Reimagining The World Economic Forum

The folks at The World Economic Forum, led by Klaus Schwab, never tire of “reimagining” everything. From food chainsdigital identityhealthcare, even reimagining capitalism itself, everything seems to be on the table. Our betters at Davos have taken it upon themselves to make every aspect of our lives fair game for being reimagined, reconstituted, recalibrated, reordered and reset. Always along top-down technocratic lines they dream up at their exclusive, invite-only confabs.

SUNDAY, JUN 19, 2022 – 12:30 AM

Authored by Mark Jeftovic via,

I don’t know about you, but I can’t remember asking nor empowering anybody else to reimagine my own life. I figure that’s my job. Shouldn’t we tell these guys not to worry about it – “We’ve got this” ?

They seem undaunted and proceed to reorganize the world anyway.

Maybe we should return the favour and reimagine The World Economic Forum and the self-appointed elites who populate its ranks…

Reimagining Klaus Schwab

Herr Schwab makes it hard not to imagine him as a SPECTRE-ish super villain straight out of a James Bond flick:

But that’s not re-imagining him. To re-imagine means to change, transform, turn something that is into something it isn’t because you prefer it that way.

So if we were to reimagine Klaus Schwab then perhaps we could start at the beginning, with Klaus Schwab’s father, Eugen Schwab who was a military industrial contractor to the Nazi regime during world war 2.

According to investigative reporter Whitney Webb, the elder Schwab:

“led the Nazi-supported German branch of a Swiss engineering firm into the war as a prominent military contractor. “

That company, Escher-Wyss, used slave labour in Nazi efforts to develop an atom bomb. Years later, when Schwab sat on the board of directors, he approved an initiative to help the Apartheid era government of South Africa in their pursuit of an a-bomb.

In this era of open talk about reparations, perhaps reimagining Klaus Schwab could prescribe that the World Economic Forum pay reparations to descendants of Nazi-era slave labour (concentration camps) and for their part in reinforcing Apartheid in South Africa.

Finally, given that Schwab was a protege of Henry Kissinger, who is considered by some to be a war criminal in his machinations toward multiple countries around the world; perhaps reimagining Klaus Schwab should also include some manner of Truth and Reconciliation process toward the countries and populations to which Schwab’s intellectual mentor inflicted so much pain and suffering.

Reimagining Carbon Footprints of The Elite

That the climate crisis requires a massive reordering of all our lives seems to have been already decided. When see some of the various pronouncements coming out of the myriad climate conclaves, including Davos, you’ll see they’re pushing for:

If one were to reimagine the World Economic Forum in terms of showing leadership and resolve for this ostensibly unprecedented crisis, then the logical and noble move would be to eliminate the most carbon intensive forms of travel and conspicuous consumption first.

Private jets and super-yachts would have to go, immediately, and with no exceptions. Private jets could be melted down for scrap metal and reused, as per the UK Fires memo on Absolute Zero 2050. All super-yachts could be permanently moored in third-world nations and repurposed as low income housing.

As of 2016 there were an estimated 10,000 super-yachts (over 28 meters) in the world, with 150 more being built every year. If a single super-yacht could be upzoned to house 50 low income families, we could provide permanent shelter for 500,000 families globally. Everybody needs a home, nobody needs a super-yacht. By re-contextualizing yacht and private jet ownership we can ameliorate the housing shortage in a carbon-neutral manner.

All Davos meetings and super-summits could be held via remote video conference from this day forward, which would further reduce carbon footprints of holding such meetings.

Finally, any Davos or WEF attendee who endorses or promotes action plans emanating from these proceedings should be legally bound to bringing their own consumption patterns in conformance to the recommendations, even before any such recommendations become policy.

That would mean: getting rid of internal combustion vehicles, private jets, yachts, second, third, forth, fifth or sixth residences, and stop eating meat.

Reimagining CBDCs and Social Credit

Make no mistake Central Bank Digital Currencies will be the lubricant for which WEF inspired social credit programs are implemented.

WEF talking points always include politically correct buzzwords like “inclusion”, “diversity” and “empowerment”, so what better way to reimagine CBDCs than to pivot the entire conversation toward a global, neutral digital currency that already exists and has no barriers to entry for anybody in the world?

I am of course talking about Bitcoin, which exists now and already ticks all of the inclusion, diversity and empowerment boxes. Even better, it provides absolute inalienable rights to those who hold it, who could argue with that?

Reimagining Constitutionally Enshrined Human Rights

Speaking of human rights, the Davos crowd always pays them lip service in everything they do. The latest Schwab book “The Great Narrative” formally endorses the human rights as laid on in the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

one all-encompassing value framework has been ratified by the 193 Members States of the United Nations: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.135 Its 30 articles detailing an individual’s “basic rights and fundamental freedoms” and affirming their universal character as “inherent, inalienable and applicable to all human beings

form the bedrock of a universal value system. This book embraces humanistic values that unequivocally prioritize freedom, human dignity and a quest for the common good.

So let’s look at what those universal human rights actually are. If we look at the UN declaration of Human Rights, particularly Articles 12:

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13:

  1. Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
  2. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 17:

  1. Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
  2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18:

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19:

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Then in reimagining the WEF we could posit them enforcing these globally ratified rights on their own membership and exclude or banish heads of state from any country that violated these rights over the past few years of lockdowns: namely Canada, Australia, the United States, the UK, almost every Eurozone country and any other nation that locked down their population, forced vaccinations, deplatformed dissenters or espoused the redistribution of wealth (property) in any way.

Reimagining “The Great Reset Fourth Industrial Revolution Grand(iose) Narrative”

Reimagining other people’s lives is fun. Once you have everything all figured out for everybody else it can be hard to understand why anybody would resist it. We’ve clearly laid out an inclusive, restorative, empowering set of principles for the Party of Davos to live by, so why won’t they do it?

They won’t do what we reimagine for them, naturally, so how come it feels like there’s a certain expectation that we’ll subserviently comply whenever they want to “re-contextualize” our basic rights?

The reality is nobody has any moral authority to reimagine anybody’s life but their own. That’s actually the objective point of the entire UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Thinking that one big super-brain or council of wise-persons can figure out the best way for over 8 billion independent minds and bodies to live is beyond imagination, it is pure delusion.

The main downside is by believing it is so, they cause a lot of damage. This technocratic mindset is what writes the pages of history: a small cadre of self-appointed elites think they have it all figured out, and then whammo – inflation, wealth inequality, civil breakdown, economic ruin and tyranny. Trying to control the outcome for all effectively bakes-in the chaos.

There is really only one thing anybody can control, which is their own reaction to whatever happens to them. That’s it. But it takes an act humility to realize that. For the Davos crowd, humility is a liability.

Fortunately there is another narrative rising: the decentralized revolution narrative. It’s the freedom to act unilaterally regardless of what anybody else thinks, and doing so without violating anybody else’s rights to do the same. This gives rise to a noble alchemy, a positive feedback loop.

It is the basis from which free markets and capitalism itself are born. It’s what launched the Reformation, the Enlightenment, the Renaissance and the Industrial and Information revolutions.

We can set up an agreed upon set of rules of what all 8 billion of us can’t do to each other. We have those kinds of rules already, handed down throughout the generations. But we can’t decide what anybody else should do without inducing them through a mutually agreed upon exchange of value.

The World Economic Forum is a last gasp of industrial age, late stage globalism. They may exert undue influence now, but it may have already passed its zenith.

Reimagine Yourself

Given that the Davos crew won’t have themselves reimagined, especially by us plebes, what we can do is really the only thing practical within the confines of incarnate reality: we can reimagine ourselves.

In my previous post about protecting oneself from “Davos Man”, I quoted Neville Goddard, one of the preeminent thinkers from the Golden Age of New Thought. His books “Awakened Imagination” and “The Power of Awareness” provide the antidote against those who would cast your life in their own mind’s image (the Tarcher reprint edition has them both)

Here is the secret that those who would rule over others don’t want you to know: It’s that imagination is an actual super-power. One bestowed on all of us.

Imagination is the very gateway of reality. “Man,” said Blake, “is either the ark of God or a phantom of the earth and of the water.” “Naturally he is only a natural organ subject to Sense.” “The Eternal Body of Man is The Imagination: that is God himself, The Divine Body. Jesus: we are his Members.”

I know of no greater and truer definition of the Imagination than that of Blake. By imagination we have the power to be anything we desire to be. Through imagination we disarm and transform the violence of the world. Our most intimate as well as our most casual relationships become imaginative as we awaken to “the mystery hid from the ages,” that Christ in us is our imagination. We then realize that only as we live by imagination can we truly be said to live at all

It’s curious that Schwab and company frequently use that word “re-imagine“. Once you understand the true power of imagination, as described by Goddard, that it encapsulates the underlying creative power of the universe, then the act of re-imagining another’s life is a type of predation. It is vampirism, both economic and spiritual. At scale it manifests as mass formation psychosis.

The Party at Davos (more like a coven, perhaps) would have you believe that power is  theirs, they are literally Priests of the Temple  in the church of Late Stage Globalism.

But the reality is that everybody has this superpower. If you use yours, you ordain your own destiny. If enough people take control of their own psychic and mental temple, the one within, then the rulers of the darkness of this world lose their power.

Without actively taking charge of your own thoughts and goals, your entire life will be something that just happens to you. When you are pursuing your own ideals and controlling your own thoughts you are expressing the universal life force in your own unique way. That doesn’t mean you are able to “command reality”, which is actually what the Davos crowd is attempting.

But what goals and aspirations you do attain will be in spite of what the Klaus Schwab’s, the Party of Davos and the World Economic Forum think you should do, instead of what they permit you to do.

If enough people do this: take the command of their own destinies, become as Sovereign Individuals, live in pursuit of their own goals and aspirations, then it won’t really matter what external groups from a waning era think.

*  *  *

You can learn more about the overall thesis behind the coming Monetary Regime Change by joining the Bombthrower mailing list.  Wherever you are on the path to being a Sovereign Individual, Bombthrower can help you navigate the terrain. (GettrTwitterTelegram)

Martin comments: I’m in two minds about this. It goes without saying that I agree these elites need to be brought to account and made to practice what they preach (or preferably stop preaching) however I’m wary of “Robin Hood” approaches to the economy that have a whiff of Communism about them. Taking from the rich and giving to the poor is a precarious tightrope that can tip into the abyss of “equal poverty for all”. Some people are good at making money and running businesses: Let’s encourage the wealthy to utilise their money productively (treat and reward their employees fairly), tax the wealthy fairly so they have no excuse to hoard their wealth in tax havens (dead money) and make sure that mythical “trickle down” of wealth becomes a reality. I’m a fan of the flat tax rate, but it should be coupled with Universal Basic Income. There should also be a stop to “philanthropists” like Bill Gates using their wealth to manipulate and control things in which they have no expertise. They should be using their wealth to employ (thus ending the “problem of useless people”) and produce, not to control and destroy. It’s all about checks and balances and limitations and accountability. Re-imagining is a fun game and can lead to constructive ideas, but transforming those re-imaginings into reality is the hard part!

See also: Harari: The problem Of All the Useless People » Uncensored Publications Limited

Uncensored is being censored
Get your copy from our Online Store or your local book and magazine retailer
Australian Retail Locations » Uncensored Publications Limited
New Zealand Retail Locations » Uncensored Publications Limited
As censorship heats up and free thought becomes an increasingly rare commodity, we appeal to our readers to support our efforts to reach people with information now being censored elsewhere. In the last few years, Uncensored has itself been censored, removed from the shelves of two of our biggest NZ retailers – Countdown Supermarkets and Whitcoulls Bookstores – accounting for 74% of our total NZ sales.
You can help keep the Free Press alive by subscribing and/or gifting a subscription to your friends and relatives.

Martin Harris

I have a lovely partner and 3 very active youngsters. We live in the earthquake ravaged Eastern Suburbs of Christchurch, New Zealand. I began commenting/posting on Uncensored back in early 2012 looking for discussion and answers on the cause and agendas relating to our quakes. I have always maintained an interest in ancient mysteries, UFOs, hidden agendas, geoengineering and secret societies and keep a close eye on current world events. Since 2013 I have been an active member of community, being granted admin status and publishing many blogs and discussion threads. At this time I'm now helping out with admin and moderation duties here at Uncensored where my online "life" began.

7 thoughts on “Reimagining The World Economic Forum

  1. It is all a matter of where the power lies! All parliamentarians, court judges, police, soldiers etc. are under oath of allegiance to their monarch, and the following shows that the monarch is not compromising, while allowing its fascists to mislead the public with some strange unwritten hearsay constitution, “maritime law” or corporation; The monarch may not create laws, but still has the power of ruling by decree (in practice this power is hidden behind its governments/courts doing it):

    NZ Habeas Corpus Act 2001: Writ of habeas corpus s 14(5)
    Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God Queen of New Zealand and Her Other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith:
    To: [name, place of residence, and occupation of the defendant, or other person in whose custody the detained person is alleged to be detained]
    We command you immediately to discharge and release from custody and detention [full name] (who may be called by another name).
    Witness the Judge of the High Court of New Zealand this . day of. 20.
    By Order of Court
    (Deputy) Registrar
    Take notice that if you wilfully fail to comply with this writ of habeas corpus the High Court will be moved as soon as counsel can be heard for an order committing you to prison for your contempt.

    After 1000 years in power the royals know that it is wiser to hide it — but they can’t hide their palace glitter. Any dictator, including dictators by birth (monarchs), cannot rule without fascism (rule by strong association esp. brotherhoods; prince Philip was a known freemason!) doing the coal-face work for them, and fascists usually aim to implement some monarchy structure and/or unquestionable “religious” priest-like ruling chamber … what else do you need to know?

    1. For completeness I may add further proofs of royal power:
      — Imprisonment in above law quotation is for contempt of royal power, not for unlawful detention (= criminal assault per Crimes Act), as such official police practice unquestionably needs to be upheld: NZ’s new “anti”terrorism law has increased the practice of detaining people until they “admit” to a crime – even if not committed, because habeas corpus is an elitary High-Court proceeding not automatically available (eg. demanded within 3 days by Germany’s constitution)!
      — Populistic fake-news propaganda separates the crown (“corporation” called state) from the crown-bearing figurehead monarch. Thus criminal cases are prosecuted by the crown (often mis-)interpreting statutory laws incl. constitutional Bill of Rights, and using precedence court-judgments’ quasi-law officially called Common Law (“maritime/admiralty law” per fake news) – While a reliable concise definition of Natural Justice is actively prevented in hidden favour of royal might-is-right: In 1994 NZ’s Appeal-Court judge Cooke reduced justice to “All that matters is being in power and staying there”…
      But when a defendant appeals his conviction to a higher court, he officially appeals against “R”; R stands for regina/rex, proving that the monarch is the crown! And he is appealing to the monarch’s “independent” judge being under oath of allegiance.
      — Even worse: “his” lawyer is not only under oath to obey the prosecutor’s judge, but worse still is under oath to cease defending the defendant, if the judge would find him guilty – when and how does he know this in advance of the actual judgment? Usually neither the defendant nor the public is informed, which explains the high rate of miscarriages of justice, while fascistic criminals remain protected from laws and at large…
      The totalitarian monarch is therefore the prosecutor, judge and defendant, the true defendant only needed for receiving punishment “at her majesty’s [sadistic] pleasure”, as they so say. Medieval monarchs must have copied it from us (if you really wanna create fake news).
      — Similar to NZ, Australia and Canada, Northern Ireland’s FPP-elected Sinn-Fein representatives cannot sit in the British parliament without swearing an oath of allegiance to their foe, the British monarch; Neither way can they therefore have democratic power. Coalition of democratic parties in governments means growing-up together…
      In comparison to such established “rule-of-law” power, Russia’s (and China’s) dictator looks like an ancient demented uncivilised dilettante using obvious brutal-raw war force against Ukraine (Taiwan’s next)…
      See the Universal Democracy Constitution for general neutral democracy information.

  2. Re Bitcoin:
    I have read a proposal somewhere that it is now so difficult to “mine”/create more bitcoin, that present bitcoin holders should be paid a sort of rent for using their currency —– This would worsen the present situation where the peasants (you, the General Public) are increasingly paying a sort of rent for housing, water, money (under today’s US’s private Federal Reserve Bank) etc. to the 1% tax-free-rich-list, just like being owned by monarchs in the past, and like monarch subjects in Britain, Australia, Canada, NZ, etc. still today being officially but silently owned by “their” monarch!… Digital currencies are not transparent for the General Public, while providing total-surveillance transparency for their hidden owners with inbuilt tax evasion, an extension of present stock exchanges. In other words: no point flying to bitcoin-Mars when you can’t put our terrestrial home coins in order, cause you’ll crash-land Mars, too…

    1. I had not yet fully read the article and Martin’s comment: If we want to restrict the wealth accumulation of the super rich, then we need to design a tax system that encourages good socially responsible entrepreneurship and start-ups while incrementally discouraging wealth-accumulation excesses; A one-size-fits-all flat-tax system will produce unfairness and tax evasion (eg. today’s degressive GST where the rich privately live off their businesses’ pre-tax profits, incl. Lear jets and Britannica yachts) — a flat tax paired with a human-rights-safeguarding Universal Basic Income is in fact and mathematically already a rather crude 2-step progressive taxation system. Greetings to Martin.

      1. Hi Fritz. I believe a tiered tax system that taxes higher the more money one attempts to make is counter-productive and promotes hoarding. What would you do if you found yourself having to hand a huge chunk of your earnings to the taxman? you’d put it in a tax haven or find creative ways to hide it (like by having a superyacht and a Learjet).
        If you are taxed the same rate as everyone else then you have more useable capital to invest in your business, have your rich-guy perks, but there’s far less “dead money”. Yes, there will always be corruption, but it will less prevalent and therefore easier to target and enforce.
        As for the UBI, the main advantage of UBI is that it does away with the current tangle of different benefits and allowances and all the institutions that manage them, thus saving a huge sum of money that would have been provided by taxpayers to operate these departments. End result: A streamlined system that requires less tax to operate, therefore facilitating a fait and equitable flat tax rate and ensuring everyone has a “safety net” should they be unable to work.
        Some people don’t want to work. They will have to be content with living off UBI because there won’t be any other options or handouts unless they can prove disability and a legitimate need for practical assistance.

        1. A progressive taxation (not only income, but also assets — in NZ property is taxed/rated according to its perceived market value, resulting in a mainstreaming market propelled by rich new neighbours) does not need to be linear; It can be fairly flat/constant for a wide range beginning at the low end and include self-employed, small-business owners, etc., before it rises sharply beyond a wealth level that equals a power concentration dangerous to democracy: Remember that NZ’s local-body (s)elections are tilted towards multiple-property owners incl. corporations having votes in each district where they own property! Of course they call this democracy, what else!…
          A compromise between tax-system simplicity, fairness and prevention of loss of democracy needs to be found and constantly adjusted via a democratic parliament (I dreamt this term up…), and today we could use computers in favour of just this, rather than for total implanted surveillance. You experienced recent censorship by TVNZ, District-Council libraries and govt spies; Big-Money power can cause/dictate such censorship by saturating the public with propaganda esp. when owning populistic/mainstream media (incl. social media), thus installing totalitarian-surveillance regimes “by stealth”.
          Consequently above all, we need to get those 1% super-rich fascists down to planet Earth again by progressively taxing them — they achieved this wealth in the first place by egocentrically using, promoting and installing anti-democratic tax-free corruption, while also having exploited the few social improvements (with eg. resulting basic technical knowledge from broad school education) that some far-sighted managed to implement before on cost of their own livelihood and even lives. Now they misuse this wealth power to philanthropically cull us via killshots against covid/monkeys! We need to depart from a few Big-Money fascists owning/dictating huge worldwide corporations and thus governments and Us — The idea of stakeholders incl. employees having a say in the boards of such corporations is far more common in continental Europe (except royal Britain, explaining Brexit), while non-existent under this monarchy here!
          I just can’t put this all into a one-liner like Trump; Greetings, Fritz

    2. ” Britain, Australia, Canada, NZ, etc. still today being officially but silently owned by “their” monarch!…” I disagree. The Crown legally and officially ceded all ownership of it’s lands and assets to the governments of the Commonwealth at Close Of Empire. The Crown is “managed” by these local governments on behalf of We The People. We technically “own” the government and they are our elected employee (“public servant”). Ultimately therefore all the Monarch’s former assets belong to us and are managed by government on our behalf. The Monarch actually owns nothing and lives off the taxpayer.
      If the reigning monarch does indeed “silently” still own Crown assets, then it would be secretly and unofficially, not officially as you claim.

Comments are closed.

Next Post

Facial Recognition is Here. You Were Forewarned!

Wed Jun 22 , 2022
Australia and NZ have had FR snuck in under the radar, it’s already in use at some major retailers. But is it legal? MH Please check out Carl Vernon’s YT channel, give the guy a Like and subscribe. awesome content! Carl Vernon160K subscribers Bestselling books and merch: Paypal tip: […]
Facial Recognition

You May Like