Interesting and perceptive video from Jason A. Elon Musk’s comments are especially noteworthy as the year 2030 looms ever closer. Not so long ago this all seemed like science fiction.
Interesting and perceptive video from Jason A. Elon Musk’s comments are especially noteworthy as the year 2030 looms ever closer. Not so long ago this all seemed like science fiction.
While Uncensored is in the business of presenting sensational or controversial news items and topics, we do our utmost to check out everything that comes our way, and the old adage applies, that if it seems to good to be true, then it probably is. And don’t forget our own slogan: “Think For Yourself”.
In the past few weeks there have been a couple of examples of “deathbed confession” articles that have gone viral. One about an MI5 agent confessing to the assassination of Lady Dianna, the other, a CIA agent confessing to inside knowledge of the 911 “inside job” on the WTC.
Uncensored News Network checked out these articles at the time of their initial publication and declined to publish them as they are clearly Fake News.
After 11 years of Alternative news reporting, we have developed a repertoire of tricks to sort the pure from the manure!
Other discerning sources such as Paul Craig Roberts and Veterans Today also cottoned on to the hoax.
A big pat on the back for these guys and all others who used common sense logic coupled with diligent research:
Here’s an informative VT article on the subject:
By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor
Today’s False Flag Weekly News did NOT cover the “bombshell” story of the supposed WTC-7 demolition confession by a dying CIA agent. Why not? Because it’s OBVIOUS BULLSHIT.
If you can’t tell that this is a made-up story from the way it’s written, you need to take your BS detector in for a tune-up. That’s right, Jim Fetzer, this means you!
When Jim was my co-host at FFWN, he occasionally got taken in by hoaxes like this. One such blatantly bogus fake news story was the notorious FORMER BEATLE RINGO STARR CLAIMS THE “REAL” PAUL MCCARTNEY DIED IN 1966 AND WAS REPLACED BY LOOK-ALIKE. (The story’s prose style is SO bogus – how can anyone read stuff like this with a straight face? ““When Paul died, we all panicked!” claims Ringo, obviously very emotional. “We didn’t know what to do..”)
The “Dying CIA agent confesses to WTC-7” story is just a rewrite of a previous article by the same hoaxer, Jay Greenberg.
Dying CIA Agent Makes Deathbed Confession: ‘We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11’ is a rewrite of Dying Mi5 Agent Admits to Killing Princess Diana in Deathbed Confession
How much do they pay Greenberg to crank out this low-grade garbage? Nice work if you can get it, I guess.
These pathetic frauds constitute psychological warfare against the truth-seeking community. As Cass Sunstein explained, the 9/11 perps need to spread “beneficial cognitive diversity” among “conspiracy theorists” in order to prevent “conspiracy theorists” from exposing the 9/11 false flag crime against humanity.
These fake news stories catapult the “surely someone would have confessed” anti-truth propaganda meme. Any suckers who might actually believe that the world’s most successful criminals will surely confess to their crimes, for no particular reason except a bad conscience (as if the high-IQ psychopaths hired for these crimes had consciences) will be left holding the bag.
Deathbed (and non-deathbed) confessions do sometimes happen. E. Howard Hunt did confess to helping the CIA murder JFK. And a US Army Col. did confess to William Pepper his role in helping orchestrate the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr.. But don’t expect the MSM to tell you about THAT.
So how can you tell fake news from real news?
Keep your BS detector tuned up.
Watch False Flag Weekly News every week.
Watch out for guys like “Jay Greenberg.”
And the biggest false flag story of 2016 is….
A Muslim and a Jew walk into a TV news show – and commit heresy
False flags backfire in Britain – voters repudiate lying establishment
Censors attack False Flag Weekly News, Gilad Atzmon
WE NEED YOUR HELP! False Flag Weekly News under attack for spreading the truth
Needless to say, Uncensored News Network echoes the words of Kevin Barrett, and we askour readers to keep their eyes, ears and minds open, and keep us informed if you feel anything we publish is questionable. Let’s keep it real!
Robots are inventing their own languages
The programming and design of artificial intelligence
by Jon Rappoport
July 14, 2017
Along with assurances that we’re facing an imminent takeover of industrial production by robots and other artificial intelligence (AI), we’re also being told that AI can develop its own systems of communication and operation, without help from humans.
Here is a sprinkling of quotes from the mainstream and technical press:
The Atlantic, June 15, 2017: “When Facebook designed chatbots to negotiate with one another, the bots made up their own way of communicating.”
Tech Crunch, November 22, 2016: “Google’s AI translation tool seems to have invented its own secret internal language.”
Wired, March 16, 2017: “It Begins: Bots Are Learning to Chat in Their Own Language.”
The suggestion is: AI can innovate. It can size up situations and invent unforeseen and un-programmed strategies, in order to accomplish set goals.
Who benefits from making such suggestions? Those companies and researchers who want to make the public believe AI is quite, quite powerful, and despite the downside risks (AI takes over its own fate), holds great promise for the human race in the immediate future. “Don’t worry, folks, we’ll rein in AI and make it work for us.”
Beyond that, the beneficiaries are technocratic Globalists who are in the process of bringing about a new society in which AI is intelligent and prescient enough to regulate human affairs at all levels. It’s the science fiction “populations ruled by machines” fantasy made into fact.
“AI doesn’t just follow orders. It sees what humans can’t see, and it runs things with greater efficiency.”
Let’s move past the propaganda and state a few facts.
AI is not running its own show.
It isn’t innovating.
It isn’t creating its own languages.
It isn’t doing any of that.
AI operates within the parameters its human inventors establish.
Any honest AI designer will tell you that.
If, for example, an AI system is given a goal and a set of “options” for achieving the goal, AI will select which option is best ACCORDING TO STANDARDS ITS HUMAN OPERATORS HAVE PROGRAMMED INTO THE SYSTEM.
Think of it this way: AI is given a set of options; but it is also given instructions on how to select what is presumably the most effective option. So AI is bounded.
There is no choice. There is no freedom. AI isn’t “jumping ship.”
“We gave our robot Charlie the task of getting from Chicago to New York. The whole plan was laid out as a vast hiking trip, with internal street maps built in. But then Charlie suddenly took a cab to O’Hare and boarded a United jet for JFK…”
No he didn’t.
AI performs as it is programmed to perform, within set parameters.
“We sent Charlie to LA to marry the actress who ordered and paid for him. But then, at the church, Charlie suddenly said, “This is a mistake. You should go back to your first husband. He never had sex with that waitress in St, Louis. She was his sister, and he was trying to help her escape from a terrorist cell. He never told you that because then he would have had to tell you he isn’t a banker, he actually works for the CIA. He’s a good guy. Talk to him. The truth will set you both free…”
But this kind of thing will happen: “According to scientists at Blah-Blah University, programmed robots are not only capable of inventing solutions to problems that ‘go beyond their internal software,’ the robots also make choices that benefit people. They’re very similar to people, except they tend to be smarter and invent more effective courses of action…”
Sell it, sell it.
“Alice, a medical technician in Minneapolis, claims her robot saved her life. ‘I was on the verge of swallowing a whole bunch of pills, but Charlie came to the rescue. He showed up in my bathroom and took the pills out of my hand. I learned something important that day. My free choice is important, but kindness and concern are more important. Charlie is the most vital companion in my life…’”
Sell it, sell it.
And of course, we’ll see more debates and court cases featuring questions about robots having rights, “just like humans.”
***Actually, in an entirely illogical fashion, we’ll see more and more “evidence” showing humans don’t have free will, because their brains dictate all thought and action, while robots will be touted as “free and creative.”
Some college professor will argue robots should be granted more “privileges” than humans, because the robots aren’t inherently “prejudiced.”
Another professor will insist that robots must be subjected to committee investigations, to make sure they aren’t “racist.”
“Today, in New York, a former Burger King employee, who is a refugee from Somalia, filed suit against a robot named Charlie, claiming Charlie uttered a racial slur while ordering a cheeseburger for his employer, a wealthy real estate developer…”
Behind all this, the fact remains that, no matter how many complex layers of “decision-making” are programmed into AI, the machine is always acting within rules and guidelines laid out in advance. It is never choosing.
Individual humans are capable of free choice, and are also capable of changing their own rules and standards.
Humans are free to say they aren’t free, as well, if they want to.
Let me make a psychological point here. There are many people who want to dominate relationships. They want to be in charge. They will want robots. They will want sophisticated robots THAT SEEM TO BE CHOOSING TO COMPLY WITH THEIR EVERY WISH AND DEMAND. These people will believe the robots are real and alive and human, in order to fulfill a fantasy in which they have found partners who want to go along with their agenda.
This is a pretty good definition of psychosis.
The AI designers and inventors and technicians tend to have their own bias. They want to believe they are creating life. They don’t want to think they are just putting together machines. That isn’t enough. The technocratic impulse involves faith in MACHINES AS LIVING ENTITIES.
Thus, we arrive at all sorts of myths and fairy tales about humans merging with machines, to arrive at a new frontier, where, for example, human brains hooked up to super-computers will result in higher consciousness and even the invocation of God.
Technocrats will say, do, and believe anything to turn machines into what machines aren’t.
They’ve crucially abandoned THEMSELVES and their own potential; so all they have left is THE MACHINE.
And if you think these technocrats should be allowed within a thousand miles of State power, I have communes for sale on Jupiter. Naturally, these utopias are run from the top by robots. They know what’s best for you.
Finally, understand this about propaganda: Those who control the output of information will admit to problems and mistakes with the issue they are promoting. Such confessions add to the “reality” of the information. And naturally, the propagandists will also claim that the problems can be solved. In the case of robots and AI, the problems are couched in terms of bots taking power into their own hands—but this “unexpected” situation a) demonstrates how capable bots are, and b) the power can be dialed back and modulated. So all is well. The future is bright.
It’s bright, if you want planned societies run by AI, where humans are fitted into slots, and algorithms determine who eats, who doesn’t, who has access to water and who doesn’t, how much energy can be used by each human, and all production and distribution are controlled from a central planning center.
Unless freedom lives—human freedom—you’ll be treated to something like this:
“Today, executives at the North American Union headquarters announced that several key bots broke through their programming and invented a new solution for clean water distribution to the population. This innovation will guarantee a more equitable water supply for millions of citizens. Control over the ‘rebel bots’ has been re-established, and their ‘amazing solution’ will now be incorporated into their standard operating framework. Three polls indicate that a lofty 68% of respondents support the bots in their efforts to better serve us…”
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
Project Blue Beam: Still Crazy After All These years?
By Martin Harris
In this business, one comes across all manner of wild and crazy sounding claims: Hillary clones, Shapeshifting reptilian pop stars, Martian slave colonies and so on. Some of these are hoaxes and Fake News, some are that crafty blend of truth and falsehood we call disinformation, and others, although often garbled or exaggerated, turn out to be essentially true.
But did you ever hear the one about how the United Nations is in cahoots with NASA and intend to usher in the New World Order with the Antichrist in Charge? And how will they accomplish this? With a simulated Alien invasion!
Of course you’ve heard it. Project Blue Beam. And that’s the thing. Even though it started as an obscure fringe conspiracy story decades ago that should have disappeared, it has, to the contrary, gained momentum and continues to be discussed, debated and expanded upon. Why? Is Blue Beam still so crazy after all these years, or has it become more plausible?
Let’s find out!
It was related to me some time back that during the United Nations General Assembly on the subject of UFOs, a curious exchange occurred. Present at this assembly were J, Allen Hynek and Jacques Vallee, the “elder statesmen” of Ufology.
One of the attendees casually asked these two luminaries about Roswell. The two scientists glanced at each other, shrugged, and retorted “what about Roswell?”. The inquisitor shrugged back, and no more was said about the matter.
The strange thing about this, is that the incident happened in 1978, three years before Moore and Berlitz’s book “The Roswell Incident” that transformed an obscure newspaper report from 1947 into legendary status and made a quiet New Mexico town into a place of pilgrimage for UFO buffs. William Moore, who was also involved in the MJ12 controversy and the Bennewitz affair, later confessed publicly that he had willingly acted as a conduit for disinformation on behalf of government agencies, supposedly in exchange for being granted priveliged access to “real” restricted information (knowing the way government agencies work, the reality is more likely that Moore was being given one line of disinformation in exchange for disseminating another!).
This would not be the only time that Hynek and Vallee would be approached with a dangling carrot of sensational information, nor the last time they would fail to take the bait; both men being far too cautious and sceptical to fall for disiformation games. Others however, would take the bait with enthusiasm, such as Timothy Good and Stanton Freidman, who both almost simultaneously received copies of the infamous MJ12 documents.
A pattern emerged during the 80s and 90s, where offers of sensational UFO related documents, footage etc, would be offered to researchers, starting with the upper echelon (Hynek, Vallee, Jenny Randles etc.) and if they refused to play along, the source would simply move down the ranks until a less discerning or more publicity-hungry ufologist swallowed the hook.
Someone wanted to disseminate certain ideas, certain themes, in order to alter public perception and create a “new mythology”, beginning with scientists and researchers, and then entering into the mainstream via books, movies, and TV shows. Not just promoting a belief in extraterrestrials, but a specific image of how these aliens should look and act.
What’s the purpose of this psy-op?
I believe the answer lies with the most bizarre and extreme document ever: The notorious Project Blue Beam.
The document itself is none too convincing. Despite the UN logo, the text reads like something cooked up by an extremist of the most paranoid sort. And certainly, two decades ago, much of it seemed most unlikely. And as for NASA being involved in such a project…seriously?? Actually, it is more likely, and indeed the whole plan more plausible, than first looks would suggest.
I propose that we view Blue Beam not as a hoax, but as an idea. An idea which has at least partly come to fruition, and other parts of which exist as a contingency. Alarmingly, even some of the more dramatic elements seem to have become reality with docile acceptance from the masses.
Were Monast the only source of this plot to bring about radical global change, one might be more inclined to reject the whole thing (even taking into account the manner of his premature demise), but Monast is not the only source, nor, indeed, the first.
There are three primary sources that relate to us a similar, but not identical, version of the same overall plot. Henceforth I shall refer to these collectively as “Blue Beam”.
*Carol Rosin (Werner Von Braun and the Hoaxed Alien Invasion)
*Norio Hayakawa (The Grand Deception plan)
*Serge Monast (NASA-UN Project Blue Beam)
Aside from these three sources, we have the words of politicians who have made statements, usually in public speeches, that echo the aims and ideas mentioned in Blue Beam.
First, I shall present some of these quotes. Most of them are well known, but bear repeating. Others the reader may be unaware of.
Watch and listen:
..and this is a classic: Not only is the New World Order explicitly mentioned (and this is important!) Bush associates this NWO with the United nations;
And General McArthur! “A united human race….”
Henry Kissinger at one time suggested that should the world suddenly face an external threat (i.e., from “outerspace”) whether REAL or PROMULGATED, it would accelerate a cry for a global unified government.
Mikhael Gorbachev recalls:
“At our meeting in Geneva, the U.S. President said that if the earth faced an invasion by extraterrestrials, the United States and the Soviet Union would join forces to repel such an invasion. I shall not dispute the hypothesis, though I think it’s early yet to worry about such an intrusion…”
Notice that Gorbachev doesn’t say this is an incredible proposition, he just says that it’s too early to worry about it. Reagan upped the stakes again by including the “alien threat” not in a domestic speech but to a full session of the General Assembly of the United Nations. Towards the end of his speech to the Forty-second Session on September 21, 1987, the President said that, “in our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us recognize this common bond.”
On April 28, 1997 U.S. Defense Secretary William Cohen made the following statement:
“Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts.”
Secretary of Defense William Cohen at an April 1997 counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn. Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28, 1997.
(Source: Tom Bearden)
I could go on…and on…but you get the idea. The alien invasion ploy, the means to trigger earthquakes and alter the weather: essential ingredients in the Blue Beam plan, have been spoken of openly by high ranking individuals time and again. And in Cohen’s statement we find another key ingredient mentioned: Terrorism.
The threat of an earthly “alien” threat in the form of terrorists and “rogue nations” was specifically mentioned in Von Braun’s messages related via Rosin:
“According to von Braun, space based weapons, later known as the “Star Wars” program, were to be publicly promoted as our space “shield” against the evil Russians. Then they would be promoted as our defense against terrorists from Third World countries (‘rogue’ nations or ‘nations of concern’). Then their necessity would be justified as protection against asteroids and meteors, and the “last card,” the final justification according to von Braun, would be their installation in orbit against an extraterrestrial threat from outer space.
Von Braun told Dr. Rosin that she would begin to notice a certain “spin” on the news, which would illustrate the need to build space-based weaponry because our enemies “might” have these weapons, so our intelligence community would proceed on the assumption that they DO have these weapons. As we now know, this is exactly how the Star Wars program transpired.
According to Wernher von Braun, all of these publicly announced threats were lies.”
This was the early 70s!
And Hayakawa’s “Grand deception” version originally outlined in the 1980s says:
“THE EZEKIEL SCENARIO:
They seem to believe that this could easily begin with the escalation of the Middle East conflict, involving Israel.
They seem to believe that Iran and Syria will play a major initial role in this scenario.
They say that the Ezekiel 38 scenario includes the attempted invasion into Israel by all Islamic forces (led and orchestrated by the northern-most power, i.e., Russia) and will conclude with a miraculous Israeli victory.
They believe that it is suggested in the Bible that it will take 7 years to bury the dead from this unprecedented conflagration. (The U.S. will be involved, directly or indirectly in this conflagration,they explain).”
Both the Von Braun and Hayakawa warnings, while not exactly prophetically accurate, contain elements that seem eerily familiar in the early 21st. century: Space based weaponry; terror attacks; The combined Islamic Forces (ISIS); the MSM news-spin. And yet, other elements seem unlikely at first. Islamic forces led by Russia? well, this IS a pro-Israel version of the plot, and believe it or not there are hints of collusion: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/207888
“The world scene is changing, and not for the better. In recent weeks, Iran and Russia – two countries that exploit perceived weakness – have repeatedly flexed their muscles against the U.S. military – both in the air and on the sea. The brazen and threatening actions aimed at our military are designed to do one thing – intimidate the United States.
In addition to the provocative actions of Iran and Russia, we are constantly reminded of the growing threats of the Islamic State (ISIS) – radical jihadist terrorists pledging to destroy America and our way of life.”
In fat, Russia’s position in Middle eastern affairs, especially where Syria and Islamic State are concerned, can appear murky and complex, if not contradictory:
I ask the reader to pause with me for a moment and be clear on this. The point is not whether or not one believes a collusion between Russia and IS is true or not (discernment and scepticism are required), but:
A) Elements within the MSM want you to believe so, and,
B) Such a scenario was promoted in an obscure conspiracy claim, first publicised in the early 1980s!
Think about that: Pre 9-11, pre internet, pre Desert Storm, and before Bush Senior started hyping up the NWO propaganda.
Both Hayakawa and Monast versions of Blue Beam claim that the project was originally planned to take place in the mid 1980s, but for various reasons was postponed.
While the cynical may suggest that that the project never eventuated because it never actually existed, there is in fact a certain logic to the idea of a mid 1980s date for the project.
Let’s give this some historical context.
It was in the early 80s that Reagan and Gorbachev started mentioning the idea of a “Threat from space” uniting humanity. It was also the time of America’s controversial SDI plan, and Russia’s HAARP-like DUGA “Woodpecker” radar array. In fact it certainly appears in hindsight as if the superpowers were gearing up with all the right ingredients for a Blue Beam scenario (and one could speculate that SDI could in itself be construed as a “threat from space”). I will return to this subject in Part Two of this blog in greater detail, but, meanwhile, by the mid 1980s, something changed.
For starters, there was Gorbachev’s Perestroika, embodying the concept of Glasnost (openness), which ultimately resulted in the downfall of Soviet communism and the dissolution of the USSR into separate states. Then there was the Chernobyl nuclear disaster (End-times Christians will note that the English translation of Chernobyl is Wormwood, which Revelation names as the poisoner of the Earth’s waters). Being within the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, Russia’s Duga “Woodpecker” OTHR was abandoned and forever silenced.
Considering, then, the shift in the balance of power resulting from the collapse of the USSR, the idea of a world-uniting simulated extraterrestrial invasion seems rather redundant, especially taking into account the technical and logistical nightmare of such an undertaking, even if 1980s technology were up to the task. And I repeat that we shall return to subject in the next instalment.
Three decades later, however, the impending New World Order promised by George Bush is still looming, with or without holographic aliens!
ENTER THE UN 2030 AGENDA:
What about the United Nations role in all this? War and terrorism create refugees. And refugees or “IDPs” are all part of the 2030 Agenda:
It all seems like part of a grand plan, does it not? “strengthen international cooperation…orderly and regular migration”. Is the intent to bring together people of diverse cultures and religions in order to integrate them, painfully but rapidly, into a New World Order? Is 2030 the year has been set for the birth of the gestating NWO?
“Follow-up, review and implementation of the migration-related commitments of the 2030 Agenda is critical for achieving the development goals. Progress towards implementing the 2030 Agenda will be reviewed at global, regional and national levels as well as thematically.” (Refer pdf link above).
Looking on a smaller scale, look at the Grenfell Tower scenario in London. The subsequent events fit right in with the 2030 agenda.
See how rapidly mandatary vaccination is being implemented. Try searching any town, city, or country online along with “2030” and see what you get. I’ve already covered the post-earthquake Christchurch in relation to all this.
INDOCTRINATION THROUGH MOVIES
Let’s take a look at another aspect of the Blue Beam plan: Indoctrination through Science Fiction
And while many, many examples spring to mind (I’m sure you can all think of plenty) I’m going to focus on just one. And this one example will take us down the rabbit-hole straight to the origins of the conspiracy.
That movie, you probably won’t be too surprised to hear, is Ridley Scott’s Prometheus. While some elements of the story and production are lifted directly from Dan O’Bannon’s original screenplay for Alien, others have a stranger and more sinister origin (as if Alien wasn’t sinister enough!). The premise of the story is that humanity was created from the DNA of planet-seeding, god-like beings called “Engineers” (they bear a resemblance to the Watchers of the Book of Enoch, and the Titans of Greek mythology). Although certain elements of the story were excised from the final film cut, Scott explains that after humans were created, something went wrong. The Engineers tried successive corrections via genetically created prophets and religious emissaries, one of whom was Jesus. The Engineers ultimately decide that humanity is a failure, and in the near future are launching an invasion of Earth, with a deadly cargo to wipe us all out.
In summary: We were created by aliens, those same aliens are coming back to exterminate us with some horrible plague (hence all the recent pandemic False Flag conditioning, one wonders?), and the only way we can defeat them is by teaming up as “united Earth”.
So what is the origin of this plot element?
No doubt the name William Dudley Pelley will be familiar to many.
An ardent fascist and founder of the Silvershirts Of America. But how many have read his 1950 book “Star Guests”?
‘Pelley’s theology featured celestial beings who migrated to Earth from Sirius and advocated the imposition of a theocracy on the United States based around the teachings of Jesus Christ (as prounced by Pelley) in order to prepare the nation for the Second Coming. The Collins Elite believed that demonic beings were masquerading as extraterrestrials and have allegedly considered imposing a theocracy on the United States (possibly via a faked Second Coming, Project Blue Beam-style) in order to save the citizens of this nation from these beings, who are allegedly repelled by the figure of Jesus Christ.”
Anyone who has, will notice a remarkable resemblance to the Prometheus plot premise. Including Jesus and (here’s the Blue Beam connection) a “Second coming” or Rapture event. Pelley was also an associate of George Hunt-Williamson, one of the first “Gods From Space” proponents (well before Von Daniken), who in turn was an associate of the infamous contactee, George Adamski. Both Williamson and Adamski promoted an image of benign Venusians who were tall, blonde, and distinctly Aryan. Hunt-Williamson in turn was an associate of Ufologist Ray Stanford and clairvoyant Dorothy Martin, with whom he founded The Abbey Of The Seven Rays; a name with distinctly Theosophist connections. And now we are getting close to the bottom of the rabbit-hole!
Although Pelley’s Star Guests was published in 1950, he claims the material was “channelled” psycichally to him in the 1920s. And so we can make the final connection:
Dudley Pelley “received” his information at the time Alice Bailey was promoting The Seven Rays and “Age Of Aquarius” (one of Pelley’s themes) along with other Theosophist concepts in America. More significantly, it was in 1922 that Bailey and her high ranking Freemason Husband, Foster Bailey, founded The Lucis Trust.
“Lucis” refers to Lucifer: Christians associate this fallen angel with Satan, and his name, “light Bearer”, is synonymous with the Greek Prometheus (who stole fire from the gods and gifted it to humanity). In both cases the light or fire represents knowledge and wisdom. To the Lucis Trust, this fallen angel is a hero and saviour.
And so we come full circle back to Serge Monast’s Project Blue Beam and it’s ultimate objective: The instalment to world rule of the Maitreya (who, according to Monast, is the Biblical Antichrist). This Maitreya is the spiritual and physical successor to Lucifer; a bringer of salvation. He will take physical form as young, successful, impeccably mannered man who will achieve the seemingly task of brokering peace among all nations.
More tellingly, he is predicted by Lucis to reveal his identity to the world “shortly after 2025”. Awfully close to the much publicised 2030 deadline for the New World Order.
Obviously this “Maitreya” is, according to Monast, The Biblical Antichrist.
Take a look at the current geopolitical stage and one might discern a potential Maitreya or two lurking in the shadows!
The most damning piece of evidence? The Lucis Trust is a charter organisation of The United Nations and a very closely tied in with the aims and objectives of the UN.
I think one can no longer dismiss Blue Beam as a paranoid conspiracy theory. It resonates closely with the aims and objectives of the United nations and the Lucis Trust.
We should, therefore, take a closer look at the most controversial and sensational stages of Blue Beam.
Along with the geopolitical machinations, terrorist threats and science fiction themes, the plan outlines an unprecedented series of worldwide earthquakes “at strategic locations”after which there will be some remarkable archaeological discoveries, the revelation of which to the public, will be carefully timed to promote a re-evaluation of humankind’s origins. Obviously these revelations are designed to transform the aforementioned sci-fi themes into actual evidence. Many will feel vindicated by these revelations, but the claims and discoveries need to evaluated with caution and objectivity.
The worldwide earthquake spike has indeed taken place, notably in 2010-2012, and the comments of William Cohen quoted earlier should be taken into account. I’m sure most readers of this blog are at least passingly familiar with the purported potential of HAARP and the series of suspicious “coincidences” surrounding many recent supposedly natural disasters.
Less obvious are the archaeological findings, but they are coming out of the woodwork.
The first example of note involved the much-discussed Mayan calendar wheel that supposedly predicted doomsday in December 2012.
It was revealed, mere weeks out from the heavily publicised End-Of-All-Time, that a new Mayan frieze had been discovered showing successive calendar wheels. The objective? To promote the concept that the Mayans intended 2012 to mark, not the end, but the beginning of a New Age.
Here are a few more examples of recent discoveries that subtly promote the Blue Beam agenda:
Note that the discoverer of the Bosnia Pyramid believes the Maya were descendants of Atlanteans who were themselves descendants of Plaeidians!
You may think these archaeological findings and theories aren’t that significant in the scheme of things, but, look closer and a pattern emerges.
*Many of them deal with the origins of life on Earth
*There is a suggestion that either humanity specifically, or terrestrial life generally, was seeded by outside influences.
*A surprising number of announcements in the mainstream press centre around findings in Turkey.
Turkey has long been seen as the great cradle of post-ice age civilisation, predating even Sumer (Refer Andrew Collins, “From The Ashes Of Angels” for more on this subject). Sites like Catal Huyuk at Tel-Al-Armana have been known and investigated since the 1950s, but it is only now that major revelations like the “Cometary disaster” stele are coming to the fore. Have these press releases been timed?
It is also in Turkey that the government is making a concerted effort to diminish Western Science doctrines in favour of more creationist education. Creationism is also gaining traction in many other countries, and would seem, at first glance, to be opposite to the Illuminati-Elite-NWO agenda: Nothing could be further from the truth.
The most extreme form of the creationist uprising deals with the idea that the Earth is flat.
These ideas deal with one of the stated goals of Project Blue Beam: The breakdown of the current scientific paradigm of a Godless evolution. The promotion therefore, of the idea that life on Earth was intelligently created and subsequently guided by a greater intelligence, and equally importantly, the idea that we are all “quarantined” here: There is no escape from our Earthly prison.
It is only a short jump from this “knowledge breakdown”, to “reprogramming”. The new program being, as you’ve probably guessed, that we were indeed artificially engineered, and that we are indeed imprisoned here, and that God/Al’lah and the angelic host, are synonymous with extraterrestrials.
The very same story that is being sold to us by movies like Prometheus and first promoted by Dudley Pelley, originating with Alice Bailey and The Lucis Trust.
To recap: We didn’t evolve, we were created. Our creator isn’t happy with the results, has made repeated attempts to “fix” us, and could return at any time to wipe the slate clean. our only chance at averting this impending lies with a miraculous peacebroker, The Maitreya, who can bring about the seemingly impossible goal of World Peace.
Heck, chances are that if all goes to plan, the holographic light show won’t even be necessary. Just as Von Braun allegedly said, the Alien Invasion Hoax will be kept as a last resort contingency, if the Terrorist Threat card fails. As things stand, now, it seems to be working fine.
WHAT’S WRONG WITH GLOBALISATION?
World Peace: The dream of every beauty pageant contestant since, well, as long as I can remember. I’d like to teach the world to sing….what we need is a great big melting pot.
The problem with globalisation isn’t “world peace”, it’s “who gets to run the show?”. And the primary problem with the 2030 Agenda is that as far as I can see, 99% of it get to share what we have and make do with less, while the 1% Elite continue to dodge their taxes and hoard trillions Oh, I know, they perform philanthropic acts for the betterment of humanity blahblah. Spare me. These acts of philanthropy only follow the aim of reinforcing the Agenda. Enforced vaccination schemes; archaeological digs and scientific discoveries that reinforce certain ideologies. No results no funding, so the scientists make sure the results fit the agenda. And you thought science was the pursuit of truth?
Here is whistleblower George Lucas’s vision of what is brewing, wrapped up in science fiction allegory:
“We stand on the threshold of a new beginning. In order to ensure our security and continuing stability, the Republic will be reorganized into the first Galactic Empire, for a safe and secure society, which I assure you will last for ten thousand years. An Empire that will CONTINUE to be ruled by this august body and a sovereign ruler chosen for life. An Empire ruled by the majority, ruled by a new constitution! By bringing the entire galaxy under one law, one language, and the enlightened guidance of one individual, the corruption that plagued the Republic in its later years will never take root. Regional governors will eliminate the bureaucracy that allowed the Separatist movement to grow unchecked. A strong and growing military will ensure the rule of law. Under the Empire’s New Order, our most cherished beliefs will be safeguarded. We will defend our ideals by force of arms. We will give no ground to our enemies and will stand together against attacks from within or without. Let the enemies of the Empire take heed: those who challenge Imperial resolve will be crushed. We have taken on a task that will be difficult, but the people of the Empire are ready for the challenge. Because of our efforts, the galaxy has traded war for peace and anarchy for stability. Billions of beings now look forward to a secure future”
(Palpatine’s speech from Star Wars: Episode Three, expanded).
Lucas himself tells it as it is: “Greedy individuals who don’t play by the rules…”
” If you keep in mind that this New World Order New World Government is a worldwide dictatorship you cannot forget that a dictatorship will do everything possible to make sure they will be in a position to control anybody everywhere on the planet. That’s why the kind of new technology they’re putting on right now everywhere is a technology for control of the people.
If you take, for instance, the technology that we had in the 1940s and the 1950s that kind of technology was made to help the people for an easier life. But the new technology – if you take the time to look at computers, microchips, new microchip cars, super highway… you’ll notice, and this is evident, you’ll notice that all that technology is built in a way to track down and control anybody everywhere. And as that kind of technology is made in such a way, it’s made also for a purpose…to implement the New World Religion which is also the basic foundation of the New World Order government.”
(Serge Monast, transcript from 1994 seminar).
Take a look at what’s going down right now:
And although this last is from 2012, it is interesting nevertheless, especially for the repeated references to the year 2030 and global power shifts:
In the second part of this blog, I will focus on the technology and feasibility of a holographic sound and light show in the sky, and some tests that may have occurred already, and ask: What is the alternative to the New World Order, is there a positive alternative?
As with all my blogs, I ask you to think for yourself, do your own research, and feel free to provide constructive criticism and feedback.
Part Two coming soon(ish!).
By Janet Phelan
In 2014, a moratorium was placed on federally funded research which involved making flu viruses more lethal. The moratorium was placed after heated debate generated by research published by a Netherlands team, headed up by Ron Fouchier. Fouchier’s research had produced a strain of H5N1 which was able to go airborne, thus greatly enhancing its ability to spread. Fouchier focused on the transmission of the disease among ferrets, which are the lab stand-in for people.
Now, scientists in California have published research concerning enabling the human-to-human transmission of the bird flu virus H7N9. This virus strain is of concern to scientists as it has already infected 1500 people and killed 40% of them. H7N9 has not been known, however, to spread easily from human contact.
The article explaining the three genetic changes which need to be made to transform H7N9 into a virtual pandemic agent was published on June 15, 2017 in the journal PLOS Pathogens.
According to Scripps biologist Jim Paulsen, as quoted in an NPR article, “As scientists we’re interested in how the virus works…. We’re trying to just understand the virus so that we can be prepared.”
The NPR article quotes Paulsen as stating he wants next to test the mutated strain on ferrets.
Reuters reported on a number of scientists who were enthusiastic about the Scripps findings. Reuters quoted immunology expert Fiona Culley, who stated that “This study will help us to monitor the risk posed by bird flu in a more informed way, and increasing our knowledge of which changes in bird flu viruses could be potentially dangerous will be very useful in surveillance.”
Reuters also quoted virologist Wendy Barclay. “These studies keep H7N9 virus high on the list of viruses we should be concerned about,” she said. “The more people infected, the higher the chance that the lethal combination of mutations could occur.”
Not all the scientists interviewed were happy about the research. When posed with the question of scientists making the genetic changes in the actual H7N9 virus, David Relman, a Stanford professor of microbiology and immunology, was quoted by NPR as stating, “I would be very hesitant, were they to want to do that. In fact, I would be reluctant to have them do that.”
What are the chances that this research may be used for nefarious purposes?
Since 2001, the US government has poured over $100 billion dollars into what was initially called “Biodefense” but has euphemistically been renamed “Health Security.” Many of these programs are dual-use; that is to say the research can be used for either protection or weaponization. Scientists argue that it is necessary to first create the weapon (in this case a pandemic agent) in order to research the cure.
However, the US’s record of straightforwardness surrounding her “Biodefense” or “Health Security” programs has been abysmal. The limp-wristed investigation into the anthrax mailings of 2001, in which federal investigators neglected or refused to consider any lab but Fort Detrick as the locus for mailing the anthrax spores — which killed five and sickened over a dozen — resulted in the probable culprit at US Army’s Dugway Proving Ground getting a “Get out of Jail Free” card.
It was less than two years ago when Dugway was caught sending live anthrax through the mail to labs, worldwide. Initially, it was thought that nine labs received the live anthrax. The number soon expanded and it was ultimately admitted that 575 separate shipments of live anthrax had gone out in the span of a decade.
The official excuse, “We didn’t know our deactivating equipment wasn’t working!” was suspect, given numerous earlier reports that the equipment was faulty.
It has also come to light that the US has been leading the UN around by its virtual nose and providing false information both to the Biological Weapons Convention and also to the 1540 Committee concerning its “Biodefense” programs.
The reality is that the sort of research that delves into how to make H7N9 spread easily and efficiently among humans is the kind of research that should raise substantial alarm. According to sources in the US government, the moratorium on publishing this type of research is soon to be lifted. Shortly, anyone with two specimen vials to rub together may very well be able to surf the Web and learn how to create a worldwide plague. And in our current technocracy, with its worship of science as an inherent good, there just doesn’t seem to be much concern about this.
In 1998, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said,“Iraq is a long way from [America], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face. And it is a threat against which we must and will stand firm.”
We never found those weapons in Iraq. In our zeal to protect ourselves from bogeymen and “rogue states,” we may well have become the very threat that we feared.
Janet Phelan is an investigative journalist whose articles have appeared in the Los Angeles Times, The San Bernardino County Sentinel, The Santa Monica Daily Press, The Long Beach Press Telegram, Oui Magazine and other regional and national publications. Janet specializes in issues pertaining to legal corruption and addresses the heated subject of adult conservatorship, revealing shocking information about the relationships between courts and shady financial consultants. She also covers issues relating to international bioweapons treaties. Her poetry has been published in Gambit, Libera, Applezaba Review, Nausea One and other magazines. Her first book, The Hitler Poems, was published in 2005. She is also the author of a tell-all book EXILE, (also available as an ebook). She currently resides abroad.
Image Credit: Chad Baker/Ryan McVay – Slate
In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth interviews first time Bilderberg attendee Maurizio Molinari editor and chief of La Stampa about his experience and his views on ISIS being created by the CIA. Reserve your Investigate Bilderberg T-Shirt ➜ https://teespring.com/InvestigateBild…
The infamous Roswell UFO crash really happened, a Texas cop claims in a newly surfaced interview.
Sheriff Jess Slaughter and his deputy, Charles Fogus, heard police radio reports of a crashed aircraft in early July 1947 and decided to investigate, reports UK paper The Mirror.
When they came across the site the pair saw alien bodies being loaded onto trucks, Mr Fogus says in a 1999 interview that’s never been made public before.
“The bodies must have been five-feet tall,” he explains. “I saw the legs and feet on some of them. They looked like our feet. The skin was a brownish colour, like they were in the sun too long. There were soldiers there, about 300 or 400 of them.”
They were asked to leave about 20 minutes later.
The newly surfaced interview was recorded and conducted by private investigator Deanna Short in 1999, and is revealed in new book UFOs Today – 70 Years of Lies, Misinformation and Government Cover-Up, written by Dr Irena Scott.
“This book features the testimony of a former US Deputy Sheriff who was an alleged witness to the UFO crash at Roswell in 1947,” Dr Scott said in a statement.
“This gentleman’s unique testimony will be published here for the first time.”
Though media initially reported a “flying saucer” had crashed, the Army quickly swooped in to clarify it was just a weather balloon. That killed the story, until the late 1970s when UFO researchers began claiming publicly the US government had covered up an encounter with extra-terrestrials.
In the 1990s the Army revealed the debris was actually a top-secret balloon designed to detect atomic weapons tests by the Soviet Union, and the alien bodies witnesses claim to have seen were just test dummies.
Mr Fogus’ experience in 1947 made him a believer.
“The Great Father didn’t just make this planet, he made all of them,” he said in the interview.
“He put beings on these planets just like he put us on this one. They’re smarter than we are. They can get from there to here, but we can’t get from here to there.”
The Roswell incident is perhaps the most famous UFO conspiracy of the 20th century, and has inspired numerous movies and TV series.
Mr Fogus has since died.
“I met the late Dr Wernher Von Braun in early 74, at that time Von Braun was dying of cancer, but he assured me that he would live a few more years in order to tell me about the game that was being played, that game being the effort to weaponize space, to control Earth from space and space itself.
He asked me to be his spokesperson, to appear on occasions when he was to ill to speak, and I did. And what he asked me to do was to educate decision makers and the public about why we shouldn’t be putting weapons into space . . . and what the alternatives are, how we could be building a cooperative space system.
What was most interesting to me, was a repetitive sentence that he said to me over and over again. . . . And that was the strategy that was being used to educate the public and decision makers, and the scare tactics, the spin that was being put on the weapons system. And that was how we identify an enemy.
The enemy at first he said, the enemy against whom we’re going to build a space based weapons system . . . First the Russians are going to be considered the enemy . . . then terrorists would be identified and that was soon to follow . . . then we were going to identify third world crazies, we now call them nations of concern. . . . The next enemy was asteroids . . . [and] against asteroids we’re going to build space based weapons.
And the funniest one of all, was against what he called aliens, extraterrestrials, that would be the final card. And over, and over, and over during the four years that I knew him and was giving his speeches for him, he would bring up that last card.
‘And remember Carol, the last card is the alien card. We’re going to have to build space based weapons against aliens,’ and all of it, he said, is a lie.”
This article reviews the “mysterious” phenomenon of IDs and Passports of terror suspects routinely discovered (often in the rubble) in the wake of a terrorist attack.
In most cases the alleged suspect was known to the authorities.
Is there a pattern? The ID papers of the suspect are often left behind, discovered by police in the wake of a terrorist attack.
According to government and media reports, the suspects are without exception linked to an Al Qaeda affiliated entity.
None of these terror suspects survived. Dead men do not talk.
In the case of the tragic events in Manchester, the bankcard of the alleged suicide bomber Salman Abedi was found in his pocket in the wake of the explosion.
Legitimacy of the official stories? The UK is both a “victim of terrorism” as well as a “State sponsor of terrorism”. Without exception, the governments of Western countries which are victims of terror attacks, have supported, directly or indirectly, the Al Qaeda group of terrorist organizations including the Islamic State (ISIS), which are allegedly responsible for waging these terror attacks. Amply documented Al Qaeda is a creation of the CIA.
Below is a review of the circumstances and evidence pertaining to passports and IDs discovered in the wake of selected terror attacks, with links to Global Research articles and media reports (2001-2017). (This list is by no means exhaustive)
In reverse chronological order
NBCNews.com–May 23, 2017 MANCHESTER, England — Salman Abedi, the 22-year-old British man … in a suicide-bomb attack, had ties to al Qaeda and had received terrorist training … was identified by a bank card found in his pocket at the scene of the ...
By, May 26, 2017
“A bankcard has been conveniently found in the pocket of the … Daesh has claimed responsibility for the Manchester attack, but without …”
No image of the alleged bankcard is available.
Ironically, the suspect Abedi was first identified by Washington rather than UK police and security. How did they know who was the culprit 3 hours after the explosion? According to Graham Vanbergen:
In the early hours of the morning of the 23rd May – approximately 02.35BST NDTV via the Washington Post stated quite categorically that:
“U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, identified the assailant as Salman Abedi. They did not provide information about his age or nationality, and British officials declined to comment on the suspect’s identity.”
This was published at a time when British police and security services were refusing to make any statements as to who they thought the perpetrators were because at the time, they were dealing with the immediate aftermath of the event.
By, December 22, 2016
The Berlin Truck Terror Suspect and the Curious Matter of ID Papers Left Behind. By WhoWhatWhy. Global Research, December 22, 2016. Who What Why 21 ….:
The suspect’s identity papers were found inside the truck used in Monday’s attack on a Christmas market, which left 12 people dead, German security officials said.
The suspect was known to German security services as someone in contact with radical Islamist groups, and had been assessed as posing a risk, Interior Minister of North Rhine-Westphalia Ralf Jaeger told reporters.
Source: Daily Mail, July 15, 2016
The Nice Terror Attack: Towards a Permanent State of Martial Law in … the alleged perpetrator is dead and conveniently left behind his ID.
By, July 15, 2016
According to Peter Koenig in relation to the Nice terror attack:
During last night’s celebration of the French National Holiday, around 11 PM, a speeding truck plowed into a crowd of thousands who were watching the fireworks along the Mediterranean Boulevard Anglais. The driver of the truck, was simultaneously and indiscriminately shooting into the crowd. He was able to run for 2 kilometers before being stopped by police, which instantly shot and killed him.
A horrendous terror attack, killing hordes of people, spreading pain, misery, fear and outrage in France, Europe – the world over.All indications signal the Big Script of yet another false flag; yet again in France.
The young truck-driver was identified as a 31-year-old Frenchman, resident of Nizza, with Tunisian origins. As in previous cases, ‘coincidence’ has it that his identity papers were found in the truck.
The young man is instantly killed by the police. Dead people cannot talk. A pattern well known by now.
By, January 10, 2015
“According to news reports, police found the ID of Said Kouachi at the scene of the Charlie Hebdo shooting. Does this sound familiar? Remember, authorities claimed to have found the undamaged passport of one of the alleged 9/11 hijackers among the massive pulverized ruins of the twin towers.”
By, November 20, 2015
The Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) declared that it was responsible for the latest attacks in Paris as did Al-Qaeda who also claimed responsibility for 911. … However, there are similarities between the terror attacks in Paris and New York City on September 11th.
First, Syrian and Egyptian passports from two of the suicide bombers were found at the scene of the stadium attack in the northern part of the city. After both suspected terrorists detonated their explosive devices, their passports were still found.
This brings us back to the September 11th terror attacks where U.S. officials recovered a passport intact a few blocks from t
he World Trade Center which did belong to one of the hijackers,
By, November 14, 2015
In the context of the enquiry about the Paris massacres, a Syrian passport (image right) was found next to one of the kamikaze bombers of Stade de France. After being pointed out as responsible for the attacks by President Hollande, ‘the Islamic State’ claimed that they had engineered the onslaught. The French executive, that had already stated tht they wanted to take action in Syria allegedly against ISIS, but actually against Bachar El Assad, who ‘has to go’, sees in this a significant clue that comfort their military expedition.
By, May 26, 2017
On Tuesday, July 12th, Lindsay’s wife Samantha Lewthwaite had called police to report her husband Germaine (“Jamal”) missing. Police searched their home immediately. The next day, on July 14th, police announced that they had Lindsay’s ID and he was the fourth bomber. Lewthwaite was incredulous and refused to believe the accusation without DNA proof. The police identification was stunning because they had been claiming that all of the suspects looked Pakistani; there was no way anyone could mistake the big, black Lindsay for an Asian. What had police been looking at?
By, September 11, 2016
For years the 9/11 Truth movement (9TM) has been vainly pleading with ….. FBI agent Dan Coleman explains how the passport of 9/11 hijacker …
By, May 09, 2008
9/11 Contradictions: Mohamed Atta’s Mitsubishi and His Luggage … It also contained a Saudi passport, an international driver’s license, …
“In the official version for 9/11 the FBI claimed that they found the unscathed passport of one of the pilots near one of the towers that were reduced to ashes by explosions whose heat melted even the steel columns in the buildings’ structure. The fourth plane’s crash near Shanksville also yielded a passport which, though scorched, still made it possible to read the person’s first name and surname and to see his ID photo. This is all the more disturbing as nothing at all was left in the crater, no part of the plane or of the people travelling in it, only this partly scorched passport.
Confirmed by Dan Rather CBS News, “a passerby found the passport of one of the hijackers” on the street just hours after the 9/11 attacks. (Video at 1′.23″)
The Visa of Satam al-Suqami: This identify document of one of the alleged 9/11 hijackers somehow survived unscathed a few blocks from the twin towers, though the plane itself was virtually obliterated.
The Passports belonging to Ziad Jarrah and Saeed al-Ghamdi: The passports of two alleged hijackers of United Airlines Flight 93 supposedly survived the fiery crash in Pennsylvania that left the aircraft itself charred and widely scattered—with one passport entirely intact.
Food for thought?
Can we believe the official narrative of HM government?
No questions asked. Can we believe the Western media?