A study coming out of Britain showed an alarming increase in the risk for myocarditis, which is inflammation in the heart, after every mRNA jab, particularly in males under 40.
Seth Hancock
The Liberty Loft
Mon, 10 Jan 2022
The study was published last month, and it analyzed data from over 42 million people 13 and older who have taken a COVID-19 shot. It was conducted by various researchers from institutions at the University of Oxford, University of Leicester, University of Edinburgh, King’s College London and University of Nottingham.
The findings showed that myocarditis risk doubled after one jab, doubled again after a second jab and doubled yet again after a third booster jab.
“An association between COVID-19 infection and myocarditis was observed in all ages for both sexes but was substantially higher in those older than 40 years,” the study’s abstract states. “These findings have important implications for public health and vaccination policy.”
The American Heart Association has released similar studies finding that the overwhelming majority of younger Americans developing myocarditis were injected with an experimental mRNA jab within a month of developing the condition as well as a study finding that “most patients” are at higher risk of heart-related medical issues after an mRNA shot.
Nurse whistleblowers have been speaking out that the jabs are more deadly to kids than the virus, and New York K-12 schools have been hiring doctors who specialize in sudden cardiac arrest.
Journalist Alex Berenson reported on the British study and wrote that the findings also show the health dangers are “sharply higher than the risk from a coronavirus infection itself.”
The Moderna jab, which includes 100 micrograms of mRNA compared to 30 from Pfizer, showed the largest risk among the various shots suggesting “strongly that the heart risks are dose-related and likely to continue to rise with each additional shot,” Berenson wrote.
“The study also contained some evidence that post-vaccine myocarditis might be more dangerous than other forms of myocarditis,” Berenson added. “It showed a trend towards higher death rates in people hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination compared to other myocarditis cases.”
Berenson notes that studies like this have not stopped COVID-19 authoritarians at various colleges from mandating the jabs, and most every shot available is mRNA with Johnson & Johnson being harder to find.
“These colleges are likely subjecting their male students to a risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, a related illness, that is much higher than the overall risk of Covid, which is vanishingly small for healthy teenagers and young adults,” Berenson wrote. “Many larger universities are likely to have multiple cases of male students hospitalized for myocarditis as a result of the mandates.”
Boston College, which brags about having a 97% compliance for students being “fully vaccinated,” has announced a booster mandate.
Not only is the government planning to change the definition of “fully vaccinated” with every booster after booster expected to be necessary to follow their dictates, it is also planning to change terminology. Anthony Fauci said last week at a lecture that “we’re using the terminology now ‘keeping your vaccinations up to date’ rather than what ‘fully vaccinated’ means.”
As the list of victims of the jab grows, the government and media is ignoring them.
The Centers for Disease Control has refuses to investigate the death of a 13-year-old Michigan boy who died of myocarditis three days after his second Pfizer jab and did not disclose the death at an advisory meeting.
A 14-year-old girl, Sarah Jessica Blattner, suffered a heart attack in her sleep and died in October after one Pfizer shot. Her father, David Blattner, now says: “She was our beautiful angel. Full of ambition, drive, passion and love. Her life was in front … the pain is unbearable. Make sure not to vaccinate anyone under the age of 24. There is no medical advantage and, in our case, total loss……”
Fabienne Schlumpf, a 31-year-old Swiss marathon runner and record holder, suffered myocarditis after a booster jab which likely ends her career.
There has been a lot written about this study. Just remember it’s a pre print and not peer reviewed. Personally I find the outcome ambiguous. I can’t work out if it is saying an increase in myocarditis for under 40 males after vaccination MORE than from COVID infection or an increase in myocarditis after vaccination but still LESS than COVID infection. Can you find anything the makes it clearer? I am with you, we WILL win this!
We’ve already won Richard.
I repeat: We have already won. Just yesterday I stood outside the local chippie, and started a conversation with the guy in front of me. Soon others ‘chipped’ in on the conversation. None of the talkers knew me nor I them. They all knew the truth. The government and MSM are fighting a losing battle to keep a lid on it.
Those who can’t see never will.
I just want to wake up as many as possible and therefore influence how matters proceed over the coming months.
As for the preprint, we’ll have to wait patiently for it to pass peer reviewal or vanish into obscurity. I’ll keeep an eye out for more info, and I’m sure you’ll do the same judging by your pro-active participation.
I realise the official “line” is that risk from Covid-induced myocarditis is greater than myo. from Vaccination, but the data on this claim is equally ambiguous!
In fact confusion and ambiguity are much easier to find than solid data. Nothing new there I guess.