls most of what passes for &quot;news.&quot;
http://rense.com/general85/ownh.htm

&quot;Why aren&#039;t people laughing their heads off?&quot;

Thanks to the internationalist&#039;s divide and conquer strategy, most people in this country (America) are in a mainstream fog and engaged in partisan sniping on the Editorial page of newspapers [LsTTE], &quot;discussion&quot; threads, in public demonstrations, and on radio talk shows. 

Of course, you see the same agenda operating in foreign countries as well. 

Timewasters, well-versed in jerking others around instead of facing the true state of things, attempt to wear down those who expose the &quot;global plantation&quot; plans of the Financial Elite. 

They can&#039;t resist coming to sites such as this one because inside they know (contrary to what they profess) that the sites they recommend actually suppress certain information and keep their readers in the dark. So the timewasters need to come to sites like this, and www.infowars.com, for enlightenment: even while they ridicule others who post here, and belittle the site itself. They do not see how transparent their disinfo agenda appears to others who do the research and know better. 

______________________________________________________________________ 
For a good laugh, go to the following URL and watch the video of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. View it several times (as suggested) for &quot;maximal enjoyment.&quot; This is one of the funniest things on the net. http://www.911weknow.com/who-is-obama
______________________________________________________________________

Here is a good article exposing the media-creation and his rise to fame.  
http:midnight-emissary.com/article_political_alchemy.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Who is going to stand up to the American and Israeli governments?&#8221;</p>
<p>The citizens of both nations need to hold criminals in their own government accountable for all of the treachery and unlawful activity done in their name.</p>
<p>&#8220;Where is the media?&#8221;  </p>
<p>Americans need to face who controls most of what passes for &#8220;news.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://rense.com/general85/ownh.htm" rel="nofollow">http://rense.com/general85/ownh.htm</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Why aren&#8217;t people laughing their heads off?&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks to the internationalist&#8217;s divide and conquer strategy, most people in this country (America) are in a mainstream fog and engaged in partisan sniping on the Editorial page of newspapers [LsTTE], &#8220;discussion&#8221; threads, in public demonstrations, and on radio talk shows. </p>
<p>Of course, you see the same agenda operating in foreign countries as well. </p>
<p>Timewasters, well-versed in jerking others around instead of facing the true state of things, attempt to wear down those who expose the &#8220;global plantation&#8221; plans of the Financial Elite. </p>
<p>They can&#8217;t resist coming to sites such as this one because inside they know (contrary to what they profess) that the sites they recommend actually suppress certain information and keep their readers in the dark. So the timewasters need to come to sites like this, and <a href="http://www.infowars.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.infowars.com</a>, for enlightenment: even while they ridicule others who post here, and belittle the site itself. They do not see how transparent their disinfo agenda appears to others who do the research and know better. </p>
<p>______________________________________________________________________<br />
For a good laugh, go to the following URL and watch the video of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. View it several times (as suggested) for &#8220;maximal enjoyment.&#8221; This is one of the funniest things on the net. <a href="http://www.911weknow.com/who-is-obama" rel="nofollow">http://www.911weknow.com/who-is-obama</a><br />
______________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Here is a good article exposing the media-creation and his rise to fame.<br />
http:midnight-emissary.com/article_political_alchemy.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/06/01/who-will-stand-up-to-america-and-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-3399</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncensored.co.nz/?p=4771#comment-3399</guid>
		<description>Interesting how someone was able to insert words into my post that I never wrote.

I almost lost the above message when it didn&#039;t go through the first time; and got assistance to paste what I wrote and save it to a disc. It somehow contained the reference to the moon and trees that I never had in the original post. Please disregard that reference and the rest will make a lot more sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how someone was able to insert words into my post that I never wrote.</p>
<p>I almost lost the above message when it didn&#8217;t go through the first time; and got assistance to paste what I wrote and save it to a disc. It somehow contained the reference to the moon and trees that I never had in the original post. Please disregard that reference and the rest will make a lot more sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
