Are there too many coincidences in the Boston Bombings official narrative to call them coincidences? Behind each one lurks the shadow of Graham Fuller—a top CIA strategist who famously advocated co-opting Islamic extremists to further advance the US agenda in Central Asia—and his cozy ties with the accused brothers’ uncle. William Engdahl delves into the ramifications of the Fuller-Tsarni connection, the most compelling of the Boston smoking guns, and the threatening can of worms it has opened up.
Voltaire Network | Frankfurt (Germany)
One of the many unexplained (at least not officially) anomalies of the persons claimed to have carried out the Boston Marathon bombings is the presence of key CIA figure in the direct family of the accused brothers. Ruslan Tsarnaev, the outspoken uncle of the brothers was married to Samantha A. Fuller until 2004. Samantha’s father is Graham Fuller, the senior CIA person who architected the Afghan Islamic fundamentalist Mujahideen war against the Soviets. He is also implicated in creating a global jihad network, presumably acting on behalf of CIA interests. Read more
FBI Director Continues Cover-up of Contacts with Boston Bombing Suspects
By Barry Grey
The bombings were used as the pretext for an unprecedented police-military lockdown
of Boston and its suburbs, in which civil liberties were effectively suspended
and federal, state and local forces tested out techniques for dictatorial rule.
Added Comment: The American public – and the world – has been lied to continuously and fooled into blindly supporting the most outrageous and egregious criminality of all time - so many times. When will they say, en mass – NOT THIS TIME! When will they recognize the fabricated lies and false-flag operations for what they are. When will they assess the reality of an agenda for Martial Law and Police State (no matter how unpleasant) – and respond with an emphatic refusal to surrender the most fundamental human rights – an emphatic refusal to allow themselves to be sold down the river and over the falls one more time.
The relation between the suspected Boston Marathon bombers and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Massachusetts State Police (MSP) and the Boston Police (BP) is a point of contention and controversy.
The FBI, at first, claimed no knowledge of the bombing suspects but later was forced to admit having received at least two sets of intelligence reports, one from Russian officials and another from the CIA, identifying one of the suspected bombers, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, as a potential security threat -linked to a Chechen terrorist organization.
The dust has settled on Boston, America’s newest example and scene of national insecurity.
As Kevin Barrett’s hugely successful Press TV article pointed out yesterday we witnessed corporate media suggesting a major domestic terror attack might have been done by our own security people. Military Intelligence agrees.
I’m not a conspiracy-minded person, but something definitely stinks about this whole Boston Marathon bombing story.
From what we’re reading about the case, the FBI had for at least two and possibly as many as five years been investigating Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the 26-year-old older brother killed during a shootout between police and the two brothers, Tamerlan and 19-year-old Dzhokhar. They had interviewed Tamerlan in his home, warned him they were watching what he ate, what he looked at on his computer, etc. They knew he had gone to Russia, Dagestan and Chechnya.
The world is once again in a state of shock after what had happened at the “Boston Marathon Race Bombing of April 15, 2013. And while many are still trying to figure the whole story of those events surrounding the bombings, many other facts have surfaced, and many others which I know of, which shall aid us in finding out the whole of the truth of what actually happened and, quite possibly, who is actually behind it all.
While many people might immediately dismiss the concept, any student of true and unadulterated history has to eventually admit this fact: Governments exploit crisis. Sometimes, they merely take advantage of the ensuing chaos and aftermath of a disaster they had nothing to do with directly. Other times, they create those disasters themselves in order to engineer social and political opportunity.