“You don’t want NZ heading from ‘Nanny State’ – to ‘Nazi State’?”

Some people do – and it’s those people that everyone needs to start worrying about.

Many New Zealanders wanted to get so far away from the ‘nanny state’ (whatever the fu*k ‘nanny state’ is supposed to mean) that they didn’t see the ‘Nazi’ state coming.

All they cared about was their ‘Tax Cuts’, their mortgage, their own status, and their own bloody kids.

With the help of soulless fu*ks working in PR firms, they were lied to, misdirected, manipulated, and bribed

Hmm convince me more

Hi Ursula,

Did you mean the posted article or my last comment ?
well – I’ll try to answer you anyway .

I don’t want to convince you of anything – just to present to
anyone information and opinions – because the act of doing
so is starting to feel like some kind of systemic defence
mechanism, if you take my meaning.

I was just pointing out a kind of personal frustration with the
on-going limitations of the two-party approach.

‘Nanny state’, ‘Helengrad’, and the highly reliable ‘Time
for Change’ or some such – were some of the many
catch-phrases bouncing around the email networks of
ambitious mid-decile types before the last election.

There’s a great quote from a long standing dead American
news teleprompter reader that says:

“Television News doesn’t tell you what to think.
Television news tells you what to think about.”

(having personally worked for television broadcasters
- this notion rings depressingly true).

This viral internet version of winning hearts and minds was no different.

This concerted e-push of information and misdirection was so very well organized and prolific to the degree that it rather overwhelmed the Labour Party’s version of online e-mailable perception twisting
- used widely in swaying and cluttering people’s
brains and ideas away from ‘what might really matter’
in order to sway people’s decisions that were happening on that day at the booth

(at least that’s what Clark believed during an interview with
her that I helped film shortly after the Labour Party lost the
last election).

I’m yet to be convinced that there is a huge amount of
difference between the reds and the blues
(although I know that there is some difference).

There’s just not a big enough point of difference when it comes to life-sucking decisions like privatisation where you sell local and national infrastructure to foreign multinationals
– for no other reason than that they want you to
– and that they will also pay you well if you do the deal.

To some eyes, New Zealand, it’s natural resources (like, for instance, water or cows)
and the harnessed energy of it’s people
(like, for instance, those little AA-batteries that Morpheus holds up in that movie, The Matrix)
– are only a resource to be usurped and owned by people that don’t live here.

And unpopular policy decisions
(as we can see when events unfold immeadiately following unpopular policy decisions made overseas)
may often require some kind of poorly thought out police action.

Fascism (my definition) is all the bad crap that happens at the
societal level and below
– once government and big business become so fused that they begin to overwhelmingly make policy and decisions in the interests only of themselves and each other.

And everyone else can go hang.

And when they have the poorly informed, well paid, brown shirted muscle – each with a fully busted moral compass – to help them to pull it off
– then all bets are off for a decent secure society here –
because everyone personally has something to lose.

(if you don’t know what I mean by this, then watch some 70 year old German footage from Germany when the Nazis were giving German society the brutal and unwanted death-camp makeover that followed the stunning PR campaign)

I’ve spoken to criminal lawyers in bars, that have told me
(sober)
that they have observed that some of our cops
(who have maybe personally forgotten their own Trentham oaths)
were (unofficially) deputiseing some of our nation’s gang members
– a la Los Angeles.

To these lawyers – to them, this was a new occurrence in the New Zealand experience.

Moving on, I know most New Zealanders care more about tax cuts than anything else,
because I once spent a week working at one of those heinous sweat-shop type telemarketing places on Nelson St,
where they pay you minimum wage and threaten your job security twice a day in a soulless attempt to increase your calls per hour.

I was asking randomly dialed New Zealanders all over New Zealand
– about who they were voting for in the upcoming Election, and why
– in order to help some undisclosed client-entity to try and find out ahead of time – who was going to win the next election.

One of my scripted questions on the screen in front of me was :
“What’s the most important issue for you in the upcoming election?”

Out of those Kiwis that didn’t abusively hang up their phone immediately, it was true that most people said that they didn’t know much about ‘politics and things’
– but 8 times out of ten,
those kiwis that possessed the ‘non-locally-observant’ gene replied:

‘tax cuts’.

Not very inspiring.

If you want to know the true meaning of soulless fu*ks working in PR firms,
then watch the Alastair Barry / Nicky Hagar doco ‘The Hollow Men’
for some good audio visual examples.

Just have a good paper bag handy.

These people have zero regard or respect for you or anyone you know,
and they will willingly attempt to manipulate you to accept huge falsehoods
(illustrated glaringly in that documentary
– as well as every time an elected New Zealand political party does a total 180 on its own election manifesto).

The size of the PR folks paychecks are matched only by their level of contempt that they have for the ‘public’.

And these PR types -suck- to bar-bee-que with.

Not exactly ‘up’ people – and ‘sincerity’ does not exactly figure big in their own plans for their own boring ascensions.

(IMOHO)

Cheers,

S

Thankyou!
I meant the article posted. If this is indeed true then it is a huge issue for our country. With more research I’m sure many people would be at the least, alarmed by the implications of this story. As much as I admire Ms Brights’ passion and action the story needs at least one other source of corroboration.

Scott: I found your reply to Ursula interesting and carefully read what you obviously put some time into writing.

It is my understanding that the internationalists are operating in a similar manner around the world as they consolidate their control over others.

I would expect your “two”-party system in NZ to be a joke, just like ours is in America.

That the globalists exercise enough control over your major media to persuade the general public to “vote” for their puppets and not take a chance on truly independent candidates (should one actually be running) because they stand “no chance of winning” and it will only “help the opposition candidate get elected”. Sound familiar? That’s the game they play here.

In a recent post from Lombeer, exposing the method of operation of Alex Search, he touched on another important aspect of how the globalists themselves operate, which is: turning as many of us against each other as possible. Sadly, I have witnessed this strategy working all too well here (in this country) as people fall right into the trap of blindly striking out at others instead of diligently finding out for themselves what is actually going on and (very important) who the enemy is.

The fog that so many are in as they lash out at those of us that try to bring the truth to them is not accidental.

Their anger is misdirected.

They tend to continue “electing” useless puppets and frontmen; but become very frustrated when these actors don’t live up to their campaign promises.

Instead of facing the phoniness of it all, most tend to take out their frustration on their independently minded countrymen (and women) who separate themselves from the lies and expose the hijacked system rather than getting sucked into it.

In America, the internationalists have their electronic voting machines to insure that the public votes correctly. Nothing is left to “chance”. Even if a larger number of us boycotted the fake elections, they could maintain the illusion of a greater turnout at the polls by tweaking their machines and presenting the phony figures via the major media that they control through the secret societies that high-level major media executives are members of.

The neoconservatives in talk radio play their part, badgering their listeners to vote for the internationalist’s puppet in the Republican tee shirt, and not “waste their vote” on a third party candidate. Their colleagues on the fake left likewise prop up an equally bad choice as they inflate the image of the globalist’s minion posing as a Democrat. The neoconservatives in talk radio on the “right” and their comrades on the political “left” unite with the major media in deceiving the American people about 9/11.

The internationalists created the “nanny state” in America as a way to increase the size and scope of government beyond the intent of the Constitution which (as I understand the Document) limits the size of government. The Democrats claim to want to treat laborers fairly and provide for those facing hardship. The Republicans claim to be for low taxation, but the globalists among them increase the size of government themselves, which requires (sooner or later) more taxes.

True conservatives desire a small government and very low taxation. Many of the Republicans are not true conservatives but actually collectivists aiding and abetting the globalist agenda and doing their part to bury this nation economically. As long as Democrats and Republicans work hand in hand to implement a globalist agenda, there will be people across the nation facing hardship basically brought on by internationalist policies enacted by these underminers of our freedoms.

They are working together to destroy jobs in America that pay a living wage. Criminals in their ranks brought us the $4 a gallon gasoline prices in the summer of 2008. After the “election” the price of gasoline dropped to $1.50 a gallon for a short time. The world economy had to pushed into a catastrophic state by the greed and design of these people before we could see the preposterous price of gasoline and home heating fuel deflated. Many lost their homes, not because they “overextended themselves” but because it was designed that way by thieves that orchestrated the rapid increase of gasoline, home heating fuel, the cost of transporting food, and ultimately the cost of food itself at the market.

How much of the “bailout” money ended up being showered upon the “speculators” that triggered the crisis in the first place?

Most of the “bailout” money was nothing more than a transfer of wealth. All planned (most likely) before George W. Bush or Barack Obama were “elected” to office. It was, and is, a very effective way to further enrich already very wealthy people; while enslaving future generations to a “debt” they had nothing to say about. Most people who appreciate a website like Uncensored consider this criminal activity.

____

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_A9X_8flGeM

“Most of the “bailout” money was nothing more than a transfer of wealth. All planned (most likely) before George W. Bush or Barack Obama were “elected” to office. It was, and is, a very effective way to further enrich already very wealthy people; while enslaving future generations to a “debt” they had nothing to say about. Most people who appreciate a website like Uncensored consider this criminal activity.”

Couldn’t agree more.

And most New Zealanders who believe only what they read in the Herald or only what they watch on One News
– wouldn’t know a gosh darn thing about it.
Or even worse – believe it to be happening unavoidably or occuring naturally.

http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner~y2009m11d12-Financial-expert-Gerald-Celente-American-public-losing-everything-to-fascist-oligarchs

Ursala in relation to Operation 8 as it has now known to have been called,
the allegations initially aimed at not only Tuhoe but other minor protest groups here in New Zealand was and is still nothing short of a TOTAL abuse of LAW.
The press release on the Day the operation was terminated was almost comical.Napalm,sniper rifles training camps etc. was sold to the public in an attempt to smooth the way. You can find the rest in the net.
If you believe that our system of law is strong and good just look at who it is copied from, the English.This is the same country whose police force executed a innocence Electrician on a Subway tube because “they thought he was a terrorist”. To date not one meber who fired into the body of that poor man has been charged.
The only charged was brought under Safety laws against the Commissioner of Police in that District.
Note also what the ‘Crown’ does to people who tilt at them, Rob Moody another solicitor for one for standing up for the Berrymans.
In Vince’s case I think they will make every effort bleed him dry financially and emotionally.
Good luck Vince.