// you’re reading...

Health Freedom Action Alert

No Forced Vaccines Election Guide

Dear Friends,

I hope you are all well.

This is your election update special bulletin.  As you may already know I am not a member of any political party.

Several weeks ago I emailed an election questionnaire on behalf of www.noforcedvaccines.org to all parties that I knew were standing candidates in the election.

I received replies from two political parties to the questionnaire that I emailed.  The first reply came from the Democrats for Social Credit and the second came from the Act party.

The full replies (and the text of the questionnaire) from both parties may be read at the following link: http://www.noforcedvaccines.org/election-guide/

Below are some excerpts:

Democrats for Social Credit

The spokesman for the Democrats for Social Credit’s sums up the party’s policies concerning vaccination as follows:

“As a general indication of the Democrats for Social Credit approach to these matters (a) we are in favour of the public being given complete information regarding vaccines and (b) we absolutely oppose any compulsion regarding vaccination.”


The Act party

Act’s spokeswoman states that:

“ACT strongly believes that New Zealand needs to increase our rate of immunisation as it protects people against fatal disease. However we don’t support compulsion and think education and incentives are the best tools to encourage vaccination.”

Unfortunately although Act doesn’t support “compulsion” it does support Dr Nikki Turner’s “Six Star Plan” – which includes a number of coercive recommendations.

“ACT supports getting as many children vaccinated as possible. We are open to exploring all the recommendations [emphasis added] of Health Select Committee about how to get more children immunised.”

Most parties didn’t answer the questionnaire

Unfortunately, none of the other parties responded to the questionnaire.  This may reflect the fact that parties put a low priority on answering questions about vaccination and/or the fact that I sent the questionnaire too late in the election cycle.

In terms of the other parties attitudes towards the vaccination issue, and specifically the recommendations made in the Report produced by the Health Select Committee following its Inquiry into how to increase vaccination rates.

The Health Select Committee that produced the Report included members from the National party and the Labour party.  There was also one MP (Kevin Hague) from the Green party on the committee.

National and Labour

Given that National and Labour party MPs made up the majority of the members of the Health Select Committee it would seem fair to assume that National and Labour support the coercive recommendations in the report.   This is unfortunate given that these are the two major parties.  Moreover, letters from National party MPs at this link http://www.noforcedvaccines.org/political-responses/ appear to show that National would be quite happy for parents to be forced to choose between either their child having all recommended vaccinations or none, with no middle ground for parents who support vaccination but want to avoid specific vaccines.

The Green Party

While the Green Party was represented on the Health Select Committee it has since stated that it does not support the coercive recommendations in the Report of the Health Select Committee and its health spokesman (Kevin Hague) wrote in a letter that the Green party is in agreement on these key points.

  1. Immunisation is an individual medical choice, and should never be mandatory. Nor should it be promoted in a way that makes people feel pressured into being immunised, or immunising their children.
  2. Parents should have access to impartial information which provides them with information about the risks and benefits of immunisation, so that all individuals (and parents in the case of children) can make an informed decision about immunisation.
  3. Parents should not be penalised for not immunising their children, nor should there be incentive payments or rewards or access to other goods and services, or any linking of immunisation to benefit entitlement.
  4. Some parents will choose to have their child immunised against some diseases, but not others. No parents should be forced to make a decision between their child having all immunisations or having none.

Other parties

In terms of other political parties, Peter Dunne from UnitedFuture has previously stated that “UnitedFuture wants to ensure that information about immunisation is widely circulated, including the latest international developments, to promote informed decisions by parents.”

However the party does not have position regarding the issue of linking children’s vaccinations to any type of “welfare benefit” or enrollment at an early childhood centre or school.

I have no information on the policies of the  Conservative party, Mana party, Maori party or NZ First about the vaccination issue.

Conclusion

To summarise, if you consider the vaccination issue sufficiently important to take into account when casting your vote Democrats for Social Credit* and the Green party have the best policies from the point of view of respecting parents’ rights to make informed decisions about vaccination without coercion.

Best wishes to you all,

Katherine Smith

*Unfortunately the latest opinion poll figures I could find (at the time of producing this guide) show that Democrats for Social Credit have no chance of being respresented in parliament unless they win an electorate seat.  According to the poll the party’s potential share of the party vote is likely to be less than 0.5%. See: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1111/S00290/roy-morgan-poll-oct-24-nov6-nat-53-lab-26.htm

 

1 person likes this post.


Share

Discussion

6 comments for “No Forced Vaccines Election Guide”

  1. Apology to the world (2/12/2006)
    No, not for anything I have done, have not done or am about to do or not do in the near future. I am apologising on behalf of all sane Australians for inflicting Viera Scheibner on the world. Dr Scheibner (she has a real PhD in micropaleontology) is one of the leading lights of the anti-vaccination movement, and is often called on as an expert. The following quote from Dr Scheibner indicates both the quality of her expertise and why an apology is needed to the rest of the world for the actions of this Australian resident.

    It is well known that measles is an important development milestone in the life and maturing processes in children. Why would anybody want to stop or delay the maturation processes of children and of their immune systems?

    Isn’t it amazing that millions of children in Australia, the USA, Britain and other places manage to survive infancy and grow up without experiencing this “important development milestone”? In the rest of the world, the death toll of only a few hundred thousand dead children so far this year must be a small price to pay for the benefits accruing to other unvaccinated children. What would a few deaths matter, or millions of blind kids or kids with meningitis, when we are talking about preventing “delay [in] the maturation processes of children and of their immune systems”? And people still ask me why I call anti-vaccination liars “liars”.

    Source? Google it yourself. Isn’t that how all you nutters do ‘research’?

    Posted by Gary | February 6, 2012, 6:02 pm
  2. There is yet still hope for an original thought Gary. Keep at it.

    Posted by Gerard | February 6, 2012, 8:49 pm
  3. Master Suppression Techniques

    [ That's not advice,

    that's what they're called ]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suppression_techniques

    Posted by ewingsc | February 6, 2012, 8:55 pm
  4. Gary sounds like a brainwashed doctor, that paid to be brainwashed by the muti-billion dollar vaccine producers at medical school..very sad

    Posted by john | March 23, 2012, 7:45 pm
  5. http://moremark.squarespace.com/quackcast-list-mp3/

    The easiest thing for AAH would be to refer people to their website (www.aahuganda.org) and follow the  instructions to donate; to donate to the clinic projects, people must specify for the donations to go to the Bupoto clinic project.  For Partnership Uganda, people can go to http://www.partnershipugandainc.org and follow the directions under the “Support” tab.

    Mail:

    Subject: Hate (of CAM) mail and many props from Uganda

    Message: Hello Mark,

    I am a pediatrician working in rural—and I mean rural—Uganda; I’ve been here full time for about two years now and on and off for four.  I’ve been lucky enough to find a scientist husband with a passion for international health, and I drug him and my dog to a little village in Manafwa District in eastern Uganda, near the Kenyan border.  There’s not much running water, power, or internet in our village, and I have to work hard to keep up my medical knowledge.  I discovered your pus- and pod-casts during one of my searches for free CME, and my husband and I have been hooked ever since.  When we travel the two or three hours every few weeks to get supplies for our clinic, we’ll download as many of your casts as possible, and we wanted to thank you for keeping us entertained and informed in the far reaches of the world.

    I’m writing specifically to thank you for and comment on your “Without Borders” pod-cast.  I always enjoy your logic and critical evaluations on (S)CAM, and this cast resonated particularly strong with me—not only because we live in the trenches of one of the countries you mentioned, but also because I am as angry and disheartened at the wasting of money on poor research and bunk therapeutic options here as you seem to be.  We know your “reply to email” stance, so we’re not expecting one; we just wanted to thank you for your work and share our take on it.

    In my region of Uganda, I’m one of four pediatricians; my three colleagues are two hours away in Mbale, the nearest big city to us, and otherwise I’m alone in the eastern territories.  We find that the doctor to patient ratio you mentioned applies more to the bigger cities; the situation is exponentially more critical in the far-flung regions (the forgotten districts, as I call them) of the country.  For the last two years, I have managed and operated two grass roots NGO clinics, and my husband and I have adopted a “McGyver Medicine” approach to make every single resource, every single cent, and every single health worker as effective as possible.  Our districts are some of the poorest and worst served areas of the country, and to compound the problem of poor education, rampant infectious disease (including an HIV/AIDS prevalence much worse than the national average), and awful infrastructure in education and public services, we’re lucky if we see a small portion of the $135/capita you mentioned Uganda spends on healthcare.  In a nutshell: every single cent matters and literally determines the difference between life and death.

    The studies you reviewed in the “Without Borders” cast are sickening.  I see time and again groups of do-gooders from around the globe popping into countries like Uganda to “help,” but who conveniently might just get some data while they’re at it.  Do they consult the people they want to study?  Maybe. Do they get permission from the country’s IRB-equivalents for ethical research protocols?  Probably not, although I bet the US institution backing them is on board and never mentioned the need to consult the in-country ethics boards.  Do they realize how far their money could go if used prudently?  Definitely not, otherwise I can’t fathom that anyone would go forward with the severe waste of resources that I see.  As I said—those of us in these countries who see the true state of health know that not a penny can go to waste.  But millions of pennies go pouring down the drains (or bills lit on fire, as you said!) on these research projects.  The acupuncture study in Uganda was a perfect example of this—hearing you speak about it made me want to scream (pretty sure I did and scared the chickens).  

    There is no wiggle room on this—we cannot allow independent groups or bad science to dictate how money is spent in areas where $1 may make the difference between a person’s life or death.  Sometimes, you literally have one opportunity to reach people: they may visit you or participate in your study for their one healthcare encounter in a decade.  How can you waste that opportunity by not using it to provide the things we KNOW will help them: de-worming, vaccinations, multivitamin supplements, HIV testing, education…

    We argue to put the money instead towards training health workers to go into their communities and educate about basic hygiene, vaccinations, nutrition, and other health topics.  As you’ve mentioned multiple times, there are not many interventions with NO possible or tangible harm done, but education sure comes close.  I’ve now worked with two groups of 16 community volunteers—people from the communities in which I’ve worked—who we trained in basic education following international and Ministry of Health guidelines.  Their educational work alone has taken a big cut out of delayed wound care, diarrhea outbreaks, and malaria cases in the community.  We attribute a rise in family planning use to their work.  Our patient volumes at the clinics in the areas have increased, and people seem to understand basic health better.  How much did it cost to train these people?  About $200.  TOTAL.  Imagine putting all that acupuncture money towards widespread community health worker trainings in Nepal, Uganda, Nicaragua and Haiti.  This is what keeps me fighting in international healthcare and why I get so damned pissed off when I hear about studies like what you discussed.  Thank you SO much for addressing this tragic ethical issue in your podcast.  We loved your work before, and we do so even more now.  Please keep up your good work, and know you’re reaching health workers and doctors in some of the most remote areas of the world.

    Also, if it’s interesting to you, we came across this journal recently; you may already know it well, but it’s the African Journal of Traditional and Complementary Alternative Medicine.  I’m sure there is a wealth of articles ripe for the picking apart.

    Thanks again,

    Lisa Umphrey and Douglas DaSilva

    Posted by Gary | April 23, 2012, 9:52 pm
  6. Thanks Gary – interesting post.

    How long do you think it will be before the first allegations that these two are “Big Pharma Plants” start flying?

    Posted by Neo | April 23, 2012, 11:20 pm

Subscribe to comment notifications without commenting


Post a comment


Email addresses submitted in comments are not publicly displayed and will not be shared with any third parties.

I have read and agree with the terms and conditions.

What is it like to be a parent of a child who becomes autistic following MMR vaccination?

Read real parents' stories in Silenced Witnesses (Volumes 1 and 2) edited by investigative writer Martin J. Walker. slingshotpublications.com

Page Visits This Week

  • No data yet!
» wp.com stats helper