Subscriptions, Current Issue & Back Issues

Current Issue | Annual Subscriptions | Back Issues

Tag: IMAC

Letter to Dr Nikki Turner Regarding IMAC Whitewashing Gardasil’s Serious Adverse Reactions

This letter was e-mailed to Dr Nikki Turner and Helen Petousis-Harris of the Immunisation Advisory Centre of Auckland University on the 25th of February regarding Ms Petousis-Harris’ letter to The Whangarei Report and Dr Turner’s public presentation regarding the Gardasil vaccine in Whangarei on the 24th.

25th of February 2009

Dr Nikki Turner,
Immunisation Advisory Centre,
Auckland University.

Dear Dr Turner,
In regard to your e-mail dated the 25th of February, your having stated that the HPV vaccine caused the reactions in the girls in Spain during the public forum on the 24th of February did contradict the letter Helen Petousis-Harris wrote to The Whangarei Report.  You also contradicted her when you acknowledged you were aware that in October 2008, over 10,000 adverse reactions, including 27 deaths had been reported to VAERS in relation to Gardasil.
IMAC can not sweep the multitude of serious adverse reactions to the vaccine under the carpet. There is too much evidence in the public arena.  The FDA reports Judicial Watch acquired about Gardasil under the Freedom of Information Act, that were described by Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton as “a catalogue of horrors,” [1,2], being a good example.
I have not found mention of  “motor vehicle accidents” being responsible for what is occurring to those vaccinated as Ms Petousis-Harris tried to claim to The Whangarei Report. There is mention of reactions occurring shortly after vaccination though.  For example, in one case a 14-year old girl took 6 steps after being injected with Gardasil before collapsing and becoming unconscious. The girl regained consciousness after “a 60 second grand mal seizure” and had pale clammy skin and blood pressure of 60/40.
In another case a 23-year old woman was vaccinated with her first dose and went into anaphylactic shock.  The report says that she experienced this 2 minutes after vaccination.
A VAERS report from a physician stated a female patient was inoculated with Gardasil and “Subsequently, the patient experienced a coma and is now paralyzed.”
Eleven deaths occurred less than one week after receiving the vaccine. Seven died in less than 2 days. The most common diagnosed cause was blood clotting.
The VAERS reports Judicial Watch acquired included 78 separate cases where, after receiving the vaccine, patients experienced outbreaks of warts, [1].  When I asked you about people developing warts after vaccination, you denied it was occurring during your talk in Whangarei Dr Turner.
Furthermore, while the Gardasil insert, which can be found on Merck’s website, mentions that the vaccine may lead to pre-cancerous lesions, you did not.
It [did] state[s] on page 14 [top of page 15] of the insert:
“Infected women may already have CIN 2/3 or AIS at vaccination onset and SOME WILL DEVELOP CIN 2/3 or AIS during follow-up, EITHER RELATED TO A VACCINE…”
In relation to this matter the Judicial Watch report states:
“The possibility that Gardasil could make HPV infections worse is very serious, and a matter of concern with both critics of the vaccine and the FDA.  A background document
produced by the FDA’s VRBPAC in May 2006 states:
There were two important concerns that were identified during the course of the efficacy review of this BLA [biologics license application]. One was the potential for Gardasil to enhance disease among a subgroup of subjects
who had evidence of persistent infection with vaccine relevant HPV types at baseline. The other concern was the observations of CIN 2/3 [cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, abnormal cell changes in moderate stage] or worse cases due to HPV types not contained in the vaccine. These cases of disease due to other HPV types have the potential to counter the efficacy results of Gardasil for the HPV types contained in the vaccine . . . The results of exploratory subgroup analyses . . . suggested a concern that
subjects who were . . . positive for the vaccine-relevant HPV types had a greater number of CIN 2/3 or worse cases.
It further states on page 6 of the Judicial Watch report:
“A chart in the committee’s report revealed that efficacy in subjects already exposed to “relevant HPV types” had an observed efficacy rate of -44.6%. The disturbing efficacy rate raises questions as to who should be receiving the vaccine, and why the FDA allows Gardasil to be administered without prescreening for HPV..”
Why did you not mention all these serious problems associated with the vaccine to the group of women in Whangarei and why did Helen Petousis-Harris claim that: “There is no evidence that Gardasil increases the risk of precancerous lesions” in her letter to The Whangarei Report?  Given the rate of sexual abuse of children in New Zealand, and thus potential infection with the HPV, one would think that this matter would be of concern to a caring medical professional.     And what ever happened to informed consent?
Thank-you for your attention to the contents herein.
Sincerely,
Clare Swinney

References:
1.  https://uncensored.co.nz/2009/03/27/a-judicial-watch-special-report-examining-the-fda%E2%80%99s-hpv-vaccine-records/

(and  https://www.judicialwatch.org/documents/2008/JWReportFDAhpvVaccineRecords.pdf )

2.  https://www.judicialwatch.org/gardasil



Serious Adverse Reactions To Gardasil Swept Under Carpet By Dr Nikki Turner of NZ’s Immunization Advisory Centre

Gardasil Vaccine
On the 24th of February, Dr Nikki Turner of the Immunisation Advisory Centre gave a presentation about Gardasil to 28 members of the public in Whangarei at the Forum North events centre.   Although people were advised by The Whangarei Report that this meeting was to help them become informed, in my opinion, it was designed to do anything but.  The public were treated like mushrooms by Dr Turner – they were fed manure and kept in the dark.
At the start of the meeting Dr Turner was asked for clarification on whose data she was presenting and when she stated that it was derived from Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil,  I advised that a whistleblower who had worked for Merck had indicated that their research data on the HPV vaccine was not trustworthy.  While Dr Turner did not dismiss this claim, she did not seem particularly concerned and moved back to the presentation.
On the topic of warts Dr Turner mentioned that Gardasil was useful in preventing these.  When I questioned her about the reports of people getting warts as a result of having the vaccine, she denied that this was occurring and implied the media had misled the public.   The media has not.  Here are 3 excerpts published on pages 4 and 5 of a Judicial Watch report on the Gardasil vaccine that link shots to the subsequent development of warts:
Two days after receiving the first dose of Gardasil, the patient developed groin warts. There is no known history of these warts. The patient came back in about a month later and was given the second dose of Gardasil.
days after receiving the second dose, the patient had a huge outbreak of warts.   VAERS ID: 292052-1

Information has been received from a consumer concerning her 17-year-old daughter with no medical history and an allergy to sulfa, who on 28-SEP-2007 was vaccinated with a first dose of Gardasil . . . Prior to being vaccinated with Gardasil the patient was tested for HPV and genital warts and all her test came back negative. On 15-OCT-2007 the patient experienced a fever, and broke out with white bumps that were diagnosed as genital warts. VAERS ID: 301339-115


“Outbreaks were not limited simply to genital warts. Some patients experienced outbreaks of warts on the face, hands, and feet. All warts are caused by strains of the papilloma virus, but it is surprising that Gardasil, which was modeled to protect only against genital warts, would cause outbreaks of warts caused by other strains of the papilloma virus.” (Refer p. 5).
The VAERS reports Judicial Watch acquired included 78 separate cases where, after receiving the vaccine, patients experienced outbreaks of warts.
What was most disturbing about this presentation, was that while she mentioned that a variety of organisations were collecting information on the adverse reactions that were occurring, such as the VAERS,  she failed to mention the thousands of adverse reactions and the deaths that have been reported to the bodies.   Instead she minimized the problems and claimed that a major concern with this vaccine was that girls were “fainting,”  which she implied was simply due to being pricked by a needle.
pinocchio-girl1
The only serious adverse reactions she mentioned as having occurred related to two girls in Spain.  She said Spanish health authorities had withdrawn tens of thousands of doses of the HPV vaccine because two girls fell seriously ill after receiving doses of it. Tellingly, Dr Turner put what happened in Spain down to a bad “batch,” while failing to mention that similar serious adverse reactions were being reported elsewhere, and in large numbers, including by the mainstream media.

As she had minimised the adverse reactions, when she asked if anyone had any questions at the end of the presentation, I said: “In October 2008, over 10,000 adverse reactions, including 27 deaths had been reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System in relation to Gardasil. Yet, the CDC and the FDA are alleging that the vast majority , or even all of these cases are not related to the vaccine. They are therefore saying Gardasil is “safe.” Could you tell me why the documents related to how they arrived at this decision that it is safe, in spite of all the adverse reactions that have been reported, are being kept hidden from the public?”
She answered by saying that she was aware of the reactions that had been reported.  She did not answer the question as to why the documents were being kept from the public though.

For more information, refer:

How the U.S. Government is Covering Up HPV Vaccine Side Effects, https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/11/15/how-u-s-government-is-covering-up-hpv-vaccine-side-effects.aspx

A Judicial Watch Special Report, Examining the FDA’s HPV Vaccine Records.  The first 6 pages are posted here:  https://uncensored.co.nz/2009/03/27/a-judicial-watch-special-report-examining-the-fda%E2%80%99s-hpv-vaccine-records/

The report in full  is at this link – click on “Ignore the warming” at the bottom of the right-hand-side of the red panel if you are willing to take a risk:  https://www.judicialwatch.org/documents/2008/JWReportFDAhpvVaccineRecords.pdf

Immunisation Advisory Centre: Gardasil Deaths “Mainly Motor Vehicle Accidents”

https://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=88272.0

Growing Controversy Over New Merck Vaccines, https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2007/03/10/growing-controversy-over-new-merck-vaccines.aspx

NZ’s Immunisation Advisory Centre Claims Gardasil Deaths Mainly “Motor Vehicle Accidents”  https://uncensored.co.nz/2009/02/26/nzs-immunisation-advisory-centre-claims-gardasil-deaths-mainly-motor-vehicle-accidents/

NZ’s Immunisation Advisory Centre Claims Gardasil Deaths Mainly “Motor Vehicle Accidents”

As can be seen in the letter below, according to the Immunisation Advisory Centre (IMAC) at Auckland University: “There are no serious events believed to be caused by the [Gardasil] vaccine.  The deaths reported following vaccination are mainly motor vehicle accidents and other unrelated events.”

vaccinedeception22

IMACs Ms Petousis-Harris made this ridiculous claim in a letter to The Whangarei Report on February the 19th 2009, in response to a letter I had published about the thousands of adverse reactions and precancerous lesions associated with Gardasil.

One has to wonder why the taxpayer-funded IMAC will not disclose the facts about the number of adverse reactions and deaths that have been reported, when the mainstream media will.    In this CBS report that aired on the 6th of February, it was mentioned that the National Vaccine Information Center, a private vaccine-safety group, compared Gardasil adverse events to another vaccine, one also given to young people, but for meningitis.  Gardasil had three times the number of Emergency Room visits – more than 5,000.    As you can see, this news report also mentions that there have been 29 fatalities reported in two years in association with Gardasil, yet according to Helen Petousis-Harris “to suggest these are vaccine related is mischievous.”

Also, while Petousis-Harris claims that there is no evidence that Gardasil increases the risk of precancerous lesions, even the Gardasil insert, which can be read at Merck’s own website, indicates that it does do so. On page 14 of the insert it states:  “Infected women may already have CIN 2/3 or AIS at vaccination onset and some will develop CIN 2/3 or AIS during follow-up, either related to a vaccine…”
In relation to this matter, a Judicial Watch report asserts:
“The possibility that Gardasil could make HPV infections worse is very serious, and a matter of concern with both critics of the vaccine and the FDA.”

A background document produced by the FDA’s VRBPAC in May 2006 states:
“There were two important concerns that were identified during the course of the efficacy review of this BLA [biologics license application]. One was the potential for Gardasil to enhance disease among a subgroup of subjects
who had evidence of persistent infection with vaccine relevant HPV types at baseline. The other concern was the observations of CIN 2/3 [cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, abnormal cell changes in moderate stage] or worse cases due to HPV types not contained in the vaccine. These cases of disease due to other HPV types have the potential to counter the efficacy results of Gardasil for the HPV types contained in the vaccine . . . The results of exploratory subgroup analyses . . . suggested a concern that subjects who were . . .  positive for the vaccine-relevant HPV types had a greater number of CIN 2/3 or worse cases.


It further states on page 6 of the report:
“A chart in the committee’s report revealed that efficacy in subjects already exposed to “relevant HPV types” had an observed efficacy rate of -44.6%. The disturbing efficacy rate raises questions as to who should be receiving the vaccine, and why the FDA allows Gardasil to be administered without prescreening for HPV..”

So there you go. Gardasil may cause precancerous lesions in those who already have the HPV and it is all there in plain print to read. Given the fact that children are being sexually abused, and thus potentially infected with the HPV, one would think that this matter would be of great concern to IMAC and they would wish to inform the public of this serious issue.

References: