What Is Going On In Christchurch … The Real Story

26
Now here’s an interesting story currently doing the rounds of the e-mailosphere.

https://www.argophilia.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/nasa.jpg

I received the below email a few days ago from a friend in the industry.
Hotel Grand Chancellor is a story that needs to be told.
Maybe a book someday!
It was finally announced on Wednesday but it is the story behind the delay that is interesting.
This story also applies to the rebuilding and repair of Christchurch which Fletcher Building are overseeing.
The tender was to RCP (project managers for council)
but was passed over to CERA once they arrived.
CERA is staffed entirely by Fletchers employees.
CERA delayed the announcement for a month to enable Fletchers to study the other tenderers info & submit a late bid.
The day it was submitted CERA awarded them the tender.
Fletchers price was 3 million higher than anyone else’s!
Fletchers have no intention of doing the demolition,
taking the risk,
or putting up the bond to cover the risk.
They are just appointing themselves as project managers to clip the ticket
& then getting the original tender winners to do the work.
How did they get away with it?
Do a companies search on Fletchers.
(No – don’t bother we’ve done it for you below).
They just got bought by the Reserve bank !
[ wha ..?  ]
RBNZ owns 275 million Fletcher shares while Hugh Fletcher now only has 5000.
Its a SOE. A Govt department !!
They bought themselves an income stream.
They direct all the profits from the recovery straight into their own pockets
instead of allowing the people of ChCh to make a bit each to help them recover.
You have to admit it is clever !!
[ clever – but evil ]
But how on earth did they keep it out of the media ?
NZ’s largest Co gets bought by Govt & it doesnt make even the tiniest news report?
Really???
Something is rotten in the state of Denmark! (or in this case Canterbury!)
Meanwhile still no start to the demo & recovery after 3 months.

The books get fiddled while ChCh burns!

Here are  a few questions for you to think about

(oh,  I’ll make it easy:  I will give you the answers as well)

Q.

Who appointed RCP (Resource Coordination Partnership Ltd) as Project
Managers for the management of ‘critical buildings’ following the February
22nd earthquake?

A .

Christchurch City Council under instructions of the NZ Government

Q .

Who appointed CERA?

A .

NZ Government.

Q .

Who appointed Fletcher Building to manage the demolition works and then,

reconstruction works?

A .

NZ Government firstly,

then CERA

Q .

Who is the main single shareholder of Fletcher Building ?

A .

NZ Government.

 

If in doubt check below :

 

Fletcher Earthquake
Who is NZ Central securities Depository Ltd  ?
Central securities earthquake

 

 

Q.

Who called for the tenders for the demolition of the Grand Chancellor ?

A.

RCP

Q.

Who is to be the Principle to the demolition Contract ?

( i.e. the Payer )

A.

The Crown ( NZ Government )

Q.

Who assessed the Tenders for the Demolition of the Grand Chancellor ?

A.

RCP

Q.

Who has been awarded the Grand Chancellor job

(at whatever price and / or conditions) ?

A.

Fletcher Building

Q.

Who will make the profits ?

A.

Fletcher Building

(and it’s Shareholders)

Q.

Who is the main shareholder of Fletcher Building?

(I know, I already asked this one,

but it could be a trick question)

A.

NZ Government as the Reserve Bank of New  Zealand

( no trick question, sorry )

Q.

Who has been blind-sided ?

A.

Everyone involved in the (supposed) tender process firstly,

but more importantly,

the people of Christchurch and New Zealand who thought that they lived in a first-world economy.

Q.

What are the ramifications ?

A.

Immediate loss of confidence by all independent Consultants and Contractors in the tender process

if CERA, RCP or Fletcher Building are involved jointly or singularly

in a government sanctioned role,

for fear of a continued potential for a monopoly and huge profiteering there from.

Q.

Who are the winners ?

A.

Fletcher Building and the NZ Government,

along with the other Financial institutions

that form the majority shareholders in Fletcher Building.

Q.

Who are the losers ?

A.

The property owners, their tenants, clients and customers,

along with everyone in New Zealand who believes in a ‘level playing field’,

all the people of Christchurch,

and all the people of New Zealand that have supported,
volunteered their time

and/or donated their hard earned,

tax-paid

monies to the recovery

following the devastating events of February 22nd.

Q.

What should I do ?

A.

If you care about living in a democratic, free market and transparent economy,

please send this on to everyone in your email address book who needs to know what is happening.

As New Zealanders, exposure of this rout is our best protection.

 

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE:

https://uncensored.co.nz/2017/08/06/34440/

With link to more Christchurch related material at the bottom of the article.

26 thoughts on “What Is Going On In Christchurch … The Real Story

  1. Q. Is the RBNZ a privately owned corporation?

    A. Yes. It is not owned by tangata whenua and gives 2/3 of it’s profit to the Bank of International Settlements in Switzerland

    Q. Is the NZ Crown the government of the sovereign nation of New Zealand?

    A. No, it is a belligerent foreign corporation registered on the New York securities and exchange commission.

    Q. What is the significance of this ChCh example?

    A. It highlights the template for theft by legal deception versus by force as experienced in Irag, Afghanistan, Libya, East Timor and most recently Ukraine.

    Q. Can we expect any arm of so-called government to remedy this means of exploitation and usurpation

    A. No. The crown election is rigged. The candidates selected before elected. The media is privately owned by the same corporate interests.

    Q. What remedies are available to us?

    A. We have to uphold natural law from which true common law derives. We either permit these wrongs or protect our rights.

    No, it is a belligerent foreign corporation.

  2. Q. Is the RBNZ a privately owned corporation?

    A. Yes. It is not owned by tangata whenua and gives 2/3 of it’s profit to the Bank of International Settlements in Switzerland

    Q. Is the NZ Crown the government of the sovereign nation of New Zealand?

    A. No, it is a belligerent foreign corporation registered on the New York securities and exchange commission.

    Q. What is the significance of this ChCh example?

    A. It highlights the template for theft by legal deception versus by force as experienced in Irag, Afghanistan, Libya, East Timor and most recently Ukraine.

    Q. Can we expect any arm of so-called government to remedy this means of exploitation and usurpation

    A. No. The crown election is rigged. The candidates selected before elected. The media is privately owned by the same corporate interests.

    Q. What remedies are available to us?

    A. We have to uphold natural law from which true common law derives. We either permit these wrongs or protect our rights.

    No, it is a belligerent foreign corporation.

  3. Hugh Fletcher (who started fletcher construction) was the chairman of the reserve bank of NZ when all this went down. Surprise surprise.

  4. I dont see the issue as long as the work is done who cares.There are much bigger issues than this, I couldnt care less who earns what. Focus on what a huge task it is to rebuild a city and lets just hope it gets done to a high standard as soon as possible. I understand that the bigger picture of people feeling deceived but honestly all the infomation is easy found.

  5. There are no ‘Governments’ as such in the western world. They are all corporations. The corporation masquerading as a govt. here is registered in Washington on the Securities & Exchanges Commission. It’s real name is HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND. Go and look it up yourself at http://www.sec.com.

  6. And what about the big contracts in the Christchurch rebuild being awarded to foreign companies, who are not going to be paying NZ Tax on their profits and repatriating all the funds offshore? Because they are paying less tax in their own jurisdictions they are tendering lower prices than local NZ companies and winning those contracts. Why are they not employing local NZ companies?

  7. Ok I can see the nepotism, cronyism, what ever we want to call it. And it is intersting that the underlying tone of your exposure feels like the current NZ government is not for its people but for its corporations.

    The rebuild of Christchurch has to be a public project and it might seem right that that means the government/ or Reserve Bank has a stake in that.

    At the same time you are right the justice of this should not see the rebuild profiting shareholders and corporate bosses more than it does the victims -the property owners, the tenants, the clients (of?) and the customers.

    I am asking that if in fact Fletcher Building is now a New Zealand public owned business under the relationship between us the citizens and our Reserve Bank/ Crown then how do we leverage that to see this business done fairly??? What can we do to motivate Fletcher Building? And hold it accountable?

  8. Fletchers isn’t government owned because the reserve bank is privately owned. It’s a misconception that NZer’s own the reserve bank and what makes this so bad is that the government is knowingly selling out NZ to a mob of banksters.

  9. If this was indeed the case (and it is not btw) it would be easy to show the revenue stream from Fletcher Building through the Reserve Bank in to the government’s cobsolodated account. Have you got that information or is it a little difficult for you to do thus rather simple thing?

  10. I’m probably missing something here, but wouldn’t Fletchers being owned by ou government mean that the profits from the re-build go back into government coffers for further development of our country?

  11. Well now you people who voted him ( John K ) in have a good look in the mirror cause you helped this communist government along this road . You all will pay for your dirty deeds

  12. This article needs to be posted to John Key and his crooked crew – see what they have to say about it! Obviously they thought they could hoodwink the commoners. Ensure we vote Key and his crooked crew out!!!

  13. Former Prime Minister Jenny Shipley (National) sits on the CERA Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Review Panel for which she is getting paid $365,000 per year – that’s $1000 PER DAY of taxpayer money.

    Not bad for a PART TIME job. Very part time.

    She is also Chairperson of Genesis Energy.

    She is also Chairperson of Momentum Consulting.

    She is also Chairperson of Seniors Money International Limited

    She is also Chairperson of Venator.

    She is also Director of the Investment Savings and Insurance Association.

    She is also a Director of the China Construction Bank (in 2009 the second largest Bank in the world by market cap)

    (In 2010 the China Construction Bank agreed to help finance a proposal by May Wang & Jack Chen to invest in New Zealand dairy industry by taking over the Crafar Farms.)

    She also serves on a number of advisory boards, advising companies and governments on geopolitical, demographic, economic and social mega trends and speaks all around the world on these and a wide range of other topics.

    She is also an active member of the World Women’s Leadership Council.

    She is also Vice President of the Club of Madrid, a group of former leaders who promote certain political and economic ideas globally.

    Jenny “Jumped” Shipley was also Chairperson of Mainzeal.

    “Jumped” Shipley is probably also pulling in at least $60 – 80,000 per year for EACH of the board appointments above
    https://www.nbr.co.nz/article/mainzeal-collapse-exposes-flakey-celebrity-directors-rv-p-135504

    Brian Gaynor: Mainzeal collapse needs investigation
    Feb 9, 2013
    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10864282

    “former politicians continue to make poor decisions when it comes to accepting board seats with former Prime Minister Dame Jenny Shipley now joining that infamous list.”

    Oh, and two others on the CERA are also getting $365,000 for their contribution, which we can assume requires about the same level of commitment that “Jumped” Shipley needs to demonstrate to get her dosh. And another one gets even more.

    PS: In 2010 the China Construction Bank agreed to help finance a proposal by May Wang & Jack Chen to invest in New Zealand dairy industry by taking over the Crafar Farms

  14. So what’s the actual problem? The work will still be done, still subbed out to the various demolition companies maybe even a local, but probably to the one with the best equipment for the job. Fletchers will supervise and need the $3m to pay for it. Plenty of all of it will be spent locally so I can’t see the difference whoever does the job? Consider the alternative of an unsupervised demo contractor, the track records ain’t too good.

    1. First point: I call utter BS on the very first line of that web page….

      “18th May, 1967:
      Texas oil billionaire Nelson Bunker Hunt, using a sophisticated satellite technique to detect global deposits”

      Satellites of such sophistication simply did not exist in 1967. A claim that the Titanic was nuclear powered it would have more veracity. Imaging satellites at that time still used low resolution (measured in kilo-pixels!!) slow-scan image transmission. That is why the yanks were still using a U2 spy plane with real, high-definition film to spy on the Soviets, because global surface digital imaging was beyond the technological capability of that time. The first satellite capable of imaging the Earth’s surface was the Earth Resources Technology Satellite launched 23 July 1972. It was later renamed to “Landsat”. However, it still lacked the necessary resolution to detect potential oil deposits, and in any case, the technology was overtaken by the Launch of Gravsat in 1977 which WAS capable of detecting potential oil deposits through gravitational anomalies – ten years too late for the claimed time-line!

      Secondly, the source of the “information” on that web page is David Icke. Nothing that this man says can be taken seriously; he has as much credibility as a corrupt lawyer. He is a Holocaust denier, who insists that the Nazi death camps were fiction, and that the photos of them and the piles of corpses were all faked by the “great Zionist conspiracy” to garner sympathy for the Jewish cause. David Icke is just a froot loop.

      1. Is that right Ian? Funny but they have lowered the number who died at Auschwitz down from 4mil to 1.5mil but no change to the 6mil figure. The 6mil also doesn’t stack up against the census figures taken in the 1930’s and the numbers of Jews who emigrated. How did they burn all those corpses at Auschwitz again? There are no mass graves around Auschwitz and no records of train loads of wood or coal coming in. Meanwhile we must all celebrate the genocide of the Palestinians since it’s the Jews doing it, it must be ok. Right Ian?

        1. We were all taught the labour camps were death camps. It isn’t a great feeling when you discover you have been lied to about this and (it turns out) many other things, since you were a child. We live in a web of lies. Track down the commentary on the three-volume Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War, Geneva, 1948. No holocaust in there. Or, just grab a snack and a drink and start here >> https://www.ihr.org/books/harwood/dsmrd01.html

  15. Sniff test Wendy? I got a wiff of this at the time. Unfortunately I can’t remember the source, but our illustrious leader John K. has personaly got considerable shares in all of the and is believed to be doing very nicely thank you out of Christchurch. Insider trading? Surely not. So the above article certainly ties in with the little I know.

    1. it is never to late to disrupt the process if it is EVIL, wait until there is an agreement with Irac, then barrels of oil will be worth very little, so we keep them fighting, christchurch the same keep confusing the people they focus on the what JOHN KEY an his cronies want CHUR CHUR to focus on, they the GOVERNMENT of this day is using same tatics of 1840, different time same process, now they have taken land, property, and the rebuild that will ensure a passive stream that belongs to the people CHRISTCHURCH, we pray for the TANGATA of christchurch

Comments are closed.

Next Post

'NATO Raids Killed 718 Libyan Civilians'

Fri Jun 3 , 2011
Libyan officials say the NATO military campaign has killed at least 718 civilians and wounded 4,067 in the North African country over the past 10 weeks. The government spokesman Mussa Ibrahim announced the death and injured tolls in a news conference in Tripoli. “Since March 19, and up to May […]