what, no bunghole debunking of this yet? you trolls are really dropping your game.

Hey Allberry, you should post that awesome link again about the ‘misquote debacle’, as it has come to be known,
time to bring out that awesome final clinching proof of nothing at all.

It’s proof that the man’s a liar who changes people’s words and libels them, and that you’re gullible and stupid enough to believe liars.
Please feel free to explain how he knows that WTC 7 (actually its facade, since the total collapse took much longer) took 6.6 seconds to collapse. NIST determined that the top 242′, or 18 stories of it, took 5.4 seconds, so did 368′ of it happen in a little over one second, or is he lying about that too? No wonder UL canned him, and his goofy lawsuit was tossed out of court.

Lombeer,

How many times do you want debunked nonsense to be debunked all over again?

Do you not yet understand why you are making an ass of yourself and the real world is laughing at you?

You have debunked nothing, troll edwards, you are a circus clown, nothing more.

9/11: Blueprint for Truth – WTC Building 7 – 10 minute Segment from New AE911Truth Companion Edition — May 14, 2009 — This is the first of 3 segments on the new AE911Truth Companion Edition to Blueprint for Truth. In just 10 minutes Richard Gage, AIA of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth takes you through most of the scientific forensic evidence proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the destruction of WTC 7 was accomplished with explosive controlled demolition.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lESol88wOi0

“9/11 is the single most important historical event since the end of the cold war. It heralded a new war, the ongoing and endless ”war on terror”. This is a global war which affects every aspect of human life on the planet. There is no enemy nor victory in sight. Most people acknowledge that the 9/11 attacks on USA soil was a crime, but only few are aware that it has never been investigated as such.

- Prof. Niels Harrit

Troll edwards & debunker albury’s whole dog and pony show summed up here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSk4SUpWVuY

And completely exposed here:
9/11 Revisited 2nd edition 1 of 9 — June 05, 2008 — We need to keep this in the public arena. 911 is the catalyst for all that is to come. We need to tell everyone. Listen to the the news accounts of explosions in the building right before the collapse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbiPAB5h26A

http://uncensored.co.nz/2010/05/21/nist-report-on-wtc-7-debunked-exposed/

MMC, as dumb as ever wrote for all to see:

“You have debunked nothing, troll edwards,..”

How many times do you want debunked nonsense to be debunked all over again? Why would I have to do something that is already been done hundreds of times for up to NINE years?

Do you not yet understand why you are making an ass of yourself and the real world is laughing at you?

Why do you like to make a complete ass of yourself, MCC?

Amazing.

morning filthy trolls! .

“You have debunked nothing, troll edwards, you are a circus clown, nothing more.”

so very true.
NINE years on and you trolls are losing ground.
BradEdwards you have nothing.
This is your life Brad.
This is your life.
Here, with us, for all eternity.

“Here, with us, for all eternity.”

Very funny line, Lombeer

Hopefully not prophetic

Lombeer, nbot capable of paying attention, wrote:

“You have debunked nothing, troll edwards, you are a circus clown, nothing more.”

How many times do you want debunked nonsense to be debunked all over again? Why would I have to do something that is already been done hundreds of times for up to NINE years?

It’s amazing just how desperate you are, Lombeer.

You’re the desperate one, you mentally diseased peckerhead.

How many people died in WWII, bj ?

6 millionish ?

66 millionish ?

.

He’s probably trying to think up an appropriate insult to hurl in your direction. I doubt he would be interested in answering the question.

Tell us, Lorraine, how you believe the topic of WWII is relevant to this thread about frauds Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan.

6 mil or 66 mill, bj ?

Tell us, ewingsc, why you believe the topic of WWII is relevant to this thread about frauds Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan.

Are you saying Jones and Ryan are Holocaust Deniers like you?

Nope.

That’s what you are trying to say you soulless little bastard.

How many people were -killed- in world war ii, bj ?

about 6 million ?

Or more like 66 million ?

Answer the question you disgusting little shit.

Well ?

WWII has nothing to do with 9/11 you sick denier.

And fakes and frauds like Jones and Ryan have nothing to do with evidence or truth.

“Fake Experts”

“You know who they are – those organizations that have words like “freedom” and “rights” “choice” and “consumer” in their names but always shill for corporate interests…those occasional MDs or engineers creationists find that will say evolution has nothing to do with science. They are the fake experts.

“But how do we tell which experts are fake and which are real?

“To figure out who is a fake expert you have to figure out what a real expert is. My definition would be a real expert is someone with a thorough understanding of the field they are discussing, who accurately represents the scientific literature and the state of understanding of the scientific enterprise. There has been some other other discussion on scienceblogs from Janet at Adventures in Ethics and Science, it also reiterates some of the same points in relation to what she feels comfortable discussing as an expert. It also stresses the importance of context in evaluating the validity of expert opinion. But I’m not the god of the dictionary so let’s consider some other definitions.

“The OED gives the definition simply as “One whose special knowledge or skill causes him to be regarded as an authority; a specialist. Also attrib., as in expert evidence, witness, etc.”

…

“Therefore I would say a fake expert is usually somebody who is relied upon for their credentials rather than any real experience in the field at issue, who will promote arguments that are inconsistent with the literature, aren’t generally accepted by those who study the field in question, and/or whose theories aren’t consistent with established epistemological requirements for scientific inquiry. Sheesh. I just described Michael Egnor, Bill Dembski, Michael Fumento, Patrick Michaels, Steven Milloy, Richard Lindzen…

“So, in honor of the false experts hired by everyone from creationists to global warming deniers, I present to you, the thinking chimp. Our mascot of the false expert, who isn’t as good at telling you accurate information about science as he is at flinging poo.”

http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/about.php

Answer the question you disgusting little shit.

Repulsive little war criminal …

““But how do we tell which experts are fake and which are real?”

Ummmm you tell us oh wise one?!

That is the main difference between your ilk and us brad. We provide the information and people get to investigate it and make up their own mind. You on the other hand try insulting and bullying people into believing your point of view.

“That is the main difference between your ilk and us brad. We provide the information and people get to investigate it and make up their own mind.

You on the other hand try insulting and bullying people into believing your point of view.”

Good luck with -that- shit, brad.