A summary of the inconsistencies that prove the Benghazi “consulate” does not exist.
I would buy the scenario of the ambassador getting killed IF it involved the following: The Ambassador bought a new personal vehicle, drove it to a friends house and got attacked there by the Mossad or other intelligence agency and murdered. I won’t buy one line of the official story, because:
Here we have the video being produced by an Egyptian Ex Patriate, and no one present while the compound was being burned
Here we have the ambassador dying while the compound was being burned:
Here we have the ambassador dying in his car when it was hit by an RPG (CNN no less!)
Here we have the ambassador dying after being raped in the name of Mohammed
Here we have the MSM backpedaling saying NO NO, we did not say that, it’s YOUR fault!
Here we have the ambassador dying of smoke inhalation
And here, no, he did not die at the consulate, or in his car, or after being raped in the name of mohammed, NO, he died in a safe house he ran to when the consulate got attacked
And here we have the consulate itself being the safe house
Here we have the Marines not able to protect an embassy or consulate because Obama says they can’t have ammo
Here we have the Marines themselves saying that story is BULLSHIT (believe me, it is, it takes an act of Congress to deny the Marines ammo.) This fraud was fronted because there is no way any U.S. embassy or consulate could have been over run to give this entire uprising story plausibility if the marines were armed, any U.S. installation overseas, temporary or not, is a defacto military base, and they don’t screw up like this.
When I hit so many inconsistencies in a story, I call B.S. on the whole thing. But wait, there is more.
Evidently, the FED has teleport technology to allow two buildings miles apart to act as one. Either that, or the various news agencies can’t even get the location of the consulate straight, proof of a bullshit story.
And the Guardian says it’s here (you have to click the little arrow that says next to make their animation work.
And the Department of State, as well as ALL other embassy listing web sites, Google, and Google maps says it does not exist at all
But that wont cut it when you need a bullshit location, which is needed to make it impossible for you to be called on your bullshit story, but before you spew your bullshit, at least agree on where it is based.
Here is a little map to help them get it straight.
Now about that protest, that culminated in the attack. More bullshit.
Here we have a massive angry mob storming the “consulate”
And here we have a security guard saying that before things went boom, there was “not even an ant”. Now, this is only a partial listing of all the inconsistencies in the story, which in fact are so vast that I’d spend a week typing them. But from what is here, it should be easy to see that the mass media just spewed a steaming ocean of BULLSHIT wide enough to spawn a hurricane.
And that begs the question, WHY?
Here is the answer, and you won’t hear it reported. Now, this is a made up answer, I have no secret sources. But we know the official story is pure B.S., yet we have testimony of people on the ground that is believable, especially that of the security guard who said that things were quiet before the attack. I don’t think that is a false report, which would mean that there WAS an attack. So let me make a guess here.
The Ambassador went to Bengasi for a short vacation. He had a friend who had an elaborate mansion, and he was there to relax for a while. The Mossad is all over Libya right now, and they pegged his phone conversations. Since a media blitz against Muslims was in the works, they knew they had the ambassador by the balls in an unsecured civilian house, which would normally be perfectly safe absent your phone getting tapped by a band of well armed murderers. A death of a prominent figure during the “protests” would be just the ticket to kick the propaganda into overdrive.
So they wait until night fall, arrive unannounced, and create their story. Who knows what happened, the media accounts are all over the map. There is no way to extract anything solid from what the media has said. So we don’t have the details but we do know that whatever was spewed had a purpose, right at prime time for war with Iran. There is no consulate in Bengasi. This is a fabrication, and any reference to it is based on it being “temporary”. This helps when dealing with the Libyan government with this story, with any problems ironed over with the phrase “it’s too new to know about”. There was a previous bombing wag the dog related to this very “consulate” that totally flew under the radar several months prior. No one called foul, so they figured it would work for the big show. Most likely the ambassador had a pattern of going there to relax.
The fact that it was just a regular house would explain why there were no marines, no cars other than only one for a very large facility, no flag pole, no placard, no NOTHING to show it was a consulate, not even any office furniture. It would explain why it was so far from the city center, where a consulate should be. The pictures show a house, and that is ALL. This alternate story would explain why there is no embassy vehicle present, which would have had bullet proof glass that would survive the fire, and heavy armor plating in front of the radiator, yet in the videos you can see flame right through the front into the engine compartment. That vehicle was not armored, and ALL ambassadors travel in armored cars. Another big hole in the story. And when there are only lies to go on in the press, the pictures really can say a lot.