Sounds really hit the spot.
However, HHO hydrogen generator system is a controversial of substitution it . By cons, there are losse of more energy while generating power and from pros they accually had a benefit of saving moneys.

Nice !

The name of that town sounded a lot like homeopath. Ha ha ha there’s a sucker born every day.

Scot wonders why I refer to people like him who fall for this crap as ‘stupid’ . Well maybe it is because they are.

That fat cop could hardly even say the word ‘skeptical’. Bet he couldn’t spell it.

His motor will fail due to hydrogen embrittlement I should think.

“Scot wonders why I refer to people like him who fall for this crap as ‘stupid’ . Well maybe it is because they are.”

More likely I think the reason you do it gary – is because you are a sneering, smearing, ugly-on-the-inside, ego-driven, website-humping douchebag

with nothing to offer the world.

Can you tell me how all three WTC buildings accelerated downwards into their own mass ?

When there is the rest of the lower floors of the building standing in the way ?

- without the use of controlled demolitions technology ?

Easy Scotty. Follow the link and wake up, you fine upstanding pillar of wacko society.

http://www.debunking911.com/collapse.htm

Just linking to crap like that does not answer my question.

911 conclusions from NIST are full of holes so large you can fly a boeing through them.

Here is the question, again.

Can you tell me how all three WTC buildings accelerated downwards into their own mass ?

When there is the rest of the lower floors of the building standing in the way ?

NIST can’t answer that question and doesn’t try.

I want you to answer it, gaz.

Can you tell me how all three WTC buildings accelerated downwards into their own mass ?

Without the use of controlled demolitions ?

Here’s a handy learning aid , gaz.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MkYRTDjFVY

Do you think the ‘piledriver’ of the north tower

is large enough to crush all the rest of the lower floors of the building to powder

- right down to street level

- at a near freefall speed, gaz ?

Here’s a stabilised view of the collapse :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=assOpNFPveM

And from another angle of the same collapse / demolition

- explosive lateral ejections can be seen well below the supposed ‘crush zone’.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxGJHTlpOc8

Can you tell me how all three WTC buildings accelerated downwards into their own mass ?

I’ve sent you the appropriate link Scotty. If it’s too hard for you to read/understand then tough, I’m not going to explain it for you in simpler terms. You will just have to try harder.

No.

I want you to explain your answer to my question to me.

I want to know that you actually understand the question.

The question again is :

Can you tell me how all three WTC buildings accelerated downwards into their own mass ?

As seen here :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XeMj4djXA8

Here :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxGJHTlpOc8

& Here :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGNlNdJbges

come on gary, you still trying to say the buildings floor pancaked down.

You must have some good pictures of other buildings that do this.

Scotty, the simple answer to you question is gravity.
For more detail go to http://www.debunking911.com/collapse.htm

And actually read and understand it this time.

‘Gravity’ is a simple answer for simple dipshits like you, gaz.

So you -don’t- understand the question, it seems.

Gaz ?

Are you listening ?

There’s the lower floors of the -building- in the way.

The upper sections of the building

ACCELERATE downward

THROUGH the lower floors

as if they weren’t there.

The lower floors are -well- designed to STAND UP and RESIST downward force.

The upper floors would only

ACCELERATE DOWNWARD THROUGH THE LOWER FLOORS

at near freefall speed

if something like explosives and / or cutter charges

As seen clearly here :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ma13I76Sb10

were progressively removing the structural resistance to downward force

THAT THE BUILDING WAS DESIGNED FOR.
.

Do you get it now, gaz ?

You wouldn’t think that willfull ignorance like yours over what happened on 911 actually enables ongoing war crimes –

but it actually -does-, gaz …

( that’s probably the lead reason I despise you so much.)

People smarter, more qualified, and more experienced

than you

explain it further for you

here :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJ8CAra36aU

and here :

Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ

9/11 Incontrovertible Proof the Government is Lying

Notes and links at source.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU

I’ll see your youtubes and raise you one anti conspiracy site…
http://www.debunking911.com/collapse.htm

Try and really read und understand this time.

It’s not a poker game, you horrible old prick.

See you in a week.

“Try and really read und understand this time.”

Are you an expert gazza? now that you’ve read that one page?
I’d defer to ewing’s extensive research on the subject.

Reading SBM and debunking911 does not make you an expert.

And spending all your time on this site badgering open minded people who are not afraid (as you are)

to consider ideas outside of mainstream.

All great scientific and cultural ideas came from the very thinking that you try, sadly, pitifully and ineffectually Silence.

Run along now and ride your ‘whacky’ motorbike. Troll.