Bombshell Revelations regarding the Mandate Order that Hipkins Signed

While Hipkins is busy brushing off the Covid Inquiry in his glib and unconcerned way, there has been a bombshell revelation from Lynda Wharton at the Health forum.

By Jo-Blogs on July 15, 2025 https://jobloggz.wordpress.com

Labour’s Chris Hipkins says Covid inquiry terms create platform for conspiracy theorists

Is he going to brush this off as a conspiracy theory?

BREAKING – IMPORTANT NEWS FOR ALL KIWI’S WHO WERE MANDATED IN EDUCATION AND HEALTH SECTORS

A Science and Insight Report from the Ministry of Health Oct 2021 has come to light that totally demolishes the government’s narrative around the “grave risk” that existed in schools and health care settings at the time.

We now know that before the health and education mandate order was signed, the government had in its possession high quality evidence that the risk of transmission in schools and health care was insignificant and therefore the vaccination mandate was totally nenecessary.

This document was the Ministry’s own contact tracing data. It has a very large sample size making it highly reliable. Over 11,000 education contacts were analysed. It told the government that in healthcare settings only 1 in 500 contacts became infected, while in education settings just one in 1000 contacts became infected.

Yet knowing all this, Hipkins went ahead and signed the mandate order that brought so much unnecessary pain and suffering on so many.

It gets worse.

Health and education workers, NZDSOS and NZTSOS went to the High Court in March 2022 to have the vaccination mandate order declared unlawful.

The Crown produced sworn affidavits from four witnesses; Mr Hipkins, Ms Mackay, Dr Town and Dr Bloomfield, with Doctors Town and Bloomfield accepted by the court as “expert witnesses.”

Now there are very strict rules that control the evidence of an expert witness. They must swear to assist the court impartially and also tell the court if any part of their evidence is incomplete or inaccurate without some qualification.

Both would have known about this highly relevant MOH analysis but they did not reveal this to the court. NZTSOS believe that by keeping this from the High Court, they clearly contravened the rules for expert witnesses and potentially opened themselves to a charge of perjury.

Another crown witness, Ms Mackay also kept highly relevant information from the court. She correctly told the court that only 11 applications for serious service disruption exemptions had been granted, but she failed to tell the court that one application alone was for 971 workers, and by the date of her affidavit these 11 applications covered a total of 2833 workers – all of this while hundreds of other fine workers were being terminated because of what the court approvingly termed “the Govt’s zero tolerance approach.” If only the court had known.

NZTSOS is now seeking leave to appeal to the Supreme Court and one of their claims is that these serious omissions in the evidence presented by the Crown’s witnesses has led to a miscarriage of justice.

Will the NZTSOS appeal be accepted?

Right now we need everyone affected by the mandates to help share this bombshell revelation. We need to make it difficult for the Supreme Court to quietly decline their application in the hope that it will all just go away.

The perpetrators need to be held to account.

Links

Here’s coverage by Martin Harris 3 years ago, NZ Teachers Take Their Case to the High Court: NZTSOS,

Jo-Blogs

NZ

Hi, I live in beautiful New Zealand. I write, I blog, I work, and in my time off I enjoy the great outdoors. I am the mother of two grown children and inheritor of their cats. I work in IT with my husband and son.