(Proof the election was stolen) THE COUP DE’TAT OF AMERICA: Italian Intelligence along with U.S. sworn testimony confirms the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election was stolen from President Trump. Satellites being controlled from Italy added votes to Biden to defeat Trump. Joe Biden is not the lawful U.S. President.
“Leonardo Aerospace, Defense and Security along with a U.S. State Department employee, the CIA, Italian Citizens and a Dominion Employee were all involved in the fraudulent stealing of the U.S. 2020 Presidential Election.
Joe Biden, once installed as the unlawful President of the United States, orders Mateo Renzi the Former Prime Minister of Italy to take down the current Prime Minister of Italy Guiseppe Conte. This is done by paying off Conte with millions of dollars in cash to keep him quiet.
U.S. Federal Prosecutor John Durham has in his possession documents of evidence that shows Barack Obama illegally moved $400 Million dollars in cash on pallets through the Dubai Embassy with the help of the Italians. They stole $400 Million dollars from America and put the money into a Merrill Lynch account in Geneva Switzerland.
Those involved in these atrocious crimes have murdered five Italian government officials in March alone to cover up their crimes. We cannot let them get away with stealing the Presidency of America and murdering innocent people. We must fight for justice and restore the rightful President of the United States.”
AMERICA IS Under Siege : ????!!!! (Proof the election was stolen)… (advfn.com)
Original source appears to be X
Thanks to Jon Eisen for the heads-up. This is a developing story and we’ll keep you posted as details emerge. If there’s any substance to this, we don’t want to see it buried. If it turns out to be disinfo, we’ll let you know also. And if anyone out there can furnish any details, please leave a comment or contact us. Martin
Get your copy from our Online Store or your local book and magazine retailer
Australian Retail Locations » Uncensored Publications Limited
New Zealand Retail Locations » Uncensored Publications Limited
As censorship heats up and free thought becomes an increasingly rare commodity, we appeal to our readers to support our efforts to reach people with information now being censored elsewhere. In the last few years, Uncensored has itself been censored, removed from the shelves of two of our biggest NZ retailers – Countdown Supermarkets and Whitcoulls Bookstores – accounting for 74% of our total NZ sales.
You can help keep the Free Press alive by subscribing and/or gifting a subscription to your friends and relatives.
First-Past-the-Post is not a democratic (i.e. proportional) election, but mostly a fascistic minority-rule selection from the same brotherhood; Therefore it cannot be “stolen”…
What has Trump done to improve constitutionally safeguarded democracy against FPP and electronic voting? — Answer: Less than nothing. He used this flawed system to the max., and now complains that his “opponents” do the same…
See Draft:Constitutional Democracy – Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Constitutional_Democracy
Universal Democracy Constitution https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8X9NHu4eL0gYldmY1ZYN0hMbG8/view?usp=drive_link&resourcekey=0-bbw9ogwH-Uecx_IxQg9ozg
I thought mail-in was Trump’s biggest complaint? In any event it’s not the electronic system that is at fault, but the way the system is managed and the people who are allowed to manage it.
Was Trump complicit in election fraud to get into office in 2016? If so I’d be happy to be shown the evidence:)
An election certainly can be stolen when it is (again) the people involved in corruption and manipulation rather than the system itself.
Regarding the constitution and FPP:
Article II Section 1 of the Constitution, as modified by the 12th Amendment, describes a “first past the post” system, in very simple terms:
The person having the greatest Number of votes for President, shall be the President.
The text requires that one of the candidates win a majority of the total votes cast. And in the event where neither candidate received a majority of the votes (as happened in 1824), a contingent election is held in the House, with each state delegation casting one vote. That winner is determined in a a “first past the post” system as well.
That answer is from James Keenley BA in History & English Literature, Northwestern University (Graduated 1984) via Quora. I’d trust that more than a dodgy Wikipedia entry fritz;)
The above-mentioned Wikipedia — Draft:Constitutional Democracy entry is not dodgy; I am its (blocked…) author, and am truly independent of any official propaganda or career!
It clearly explains that English-originated FPP is not absolute-majority rule but relative majority and thus in most cases minority rule / dictate (not deserving a democracy label), which invalidates votes for opposition candidates or parties, while effectively removing minor parties from the spectrum so that only the 2 major parties (2 wings of the same fascistic bird) remain —
This is why not only European countries (except Brexit-Britain monarchy…) use a proportional election system, but also NZ and even the European parliament (however, not its Commission which is less-democratically determined by states’ governments, much like the UN…).
America is in effect still suffering under the English monarchy system (literal meaning: (totalitarian) rule by one) which it “replaced” with (s)elected (indirect by the Electoral College that does not even have to accept the FPP outcome…) presidents (and states governors) who have far too much monarchic / dictator power without need for compromises — all described in above Wikipedia entry.
History’s interpretation is often very subjective, being dependent on the historians’ conditioning etc. the further it reaches into the past — If historian James Keenley with his BA diploma comes from Britain or America, then this would explain his lack of fundamental mathematical election knowledge — maybe he has read too much contents-less James Joyce in his English-Literature studies. Martin, it appears that your American conditioning affects your objectivity similarly, and it is not a good style to call my work dodgy just because it is not backed by such official history diploma;
— I dare say that electronic engineers have a far stronger training / conditioning in causal-chain logic than historians, though, else their designs would simply not work…
This illustrates two things:
Firstly, that anyone can compose or edit a Wikipedia entry and therefore it is extremely susceptible to the bias of the singular author. (I’ve altered and re-edited many Wikipedia entries that spewed blatant lies and /or individual opinions misrepresented as fact).
Secondly that it’s easy to attack the messenger (James Keely) while avoiding his direct reference to the data.
Historical interpretation has very little to do with direct reference to data Fritz.
The data is:
“Article II Section 1 of the Constitution, as modified by the 12th Amendment, describes a “first past the post” system”.
Do you refute this? If so, please outline why you refute this data.
It was a several-years-long fight with deletion and blocking (still blocked today, because I do not waste my time by begging for reinstatement… after I tried to insert a correction to the false claim that India’s Single-Transferable-Vote system were proportional, and trying to replace propaganda redirection to the false “Liberal Democracy” article) to get this Wikipedia “Constitutional Democracy” article installed — my argumentation that the Ukraine war would not have taken-off if Russia’s public (and indirectly also America’s public) would have known such basic democracy facts probably achieved this…
By reducing it to “dodgy” status without any detailing you in fact attacked me, even though you used a historian/English-literature BA graduand;
I use “FPP” in the English sense as it is commonly known worldwide; It may be that the 12th Amendment has redefined it and altered some details, but the relative-majority / minority-rule character still remains. Example: Just because Conservapedia presents Republicans’ redefinition of “republic” as being a better systems than “democracy”, because the latter were a “dictatorship by a majority (implying that a dictatorship by a FPP-minority were better…), it cannot alter the fact that “republic” is the Roman-Latin word for Greek “democracy” as proven in the Wikipedia article…
Food for Thought: If Americans would replace their foggy-nebulous “Deep-State” term with “fascistic corruption”, the public would get the clue that it is about secretive-freemason brotherhood controlling both sides and installing their mates, which the 2-party FPP system so much supports – Tony Bliar is one, as are ¾ of conservative Tories in the British Parliament according to a fairly recent book (I forgot its title); Prince Philip was one, too… Why did Trump not remove gain-of-(Covid)function Fauci mate? We better stop here to let readers some time to study the basic democracy facts in “Draft:Constitutional Democracy” of imperfect Wikipedia…
This Wikipedia“Draft:Constitutional Democracy” has been deleted on 3/12/23 and been replaced with a redirect to “Constitution#Democratic constitutions”, containing extreme pro-monarchies propaganda and no mentioning of election methods and other constitutional-democracy safeguards, but claims that government-appointments like ombudsmen are independent; Even important fundamental contributions in “Talk:Constitutional Democracy” about fascism, meaning of “monarchy” etc. have been deleted! They can be read here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ekUJ_oXz4J4ZheV0fAx6_3vguWW0FMpKGty7xAFSLKw/edit?usp=drive_link
Wikipedia, the most dangerous propaganda tool for dictators and their fascists !…