[Listen to my interview with David Ray Griffin, author of Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? here.
In it we discuss the evidence that OBL died in December 2001.]
Osama Bin Bogeyman, the tribal chiefs tell us, has been ritually sacrificed:
Slaughtered by warriors, then dumped into the ocean.
But how can you sacrifice a ghost?
Bin Laden has almost certainly been dead since December 2001, when far more reliable reports of his death were published.
That means the guy they killed and threw in the ocean must have either been a ghost, or one of Bin Laden’s many reported doubles.
The controlled demolition of the World Trade Center, which pulverized about 3000 people into dust in a few seconds,
was the most elaborate and spectacular ritual human sacrifice ever orchestrated.
Now, almost ten years later,
an almost equivalently unspectacular human sacrifice has been arranged to reinforce the sacred myth of the original sacrifice,
which founded a new, homicidal pseudo-religion.
(I will discuss this on today’s radio show with Elias Davidsson, author of The Dangerous Cult of 9/11.)
This coupling of human sacrifices is pure religious ritual, with a dash of theater of the absurd.
It has nothing to do with reality.
Even the FBI admits that Bin Laden is “not wanted” for 9/11
– though he is wanted for other crimes –
because there is “no hard evidence” that he had anything to do with 9/11.
[ … & there isn’t ]
If in fact US authorities suspected Osama Bin Laden was involved with 9/11,
and was still alive,
they would have pulled out all the stops to take him alive.
And if they had screwed up royally and killed him,
would they have immediately dumped the body at sea?!
Given the formidable case that Bin Laden died in 2001,
obviously US authorities would have taken pains to prove to a skeptical world that the corpse or specter or whatever it was they possessed was the real Bin Laden.
Feeding the body to the fishes so fast looks …well, calling it “fishy” would be an insult to the scaly denizens of the deep.
Whatever evidence they produce identifying the ghost or double as “Bin Laden”
will probably have the same chain of custody as the Fatty Bin Laden “confession video” of December 2001
– that is, no chain of custody whatsoever.
So why was this moment chosen for the ritual sacrifice of Bin Laden’s ghost?
Some say to distract from Obama’s bogus birth certificate.
[ or – as scrumpy points out : a good distraction from the murder of Ghaddafi’s grandchildren. ]
Others suggest that the whole point is to demonize Pakistan, which is moving out of the US orbit into an alliance with China.
But I think the real motivation was to blast the media with a message reinforcing the official myth of 9/11,
in the run-up to the tenth anniversary.
The whole world is jeering at the “19 hijackers” myth,
and waking up to controlled demolition–as proven by a recent poll showing 89% of Germans don’t buy the official BS.
The spectacular, I mean specular, sacrifice of OBL’s ghost is supposed to subliminally convince us that OBL and the radical Muslims really did it – even though the FBI begs to disagree.
From spectacular human sacrifice to spectral human sacrifice. What a joke.
If stupidity were a capital crime,
OBL’s dictate “kill Americans wherever you find them” would apply,
in spades,
to the acephalic yahoos dancing around waving American flags in response to the mendacious media’s spectral sacrifice of Bin Laden’s shade.