// you’re reading...

911

Kim Hill Interviews Richard Gage About 911

The phrase  ‘contempt prior to examination’  leaps readily to mind here.

(and so does her interview with John Pilger just after the ‘war on terror’ started some eight -fucking- years ago).

http://img.slate.com/media/1/123125/123050/2133481/2148159/060912_CB_911pic.jpg

I guess some journalists

- especially those that wish to remain systemically employed for wealthy entities like the Crown and such

- just think that the devil is ALWAYS in the details.

Would have been nice if she’d interviewed him instead of cutting off his responses to her questions with her next question.

- that way people can communicate -

thereby passing on information that might be of value

instead of just ‘waiting to ask another question’.

It’s understandable, tho.

Because when you are an interviewer with some apparent measure of social conscience

(even despite working professionally in that regard amongst slim company)

you may have already decided that you are interviewing a ‘whacko’

and you are filled with indignant outrage that someone should come on your show

- sprouting such preposterous and cleverly thought out -lies-

And – because of that – you are going to let him have it.

(unless, of course, she attempts to shout down her opponents with equal vigour every week

- I don’t know, because I don’t listen to her show)

The information of the type Gage chooses to present – generally scares the crap out of people.

The biggest impediment to people looking further into the events of that day and discovering more information about it for themselves

- is that they personally cannot bring themselves to perhaps imagine or consider that elements within the U.S. and Israeli Government (same thing really), the U.S. and Israeli military, and the financial elite

-may- have possibly had a hand in it.

As David Lynch once commented somewhere on Dutch News TV :

“Some people – just can’t go there”

People generally won’t research 911 – because they do not want to.

So if you -don’t- research 911 – then how would you -know-

that the official version of events was utterly -bunk-

until you actually -looked- into the information that is available.

But, the emotional prospect of imagining something other than a small but determined bunch of swarthy semitic types in robes operating out of a cave with some box-cutters actually triggered a war that killed 3,000 Americans along the eastern seaboard of North America

- and which has since gone on to kill circa 2 million people in South West Asia since the end of 2001 -

kind of puts you off taking the time out to have a closer look at the information that is widely available online about just what might have gone down on that day.

Kim Hill didn’t want to take a closer look either.

People that do try and present this information in mainstream news companies

- are consistently ridiculed.

(And what the -fuc*k- does Americans believing Darwins theory or not

- have to do with what any given American might believe about the events of that day?)

And for everyone else:

Not everyone who thinks that the Apollo Moon landings were faked

- also automatically means that they also believe that 911 was an inside job.

Not everyone who thinks that the U.S. Eastern Seaboard attacks in 2001 was an inside job

- also automatically thinks that no planes hit the towers.

Not everyone who believes that actual physical planes hit the towers

–also-

automatically believes that a plane hit the Pentagon.

Btw, it’s hard (impossible, actually) to get online footage of the Pentagon event in Washington D.C. on that day

which involved one of the most protected and security cameraed human made structures in the world.

You think that there would be a decent amount of footage online

- because the FBI also believes that there is around 84 cameras that were rolling tape at the time

- pointing at that side of the building that day

- but no-one has seen video tape or images of a great big -fucking- jumbo jet ploughing at hi speed into the side of that  building

- just like we saw in New York.

Ok?

Ok.

Anyway, here’s her bloody show :

http://static.radionz.net.nz/assets/audio_item/0011/2137592/sat-20091121-0910-Richard_Gage_architecture_of_destruction-m048.asx

Related posts

  1. Big In Japan : The Gage Demolition World Tour -
  2. 9/11 Truth : The Challenge To The Peace Movement -
  3. Israel's Connection To The 2001 Attacks On U.S. Soil -
  4. Richard Gage A&E 911 Truth - Auckland Mon 30th Nov -
  5. Richard Gage on Close Up TVNZ Tonight (Friday) at 7.00pm -
  6. Kim Hill Interviews Richard Gage About 911 (This post) -

Discussion

11 comments for “Kim Hill Interviews Richard Gage About 911”

  1. 9/11 Truth : Dr David Ray Griffen Speaks @ Santa Rosa College

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9RJPeP3haM&feature=related

    Posted by ewingsc | November 24, 2009, 8:34 am
  2. Why universities should study 9/11

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1jb-0ClpbM

    Posted by ewingsc | November 24, 2009, 11:17 am
  3. Just thought I’d contribute a brief piece in light of the distinct lack of trolling on the site at present, which has the unfortunate side effect of bolstering Scott, Phil and co.’s already considerable egos by making it seem as if the rest of the world (i.e. the other dozen or so paranoids who comment on the site) actually agrees with their delusions:

    “the emotional prospect” of the reality that “a small but determined bunch of swarthy semitic types in robes operating out of a cave with some box-cutters actually triggered a war that killed 3,000 Americans along the eastern seaboard of North America…” is at the core of the truther movements in general.
    Yep. There’s no way a small group of ‘ignorant, inferior’ Arabs could have changed American history in such a way. Only Americans can do that to themselves, in keeping with the nationalist myths of American exceptionalism.

    Posted by alex search | November 26, 2009, 11:39 am
  4. “Just thought I’d contribute a brief piece in light of the … blah blah blah”

    Yeah thanks Alex don’t forget to flush.

    Posted by ewingsc | November 26, 2009, 12:22 pm
  5. Scott – not much bile and invective by your usual standards. I was hoping to be ‘ewinged’ more thoroughly…

    Posted by alex search | November 26, 2009, 1:16 pm
  6. hey wow cool, alex is back trying to stifle dissent shouting “racist!” at people who do not agree with everything the mass media spoon feeds us.
    you are a fearsome opponent alex, fearsome.
    I think your pony-tail is coming loose alex, best you tighten it up or you might have an independent thought.

    Posted by Lombeer | November 26, 2009, 8:42 pm
  7. The onus is on the US Government to disclose evidence. Until then how can we not presume guilt?

    eg. After the 911 commission sham – the fact that 6 out of 10 Commission heads now consider their report constituted a whitewash ?

    http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050523112738404

    Posted by Willie Nelson Mandela | November 27, 2009, 1:34 pm
  8. Free Willie Nelson Mandela!

    Kim Hill-ock is a trout. The interview was a sham and she embarrassed herself. Gage just kept on going despite Hillock throwing every dirty trick in the book at him and being exceptionally rude. Well done Mr Gage… not that he will be reading this…

    Posted by Lombeer | November 27, 2009, 6:11 pm
  9. Shock horror! that was actually quite a reasonable interview, and no-one mentioned darwinism!

    Posted by Lombeer | November 27, 2009, 6:23 pm
  10. doh, the above comment was about the closeup interview not the kim ‘the trout’ hill interview…

    Posted by Lombeer | November 30, 2009, 10:23 pm
  11. 9/11 Revisited: Were explosives used? [] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgSaBT9hNU []

    NEW VIDEO OF WTC DEMOLITION [] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3X-NvZBG04 []

    EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY! / MacQueen NYFD 9/11 witnesses [] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ4dVo5QgYg []

    911 Mysteries- Demolitions(part1) [] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5_tTRliTDo [] “This film has 90 minutes of pure demolition evidence and analysis, laced with staggering witness testimonials.
    Moving from “the myth” through “the analysis” and into “the players,” careful deconstruction of the official story set right alongside clean, clear science. The 9/11 picture is not one of politics or nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple physics.”

    [2] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnNA7AEM4UM [3] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilM3uAMqi6s

    “Happy As Larry – The WTC7 Implosion” [] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ9BofDUXv0 []
    ______________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Unusual Evacuations & Power-Downs before WTC 911 Demolition [] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qUAtbkzjBQ []

    “Amazing, incredible, pick your word. For the third time today, it’s reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.”

    CBS News anchor Dan Rather commenting on the collapse of Building 7 – September 11, 2001 at approx 5:30pm EST.
    ______________________________________________________________________________________________________

    An interesting read… Barrie Zwicker – “The Left Gatekeepers” “This essay is excerpted from Chapter 5 of Barrie Zwicker’s book, Towers of Deception. Barrie squarely addresses the issue of Left Gatekeepers, those wonderful and sensitive souls of the Left who bring us the ‘real story’ on alternative radio. These include most of the regulars I hear over the only alternative FM radio station available here in southern California, Pacifica’s Radio KPFK out of Los Angeles. Amy Goodman, Lila Garrett, Sonali Kolhatkar, David Basarmian, Howard Zinn, and Noam Chomsky are but a handful of the more prominent names. What we hear from Chomsky, Zinn, and even Bill Moyers, are sublime and poignant commentary on the barbarities of our day- from the heartless profiteering by corporate fat cats to the incalculable misery imposed on the people of Afghanistan and Iraq by right wing ‘neo cons’ bent on ever-greater profits from oil, but we don’t hear ONE word about 911 being an Inside Job. We don’t hear one word about Chemtrails. We hear nothing of Rex 84, FEMA concentration camps… We hear zero criticism of the majority in congress who have voted for legislation or who sponsored bills which encouraged the hordes of illegal aliens to pour into this country from our southern border and deprive Americans of fair wage jobs, while saddling American taxpayers with the cost of incarceration, medical care, and schooling for roughly 32 million illegals. What we hear from Left Gatekeepers is what the Illuminati WANTS us to hear from a thoroughly controlled ‘alternative’ news source”

    - Ken Adachi [] http://educate-yourself.org/cn/zwickergatekeepersofleft05oct07.shtml []
    ______________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Posted by Philip | January 27, 2010, 8:28 am

Subscribe to comment notifications without commenting


Post a comment

Captcha

Enter the letters you see.

Page Visits This Week

  • 15
» wp.com stats helper