Subscriptions, Current Issue & Back Issues

Current Issue | Annual Subscriptions | Back Issues

Tag: Clinton

Hillary Clinton promotes new media platform no one seems to understand

Hillary Clinton

https://a.msn.com/r/2/AAreHTA?m=en-nz

Hillary Clinton has drawn criticism for promoting a new political media platform that is being labelled confusing.
The former First Lady, who has maintained a low profile since she lost the US presidential election to Donald Trump in November 2016, today tweeted her support for a website called Verrit.
Described as a “media platform for the 65.8 million”, the site is an effort to organise Clinton supporters by arming them with verified facts.
Co-founded by former Clinton adviser Peter Daou, Verrit allows users to create cards using verified items of information called ‘verrits’ from a collection of political facts, quotes and statistics.
In a series of tweets, Daou called the site “our way of declaring independence, repudiating false narratives, and telling our OWN story”.
Through “daily, rigorously-verified info and analysis”, Verrit is an attempt to combat a post-Trump political landscape of “fake news” and “alternative facts”.
Clinton’s tweet was met with confusion from many social media users.
The platform is already being criticised as ‘divisive’ by US political experts.
Verrit’s verification process has also been criticised after Twitchy published a card where a quote from a conservative columnist was taken out of context.
Within an hour of Clinton’s endorsement, Verrit was hit by a cyber-attack that shut the website down

 

Relevant Flatulence, by G Squared

Hilary Clinton has lost it even further. Her Secret Service Detail Logs have been appropriately disseminated. After all, she doesn’t know the difference between ‘confidential’ and ‘open source’.Clinton

SS now want the ‘Hardship Bonus’, and limited two month rotation shifts, to work with her. Apart from the extraordinary fact that she does not like showering. Those in close, know when she is in the room.

https://youtu.be/2BnXGEjg7ig

The tractioned stupidity is deep seated and there is blissful ignorance.

https://youtu.be/ljkg-cRGfZo
https://youtu.be/Kly9ZSIJee8

A drug and alcohol addicted, megalomaniacal (psycopathic) sociopath. How does that define the herds of disengaged, challenged; incessantly and nauseously delivering the poutings, feety stomps and fisty wave screechings, offered as relevant flatulence from various street corners.

The ‘Security’ of The Obamas and The Clintons costs America the same as when they were fraudulently occupying The White House. The unending ‘Holidays’, office accomodation, staff, services, and transport, are paid for by America.

America also pays for their ‘Libraries’. The Clinton Library has locked up over two million files and plays games with FOI requests. Obama has sealed the doors his stash.

Clinton pardened 140 on his last day in office. The trail was money to Sick Momma, then Sick Willy signed. Apart from Mark Rich, The Clintons released 14 imprisoned murderers from The Puerto Rican Terrorist or Crime Group FALN. Over 30 bomb blasts in New York alone.

The world’s best hotels are cleared. Obama even gets fighter jet escorts. The sacked Bannon’s Breitbart News has started a campaign for Obama to be revered as The Greatest President in America’s History. His true identity yet to be publicly known.

All while they are personally paid amounts of two hundred thousand to half a million dollars each, as payoff speeches, collude with ‘America’s Enemies’, and sealed the destruction of America.

Obama is a script reading puppet, manufactured by The Ayers and Daley Interests of Chicago. It traces to The Chicago Seven Trial (worthy of a study) derived from the 1968 DNC Convention in Chicago.

The International Student Demonstrations of 1968, should not be confused with the 1968 Chicago Demonstrations. Chicago was part of The 1968 Demonstrations, but not the precursor. And ‘Communism’ was not the driving factor. I was personally involved.

Sick Momma destroyed what was left of The  Democratic Party. She is cogitating and ruminating a return to The White House. Everyone; even The Russians (who don’t really care who allegedly ‘leads’ the great spent force), is to blame for her very predictable November 2016 suicidal insanity.

The historic trail from 1968 to 1972 and The LBJ and RMN White Houses are very relevant antecedents. Russia and China led the very stupid America, into The Korean and Vietnam Wars, through manipulations of UN-SC abstentions and absences.

It somewhat adjusted America savaging its immediate neighbours, kept it occupied in the military devastation of its domestic economy, and prevented it cogitating on the reality of its impotence in Europe after WWII.

America never ‘won’ any UN-SC vote nor blocked any Veto. America was let loose of its chafing lead, with its droolings, and destroyed itself. A seamless determined devastation from 1946 to the present.

America self-destructed through its fictional self-belief, and will never recover. Deep State was permanently bolstered by The American Asian Wars, beginning with The China Policy.

The following generation ‘worked from within The System’, and cemented all the wrongs about which it was protesting. It’s ‘success’ was the concerted destruction of America. Perfectly reconfirmed by the pivotal, idiotic, and totally misunderstood 27/7/2017 Russian Sanctions.

America duped itself by believing its own propaganda. It captured itself by its abrogation and rewrite of true history. ‘Empires’ move beyond Reality and only comprehend their own rewritten versions. I don’t have an illness, if I choose not to believe that I have.

Neither Trump, nor any other actor, can save the squandered credibility of America, with its apparatchik devastated economy, military, social fabric, and future. The determined tragedy that can never be assuaged.

‘America’ hacks the world; and on which it will choke. The concept is a ‘Terrorist’ act against those it purports to represent, serve, and hack. Americans variously fear their Deep State Government. The entity that is not one of the three branches of their Constitution; The Executive, The Legislative, and The Judiciary. The tail wags the dog.

As at this day: The Executive is the only Branch representing The People, and the only Branch regarded out of step with The People, because it will not obey Government.

The Constitution was specifically written to prevent that occurrence; and reconfirmed by The Bill of Rights. Freedom of Speech, The Right to Silence, and The Right to Bear Arms, as specific protections from The Tyrrany of Government Power Base. The failed experiment of a Constitutional Republic.

The targeted are virtually without meaning or merit. Terrorism is a concocted fiction of convenience. Leaped upon by the morose Power Bases of the sycophant nation states, as some form of Cause Celebre and tractioned Casus Belli. The idiocy on which tragedies are built.

As before was Communism. And as before that was Anarchy.

‘Transparency’ in America is “everybody hacks America”. The 650,000 Sick Momma emails, including the deleted 33,000, including the 120 Top Secret and 5 Gamma, are all virtually Intenational Intel Open Source.

Emails are sent from someone to someone and hacked by all. This can be from the sender, from the receiver, a diversion inbetween, or all of the above. Secure systems are all hacked. So her sending and receiving ‘Classified’ content insecurely as she did, means nothing in the real world.

The belief that the storage devices and servers of the sending systems could be destroyed and therefore all the evidence would be destroyed is monumental idiocy. But look at her and her immediate troupe.

She has been progressively unstable from before Sick Willy was fraudulently put in as President. The tantrums have worsened.

During the 2016 Campaign she had 25 people on staff attending to her Make Up and Hair. The record is Schwarzenegger. When Governor of California. He had over 400 people on his ‘personal staff’. And they wonder why.

The drought riddled Sanctuary State with its obscene local and state taxes that have chased out legitimate enterprise, had manipulated to move virtually all of America’s non broadacre crops, to beautifull sunny California. This is the state that is currently making secession noises. It should be sacked.

Clinto California water

Its fresh water has been progressively greened out of existence. WalMart and Nestle were granted special water rights to keep them there. But even that wasn’t enough when balanced with the rest of the insane baggage.

The reduction in the size of water cisterns doesn’t reduce the amount of water used for toilet flushings. It increases it, due to the number of flushings required to perform the task.

The demolition of dams does not reduce a water footprint. It causes damage. The monumental flushing of a dam to move some 14 stranded fish, to prevent their capture and eating, requires no comment. And this level of further tractioned insanity was to be dropped into The White House in November 2016.

Sick Momma recently fired six rounds from a revolver into a TV screen when Trump was appearing. She is usually drunk on Wild Turkey and partakes ‘liberally’ of certain substances. She carries a revolver around her house or where else she is living, and fires it at whatever upsets her. It’s called ‘Power’.

She should have been institutionalised, not endorsed as a Presidential Candidate. But such is The Deqmocratic Party and the abject lunacy of the herds which wanted a skirt in the oval office at any cost. Such is Fascism, and such is Feminism.

The recent hysteria at Google because someone dared suggest men and women were different, and the spasms at CNN because someone inferred that the Clinton supported and Soros funded Media Matters is a Liberal Fascist Junk Shop, are typical of the ‘Politically Correct’ disengagement from reality of the obtuse, believing themselves normal.

This nutcase was heading for The White House and her disgruntled supporters are causing ongoing damage to America.

A little fact that slipped the scenes: Obama, Abedin, and Loretta Lynch are Muslims. Obama and Lynch feign being Christian.

They damaged the fabric of America. Their public image is very different to their realities. Lynch’s legislative agendas and practices were very specific.

https://youtu.be/_DMQ8sMNFT0

By G Squared

Hillary’s new book: It’s Never My Fault, by Jon Rappoport

Hillary new BookHillary’s new book: It’s Never My Fault
by Jon Rappoport
July 31, 2017
This is an antidote to Hillary’s new book, titled, “What Happened,” which I would sub-title, Why Was I So Clueless? The book purports to explain her loss in the 2016 election.
What would Hillary think if she could think?
First of all, she would think about the team trying to get her elected and the problems they faced: they had a candidate who basically had no platform, no cogent ideas, only a slim file of vapid generalities. She couldn’t deliver a coherent speech.
The team had to devise a way to keep her out of the spotlight on the campaign trail. This, the last time I looked, is not a winning strategy.
“How can we minimize her appearances?”
Hillary would think about that.
She would think about why sexism (her favorite), Putin, Comey, WikiLeaks, and “fake news” don’t explain her loss. How they didn’t add up to an Electoral College defeat.
She would think about her supporters whining, “But she won the popular vote.” That complaint only highlights the failure of her team to realize the Electoral College system (which any fifth-grader can understand) was the umbrella under which the election was actually conducted.
She would think about why serving as a senator and secretary of state doesn’t automatically entitle her to the job of president.
She would think about her past crimes—there is not enough time or room to detail them here.
She would think about why Americans who have lost their jobs didn’t trust her to bring those jobs back.
She would think about Trump and his resonating messages—regardless of whether Trump intends to deliver on those messages.
She would think about the Left’s political correctness, and all the people who hate it.
She would think about college students who defected from her camp to support an old radical socialist (who owns three homes and has pocketed close to a million dollars from his latest book about income inequality).
She would think about the distance between her vague promises and the interests of non-white voters.
She would think about the numbers of Americans who don’t embrace the growing Welfare State and don’t want to pay taxes to support it.
She would think about what many Americans really think about open borders and unchecked immigration.
She would think about the emotional impact of promoting Globalism and an “interdependent world” (it takes a village) vs. promoting Nationalism.
She would think about the dead rotting core of the Democratic Party.
She would think about effect of the previous president, Barack Obama, harping on racism whenever he could.
She would think about her history of support for a federally dictated national health insurance plan.
She would think about her duplicitous husband, with whom she is forever linked.
She would think about her husband’s faded ability to mobilize Americans on any political issue whatsoever.
She would think about (cough, cough, stumble, stumble) her health issues.
She would think about her failure to project an aura of strength.
She would think about the wisdom of trying to assume the mantle of president before the election had taken place.
She would think about her decades-long transparent pursuit of power for its own sake.
She would think about her own team lying to her about her “positive impact” on the public during the campaign. She would think about why they had to lie, given her ironclad delusions about her own “deserved status.”
She would think about the rebound effect of Hollywood sycophants piling on in her favor.
She would think about these things if she could.
She can’t, because then she would understand.
She would understand why she lost, and why she would most definitely lose a race for dogcatcher.
She would understand her long history of pretending to accrue prestige, based on nothing.
She would understand that her own Party has been humoring her for decades and faking loyalty where none existed.
She would understand that, during the campaign, the news networks, eternally in need of ratings, would cover Donald Trump every day, because she, Hillary, was a ratings washout, and he was a rating magnet.
This last factor is the bitterest pill of all.

 

 

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/07/31/hillarys-new-book-its-never-my-fault/

Slogans And Stickers Of Negativity, By G Squared

They voted both FOR Trump, and AGAINST Sick Mama. They voted for policies and a promise of a rational future, as against stupidity.
The Democratic Party has no Champion and no Message. At this time they are attempting to gain traction by slogans and stickers of negativity against Republican candidates. In preparation for the looming November 2018 Mid-Term Elections.
The Donkey Party needs to reinvent itself by the end of 2017. Or hope that the fictions it has evolved and articulated, are sufficient to carry its meaningless loud and proud candidates, over the line in November 2018.
It needs to wrest control of The US House of Representatives. In its final bid for relevance.
They will probably wheel out Obama. He also doesn’t have a term limit in Congress. Pelosi, their House of Representatives Leader, has a bad case of Alzheimer’s. Schumer, their Senate Leader, has a bad case of screaming ‘Bitch’ to anyone he doesn’t like.
His airline flights between New York and Washington, are legend. Senator Gillibrand, Schumer’s cohort, has her head firmly inserted where the sun does not shine. Her only perceptions resonate from LGBT reverberations.
They killed-off Sanders, so they could front Sick Mama, as their ‘Candidate’. A worse choice could hardly be imagined. The stench of; child sex abuse, rape, drug dealing, violence, murder, thieving, and lying, is not going to dissipate.
Tragically, America has been debased to the point that; if the narrative comes from The Democratic Party, through MSM and supported by Washington Deep State Interests; it’s a lie.
The worst failings of Sanders were; his incoherent rants, lying, and economic ignorance. The decision to run Sick Mama against Trump, was the best choice for The GOP.
All their policies and agendas; since at least; the disastrous Obama era; have been concerned with forced social engineering. The many aspects of which are; not the new enlightening; not progressive liberalism, not an awareness, and not any advance in any capacity.
Obama did not bow to Abdullah to receive a medal. He is a gay black muslim, non-American, war-mongering, Cover CIA, GHWB puppet, Goldmanite.

The forcing of entrenched discourses of the disgruntled, intellectualised, and the self-marginalised, miniscule factions. Posturing a voice and relevance well beyond any reality.
The very silent vast majorities spoke; in November 2016. But the over-opinionated, irrelevant, nauseous and loud, self-indulgent, arrogant and ignorant, refuse to listen.
It needs to be understood that the total annihilation of The Democratic Party in November 2018 is not a revulsion of any democratic relevance by virtue of a Two-Party System. A new party will form. And any believed extremism in one or other direction of the alleged political spectrum; will not eventuate.
There is a believable centrist ideology that has evolved in America. Don’t be surprised if ‘Independent’ candidates begin to form a common narrative in early 2018. As the beginnings of that third party, to become the second party; to replace or rework this former Democratic Party.
And of course; despite best efforts to continue the practices; the massive voter frauds that are the culture of The Democratic Party need to be prevented. The only positive, in contemporary history, from the frauds. was the ‘election’ of JFK. Who in turn developed a following.
Nixon was variously demonised through MSM. And JFK; a Catholic elitist with overwhelming personal baggage of deceptions, and monied from the prohibition era, succeeded with Mafia connections.
America is not a true Democracy. It is a Constitutional Republic. Its postured democratising, while regime changing, to loot and pillage, is the reality of its invasions, incursions, and occupations. These actions were disguised during the; Slick Willy, Barry Soetoro, and Sick Mama, years of executive occupancy in Washington.
The irrelevant and self-marginalised will always find a voice. But to posture some enormous mythical reality beyond truth, will never occur in any meaningful form.
The Democratic Party, beyond the comparable sectarian interests factionalised in The Republican Party, attracted the manipulators and handlers. The destructive paths to continue.
The world has been damaged by the incessant manipulations by those, hidden from view, and under the mantle of plausible denial. At least to the uninformed, or those believing they are further informed. Those on either side of the line of reality and truth.

 by G Squared, edited by Martin H.

FAKE NEWS Is The Norm In Corporate Mainstream Media

FEEL FREE TO CHECK OUT YOUR MSM NEWS SOURCES GUYS: THIS IS REAL NEWS!

CNN fake news

 

Pulitzer Prize-winning Journalist resigns from CNN after being busted for Fabricating Fake News – Ethan Huff.
Following more than a years’ worth of binge-publishing of fake-news about the Trump campaign, CNN has announced the resignation of three of its top ‘journalists,’ including Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Eric Lichtblau. Along with Thomas Frank and Lex Haris, Lichtblau was found guilty of publishing false information about Russia’s alleged meddling in the 2016 Presidential election, a rumour that was apparently started by none other than failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. The resignations came to a head after CNN carelessly published a story recently accusing entrepreneur Anthony Scaramucci, an ally of President Trump and a member of his transition team, of colluding with Russia to get Mr. Trump elected.
These allegations centered around a delusion by these CNN reporters that Scaramucci was somehow connected to a Russian investment fund that’s currently under Congressional investigation, a rumour that has since proven to be completely false. There was never any proof to support these allegations, other than a single “anonymous source” that CNN and many other mainstream ‘news’ outlets grabbed onto as “evidence” that President Trump had worked with the Russians to cause Clinton to lose the election.
When it became undeniable that the whole thing was completely made up, CNN had no choice but to do something – anything – to mitigate the damage to its already battered reputation. They chose to issue the following statement… “On June 22, 2017, CNN.com published a story connecting Anthony Scaramucci with investigations into the Russian Direct Investment Fund. That story did not meet CNN’s editorial standards and has been retracted. Links to the story have been disabled. CNN apologises to Mr. Scaramucci.”
CNN got it wrong about Comey’s investigation of Trump, too. That CNN would claim to have “editorial standards” is rather humorous considering this isn’t the first time the network has published fake news about President Trump based on little more than wishful thinking. Back in June, the dying network reported that former FBI Director James Comey was going to dispute the claim that President Trump was not under investigation by the agency. The CNN article, which was titled Trum“Comey expected to refute Trump,” was once again based on ‘anonymous sources’ that apparently told the network Comey’s conversations with the President were “much more nuanced,” and that Mr. Trump had gotten things wrong in claiming that he was not under investigation.
Four CNN journalists – Gloria Borger, Eric Lichtblau, Jake Tapper, and Brian Rokus – all compiled the story, with Borger, CNN’s chief political analyst, appearing on TV to state the following: “Comey is going to dispute the President on this point if he’s asked about it by Senators, and we have to assume that he will be. He will say he never assured Donald Trump that he was not under investigation, that that would have been improper for him to do so.” But that never happened, and CNN was forced to admit that the whole thing was simply untrue. CNN quickly changed the title of the article to “Comey unlikely to judge on obstruction,” issuing the following statement in a correction… “CORRECTION AND UPDATE: This article was published before Comey released his prepared opening statement. The article and headline have been corrected to reflect that Comey does not directly dispute that Trump was told multiple times he was not under investigation in his prepared testimony released after this story was published.”
More and more Americans are learning the truth… and that it can’t be found at CNN.
Sources for this article include:
TheIntercept.com
NaturalNews.com
CNN.com
TheHill.com
http://newstarget.com/2017-07-20-pulitzer-prize-winning-cnn-journalist-busted-for-fabricating-fake-news-resigns-from-cnn.html

Yes, Bill Clinton ASKED Russia to interfere in a US presidential election: Jon Rappoport


Yes, Bill Clinton ASKED Russia to interfere in a US presidential election
by Jon Rappoport
July 18, 2017

Press outlets are now reminding us that President Bill Clinton interfered in the 1996 Russia election that brought Boris Yeltsin to power for a second term.
This is by way of saying, “Well, if Putin helped Trump win the 2017 election, so what? The US did the same thing in Russia.”

Clinton Russia election
That’s an interesting but not terribly strong argument. However, there is another piece to the 1996 Clinton op, and it is explosive and quite relevant.
Let’s start here, with the 1996 leak of a document detailing a meeting between Bill Clinton and Boris Yeltsin. Sean Guillory, writing at jacobinmag.com, states:
“According to a White House memo leaked to the Washington Times in March 1996, Clinton and Yeltsin had agreed to support each other in their respective reelection bids.”
We are talking about mutual interference. President Clinton helps President Yeltsin win, and President Yeltsin helps President Clinton win.
Bill Clinton asked the president of Russia to interfere in a US presidential election.
Digest that.
The Washington Post (2/26/96) reports on “…a memo written by Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, according to White House press secretary Michael McCurry. It [the memo] recounted talks between Clinton and Yeltsin earlier this month when both leaders attended an anti-terrorism summit in Egypt.”
“The memo, as quoted in the [Washington] Times, said Clinton pledged to work with Yeltsin to maintain ‘positive’ relations with the United States as both men seek reelection this year. One way to do this, the memo quoted Clinton as saying, is for Yeltsin to stop restricting poultry imports. Clinton said ‘this is a big issue, especially since 40 percent of U.S. poultry is produced in Arkansas,’ the memo said.”
We had a US president, Bill Clinton, specifying HOW the Russian president could help him win a second term as US president.
Let that sink in.
The Associated Press reports, on March 28, 1996: “Citing a classified memo, the Washington Times reported yesterday that Clinton had promised Yeltsin to back his re-election bid by formulating “positive” policies toward Russia…On a matter important to his political supporters in Arkansas, Clinton asked Yeltsin to stop restricting poultry imports. ‘This is a big issue, especially since 40 percent of U.S. poultry is produced in Arkansas,’ Clinton said, according to the memo…On Monday, Vice President Al Gore announced Russia was lifting the ban, which was imposed because of the suspicion that U.S. chickens are not inspected sufficiently for salmonella, which causes illness.”
Clinton promises to back Yeltsin in his effort to win the presidency of Russia.
In return, BECAUSE IT IS IMPORTANT TO CLINTON’S POLITICAL SUPPORTERS, Clinton asks Yeltsin to lift Russia’s ban on importing chickens, particularly since 40% of US poultry is produced in Arkansas, Clinton’s home state. And lo and behold, Yeltsin does comply with Clinton’s request for help in winning the 1996 US presidential election. Yeltsin lifts the ban on importing US poultry.
Both president agree to interfere in each other’s election.
And it gets worse. The major chicken producer in Arkansas is Tyson. The Fiscal Times reports, on 2/2/16: “…consider a largely forgotten financial scandal that directly involved Hillary Clinton during 1978 and 1979.”
“Under the guidance of an attorney representing Tyson Foods, Hillary Clinton made a $98,540 profit from a $1,000 initial investment in less than one year trading commodity futures. While $98,540 may not seem like much money relative to the Clinton family’s wealth today, it exceeded Bill and Hillary’s combined annual income at the time.”
“…Clinton’s initial trading also had a serious irregularity…her $1,000 initial investment was well below the $12,000 deposit required by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange for the first trades she executed. So not only did Hillary make an extraordinary profit for a novice investor, she did so without following the rules applied to less well-connected traders.”
There is much more to say about the relationship between Tyson Chicken and the Clintons, but we’ll leave it there for now.
So there is a precedent of Russia interfering in a US presidential election (by stark invitation)—and nothing happened to the US president, Bill Clinton, who asked for the interference. Nothing.
Clinton was, of course, upset when the memo of his meeting with Yeltsin was leaked. But here is how he spun his objection:
Washington Post, 2/28/96: “[Clinton Press Secretary] McCurry said Clinton and [National Security Advisor] Lake considered the leak to be far more sensitive than the typical anonymous disclosure that is commonplace in Washington journalism. ‘The president feels like he ought to be able to sit down with the president of Russia and have a private conversation,’ McCurry said.”
Clinton and Yeltsin agreeing to interfere in each other’s presidential election was ignored, as if it were of no concern. The big issue was the leak of the memo. Private and highly felonious deals between two superpower chiefs of state? No problem.
To repeat: this 1996 memo-scandal of enormous proportions didn’t make a dent in Bill Clinton’s second term in office. After a brief press blast, and a round of “I’m shocked” within the Beltway, the roar died and vanished.
If a comparable memo were unearthed from the Trump team today, impeachment proceedings will begin in a matter of hours, and the press would be booking seats for the firing squad.
Soros-paid street soldiers would lift Barack Obamas up on their shoulders, break down barriers at the White House, and carry him into the Oval Office.
We need to revisit the old saying, “It’s not the conspiracy (that hurts a political criminal), it’s the cover-up (of the crime).”
There needs to be an addendum. “It’s not the conspiracy, it’s the coverage.” Meaning press coverage.
If a politician commits a major crime and the press coverage dies out, the politician gets away with it. If the press keeps hounding the politician endlessly, he doesn’t get away with it—even if there is no solid proof he committed a crime in the first place.

Yes, Bill Clinton ASKED Russia to interfere in a US presidential election

Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

Harvard Analyst Accuses The Clintons of ‘Largest Charity Fraud in History’

Clinton Fraud

Source: neon nettle

An investigation into The Clinton Foundation by a financial analyst from Harvard University has revealed fraud on a “monumental scale”, according to reports.
Charles Ortel claims to have evidence that Bill and Hillary Clinton have committed the largest case of charity fraud in American history.Ortel, one of the world’s leading financial experts, claims that the Clintons are also part of a global fraud networks that have acquired billions in fraudulent profits.

Wall St On Parade reports: In a 9-page letter dated yesterday and posted on his blog, Ortel calls the Clintons’ charity the “largest unprosecuted charity fraud ever attempted,” adding for good measure that the Clinton Foundation is part of an “international charity fraud network whose entire cumulative scale (counting inflows and outflows) approaches and may even exceed $100 billion, measured from 1997 forward.” 

Ortel lists 40 potential areas of fraud or wrongdoing that he plans to expose.

Like Markopolos, Ortel has an impressive resume. Ortel’s LinkedIn profile shows that he received his B.A. from Yale and an MBA from Harvard Business School.

He previously worked as a Managing Director at investment bank Dillon Read and later as a Managing Director at the financial research firm, Newport Value Partners.

In more recent years, Ortel has been a contributor to a number of news outlets including the Washington Times and TheStreet.com.

The charges being made by Ortel are difficult to dismiss as a flight of fancy because mainstream media has tinkered around the edges of precisely what Ortel is now calling out in copious detail.

In a 2013 New York Times article, Unease at Clinton Foundation Over Finances and Ambitions,” reporters Nicholas Confessore and Amy Chozick hint that Hillary Clinton’s political operatives are occupying offices at the Clinton Foundation headquarters, writing that they “will work on organizing Mrs. Clinton’s packed schedule of paid speeches to trade groups and awards ceremonies and assist in the research and writing of Mrs. Clinton’s memoir about her time at the State Department, to be published by Simon & Schuster next summer.”

A June 2015 article in the Wall Street Journal by Kimberley Strassel stopped hinting and spelled it out boldly, calling the Clinton Foundation a “Hillary superPac that throws in the occasional good deed.” Strassel explained:

“The media’s focus is on Hillary Clinton’s time as secretary of state, and whether she took official actions to benefit her family’s global charity. But the mistake is starting from the premise that the Clinton Foundation is a ‘charity.’ What’s clear by now is that this family enterprise was set up as a global shakedown operation, designed to finance and nurture the Clintons’ continued political ambitions. It’s a Hillary super PAC that throws in the occasional good deed.”

Strassel goes on to provide the specific names of staffers who are deeply conflicted in their political work for Hillary Clinton’s ambitions and their ties to the charity.

An article by James Grimaldi in the Wall Street Journal on May 12 of last year charges that a “$2 million commitment arranged by the nonprofit Clinton Global Initiative in 2010 went to a for-profit company part-owned by friends of the Clintons.” The Clinton Global Initiative is a program associated with the Clinton Foundation.

One notable thing that Charles Ortel is pounding away at is, why, with all of these media red flags for years, the Clintons have been allowed by state charity regulators in multiple states in which they solicit donations as well as their Federal regulator, the IRS, to continue business as usual.

Are we looking at the Madoff-effect where regulators are afraid to take on powerful figures?

We think that’s a very good question to which the American public deserves a credible answer.

https://www.blacklistednews.com/Harvard_Analyst_Accuses_The_Clintons_of_%27Largest_Charity_Fraud_in_History%27_/59167/0/38/38/Y/M.html

She’s Back! Hillary Clinton Returns.

Comment: Hillary Clinton is returning to public life. But if she wants to help Democrats, she should tread carefully.

With the Democrats still trying to figure out who’s going to lead them, Hillary Clinton’s reemergence on the political scene is attracting a lot of attention. But while her recent appearances indicate that she can still lend a high-profile voice to Democratic causes, Clinton risks igniting a controversy that distracts from her party’s message.

On Wednesday, during an event at the Code Conference, Clinton told interviewers Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg that she believed the  Democratic National Committee’s failures contributed to her loss . This rankled some political operatives and caused a small Twitter furor. Over on the right, Fox News fired up a Clinton chyron and brought pundits on to condemn her words.

The moment underscored for Clinton that if she’s going to return to public life — and help to Democrats — she’s going to need to choose her words and actions wisely.

Democratic operatives say it’s not surprising that Clinton would reenter the fray. She has immense resources and influence after a historic election and a long career in politics. And Trump is working to enact the kind of future she ran against.

However, she remains a deeply polarizing figure — and an unpopular one. A Suffolk University poll from March found that Trump had a higher favorability rating than Clinton and that her favorability has dropped since the election.

Clinton is also returning at a time when political watchers wish to move on from 2016 yet continue to pore over the results, trying to figure out how to move the party forward in 2018 and 2020. Though her prominence in the Democratic Party means she’s unlikely to ever fully disappear from the spotlight, she is human kindling for the combustible debates happening among Democrats right now.

Hillary Clinton.© AFP Photo Hillary Clinton. One of the benefits of Clinton reentering the political conversation is that her clout could provide direction and inspiration for a riled-up liberal base.

“I think that she has people that were more than distraught that she lost. Those people are trying to figure out what to do,” said Scott Mulhauser, who served in the Obama administration.  “I think her emerging and steering some of her supporters toward causes, toward issues, toward moments where they can weigh in, helps at a moment where a lot of her supporters are looking for outlets and looking to change things in Washington.”

Mark Longabaugh, who served as a media adviser on Sen. Bernie Sanders’s presidential campaign, said,“Pointing out the flaws in Trump’s foreign policy, Trump’s health-care polices, I think that’s a very appropriate place for her to be.”

But operatives agreed that any remarks she makes about the 2016 election — why she lost, for example — may do more harm than good.

“I think the concern right now is there’s a lot of talk of unity and there’s a lot of finger-pointing from progressives who want to point out institutional issues that exist within the party,” said Nomiki Konst, who served as a Sanders campaign surrogate. “It’s like there’s this external campaign of: ‘We’re all fine. We’re all coming together. We’re part of the resistance together.’ But the reality is there are real infrastructure issues within the party that need to be addressed.”

Longabaugh had similar sentiments. “I would be less inclined to do an autopsy of the election in terms of Comey, the Russians, the this ones, the that ones,” he said.  “I don’t think that’s very productive for the Democratic Party moving forward.”

As one longtime Democratic operative noted, Clinton is often at her best — and perceived the best — when she isn’t running for office and when she’s lending her gravitas to causes that she believes in.

But some believe she should be wary of giving the impression that any public immersion is a “relaunch” for the Clinton brand, which could come across as self-interested.

They say sticking to supporting the progressive resistance and lending her voice to the chorus that’s mostly being led by Sanders (I-Vt.), Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) might be a better way for Clinton to use her natural platform to guide the party.

Clinton certainly seems aware of her platform. “I’m not going anywhere,” she promised at the Code Conference.

Source:

Kayla Epstein