Patriots Question 9/11
“The official 9/11 Commission’s work and report were at best an incomplete exercise. Many people dismiss the findings of the Commission, and that includes its co-chairs [ Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton ]. Many others who utterly distrust the 9/11 Commission report, dismiss the US Government’s explanation of it, and point to both an official cover-up and an ‘inside job,’ include veteran fighter pilots, EMTs (Emergency Medical Technicians), air defense experts, experienced commercial pilots, demolition experts, architects and civil engineers – none of them professions that inherently attract and retain the gullible and credulous.
Several things are very clear to me from a careful assessment of both official and critical evaluations of the 9/11 attacks. First, the striking aircraft alone simply could not have brought down either of the two buildings in the manner in which they fell, much less a third building which was not hit by a plane (I expect the one intended to do that as a ‘cover’ had ended up in that Pennsylvania field), given the available physical evidence and a wealth of expert testimony. This means the attackers had assistance on the ground, and it had to have been active before the attacks occurred: preparing buildings for controlled demolition is not something done haphazardly in the midst of chaos.
Second, only two intelligence agencies had the expertise, assets, access and political protection to execute 9/11 in the air and on the ground: our CIA and Israel’s Mossad. Only one had the incentive, using the ‘who benefits’ principle: Mossad. And that incentive dovetailed perfectly with the neo-con’s agenda and explicitly expressed need for a catalytic event to mobilize the American public for their wars, using American military power to destroy Israel’s enemies. Only the unexpected strength of the Iraqi resistance kept Syria and Iran from being attacked in the second Bush Administration. Thus, the evidential trail for 9/11 and the wars in Afghanistan & Iraq run from PNAC, AIPAC and their cohorts; through the mostly Jewish neo-cons in the Bush Administration; and back to the Israeli government. None of the denials and political machinations can alter that essential reality. Terms such as treason, betrayal and deceit do not overstate the case against them.
Finally, we need to take a hard look at why the mainstream media (MSM) have paid more attention to Sarah Palin’s wardrobe than they have to dissecting blatant falsehoods, discrepancies and inconsistencies in the US Government’s treatment of 9/11 and its aftermath. And the reason is that on this issue, all are on the same side, and the official line is the one they all prefer – ‘all’ meaning the PNAC alumni who took over the Bush Administration’s national security apparatus and their counterparts in the Obama administration, AIPAC and the rest of the numerous Jewish PACs, the MSM owners and Israel.” – Alan N. Sabrosky, PhD – Former Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute and holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research, U.S. Army War College. A Marine Corps Vietnam veteran with 10 years of service. Graduate of the U.S. Army War College.
The following list of quotations will be updated occasionally as more become available:
“The official story of what happened on 9/11 is a lie.” – Philip J Berg, former Deputy Attorney General, Pennsylvania
Statement in support of Medical Professionals petition for Reinvestigation of 9/11: “I have investigated 9/11 extensively over the last two weeks and I am totally convinced there was criminal action on a huge scale. These people are abrogating their responsibility, aiding and abetting criminals, and thumbing their nose at the justice system; exactly what they are doing all over the world with their unconstitutional wars. They must be brought to justice sooner than later. I have children and I don’t want them to inherit this world. I (We) have a huge responsibility to expose these lies.” – Dr. James E. Bjork, OD – Licensed Optometrist, Province of Ontario. In practice for more than 20 years.
“Why weren’t the hijacked airliners intercepted by jet fighters and shot down before they could fly into the WTC and Pentagon? Standard procedures call for any airliner that loses radio contact or goes off course to be intercepted. Four airliners were hijacked almost simultaneously, and it was obvious to air traffic controllers immediately. The transponders on the airliners were turned off. The hijackers were heard on the radio. And the four deviated drastically from their assigned courses. Was NORAD told? If not, why not? What did the air traffic controllers say, and to whom? Why did the FBI impound the tapes of those conversations? Why has the public never been told what was on them? Why weren’t the congressional investigators told? The independent commission? Who is hiding what, and why? If it was just a matter of incompetence or somebody not doing their job, why hasn’t anyone been fired or reprimanded? If someone ordered the standdown, who? and why? and why haven’t they been charged with treason?” [read more] “A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story … of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible. … There’s a second group of facts having to do with the cover up. Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government don’t want us to know what happened. Who gained from 9/11? Who covered up crucial information? And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place? I think the case is pretty clear that it’s highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney. I think the very kindest thing that we can say about George W. Bush and all the people in the U.S. Government that have been involved in this massive cover-up … is that they were aware of impending attacks and let them happen. However even that is high treason and conspiracy to commit murder.” – Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. Air Force fighter pilot, over 100 combat missions. PhD in Aeronautics, Nuclear Engineering. Recipient of the Eisenhower Medal and dozens of prestigious national awards.
“Four years ago an enormous media event changed the course of the world. Billions of people were given only one explanation for it which was false… Anyone who dares to question it is treated as if he were a fool… The media are silent. I believe you know what event I’m speaking of: Sept. 11, 2001.” – Guilietto Chiesa, Member of European Parliament, Committee on Security & Defense, 11/18/05
On Nov. 30, 2007, Francesco Cossiga, former Italian President, former Undersecretary of Defence & False Flag Operation Expert, instrumental in orchestrating ‘Operation Record’ went on record as saying 9/11 was a False Flag Operation.
“There’s a strong body of evidence showing the official U.S. government story of what happened on Sept. 11, 01 to be almost certainly a monstrous series of lies.” – Bill Christison, CIA Veteran, former National Intelligence Officer
“The Patriot Act was actually written prior to 9/11 with the intention of destroying the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights… It was all premeditated. Treason, a false flag military operation… scripted and executed by rogue elements of the military, intelligence and private contractors working for the U.S. government. The government and the news media were once again lying to the world about the real terrorists” – Lt. Jeff Dahlstrom, former U.S. Air Force Pilot
“As a former General Electric turbine engineering specialist and manager, I can guarantee you that none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered, or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked yes, but not destroyed… Attempts to obscure the facts by calling them a ‘Conspiracy theory’ does not change the truth. It seems that something is rotten in the State” – Capt. Daniel Davis, former US Army Defense Officer and NORAD Tactical Director
“The best I can say is that they (9/11 Commission) really botched the job. At worst, I think that the Commission Report is treasonous.” – Bogdan Dzakovic, Counter Terrorism Expert, Security Division FAA, Witness, 9/11 Commission
“…there’s no question in my mind that there’s enough evidence there to justify a very comprehensive and hard hitting investigation of a kind that we’ve not seen, with subpoenas, general questioning of people, and raising the release of a lot of documents, there’s no question that (D.E. chuckles) put it this way, very serious questions have been raised, about how much they knew beforehand and how much involvement there may been. Is the, is a administration capable, humanly and physiologically of engineering such a provocation?
Yes, I would say that, I worked for such an administration myself, Johnson, ah, President Johnson put destroyers in harm’s way in the Tonkin Gulf not only once, but several times, with the, with a lot of his people hoping that it would lead to a confrontation and claiming that it had.” [read more] – Daniel Ellsberg, Former American military analyst who precipitated a national uproar in 1971 when he released the Pentagon Papers, the U.S. Military’s account of activities during the Vietnam War, to the New York Times.
Interview with April Gallop 7/14/06 Interviewer: Do you have any theory about how a Boeing 757 could have hit such a secure building without any anti-aircraft defenses being activated or any warning alarms sounded?
Gallop: I have thought about this very question numerous times. And then I realized I needed to rephrase the question. The real question is what is the probability or likelihood that no anti-aircraft defense, warning alarms or additional security mechanism functioned on that particular day?
And then we need to think how likely is it then there was a glitch in all the security mechanisms, anti-aircraft defense and warning alarms?
You know, it takes a while to get around that building. And I remember being so disgusted at the frequency of random drill exercises taking place for us to evacuate the building. It seemed as if they always happened when I had to take care of certain things.
Yet on September 11th, the day when our lives were threatened, not one alarm. …
Interviewer: I know that you have previously been quoted about things like thinking that a bomb had exploded in the Pentagon, and that you did not see any plane debris in the Pentagon. I do not want to misquote you or twist your words. Is there anything you wish to state about these topics?
Gallop: I have been misquoted on numerous occasions. That happens when individuals have ulterior motives. But here is my statement for the record.
I was located at the E ring. From my inside perspective, with no knowledge of what had actually happened on the outside, it did sound like a bomb. And we had to escape the building before the floors, debris etc collapsed on us.
And I don’t recall at any time seeing any plane debris. Again, I don’t know what plane debris would look like after hitting a building. But I would have recalled unusual looking pieces similar to plane parts.
… I was focusing on getting help and getting out. With that in mind, the images are etched in my mind. When I review the pictures regarding the Boeing, in my opinion, the hole didn’t appear to be big enough for the 757. I don’t know the scientific theory that was created to justify it being a hole created by a 757. What we need to consider is how did the plane go thru the building with all that heat and not burn us (those on the inside) to a crisp? We need to consider, how did the plane break up so to the point it created a perfectly round hole considering the rate of impact?
I didn’t know it was a plane until I was informed at the hospital. If I wasn’t informed I would have never believed it. I walked through that place to try to get out before everything collapsed on us . . . surely we should have seen something.” – April Gallop, Administrative Specialist, U.S. Army – Pentagon survivor. April suffered major injuries in the attack on the Pentagon, resulting in partial disability and medical discharge from the Army. Two-month old Elisha (April’s daughter) suffered head injuries causing hearing loss and developmental delays.
“Having witnessed the collapse of the second tower on television, I noticed brilliant white flashes on the lower floors immediately before collapse. Why was that? Why was that film clip never seen on TV again?” – Capt. Stephen M. Gann, PhD, U.S. Navy Reserve (ret) – Analytical Chemist. Former Licensed Professional Engineer with 18 years experience as a nuclear chemist.
“It is already possible to know, beyond a reasonable doubt, one very important thing: the destruction of the World Trade Center was an inside job, orchestrated by terrorists within our own government.” [read more] – David Ray Griffin, Ph.D. , Author of The New Pearl Harbor : Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11.
“The issue of knowing who was really behind the 9/11 attacks is of paramount importance to the future of our country, because the ‘official’ assumption that this was the work of 19 Arab amateurs does not fit the facts and has led directly to the deplorable Patriot Act, the illegal Iraq war, NSA spying on ordinary Americans and repeal of habeas corpus.” – David Griscom PhD, Research Physicist (ret.) Naval Research Laboratories
“The evidence that Al-Qaeda is actually an arm of the U.S. government is voluminous… This whole thing was not engineered from a cave in Afghanistan… It’s hard for people to believe that their government could be as incideous as this one but the evidence is there… you can’t put anything past them” – Daniel Hamburg, former U.S. Congressman
“9/11 is the single most important historical event since the end of the cold war. It heralded a new war, the ongoing and endless ”war on terror”. This is a global war which affects every aspect of human life on the planet. There is no enemy nor victory in sight. Most people acknowledge that the 9/11 attacks on USA soil was a crime, but only few are aware that it has never been investigated as such.” – Prof. Niels Harrit
“It is clear extraordinarily powerful explosives were used to destroy the WTC Twin Towers.
Careful scrutiny of video of the collapse of the South Tower (WTC2) shows the upper segment (above the airplane strike) listing, then dropping, then disintegrating or pulverizing. There was a massive explosion near ground level immediately before those events. Using only common sense and reflection, the tilt-then-drop sequence shows the building’s central structural steel core (including stairwells, elevator shafts, utility conduits, etc., and mainly, 47 thick-walled 2’X4′ box section steel columns) had by some agency been made insubstantial and unable to bear weight. Putting that together with the ground level blast and the subsequent pulverization it is clear very powerful explosives had to have been in play. The airplane strike was a mere smokescreen.
Understanding the mechanism of the collapse leads to additional important questions. Who planted the explosives? What kind of explosives were used? When were they planted? And for what reasons would someone destroy not only the Twin Towers, but all the buildings in the World Trade Center?
Simple logic requires of a credible account of the Sept. 11 events that it explain ALL details clearly shown in documentary footage, together with all other known facts e.g. that alleged ring-leader Mohamed Atta had been identified by the Department of Defense antiterrorist program known as Able Danger more than a year prior to 9/11. The Official Story does not even come close to meeting that standard.” – Bruce R. Henry, PhD – Professor Emeritus, Mathematics and Computer Science, Worcester State College. Former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles, General Electric Co.
“Being a civil engineer & understanding the laws of physics, I know that a building cannot fall at free fall speed without the floors already falling, giving no resistance. I wish our Congressman were so smart, showed some backbone & got a truly independent investigation going… The 9/11 Truth movement has shown me that our press is every bit as controlled and spits out as much propaganda as I thought Pravda did for the old Soviet Union.” – Commander Dennis Henry, U.S. Navy Reserve (ret.) C.E., P.E.
“Any chain reaction theory would have to accommodate the fact that each of the towers unraveled completely in less than 15 seconds, which is close to the time of free fall from the top of the buildings if there had been no intervening solid structure. How could a mechanical process proceed through 100 floors with such speed? [read more] – Rodger Herbst, Bachelor of aeronautical and astronautical engineering and mechanical engineer.
“Only the U.S., not Al-Qaeda, has the ability to break all of its standard operating procedures to paralyze its own emergency response system.” – Barbara Honegger, MS-Senior Military Affairs Journalist, former White House Policy Analyst
“Based on my 11 year experience as an FAA air traffic controller, I knew within hours of the attacks, it was an inside job.” – Robert Hordon, former FAA Air Traffic Controller, Boston
“The horizontal ejection of structural steel members for hundreds of feet and the pulverization of concrete to flour-like powder, observed clearly in the collapses of the WTC towers, provide further evidence for the use of explosives. [explained here] (See also, Griffin, 2004, chapter 2.) The observed plumes or “squibs” are far below the pulverization region and therefore deserving of particular attention. They appear much like the plumes observed in the controlled demolition of the Southwark Towers [see here] … I call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that WTC7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fires, but through the carefully planned use of explosives/incendiaries. I have presented ample evidence for the controlled-demolition hypothesis, which is testable and falsifiable and yet has not been seriously considered in any of the studies funded by the US government.” [view entire paper here] – Prof. Steven E. Jones, Department of Physics and Astronomy at Brigham Young University.
“I have 6,000 hours of flight time in Boeing 757’s and 767’s and I could not have flown it the way the flight path was described.” Commander Ralph Kolstad, Retired U.S. Navy ‘Top Gun’ Pilot (Also see: www.pilotsfor911truth.org)
“There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked Pentagon lawn, where I stood only minutes after impact. I saw nothing of significance – no airplane metal or cargo debris… The visible lack of evidence may have also been apparent to the Secretary of Defense, who in a slip of tongue referred to the craft that hit the Pentagon as a ‘missile’… It’s as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics.” – Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, US Air Force (ret.) PhD, former Political – Military Affairs Analyst
“Our government has been hijacked by the means of a new ‘Pearl Harbour’ and a lot of otherwise good and decent people are gullible enough to think that the first three steel framed buildings in history fell down because they had some fires that the firefighters on the scene said could be knocked out with a couple of hoses. Your countrymen have been murdered and the more you delve into it the more it looks as though they were murdered by our government who used it as an excuse to murder other people.” – Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford, US Marine Corp. (ret.)
“…I think that we Americans need to demand further investigation just to clarify the discrepancies that you’ve [Pilots for 9/11 Truth] found. And I think that we need to be getting on the phone with our Congressmen and women and letting them know that we don’t accept the excuses that we’re hearing now, that we want true investigators to do a true investigation.” – Lt. Col. Jeff Latas, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former combat fighter pilot. Aerospace engineer. Currently Captain at a major airline. Combat experience includes Desert Storm and four tours of duty in Northern and Southern Watch. Aircraft flown: McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle and General Dynamics F-111 Aardvark fighter/bomber. Former President, U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation Board. Also served as Pentagon Weapons Requirement Officer and as a member of the Pentagon’s Quadrennial Defense Review. Awarded Distinguish Flying Cross for Heroism, four Air Medals, four Meritorious Service Medals, and nine Aerial Achievement Medals. 20-year Air Force career.
“After five years of talking to people in the Intelligence community, in the military, foreign intelligence agencies, people from the air traffic control community and the FAA, I came to the conclusion that what we saw on the morning of September 11th was a result of a highly compartmentalization covert operation to bring about a fascist coup in this country.” – Wayne Madsen, former US Navy Intelligence Officer, Specialist in Electronic Surveillance and Security
“So who cares that the 9/11 Commission chose to believe that Dick Cheney did not enter the White House bunker until ‘shortly before 10:00’, twenty minutes after the strike on the Pentagon? Surely the Vice President would not fib, so the Commission threw out the testimony of several eyewitnesses, including Norman Mineta, the Transportation Secretary. Mineta must have been making it all up when he testified that he joined Cheney in the bunker at about 9:20 and heard Cheney reaffirm an apparent stand-down order just before the Pentagon was struck.” – Ray McGovern, former CIA Analyst and Presidential Briefer
“The first hijacking was suspected at not later than 8.20 a.m, and the last hijacked aircraft crashed in Pennsylvania at 10.06 a.m. Not a single fighter plane was scrambled to investigate from the US Andrews airforce base, just 10 miles from Washington DC , until after the third plane had hit the Pentagon at 9.38 am. Why not? There were standard FAA intercept procedures for hijacked aircraft before 9/11. Between September 2000 and June 2001 the US military launched fighter aircraft on 67 occasions to chase suspicious aircraft (AP, August 13 2002). It is a US legal requirement that once an aircraft has moved significantly off its flight plan, fighter planes are sent up to investigate.” [read more] – Michael Meacher, British member of Parliament and former environment minister
Interview Alex Jones Show 4/11/07:
Alex Jones: Recap Hani Hanjour’s maneuver, what they claim — go through the maneuver they claim he did and then what supposedly happened there at the Pentagon …
Commander Muga: The maneuver at the Pentagon was just a tight spiral coming down out of 7,000 feet. And a commercial aircraft, while they can in fact structurally somewhat handle that maneuver, they are very, very, very difficult. And it would take considerable training. In other words, commercial aircraft are designed for a particular purpose and that is for comfort and for passengers and it’s not for military maneuvers. And while they are structurally capable of doing them, it takes some very, very talented pilots to do that. …
When a commercial airplane gets that high, it gets very, very close to getting into what you refer to as a speed high-speed stall. And a high-speed stall can be very, very violent on a commercial-type aircraft and you never want to get into that situation. I just can’t imagine an amateur even being able to come close to performing a maneuver of that nature…
And also in all four planes, if you remember, none of the planes ever switched on their transponder to the hijack code. There’s a very, very simple code that you put in if you suspect that your plane is being hijacked. It takes literally just a split-second for you to put your hand down on the center console and flip it over. And not one of the four planes ever transponded a hijack code, which is most, most unusual. …
Commercial airplanes are very, very complex pieces of machines. And they’re designed for two pilots up there, not just two amateur pilots, but two qualified commercial pilots up there. And to think that you’re going to get an amateur up into the cockpit and fly, much less navigate, it to a designated target, the probability is so low, that it’s bordering on impossible.” Appears half way through the second hour segment at https://www.realradioarchives.com “If we don’t expose the 9/11 lie it will happen again” – Commander Ted Muga, U.S. Navy (ret) – Retired Naval aviator (Grumman E-1 and E-2). Retired Pan-Am commercial airline pilot (Boeing 707 and 727).
“With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. …
As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country’s history.” – Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. Graduate, U.S. Air Force War College. 34-year Air Force career.
“A crisis is an event which can force democratic governments to make difficult decisions like those required to create a North American Community… It’s not that I want another 9/11 crisis but having a crisis would force decisions that otherwise might not get made.” – Robert Pastor, key NAU architect (12,15,06 Article J. Corsi)
“After four years of research, I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11th were planned, organized and committed by the treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government. It is time to take back our country… The collapse of Building 7 shows beyond any doubt that the demolitions were pre-planned. It is simply impossible to demolish a 47 story building over a coffee break. It was also impossible to predict the buildings collapse as BBC did… unless it was pre-planned. Further damning evidence is Larry Siliverstein’s video taped confession in which he states ‘they made that decision to pull (WTC 7) and we watched the building collapse’.” – Lt. Col. Guy Razor, MS US Air Force, (ret.) former Instructor, USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATO Tactical Leadership Program (Also see: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth: www.ae911truth.org)
“The fundamental difficulty is not really disbelief about the ability to keep conspiracy secrets but disbelief that U.S. government officials could really collaborate in attacking America and take all those innocent lives at the World Trade Center. This is naïve. First, government is the instrument of social compulsion. Organized force is what government does. The belief that soft-hearted people rise to the top in government is akin to the belief that softies were whipping masters on slave plantations.” [read more] “I first began to suspect that 9/11 was an inside job when the Bush-Cheney administration invaded Iraq… We can prove that the government story is false.” – Dr. Morgan Reynolds, Professor emeritus at Texas A&M University, former chief economist at the Department of Labor
“As G. Edward Griffin has pointed out, the only way to get the pirates off the helm is to come to power.” – Robert Rice
“We know that this is strictly impossible for any building much less steel columned to ‘pancake’ at free fall speed. Therefore it is non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the collapse of the WTC building is false.” – Paul Roberts, PhD, former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury
” When I heard the sound of the explosion, the floor beneath my feet vibrated, the walls started cracking and it everything started shaking… Seconds after the first massive explosion below in the basement still rattled the floor, I hear another explosion from way above … Although I was unaware at the time, this was the airplane hitting the tower, it occurred moments after the first explosion … I know there were explosives placed below the trade center. I helped a man to safety who is living proof, living proof the government story is a lie and a cover-up. … The skin was hanging off his hands and arms. His injuries couldn’t have come from the airplane above, but only from a massive explosion below. I don’t care what the government says, what scientists say. I saw a man burned terribly from a fire that was caused from an explosion below … I have tried to tell my story to everybody, but nobody wants to listen.” [read more] – William Rodriguez
“When you look at the crash site (Pentagon) void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact that the projectile’s impact penetrated concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile. And when you look at the damage it was obviously a missile.” – Major Douglas Rokke, US Army (ret.) PhD
“Here we are talking about plastic knives and using American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building (Pentagon)” – Rumsfeld in interview with Parade Magazine, Oct. 12, 2001.
“We know that the steel components were certified to ASTM E119. The time temperature curves for this standard require the samples to be exposed to temperatures around 2000F for several hours. And as we all agree, the steel applied met those specifications. Additionally, I think we can all agree that even un-fireproofed steel will not melt until reaching red-hot temperatures of nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr. Brown would imply that 2000F would melt the high-grade steel used in those buildings makes no sense at all.” [read more] – Kevin Ryan, Former employee of Underwriters Laboratories (the company that certified the steel in the WTC towers).
“Several things are very clear to me from a careful assessment of both official and critical evaluations of the 9/11 attacks. First, the striking aircraft alone simply could not have brought down either of the two buildings in the manner in which they fell, much less a third building which was not hit by a plane (I expect the one intended to do that as a ‘cover’ had ended up in that Pennsylvania field), given the available physical evidence and a wealth of expert testimony. This means the attackers had assistance on the ground, and it had to have been active before the attacks occurred: preparing buildings for controlled demolition is not something done haphazardly in the midst of chaos.” – Alan N. Sabrosky, PhD – Former Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute and holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research, U.S. Army War College. A Marine Corps Vietnam veteran with 10 years of service. Graduate of the U.S. Army War College.
“There are some who maintain that the mythical 9/11 hijackers, although proven to be too incompetent to fly a little Cessna 172, had acquired the impressive skills that enabled them to fly airliners by training in flight simulators… According to FAA radar controllers, “Flight 77” then suddenly pops up over Washington DC and executes an incredibly precise diving turn at a rate of 360 degrees/minute while descending at 3,500 ft/min, at the end of which “Hanjour” allegedly levels out at ground level. Oh, I almost forgot to mention: He also had the presence of mind to turn off the transponder in the middle of this incredibly difficult maneuver … The maneuver was in fact so precisely executed that the air traffic controllers at Dulles refused to believe the blip on their screen was a commercial airliner. Danielle O’Brian, one of the air traffic controllers at Dulles who reported seeing the aircraft at 9:25 said, “The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane.” [read more] – Nila Sagadevan, Aeronautical engineer and pilot.
“I am forced to conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indict Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, and others close to the Wall St. gangs of the neo-Nazi coup de etat and kickoff the clash of civilizations.” – Robert David Steele, US Marine Corp. Infantry and Intelligence Officer, former CIA Clandestine Case Officer
“One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What’s going on?” – Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 1981 – 1984. Also commanded the U.S. Army’s Electronic Research and Development Command and the U.S. Army’s Intelligence School and Center. Former head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence. 32-year Army career.
“After 30 years of teaching in the Engineering and Science Dept at Virginia Tech, I am now retired but still involved in performing research and writing technical papers. I have been involved in low-speed aerodynamics specialized in the analysis of wind load on low-rise structures.
About two years ago after hearing and reading the work by David Ray Griffin, I decided to look into the history of the collapse of the World Trade center towers. It is clear to me that the official explanation including the evidence presented by the 9/11 Commission is inadequate to explain the collapse of the towers.
I am convinced that a new independent commission with complete subpoena power should be installed to find out the complete truth of 9/11. If we don’t the same thing may happen in the future.” – Henry W. Tieleman, BS Ag, BS CE, MS Mechanics and Hydraulics, PhD CE – Professor Emeritus, Engineering Science and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
“He (Bin Laden) has not been formally indicated and charged with in connection of 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” – Rex Tomb, FBI to Muckracker Report June 5th, 2006 _ “Where were the headlines?”
Statement in support of Medical Professionals petition for Reinvestigation of 9/11: “I have spent most of my professional career as a diagnostic radiologist. A diagnostic radiologist is trained to look at images, interpret them and express an opinion. As I watched the video of the twin towers collapsing, on 9/11 and the few days afterwards, I was aware that whoever was commentating was telling me something that common sense, and my scientific training told me was not happening. The towers could not and did not collapse due to fire. I have read about and researched the subject extensively since then and have lectured to medical colleagues in Cape Town on 9/11. 9/11 was a false flag operation, designed to allow the Bush government to invent the ‘War Against Terror’, and use it as an excuse to wage two subsequent ongoing wars with horrendous loss of life. The criminals responsible for this must be brought to justice. A new and independent inquiry would expedite this.” – Richard Tuft, MBBS, FRCS, FFRad, FRCR – Diagnostic Radiologist. Past President, Radiological Society of South Africa 1995 – 2007. Past Member of the Board of Directors and Past Chairman, Finance Committee and Private Practice Committee, South African Medical Association. Chairman, 24th International Congress of Radiology (2006). Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Fellow of the Royal College of Radiologists.
“For those who might question the reasoning and importance for re-examining the [9/11] Commission’s report, the events that led up to and the day of September 11th, one only has to recall the enormous ramifications that the attacks of September 11th have had on our country. …[Only] an honest re-evaluation of how the 9/11 attacks could have happened will allow us to reverse the adverse consequences of overreaching laws and the existing loop holes in our security systems in order to allow us to be safer in the future.” [download full briefing] – Lorie Van Auken, Widow and founding member of Family Steering Committee, Congressional Briefing testimony (beginning on page 10 of full report).
“I kick myself that when it initially happened that the light didn’t go off… In my opinion there’s no doubt that building (WTC 7) was brought down with demolition.” – Jesse Ventura, former Governor, Minnesota, former Member, U.S. Navy Underwater Demolition Team
“At 9 11, four planes for two hours were able to drive around, fly around even one hour in the direction going toward the west and then turn around and then comeback. The military air force was not able to interdict them. It’s [un]imaginable.” [read more] – Andreas Von Buelow, Former assistant German defense minister, director of the German Secret Service, minister for research and technology, and member of Parliament for 25 years.
“They (9/11 Commission Report) either refused to interview all relevant experts and witnesses, or they censored the reports provided to them by those with direct and first hand information.” – William Weaver PhD, former US Army Signals Intelligence Officer
“There is something very sinister that really troubles me. What does the 9/11 Commission got to hide?” – Curt Weldon, former US Congressman, Pennsylvania; former Chairman, House Armed Services Committee
“The government story of what they handed us about 9/11 is total B.S. plain and simple. The airplane could not have been flown at those speed which they say it did without going into what they call a high-speed stall. The airplane won’t go that fast if you started pulling those high G maneuvers at those bank angles. To expect maneuvers with a total amateur at the control is simply ludicrous.” – Capt. Russ Wittenberg, US air force (ret.) Commercial Pilot for PanAm and United including 2 of the Sept. 11 planes
“I knew from September 18th, 2001 that the official story about 9/11 was false. Anomalies poured in rapidly: the hijackers’ names appearing in none of the published flight passenger lists… the obvious demolitions of WTC 1, 2, and 7, the lack of identifiable Boeing 757 wreckage at the Pentagon.” – Capt. Gregory Zeigler, US Army, PhD, former US Army Intelligence Officer
25 Veteran National Intelligence Officers
A letter to the 9/11 Commission signed by FBI, military, and intelligence veterans: “Omission is one of the major flaws in the Commission’s report. We are aware of significant issues and cases that were duly reported to the commission by those of us with direct knowledge, but somehow escaped attention. Serious problems and shortcomings within government agencies likewise were reported to the Commission but were not included in the report. The report simply does not get at key problems within the intelligence, aviation security, and law enforcement communities. The omission of such serious and applicable issues and information by itself renders the report flawed, and casts doubt on the validity of many of its recommendations.” [read entire letter]
Truth Profile – Amber Sweet – WeAreChangeLA member
wearechangela | January 26, 2010
“This is a profile in courage of LA actress Amber Sweet who is willing to tell the world about the responsibility of being an American, and also bringing awareness to the 9/11 Truth movement. As a member of WeAreChangeLA, she is a shining example of truth in action. If only more Americans could have the courage of Amber Sweet, we’d all be much better off and we would be on the way to regaining control of our once great nation. Individual Liberty is the greatest American Product.”
This testimony was especially exciting for me, because several years ago I gave a cassette tape exposing 9/11 to a young woman named Amber. The next time I saw her, she told me that she found the compilation of excerpts on the tape so interesting that she listened to it twice! She is close to the same age as the young woman in this video, has the same first name, and is also intelligent and not fooled by the media. It was very encouraging to find this on YouTube. – mcc
Just want to say thank you to everyone who took the time to read these quotations and watch the video clips.
Please post a link at blogs where readers would be interested in this information.
– Monmouth’s Conspiracy Connoisseur
Special thanks to the following websites where many of the quotes and hyperlinks used in this compilation were found: