Tag: New Zealand

Americans Flock To NZ “Safe Haven”.

Queenstown, along with Waiheke and Auckland, is top of the list for wealthy Americans avoiding 'the end of the world'.

An upsurge in the number of wealthy Americans seeking New Zealand property is being linked to fears of a political or natural disaster.

The latest New Yorker magazine, in a long story about the super-rich making doomsday preparations, gives a high profile to New Zealand as a haven from any apocalypse.

Graham Wall Real Estate is handling five enquiries a week from rich Americans, up from one a week before Donald Trump began his campaign to be US president.

“Auckland, Waiheke, Queenstown are absolutely at the top of the hit list for these Americans,” said partner Ollie Wall.

“Over the past six months it’s certainly heightened hugely the interest that we’re getting.”

“Before the sort of Trump effect, as we call it, probably one [enquiry] a week, but in the last year we have done over $50m worth of business with Americans.”

Mr Wall said it was clear they were nervous about the future and New Zealand was seen as safe.

The New Yorker quotes Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn, recalling how he discovered New Zealand was a favoured refuge. A friend, hearing he was thinking of visiting New Zealand, asked whether he was getting “apocalypse insurance”.

“Saying you’re ‘buying a house in New Zealand’ is kind of a wink, wink, say no more”, Mr Hoffman told the magazine.

But Ollie Wall said none of the Auckland real estate firm’s US buyers had talked of making doomsday preparations.

“I was surprised to see it was a lot about almost doomsday preppers rather than people seeking new opportunities, because that’s how it’s generally explained to us,” said Mr Wall.

However he expected the New Yorker article to trigger another upsurge of interest among Americans in property here.

Buyers see New Zealand as “safe and steady”, he said.

“They are feeling uncertain about America, and not only America but the whole world at the moment.”


Safe haven? They never heard of earthquakes then?

NZ Fluoridation Legislation: Take Action Now!


Legislation on Fluoridation 2017  

Legislation was introduced to Parliament on the 17th November 2016. This Legislation will shift responsibility from the local councils and give it to the District Health Boards. It is designed to make it virtually impossible to stop fluoridation in currently fluoridated areas, or to keep it out of places that do not have it – even if they have said “no” to it in the past. Local Councils will be required to do as the DHB dictates or face a fine of $200,000 and a further $10,000 per day of non-compliance.

Download Health Fluoridation of Drinking Water Amendment Bill

This Legislation does not allow for DHBs to consult with the community and it only allows a very narrow range for the DHBs to evaluate the subject as they will only be allowed to consider dental health in the community against the cost of fluoridation. They are being steered to only consider the 2009 Oral Health Survey rather than much more comprehensive data. They are not given any leeway to consider overall health effects.

Submissions close 2nd of February

As you will see from the transcript and related documents and the video footage of the MPs that spoke at the first Reading (5th of December 2016) – National, Labour and the Greens support the Bill. The Labour Party even want to strengthen the legislation by making it mandated by Central Government just in case a DHB tries to wriggle out of it. In a press release in December 2016, Labour also condemned the Maori Party for running a poll to find out what people think.

Progress on the Bill can be found here

You will also see that none of the speakers know very much about the subject. Health Select Committee Chair Simon O’Connor mistakenly credits his good teeth on taking fluoride tablets as a child. Unbeknownst to him, the Ministry of Health no longer recommends fluoride tablets because we now know fluoride doesn’t work by swallowing and fluoride tablets cause dental fluorosis!

Associate Health Minister Peter Dunne, who introduced the Bill, has called us “tin-foil hat wearing, UFO-abducted pseudo-scientists.” He mustn’t realise that he is insulting around half of the NZ population. Results from all referenda held in NZ show that people tend to vote status quo. As only half of the country is fluoridated (23 councils out of 67, not “27 councils have rejected fluoridation” as Peter Dunne incorrectly stated) which means that roughly half the population is opposed to fluoridation (or maybe more than half) and if a nationwide referendum was held tomorrow, we would have a good chance of winning.

The NZ First Party thinks the issue should be decided by local referendum. The Greens supported the Bill “at first Reading stage” as they, too, have concerns about local decision-making – but the Greens as a party do think fluoridation is safe and effective. It shows that most of them must only have read the Ministry of Health propaganda.

How to stop the Legislation

The Government is now giving until the 2nd of February for us to send in written feedback on the issue. The law allows everyone who gives feedback to have 10 minutes speaking time for individuals, and 15 minutes for organisations. At the Hamilton Tribunal in 2013, 1557 people put in a submission, 1385 opposed fluoridation and 130 people spoke at the hearing to support their submission. That required the councillors to sit through 3.5 days of oral submissions and the result was a 7 to 1 vote to stop fluoridation. Unfortunately, some Hamilton councillors who had excused themselves from the Tribunal Hearing because of a conflict of interest, and did not bother to attend the Hearing as part of the audience, subsequently worked to overthrow that decision. (See Hamilton page if you would like more information on that).

Therefore, we urge everyone to give written feedback, and do their utmost to speak to that submission in person. We have been advised that It is best to keep feedback to a page or two with around half a dozen really salient points. The Hearing will be in Wellington, which is likely to be in February or perhaps March next year..

Ways to give Feedback:

Use this Online Form If you don’t know what to say, a personal testimony is good, or attach an article already written (suggestions here) or list a few points as suggested above. Send hard copy to Health Select Committee, Parliament Buildings, Wellington. It is really good if you can also say you will speak to your submission. This can be done by Skype if you cannot make it to Wellington.

Fluoride Free New Zealand will be providing a comprehensive written submission where we will explain the ineffectiveness and dangers of fluoridation and details of public dental health programmes operating overseas that actually do reduce dental decay.

Please encourage your friends and family to help us now by sending feedback to the Committee and by informing everyone they know on the facts about fluoridation. The number of people that do this makes a difference! You can also help by posting respectful and informative comments on Facebook, liking posts and comments and joining the discussions, particularly on the Facebook pages of the Health Select Committee Members. See the list below.

Remember, this is election year. We need to let politicians know we will not vote for them if they introduce this draconian legislation.

Health Select Committee Members
Simon O’Connor, Chairperson, National Party, Tāmaki
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SimonOConnorMP/

Barbara Kuriger, Deputy-Chairperson, National Party, Taranaki-King Country
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BarbaraKurigerMP/

Jacqui Dean, Member, National Party, Waitaki
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JacquiDeanMP/

Julie Anne Genter, Member, Green Party, List
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JulieAnneGenterMP/

Annette King, Member, Labour Party, Rongotai
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/annette.king.127

Shane Reti, Member, National Party, Whangarei
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/drshanereti/

Scott Simpson, Member, National Party, Coromandel
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/scottsimpsonmp/

Barbara Stewart, Member, NZ First, List
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/barbarastewartmp/

Poto Williams, Member, Labour Party, Christchurch East
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/poto.williams.7/


More Information

Local Government New Zealand’s response to amendments to the Act

Ministry of Health’s position statement on current proposed Legislation

Legislative Disclosure Statement from the Ministry of Health.

Israel: Next Step, Sanctions Please!

‘Next step, sanctions please

Law-breaking, resolution-busting Israel in a sulk after being told to play by the rules.

by Stuart Littlewood

Nothing could have been more calculated to ruin Hanukka for the Israeli High Command and bring Christmas cheer to the Palestinian Christians and Muslims they have abused and terrorised for decades. Yes,  the UN Security Council finally had the balls to adopt a resolution condemning Israeli “settlements” (posh word for illegal squats) on stolen Palestinian lands.

A statement from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office says: “Israel rejects this shameful anti-Israel resolution at the UN and will not abide by its terms.”

That’s good. The BDS boys and girls with be rubbing their hands with glee. It’ll mean a massive boost for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign, particlarly as 200 legal scholars and practising lawyers from 15 European countries have assured everyone – including those governments that misuse their power to try to scupper boycotting of Israeli goods and other interests – that BDS is actually a lawful exercise of freedom of expression. It is protected by the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights and any attempt to outlaw it undermines a basic human right and amounts to supporting Israel’s violations of international law.

A not-so-good consequence is that Israel’s attitude problem is likely to ratchet-up anti-Semitism yet again. But Israelis are well aware that Jews worldwide suffer for the Jewish State’s misbehaviour, so the remedy is largely in their own hands.

Still railing against the Security Council, Netanyahu says: “Peace will come not through UN resolutions, but only through direct negotiations between the parties.” He speaks, of course, with his military jackboot on the neck of the Palestinian people. His idea of negotiations, as always, is holding a gun to the head of the other party. As everyone, especially America, knows peace doesn’t suit Israel’s purpose although the pretense of seeking peace does.

And not content with defying the UN, Netanyahu wants revenge on the countries that co-sponsored the resolution, namely New Zealand, Malaysia, Venezuela and Senegal. He’s taking petty diplomatic reprisals against NZ and Senegal like recalling ambassadors and cancelling official visits.

Settlements “a flagrant violation under international law”

So what exactly does the resolution say? It condemns all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, and the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions.

The resolution also:

  1. Reaffirms that the establishment by Israel of settlements in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-State solution and a just, lasting and comprehensive peace;
  2. Reiterates its demand that Israel immediately and completely cease all settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and that it fully respect all of its legal obligations in this regard;
  3. Underlines that it will not recognize any changes to the 4 June 1967 lines, including with regard to Jerusalem, other than those agreed by the parties through negotiations;
  4. Stresses that the cessation of all Israeli settlement activities is essential for salvaging the two-State solution, and calls for affirmative steps to be taken immediately to reverse the negative trends on the ground that are imperilling the two-State solution;
  5. Calls upon all States to distinguish, in their relevant dealings, between the territory of the State of Israel and the territories occupied since 1967.

The US didn’t have the backbone to support the resolution, only to abstain. Furthermore, despite its tough wording, this was only a Chapter 6 resolution with more growl than bite. The situation clearly calls for a Chapter 7 job as Israel’s actions most definitely “constitute a threat to the peace, a breach of the peace, or an act of aggression” requiring coercive and enforceable measures.

Nevertheless it wasn’t entirely a waste of time. It turns a spotlight on Israel’s criminal conduct, it will have the effect of releasing the brake on various civil society actions against Israel – especially BDS – and it will hasten the day when countries slap sanctions on the rogue state and demand Israel’s expulsion for repeatedly failing to meet the obligations of UN membership.

The US ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, explaining America’s reasons for applying her veto, quoted Reagan in 1982: “The United States will not support the use of any additional land for the purpose of settlements during the transitional period….  Further settlement activity is in no way necessary for the security of Israel and only diminishes the confidence of the Arabs that a final outcome can be freely and fairly negotiated.”

She said those words “highlight the United States’ long-standing position that Israeli settlement activity in territories occupied in 1967 undermines Israel’s security, harms the viability of a negotiated two-state outcome, and erodes prospects for peace and stability in the region. Today, the Security Council reaffirmed its established consensus that settlements have no legal validity. The United States has been sending the message that the settlements must stop – privately and publicly – for nearly five decades.”

As Power also pointed out, the total settler [squatter] population in the West Bank and East Jerusalem now exceeds 590,000 and nearly 90,000 are living beyond the separation Wall which itself cuts well into Palestinian territory.  In the last few months Israel has planned for more than 2,600 new settlement units. “Rather than dismantling these and other settler outposts, which are illegal even under Israeli law, now there is new legislation advancing in the Israeli Knesset that would legalize most of the outposts – a factor that propelled the decision by this resolution’s sponsors to bring it before the Council.”

However, even if every settlement was dismantled Israel’s military occupation of the West Bank and Jerusalem and blockade of Gaze would still be in place.

The World Jewish Congress (WJC) President Ronald S. Lauder complains that once again the UN “singles out Israel for condemnation. It is shocking that 14 of the 15 members of this council voted in favor of the resolution.” Whining about Israel being singled out is a favourite refrain, as is another of Lauder’s remarks that peace can only be reached through bilateral talks between Israelis and Palestinians.

People like Lauder don’t seem to comprehend that peace can only be achieved within a the framework of international law and a level playing field. Lopsided negotiation between an armed bully still in possession of stolen property and an unarmed, dispossessed weakling is no basis for a just peace.

Meanwhile J-Wire reports that Christian Zionists in New Zealand – the Flaxmere Christian Fellowship – condemn what their pastor calls “the anti-Israel resolution outlawing Israeli settlements.” He adds: “We are disgusted at the leading role New Zealand played today at the UN. This is a day of shame for New Zealand. This resolution denies the rights of the Jewish People to build and live on the Holy Land of Israel, Land that has been promised to them in an everlasting resolution by a much greater authority than the New Zealand Government or the United Nations but by the God of Nations Himself….

“At a time when we should be celebrating the birth of the Jewish Saviour we have decided instead to back an anti-Semitic, anti-Israel Resolution at the United Nations. We condemn the UN Resolution completely.”

All that matters, then, is the mythical rights of the “Jewish People”, not the legitimate rights of the genuine Palestinians. They don’t even get a mention.

The Flaxmere Christian Fellowship website carries a map showing occupied Palestine as all-Israel. It promotes the following statement: “Regarding Israel, we believe it is their God given right to inherit the Bible Land of their forefathers, and this includes Judea & Samaria (West Bank) which is currently the matter of dispute between Israel and those who call themselves Palestinians.

“Part of the problem regarding the Middle East conflict is ignorance. Many people are ignorant of the historical facts not to speak of the Bible narrative. We as a church aim to bring education to people —especially Christians, regarding the unique plan God has for the Jewish People & Israel in these last days.”

Ignorance? Facts? Education? This “Christian fellowship”

  • believes that God has a unique plan for the Jewish people and the Nation of Israel.
  • believes that as Christians they are called to bless and support the Jewish people and if they do so God Himself will bless them.

Inside the church the flag of Israel hangs beside the New Zealand flag. It’s an interesting insight into the mixed-up mind of the Zionist.

Netanyahu’s office states that ​​”Israel looks forward to working with President-elect Trump and with all our friends in Congress, Republicans and Democrats alike, to negate the harmful effects of this absurd resolution.” So he’s banking on Trump being as crazed as he is.  If that turns out to be the case, we’re all in trouble.

Veterans Today

Kaikoura Quake: “A Trillion To One”

Image result for kaikoura earthquake photosSite Icon -Small

From Jeffrey ‘Goober’ Wefferson, via Rose at theCONtrail.com:

Here’s the audio from Jeff’s blog:

The odds are a trillion to one that the recent…and on-going…Kaikoura quakes on New Zealand’s south island…were not natural, but the result of scientifically premeditated geo-physical warfare, the main-stay of the global war-machine (or should I say ‘defense industry’?)’s ‘revolution in military affairs.’
Sure, sure…earthquakes DO happen naturally. New Zealand is bisected by a major fault line and Kaikoura is right on it. And the moon wasn’t only full, it was a SUPER MOON! To say that this was done on purpose by people is no more than some of that conspiracy theory, many will say.
Well, to those, all I can say is ‘Go and pop another beer and watch some footie…and be sure not to look at any FAKE NEWS OK?’ Leave the critical thinking to those who don’t have brain damage! Are you sure the quakes weren’t caused by ‘climate change’???
Astronomer Carl Sagan observed that “We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology, in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology.” That the military in general has developed what most would consider to be ‘science fiction’ level weapons systems is a testament to Sagan’s critique, as is his untimely death from leukemia contracted from his 100+ personal demonstrations against nuclear weapons at the Nevada Test Site.
These quakes, however, didn’t surprise me in the least. I never ventured a ‘formal prediction’ but the possibility did cross my mind a number of time as I have been monitoring the naval ‘war game’ Exercise Mahi Tangaroa happening this week in two Auckland harbours, as well as providing in-depth coverage of the recent RIMPAC naval war-games in Hawai’i which killed an enormous amount of marine life and helped to destroy the coral reefs with high-powered microwave transmissions coupled with electromagnetic ‘pollution’ from weaponized systems that ‘protect’ ship hulls from corrosion. Marine biologist Terry Lilley and chemical engineer Stewart Simonson have made enormous contributions to our understanding of this covert environmental warfare, even greater burdens on the health of Mother Ocean and her family of life.
another quake just hit Blenheim – still quaking http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us10007eq8#executive
Trails are insane here on the other coast.

Massive 7.5 Magnitude Earthquake and Tsunami, New Zealand


Site Icon -SmallApologies for the delay in getting this post up folks, but I’ve been directly affected and had a very dramatic and sleepless night, evacuated due to high tsunami risk.

At this stage I will add some links and keep building on this post as details come to hand.





Read and weep. Astounding bombardment:


(Shows interactive map)
(Other info)
17-OCT-2016 13:15:13 -40.21 174.45 4.3 80 243 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9387374
21-OCT-2016 18:20:47 -37.13 179.09 4.5 11 732 OFF E. COAST OF N. ISLAND, N.Z.   9384261
26-OCT-2016 10:08:08 -37.40 179.30 4.6 10 720 OFF E. COAST OF N. ISLAND, N.Z.   9385303
01-NOV-2016 19:43:53 -37.43 176.96 4.7 186 608 NORTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9387401
02-NOV-2016 09:54:16 -37.66 179.11 4.7 14 687 OFF E. COAST OF N. ISLAND, N.Z.   9387534
04-NOV-2016 23:23:27 -37.52 179.21 4.6 10 704 OFF E. COAST OF N. ISLAND, N.Z.   9388266
07-NOV-2016 16:59:07 -39.37 173.79 4.8 19 331 OFF W. COAST OF N. ISLAND, N.Z.   9388988
13-NOV-2016 11:02:56 -42.76 173.08 7.8 23 78 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9390973
13-NOV-2016 11:12:39 -42.39 173.66 5.8 10 17 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9390984
13-NOV-2016 11:32:07 -42.25 173.63 6.5 10 22 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9390977
13-NOV-2016 11:41:49 -41.79 174.11 5.7 10 66 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9390978
13-NOV-2016 11:52:45 -42.20 173.61 6.1 16 26 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9390979
13-NOV-2016 12:04:15 -41.68 174.49 5.0 14 91 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9390980
13-NOV-2016 12:20:44 -42.28 173.45 4.9 10 35 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9390982
13-NOV-2016 12:25:55 -42.71 172.83 5.2 10 93 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9390983
13-NOV-2016 12:37:45 -42.39 173.36 5.2 10 41 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9390985
13-NOV-2016 12:38:38 -41.70 174.22 5.2 19 78 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9390987
13-NOV-2016 12:52:19 -42.23 173.64 4.9 5 22 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9390986
13-NOV-2016 13:12:30 -41.86 174.03 4.9 21 56 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9391005
13-NOV-2016 13:21:12 -41.82 174.21 5.3 10 66 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9390989
13-NOV-2016 13:31:26 -42.29 173.69 6.2 8 15 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9390992
13-NOV-2016 13:49:59 -41.78 174.36 5.2 10 76 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9390994
13-NOV-2016 14:15:47 -41.94 174.08 4.2 10 49 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9391116
13-NOV-2016 15:33:03 -41.86 174.26 5.1 15 64 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9391003
13-NOV-2016 17:17:38 -42.54 173.82 5.2 10 21 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9391127
13-NOV-2016 18:10:26 -42.72 172.92 4.5 10 87 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9391132
13-NOV-2016 18:16:36 -42.64 173.23 4.9 10 61 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9391083
13-NOV-2016 18:34:26 -41.92 174.22 4.8 10 56 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9391085
13-NOV-2016 18:49:24 -41.99 174.02 4.7 10 42 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9391144
13-NOV-2016 18:59:07 -42.36 173.99 5.1 10 11 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9391091
13-NOV-2016 19:28:44 -41.73 174.34 5.1 8 80 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9391106
13-NOV-2016 19:38:07 -41.83 174.44 4.6 10 75 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9391109
13-NOV-2016 20:14:50 -42.37 173.89 4.9 10 3 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9391111
13-NOV-2016 20:22:13 -42.29 173.81 4.9 10 8 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9391114
13-NOV-2016 21:57:40 -42.30 173.78 4.2 10 9 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9391142
13-NOV-2016 22:19:32 -42.35 173.06 5.1 10 66 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9391149
13-NOV-2016 23:17:33 -42.09 173.81 5.0 12 29 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9391157
13-NOV-2016 23:49:10 -41.79 174.47 5.2 10 80 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9391160
13-NOV-2016 23:54:58 -41.73 174.33 4.6 13 79 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9391163
14-NOV-2016 00:34:22 -42.59 173.28 6.5 10 55 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9391174
14-NOV-2016 01:28:21 -42.07 173.93 5.2 10 32 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9391185
14-NOV-2016 01:30:11 -42.46 173.90 5.4 10 13 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9391187
14-NOV-2016 03:40:16 -41.90 174.52 4.5 10 74 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9391205
14-NOV-2016 04:05:45 -42.40 173.85 4.5 10 6 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9391206
14-NOV-2016 04:10:17 -42.17 174.10 4.5 10 28 OFF E. COAST OF S. ISLAND, N.Z.   9391207
14-NOV-2016 06:42:58 -41.87 174.37 5.1 9 68 COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND   9391220
14-NOV-2016 06:47:52 -42.35 173.86 5.8 15 0 SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND   9391221



‘What’s all the fuss about the Search and Surveillance Bill’

More info: http://october15thsolidarity.info/surveillance


Download and print for the protest march:
‘What’s all the fuss about the Search and Surveillance Bill’ (A4 doubles-sided tri-fold leaflet, 328kb)

“The war on news” with Martyn “Bomber” Bradbury. Weekly TV show on Triangle/Stratos-3

[Net Neutrality] Online petition – PublicACTA – The Wellington Declaration

Read: PublicACTA – The Wellington Declaration

Online petition – PublicACTA – The Wellington Declaration