The following are examples of misinformation from the New Zealand Ministry of Health regarding the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine:
Martin Harris 14/10/22
The Pfizer vaccine
• The COVID-19 vaccines are already the
most well-studied vaccines ever made.
• The Pfizer vaccine is highly effective if
people have both doses, including against
the Delta variant.
• The Pfizer vaccine has a good safety
record and has proven to be effective after
millions of doses have been administered
worldwide.
• Studies show that about 95% of people who
have received both doses of the vaccine
are protected against getting COVID-19
symptoms. This means that once you are
fully vaccinated, you are far less likely to fall
seriously ill and less likely to transmit the
virus to friends, whānau or workmates.
• In New Zealand the vaccine has been
thoroughly assessed by Medsafe experts
and has met strict safety standards.
You can find more information at
Covid19.govt.nz/vaccines
• Two doses of the Pfizer vaccine are needed
for maximum protection
SOURCE: COVID-19 vaccine – Business toolkit (covid19.govt.nz)
History has proven that not even three doses were effective in preventing recipients experiencing “COVID-19 symptoms”. Note the wording “the most well-studied vaccines ever made.”. Not the most “proven”. Anyone can “study” a vaccine. Very misleading.
As for the claims about testing and safety, read on.
*Anyone genuinely interested in how Medsafe “thoroughly assesses” vaccines can read here: COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Monitoring Process (medsafe.govt.nz)
Again, read on regarding safety. Free? The cost revealed in the 2021 budget was $1.4 billion. That’s taxpayer money and hence is not “free”.
From May 2021:
Well, that propaganda piece has not stood the test of time. Somewhat embarrassing one might suspect.
And lastly, here’s some CREDIBLE advice from the NZ Ministry of Health!
COVID-19 information: How to tell if a website or social media site is credible
There is a lot of information online – it can be difficult to know what’s reliable. Here are five tips to help you make sure what you read online is from a reliable source:
- Understand the publisher. Anyone on the internet can publish anything they like. It’s important to understand the goals of that publication. You can often learn about a website’s background by reviewing a website’s ‘About’ page.
- Check the sources. The sources of an article are a strong reflection of an article’s quality. If the article doesn’t list sources, ask yourself – where is this information coming from? If the article does list sources, check them and make sure you believe they are authoritative.
- Check the date. You can usually find this at the top or bottom of the page. Recently written articles are more likely to be trustworthy than outdated articles.
- Check grammar and spelling. Poor grammar and multiple spelling mistakes could be a flag that the information you are reading is not trustworthy.
- Check the site design. Reputable publishers put a lot of effort into making sure their articles are easy to read. If the page you are on has advertising that blocks you from reading the article, or formatting that makes it difficult to read, then those are signs the publication is not trustworthy.
SOURCE: Group 2 COVID-19 vaccination continues this week – Te Whatu Ora – Nelson Marlborough (nmdhb.govt.nz)
Couldn’t have put it better myself. Fight misinformation. Check your sources!
Here’s some FACTUAL information from reputable sources…
Misinformation exposed, hidden agenda revealed…
Surgeon General’s Stationery (state.fl.us)
Based on currently available data, healthy children aged 5 to 17 may not benefit from receiving the currently available COVID-19 vaccine. The Department recommends that children with underlying conditions are the best candidates for the COVID-19 vaccine.
At the present time, there are certain risks to consider that may outweigh benefits among healthy children with no underlying conditions:
• Limited risk of severe illness due to COVID-19
• High prevalence of existing immunity among children
o Absence of data informing benefit of COVID-19 vaccination among children with existing
immunity.
• In clinical trials, higher than anticipated severe adverse events occurred among those receiving the
COVID-19 vaccine.
• Reduced COVID-19 vaccine efficacy among children 5-17
• Risk of myocarditis due to the COVID-19 vaccine
84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination.
Individuals with preexisting cardiac conditions, such as myocarditis and pericarditis, should take particular caution when considering vaccination and discuss with their health care provider. Florida Department of Health has issued the following guidance: Based on currently available data, patients should be informed of the possible cardiac complications that can arise after receiving a mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. With a high level of global immunity to COVID-19, the benefit of vaccination is likely outweighed by this abnormally high risk of cardiac- related death among men in this age group.
The State Surgeon General now recommends against the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines for males ages 18-39 years old. Males over the age of 60 had a 10% increased risk of cardiac-related death within 28 days of mRNA vaccination. SOURCE:
FOI reveals Pfizer and Medicine Regulators hid the dangers of Covid-19 Vaccination during Pregnancy because Study found it increases risk of Birth Defects & Infertility. Another alarming real-world study also found that the rate of Miscarriage is 82% following Covid-19 Vaccination.
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial (From the British Medical Journal)
Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports
Full PEER REVIEWED article at BMJ: Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial | The BMJ
From the government…silence. From the mainstream media…silence.
This is one of the greatest medical scandals in history. It should be screamed in world news headlines. It should be the subject of investigations and documentaries.
Except that the very media who should have been exposing this were complicit.
Check your sources. Use sources you can trust. Like us: