Subscriptions, Current Issue & Back Issues

Shop Website | Annual Subscriptions | Back Issues |

Tag: Hillary Clinton

Atrocity!

screenshot-10
Image: Dr. K.A. Paul with Colonel Gaddafi.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

During his time in Libya, Fauntroy claimed that he witnessed Danish and French special forces committing atrocities against Libyan civilians and rebel fighters to be blamed on the Libyan government.After the war, Fauntroy disappeared for five years, reportedly over allegations he had written a fraudulent check for $55,000, although the Congressman says he fled because he feared he would be assassinated to prevent him revealing what he had witnessed in Libya.

screenshot-14

Dr. Paul also claims he was personally warned by a CIA agent that his life, “was in danger not from the war but from Secretary Clinton herself,” and that Clinton had a hand in ordering his subsequent arrest in order to besmirch his reputation.
New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi vouched for Fauntroy’s credibility. Corsi is set to release new footage of atrocities committed by Libyan rebels that were backed by Hillary Clinton.
“I have spoken with former Congressman Walter Fauntroy and I have researched his account of his experiences in Libya,” Corsi told Infowars.
“My conclusion is that Fauntroy is 100 percent credible and telling the truth. He confirms what I have already put into print about various other efforts to have Gaddafi abdicate that were ignored or otherwise rebuffed by the Clinton State Department.”
Dr. Paul’s claims are consistent with reports that Clinton refused to take a Skype call from Moammar Qaddafi’s son Saif, who was also trying to broker a peace deal.
Dr. Paul is vehement in laying the blame for the subsequent disaster in Libya firmly at the feet of Hillary Clinton, adding that the entire scandal “makes Watergate look like child’s play.”
“The image of bodies of women and precious children piled high in the streets of Tripoli will haunt me forever—not to mention the millions of others who lost their homes and lives, becoming part of the massive wave of displaced immigrants seeking asylum,” said Paul.
He notes that stockpiles of world class weaponry disappeared shortly after the country fell to jihadists, creating a “brand new safe haven for ISIS in place of the Western-friendly, non-nuclear aspiration state Libya had become,” adding that this outcome was “directly attributable to Ms. Clinton’s self-serving and duplicitous foreign policy.”
“Any fifth grader would have insisted Clinton’s “regime change” at-any-cost was absurd in the absence of a succession plan and troops on the ground, essentially handing the very strategic territory and its assets over to whoever wanted them most, which not surprisingly turned out to be Islamic terrorists. The entire world is paying a high price for her stupidity and horrific decision by further radicalizing the Middle East,” asserts Dr. Paul.
Dr. Paul is adamant that emails will soon be revealed that confirm all of his claims. He is also demanding that, “General Clark should be brought before a Senate sub committee and forced to testify under oath immediately.”
Dr. Paul personally endorsed Donald Trump back in February, although he is bipartisan, having supported Barack Obama back in 2008 over his opposition to the Iraq war.
Dr. Paul concludes that he is putting his life at risk by revealing Hillary’s role in nixing the Libyan peace deal, but that he can no longer hold back.
“Anyone who knows too much about this deplorable former Secretary’s actions turns up dead like Chris Stevens or Gaddafi,” states Paul. “Still, there is far too much at stake for this great nation, America, for me to remain silent any longer. I know I’m risking my life going public with what I know—but God will hold me accountable if I know the truth and do not speak it for fear of Clinton.”

Another letter sent by Khaled Kaim, then Deputy Foreign Minister of Libya, thanks Dr. Paul for doing “whatever it takes to promote peace and stop war.”

screenshot-15screenshot-16screenshot-17

Had this deal gone through, it would have saved countless lives that were lost in the aftermath, prevented the collapse of Libya into a failed state fought over by rival jihadist gangs and significantly alleviated the international migrant crisis that worsened dreadfully in the years that followed. It could even have contained ISIS’ spread across the Middle East. The Benghazi attack would never have happened.
According to Dr. Paul. General Clark was so pleased with the outcome of the negotiations that he personally arranged a teleconference with Hillary Clinton on the line to congratulate Dr. Paul on “getting the job done in the face of such danger.”
But there was a problem.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton didn’t want peace. She wanted Muammar Gaddafi dead for her own selfish, spiteful reason – the fact that Gaddafi had favored Barack Obama over her own campaign during the 2008 presidential election cycle.
“It’s well known in Libya that Gaddafi supported Obama over Clinton in the run up to the ‘08 elections, despite the Clinton team approaching Gaddafi’s son, Saif al-Gaddafi, and asking the family to invest in Hillary’s campaign and foundation, which they did not,” said Dr. Paul.
Hillary nixed the peace deal. The war continued. Libya – the most prosperous nation in Africa – fell into the hands of jihadist militants and subsequently ISIS. Thousands of migrants have since drowned in their desperate attempts to flee the country.
Gaddafi’s public execution was celebrated by Clinton during her now infamous television appearance when she exclaimed; “We came, we saw, he died!”
“Her personal vendetta better explains her oddly giddy behavior when taking credit for Gaddafi’s horrifying death, as captured on video for the world to see,” asserts Dr. Paul, adding that the footage “is evidence of a pathology or mental illness.”
Libya subsequently fell to jihadist rebels allied with Al-Qaeda, militants who had killed U.S. troops in Iraq and went on to kill four Americans during the Benghazi siege – all because Clinton had a personal vendetta with Gaddafi over his support for Barack Obama.
According to Dr. Paul, other Middle Eastern nations rushed to make substantial donations to the Clinton Foundation, fearful that they would be the next victims of Hillary’s wrath.
“Clinton’s penchant for the violent overthrow of less than cooperative governments knows no end, and they know it,” said Dr. Paul, adding that GCC member states Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates are all “silently terrified at the prospect of Hillary Clinton becoming the next President of the United States.”
“Why is anyone who knew anything about Clinton’s overthrow of Gaddafi dead, missing, in prison, or their good name besmirched and their voice silenced?” asks Dr. Paul.
screenshot-11
screenshot-12
“Chris Stevens, my friend who helped negotiate peace in Libya is dead despite hundreds of his desperate pleas for more security – that was hardly a mistake. For that matter, where is my friend the Prime Minister who in good faith signed the peace agreement Clinton asked me to negotiate? Where is the Under Secretary who signed the other letter?”
It is important for the reader to understand that the Clinton-mouthpiece mainstream media will try to discredit this report by attacking Dr. Paul’s credibility.

4 Oct 16  AND there is much MORE to this horrible atrocity.  In fact, much more than a personal vendetta.  This was all part of the well planned neocon agenda; a long time in the making.  The domestic violence, arms and drug running was deliberately carried out by covert, foreign neocon agents (imbedded in the c-a etc.) sent in to create chaos, destroy Gaddafi, and steal his country’s oil and tons of their gold.  It was the heist of the century… hardly ever reported!  HC & BO were not the only one involved.  French & UK neocon agents were also heavily involved.  Similar to what is now going on in Syria, which the media keeps trying to blame on RU, w/constant lies!  

 

https://www.infowars.com/exclusive-hillary-killed-libya-peace-deal-over-personal-vendetta-claims-whistleblower/

EXCLUSIVE: HILLARY KILLED LIBYA PEACE DEAL OVER PERSONAL VENDETTA, CLAIMS WHISTLEBLOWER

Gaddafi agreed to hold free elections, but Clinton’s refusal led to ISIS takeover, thousands of deaths, international migrant crisis

Paul Joseph Watson – OCTOBER 3, 2016

screenshot-13

YouTube
YouTube
YouTube
533K
Follow on Twitter:Follow @PrisonPlanet
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.

Christchurch Earthquake Was “On Cue”: Hillary Email

 

 

Site Icon -SmallCoupled with the multitude of “coincidences” and the HAARP charts, this leaked Clinton Email, found by CONTrail member Trillion, is a real piece of smoking gun evidence that the February 22 earthquake in Christchurch was either engineered or at least precisely predicted.

https://thecontrail.com/profiles/blogs/smoking-gun-for-christchurch-killer-quake

 

The “Android Like” Lester Holt: From John Rappaport.

By Jon Rappoport
Others have pointed out how many times debate moderator Lester Holt slanted criticism toward Trump, rather than Hillary. Others have suggested Hillary and Holt were a tag-team, with Hillary throwing hand signals to Holt indicating she was ready to hit Trump with a zinger.
On a different level…
Watching the debate-host, Holt, working his way through Trump vs. Hillary, sitting in his chair, bathed in a spotlight glow against a sea of total darkness, eerie metallic glimmers reflecting from his glasses, I was reminded of Dr. Eldon Tyrell, the barely human chairman of the corporation that designed androids in the film Blade Runner.
—Holt, the man who had the script and the questions and the facts at his immediate disposal. The brain. The wisdom figure. The synthetic guide with a touch of humanity built in.
Quite an archetype.
As I pointed out recently, the ridiculous notion of a debate with a moderator is modern. When Lincoln and Douglas famously debated slavery for hours at a time, over the course of several weeks, there was no intermediary voice. One man spoke for an hour, and then the other man spoke for an hour.
The moderator is a prop, a pretense of introducing objectivity into the proceeding.
The moderator is the “voice of rationality,” as it were. From that perch, he can, of course, slant the event—and Holt certainly did.
His dry speech patterns, in fact, resembled those of Barack Obama, when the President is reciting script.
Watching Holt operate, I was also reminded of the technocratic wet dream of a human brain hooked up to a computer, from which emanates undeniable wisdom.
Holt adopted the persona of a machine, and he pulled it off.
Which means? This is where the world is heading, if the technocrats have anything to say about it. You “need the best data—and one day soon you’ll get the data from a computer your brain is connected to. All will be well.”
Holt is also NBC’s national news anchor, which means he tells the stories of our time, every night, to millions of tranced viewers who are seeking a voice not their own.
Anchor and debate moderator—a powerful combination.
Hypnotically commanding.
Replay the debate moment when, out of nowhere, Holt’s words suddenly crackled like dry autumn leaves: “[Stop and frisk] was ruled unconstitutional.”
The narrator thus spake.
A brain not their own…a voice not their own…a narrator of reality…a fount of instant wisdom…the answer from on high…there are many, many people who want those things, and they want them embodied in a machine-like structure that assures them of dispassionate “honesty.”
Holt provided.
It’s no surprise that giant television networks have made these debates their own property. After all, the companies consider the events media-moments. Hosting them and appointing the moderators is no different from designing and presenting the nightly news broadcasts.
Of course, when you stop and think about this arrangement for debates, it’s absurd. Why would Lester Holt be more qualified to guide the proceeding than a car mechanic from Peoria?
Why have a guide at all?
Why allow media companies or government entities or even non-profit organizations a place in the debates? The two ruling political parties are the correct sponsors. We’re watching their candidates.
Holt was a well-groomed device. A hint of the near-future. A figure of “just-enough-authority” sitting in the darkness, dispensing voice-of-god to the masses, backed up by a production crew with split-screen, miced-up, podium-on-stage technology to provide a fatuous imitation of a real debate
Instead, let there be a stage in a glen. Two or three television cameras. Let there be a topic. Foreign policy. Hillary ascends the stage and speaks for an hour. Then she leaves. Trump appears. He talks for 90 minutes. Then Hillary comes back for 30 minutes. The candidates never speak to each other. There is no moment-to-moment exchange of daggers or jokes or gotchas. This isn’t entertainment. It isn’t grins or hair or dress or tie or teeth.
If there is a moderator, he stands down off-stage and to the side, grumpy and frowning, holding an umbrella in case it rains. He reads a book while the candidates speak, he eats a hot dog. He combs and re-combs his hair. He waits. He thinks about his 20-dollar-an-hour salary. He must remain absolutely silent.
He’s an actual prop put there to remind people of a time when things were different, when the so-called news was delivered by media stars, who competed to see which ones were the most clever at inventing reality that seemed factual, but wasn’t.
In a world with a shred of sanity, that’s what Lester Holt would be doing.
What is modern television news (including debate moderation)?
From their perch, anchors can deign to allow a trickle of sympathy here, a slice of compassion there.
But they let the audience know that objectivity is their central mission. “We have to get the story right.” “You can rely on us for that.”
This is the great PR arch of national network news. “These facts are what’s really happening and we’re giving them to you.” The networks spend untold millions to convey that false assurance.
The anchor is the narrative voice of his time, for all people everywhere. The voice that replaces what is going on in the heads of his audience—all those doubts and confusions and objections in the heads of the great unwashed. The anchor will replace those and substitute his own plot line.
The network anchor is The Wizard Of Is. He keeps explaining what is. “Here’s something that is, and then over here we have something else that is, and now, just in, a new thing that is.” He lays down miles of “is-concrete” to pave over deeper, uncomfortable, unimaginable truth.
The anchor must become comfortable with having very little personality of his own. On air, the anchor is neutral, a castratus, a eunuch.
This is a time-honored ancient tradition. The eunuch, by his diminished condition, has the trust of the ruler. He guards the emperor’s inner sanctum. He acts as a buffer between his master and the people. He applies the royal seal to official documents.
Essentially, the anchor is saying, “See, I’m ascetic in the service of truth. Why would I hamstring myself this way unless my mission is sincere objectivity?”
All expressed shades of emotion occur and are managed within that persona of the dependable court eunuch. The anchor who can move the closest to the line of being human without actually arriving there is the champion.
The vibrating string between eunuch and human is the frequency that makes an anchor great. Think Cronkite, Chet Huntley, Edward R Murrow.
The public expects to hear that vibrating string. It’s been conditioned by many hard nights at the tube, watching the news.
There are other reasons for “voice-neutrality” of the anchor. Neutrality conveys a sense of science. “We did the experiment in the lab and this is how it turned out.”
Neutrality gives assurance that everything is under control.
Neutrality implies: we, the news division, don’t have to make money (a lie); we’re on a higher plane; we’re performing a public service; we’re like a responsible charity.
The other night, Lester Holt was the machine-like agent of the Cosmic Charity of All Souls dedicated to higher wisdom from an unimpeachable source. That was his role and he played it.
“I take no sides. I have no opinions. I am objectivity personified. I am…The Fact Checker.”
Use this link to order Jon’s Matrix Collections.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
%d bloggers like this: