Wirt Walker III, Marvin Bush, Jim Pierce, L Paul Bremer, Barry McDaniel, Joseph Kasputys, Jerome Hauer, Stephan Friedman, Craig Stapleton, William Clark, Preston Rahe Jr., Michael Daniel (SAIC), Frank Carlucci, Rudy Giuliani, Bernard Kerik, and probably a few more names we are yet to uncover… http://www.reef.ufl.edu/FIRE_WEB/Bio%20Pages/Son.htm
Nanothermite & Science Experts complicit in cover-up of 9/11:
Hratch Semerjian, Shyam Sundar, John Gross, Richard Gann, Andrzej Miziolek
Professor Steve Son:
Thank You! Please help investigate these people and expose this information to everyone you know before they use Wikileaks as an excuse to shut down the Internet! This is the REAL leaking conspiracy; please don’t put too much trust into Julian Assange until his Banking and UFO cables check out. Many of us have suspicions that Assange is part of an intelligence operation to gain control over the internet. – NanoThermite911
One of the reasons that most debunkers of 9/11 truth are cemented in error, is their rejection of the conspiratorial view of history.
Having a false starting point, they ultimately fail in understanding the events of the day that (by design) “changed America forever.”
The accidental view of history is part of the foundation most debunkers of 9/11 truth build upon as they “decide” what’s happening around them.
The first film in the series below was produced by someone who understands the conspiratorial view of history, which makes all the difference: and gives the viewer a much better understanding of world events than could be obtained from the corporate media.
Mainstream sources generally present the accidental view of history, and the public tend not to notice they’re being conned by an erroneous worldview that doesn’t stand up to scrutiny; and is even contradicted by the globalists themselves, in their writings and even during some of their speaking engagements.
The late Dr. Carroll Quigley, professor of history at the Foreign Service School at Georgetown University, and mentor of President Bill Clinton, clearly stated: “There does exist, and has existed for a generation, and … international network which operates to some extent in the way the radical Right believe the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, have no aversion to cooperating with the Communists or any other group, and frequently do so. I know of the operation of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for most of my life, been close to it and many of its policies … but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known”(Tragedy and Hope, Macmillan, 1966, p. 950).
Also in Tragedy and Hope, Quigley stated that the ultimate aim is to establish a system in which the individual’s “freedom and choice will be controlled within very narrow alternatives by the fact that he will be numbered from birth and followed, as a number, through his educational training, his required military or other public service, his tax contributions, his health and medical requirements, and his final retirement and death benefits.” This would be “nothing less than a world system of financial control in private hands … able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system [will] be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert”(p. 866).
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during these years.” – David Rockefeller 1991, Germany.
Fall of the Republic is one of the best films documenting the sabotage of the U.S. economy and other nations throughout the world.
Instead of being in the forefront, as in many of his other videos, Alex Jones does some of the narration, and then comes across as simply being interviewed for the film along with his other guests. Calmly presenting the current economic situation to his viewers: this is Alex at his best.
This presentation is a must see for anyone who would like to know how we got to this point of world financial crisis, and who the architects of major world events are. It will be especially helpful for any new readers of Uncensored who would like to better understand the agenda of the Financial Elite. This is an excellent film to wake up friends, neighbors, and family members to what’s going on.
When “debunkers” of 9/11 Truth refuse to watch a presentation like Fall of the Republic or dismiss it as “wild conspiracy theories” it is a clear indication that you shouldn’t waste a lot of time with them. If they reject a film like this (including all the good interviews) there is very little anyone could possibly say to change their minds. Especially those who debunk others for the fun of it; and the tools that have a job to do here.
The next essential video is 9/11 Revisited.
“This just continues to ANGER me every time I see more and more evidence of this…Who am I angry at…THE AMERICAN PEOPLE…for doing nothing about it and sitting back like babies as their government feeds them more baby food…What’s so horrible about this is the fact that the next time this happens it will be on a much more devastating and planetary scale. People won’t have time to be fed the baby food…they will be dead.” – WAYDESWORLDHAWAII
“September 11th Revisited is perhaps the most riveting film ever made about the destruction of the World Trade Center. This is a powerful documentary, which features eyewitness accounts and archived news footage that was shot on September 11, 2001 but never replayed on television. Featuring interviews with eyewitnesses & firefighters, along with expert analysis by Professor Steven E. Jones, Professor David Ray Griffin, MIT Engineer Jeffrey King, and Professor James H. Fetzer. This film provides stunning evidence that explosives were used in the complete demolition of the WTC Twin Towers and WTC Building 7.”
National Security Alert – Sensitive Information
Reveals some very interesting facts regarding the attack on the Pentagon.
The same troll posted on the 100 Reasons thread, but failed to “address,” “debunk,” or “answer” the video in any meaningful way.
Most Uncensored readers have made a choice to peruse alternative news websites because the information is often considerably more reliable than what is spoon-fed to the millions of gullible people who still have faith in the system and are fearful to expose themselves to accurate news that clearly shows who the orchestrators of major world events are, and reveals their agenda.
If debunkers-for-sport (and internet trolls) desire to remain in their ignorance; anyone who appreciates reading Uncensored is not likely to spend 12 hours a day posting pleas to them to change their minds. We do, however, recognize the contempt for truth that they bring here upon their arrival; and the fact that they truly despise sites like this one. And that is why many readers do not bother trying to reason with them or answer their questions, which are designed to draw others into debate without end. It would be much more profitable to plant a garden and, in a few months, enjoy the harvest: than waste that same time going around in circles with people who are here to disrupt the flow of information and clutter discussion threads with their debunker talking points and scornful remarks about authors, video producers, lecturers, and other activists worldwide that continue to speak out and expose the September criminals.
Thank you for taking the time to read this message.
Philip Dec – P.O. Box 76 – Monmouth, ME – 04259-0076 – USA
“Our government has kept us in a perpetual state of fear — kept us in a continuous stampede of patriotic fervor — with the cry of grave national emergency.”- General Douglas MacArthur — [Posted by ContinentalArmy1776 youtube]
The real problem is that MOST U.S. citizens are so dumbed down by the media that when they hear the truth from the likes of Ron Paul, it just doesn’t even register.
If Chinese tanks were rolling down our streets, [and the Chinese were] kicking in our doors, dropping Missiles from their version of predator drones, our “citizens” would be doing the EXACT same [thing] the so labeled “Taliban” is doing. – mark97213
Why Do They Want To Kill Us? Because We Occupy Their Land!
Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul Force Debate Over Af-Pak War
…The two congressmen offered a resolution ordering President Barack Obama to withdraw U.S. military personnel from Pakistan, saying their presence violates the War Powers Act since it was not approved by Congress. The resolution failed by a very large margin 38-372. The antiwar Democrats are obviously a feeble few. Only 32 Democrats voted for the measure and 6 Republicans as well.
Many opposed used the argument that the War Powers Act only covers troops engaged in hostilities. It seems that in the case of special forces they would be engaged in hostilities. Of course their presence will never be admitted in any event.
The debate gave an opportunity for lawmakers to express their views on the Afghan war as well with divisions within the Democratic party made obvious. However, there are also a few courageous Republicans who are willing to speak out against the war as well. Ron Paul being the best known. – northsunm32
Statement in the House on funding the war in Afghanistan, July 2, 2010
In January 1991, we went to war in the Middle East against Saddam Hussein, Iraq’s dictator who was our ally during the Iran-Iraq war. A border dispute between Kuwait and Iraq broke out after our State Department gave a green light to Hussein’s invasion.
After Iraq’s successful invasion of Kuwait, we reacted with gusto and have been militarily involved in the entire region 6,000 miles from our shores ever since. This has included Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia. After 20 years of killing and a couple trillion dollars wasted, not only does the fighting continue with no end in sight, but our leaders threaten to spread our bombs of benevolence on Iran.
For most Americans, we are at war, at war against a tactic called terrorism, not a country. This allows our military to go any place in the world without limits as to time or place. But how can we be at war? Congress has not declared war, as required by the Constitution, that is true. But our Presidents have, and Congress and the people have not objected. Congress obediently provides all the money requested for the war.
Check out this excellent recent documentary, which has just been posted on the Internet, about Nato’s secret armies that were set up across Western Europe after the Second World War. While these “stay-behind” armies were supposedly intended to help put together a resistance if the Soviet Union invaded their countries, they went on to commit terrorist attacks against their own populations, so as to influence domestic politics.
The documentary describes how, from the late 1960s to the early 1980s, Western intelligence agencies collaborated with right-wing extremist groups to commit false flag terrorist attacks, which would often be falsely blamed on left-wing groups. It features interviews with, among others, Daniele Ganser, author of NATO’s Secret Armies: Operation GLADIO and Terrorism in Western Europe.
But a government’s attempt to increase power, or capitalize on fear, doesn’t mean that a government would actually turn a blind eye to a known attack or itself carry out a fake terror attack in order to obtain its goals, right?
Well, this has happened before in foreign countries. For example, it is widely known that the Nazis, in Operation Himmler, faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. And it has now been persuasively argued — as shown, for example, in this History Channel video — that Nazis set fire to their own government building and blamed that fire on others (if you have trouble playing the clip, it is because the website hosting the clip requires you to download the clip before playing it). The fire was the event which justified Hitler’s seizure of power and suspension of liberties.
Cyber wars and cyber security are no longer fictional plots from science fiction movies. They are very real and very serious concerns for the American people, being tracked by politicians and the government in Washington. Webster Tarpley gives his opinion on the seriousness of the cyber threat.
You couldn’t make it up if you tried. AFP today reports that Al-Qaeda chief in Iraq, Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, has been captured and arrested. The problem with this is that al-Baghdadi has already been reported captured, previously reported killed and even said to have never actually existed by the U.S. military.
“Abu Omar al-Baghdadi was arrested today in Baghdad,” Baghdad security spokesman Major General Qasim Atta told AFP.
“It was Iraqi forces who arrested him based on an intelligence tipoff from someone,” he added.
Also known as Abu Hamza al-Baghdadi and Abu Abdullah al-Rashid al-Baghdadi, many questions have surrounded the so called leader of al Qaeda’s political front organization the “Islamic State of Iraq”.
He was thought to have been one of the figures to succeed the equally shadowy Abu Musab al-Zarqawi as a leader of insurgent forces in Iraq in 2006, after al Zarqawi, who was also previously reported captured and killed on several occasions, was laid to rest for good by the PR arm of the Pentagon.
The announcement of al-Baghdadi’s capture today jars with multiple previous reports from up to two years ago, detailing his arrest, his death and even questioning his existence altogether.
In March 2007, the Interior Ministry of Iraq claimed that al-Baghdadi had been captured in Baghdad. This was reported by AP and picked up by the likes of CNN, whose report stated that another insurgent had positively confirmed al-Baghdadi’s identity.
The U.S. military denied that al-Baghdadi was in their custody, however, and one day later Iraqi officials retracted their statements regarding his arrest.
Indeed this back and forth announcement of capture and later retraction occurred three times in the space of one week.
However, in July 2007, the U.S. military reported that al-Baghdadi had never actually existed and was, for all intents and purposes, a myth.
A reportedly high ranking “Al Qaeda in Iraq” detainee identified as Khaled al-Mashhadani, then claimed that al-Baghdadi was a fictional character created to give an Iraqi face to a foreign-run terror group, and that the “Islamic State of Iraq” was a “virtual organisation in cyberspace” created by al-Qaeda in Iraq leader Abu Ayub al Masri.
The person claiming to be Baghdadi continued to release video and audiotapes attacking U.S. occupation of Iraq, but refused to show his face.
The U.S. military’s claim that Baghdadi is a fictitious character was then challenged in May 2008 after a police chief in Haditha said Baghdadi’s real identity is Hamed Dawood Mohammed Khalil al Zawi. “He was an officer in the security services and was dismissed from the army because of his extremism,” the police chief told al Arabiya television.
Now Baghdadi has been reported captured again!
This saga is another example of how a manufactured smoke and mirrors propaganda veils reality. The “war on terror” mantra continues to be propagated as justification to wage permanent occupation and control over the middle east by the global elite.
Al Qaeda in Iraq, al Zarqawi, al Baghdadi and the legions of other al qaeda operatives who have been reportedly captured and killed over and over are used as interchangeable PR tools.
Are or were any of them ever real? Possibly. However that matters little now.
Once again 99% of the corporate media will no doubt enthusiastically champion this latest arrest as a key victory in the continuing war on terror, and the majority of Americans who even notice will not take a second glance at the ludicrous back story.
The New Zealand Herald is asking for your views on this topic here:
Tell them what you think.
It states: “Army heads are calling for recruits from the armed forces to man an anti-terror squad responsible for domestic security.
A defence source last night said the recruitment drive was prompted by “a surge in the global war on terrorism”.
The unit would also be responsible for dealing with any security threats at the 2011 Rugby World Cup.
Does NZ need an ‘anti-terror’ squad?”
Uncensored reply: “The New Zealand people do not need an anti-terror squad. The attacks of 7/7, 9/11, Oklahoma City and numerous other terror attacks have been proven to be inside jobs and have been used to justify the setting up of a police state, surveillance grid and invade countries for oil. Even the BBC series ‘The Power of Nightmares’ revealed that the so-called “War on Terror” is a scam. People need to ask themselves what the purpose of this squad really is. Does it have something to do with the elite bankers’ call for a New World Order? Does government need this squad because they are expecting resistance to what they have planned for us and want the army to protect themselves?