Screenshot (141)

The “Android Like” Lest...

By Jon Rappoport Others have pointed out how many times debate moderator Lester Holt slanted criticism toward Trump, rather than Hillary. O...

vitello_h168_h2-2

Lunar Anomalies: The Vitally Object...

WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON UP THERE....? http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/02files/Moon_Images_A06.html http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43...

UNCENSORED 43 cover

ZIKA: Judicial Remedy Urged, Resear...

Researchers Decry ZIKA Fraud in “Crisis Capitalism” and Urge Judicial Remedy   Miami, FL (Sept. 21, 2016)—A team of experts investigati...

Screenshot (192)

Hillary Clinton Has One Year To Liv...

In a detailed 10 minute YouTube video, using brain scans, disputed medical records and slow motion clips of Mrs Clinton, the "professor" – who c...

Issue 45

screenshot-217

In this quarter’s informative, thought provoking issue:

Palestine Destroyed on Google Maps

Post Fukushima: US EPA Raises Radiation Limits

Terrorism and the Fluttering False Flags

How Hillary Will Steal the US Election

The Obvious Question No One is Asking Obama

Did Hitler Escape Germany to Live in Paraguay Until His Death in 1971?

Italians Blow The Lid off the Chemtrail Secret Ops!

Religion: Why Are the Pyramids Not Mentioned in the Bible?

Nine Questions That Stump Every Vaccine Advocate

…and not forgetting the latest fascinating Lunar Anomalies pics and analyses!

screenshot-221

“You won’t get a better deal than this!”

 

 

 

 

Click here to buy

 

 

WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE DO

UNCENSORED magazine is actually the best-selling English language “alternative” news magazine in the Southern Hemisphere – and has been for over 10 years!

Launched in New Zealand and Australia in 2005, UNCENSORED quickly established itself as the leading “alternative” magazine in both countries and built a reputation as a highly respected, profoundly interesting magazine, featuring some of the best writers in the world.

Edited by Jonathan Eisen (author of Suppressed Inventions and other Discoveries), UNCENSORED has been in the forefront of major issues such as the real perpetrators of 9/11, alternative energy (and its suppression), the UFO cover-up, the GMO scandal and the dangers of corporate science, suppressed cancer breakthroughs, the global warming hoax, and many, many others topics that will open your eyes.

With over 90% of today’s media sources owned by only 6 corporations, can we honestly believe that we’re getting an unbiased, objective view of what is really going on in the world today?

It is for this reason that UNCENSORED is a completely independent enterprise with no affiliation or alliance to any corporation, religion, political party or organization.

And as such, it is free to publish even the most controversial articles that reveal the truth to an increasingly deceived society.

In this age of rampant conformity, manufactured consent for war and the poisoning of our land, water and air, UNCENSORED provides the catalyst and the resources that empower each of our readers to think for themselves.

In fact that’s our motto: “Think for Yourself”.

WE’RE READER SUPPORTED!

In a world where nearly every publisher’s survival is completely dependent on its advertisers (as witnessed by their 60% – 40% ads-to-articles ratio), UNCENSORED is almost entirely reader-supported.

OUR POLICY IS TO HAVE NO MORE THAN 10% ADVERTISING. (And the ads we do accept are only for products we really believe in.)

Our philosophy is simple: Dependence begets subservience, so a truly free press cannot exist if it is beholden to any entity other than its readers. In fact, our entire business model is predicated on the idea that Americans are finally beginning to wake-up to the extent and magnitude of the deception.

And they want the truth, for a change.

UNCENSORED is available in NZ and Australia a hundreds of newsagents and also individual copies and subscriptions from

uncensoredmagazine.co.nz

UNCENSORED is NOT available in any stores within the United States, but ONLY by subscription (or individual copies) through this website:

www.uncensoredpublications.com

Site Icon

The Great Vaccine Hoax

This is the cover-up of all time. Show this to your doctor!
Or if you are a doctor reading this, show it to yourself.
– Jon Eisen

VaccineGate: 30 years of Secret Meetings, Conflict of Interests, Dubious Science

link

Read more

UNCENSORED ENDORSED BOOK: SOLVING 9/11 BY CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN

Now available from the uncensored shop

SOLVING 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World

Click here to download

 

The “Android Like” Lester Holt: From John Rappaport.

By Jon Rappoport
Others have pointed out how many times debate moderator Lester Holt slanted criticism toward Trump, rather than Hillary. Others have suggested Hillary and Holt were a tag-team, with Hillary throwing hand signals to Holt indicating she was ready to hit Trump with a zinger.
On a different level…
Watching the debate-host, Holt, working his way through Trump vs. Hillary, sitting in his chair, bathed in a spotlight glow against a sea of total darkness, eerie metallic glimmers reflecting from his glasses, I was reminded of Dr. Eldon Tyrell, the barely human chairman of the corporation that designed androids in the film Blade Runner.
—Holt, the man who had the script and the questions and the facts at his immediate disposal. The brain. The wisdom figure. The synthetic guide with a touch of humanity built in.
Quite an archetype.
As I pointed out recently, the ridiculous notion of a debate with a moderator is modern. When Lincoln and Douglas famously debated slavery for hours at a time, over the course of several weeks, there was no intermediary voice. One man spoke for an hour, and then the other man spoke for an hour.
The moderator is a prop, a pretense of introducing objectivity into the proceeding.
The moderator is the “voice of rationality,” as it were. From that perch, he can, of course, slant the event—and Holt certainly did.
His dry speech patterns, in fact, resembled those of Barack Obama, when the President is reciting script.
Watching Holt operate, I was also reminded of the technocratic wet dream of a human brain hooked up to a computer, from which emanates undeniable wisdom.
Holt adopted the persona of a machine, and he pulled it off.
Which means? This is where the world is heading, if the technocrats have anything to say about it. You “need the best data—and one day soon you’ll get the data from a computer your brain is connected to. All will be well.”
Holt is also NBC’s national news anchor, which means he tells the stories of our time, every night, to millions of tranced viewers who are seeking a voice not their own.
Anchor and debate moderator—a powerful combination.
Hypnotically commanding.
Replay the debate moment when, out of nowhere, Holt’s words suddenly crackled like dry autumn leaves: “[Stop and frisk] was ruled unconstitutional.”
The narrator thus spake.
A brain not their own…a voice not their own…a narrator of reality…a fount of instant wisdom…the answer from on high…there are many, many people who want those things, and they want them embodied in a machine-like structure that assures them of dispassionate “honesty.”
Holt provided.
It’s no surprise that giant television networks have made these debates their own property. After all, the companies consider the events media-moments. Hosting them and appointing the moderators is no different from designing and presenting the nightly news broadcasts.
Of course, when you stop and think about this arrangement for debates, it’s absurd. Why would Lester Holt be more qualified to guide the proceeding than a car mechanic from Peoria?
Why have a guide at all?
Why allow media companies or government entities or even non-profit organizations a place in the debates? The two ruling political parties are the correct sponsors. We’re watching their candidates.
Holt was a well-groomed device. A hint of the near-future. A figure of “just-enough-authority” sitting in the darkness, dispensing voice-of-god to the masses, backed up by a production crew with split-screen, miced-up, podium-on-stage technology to provide a fatuous imitation of a real debate
Instead, let there be a stage in a glen. Two or three television cameras. Let there be a topic. Foreign policy. Hillary ascends the stage and speaks for an hour. Then she leaves. Trump appears. He talks for 90 minutes. Then Hillary comes back for 30 minutes. The candidates never speak to each other. There is no moment-to-moment exchange of daggers or jokes or gotchas. This isn’t entertainment. It isn’t grins or hair or dress or tie or teeth.
If there is a moderator, he stands down off-stage and to the side, grumpy and frowning, holding an umbrella in case it rains. He reads a book while the candidates speak, he eats a hot dog. He combs and re-combs his hair. He waits. He thinks about his 20-dollar-an-hour salary. He must remain absolutely silent.
He’s an actual prop put there to remind people of a time when things were different, when the so-called news was delivered by media stars, who competed to see which ones were the most clever at inventing reality that seemed factual, but wasn’t.
In a world with a shred of sanity, that’s what Lester Holt would be doing.
What is modern television news (including debate moderation)?
From their perch, anchors can deign to allow a trickle of sympathy here, a slice of compassion there.
But they let the audience know that objectivity is their central mission. “We have to get the story right.” “You can rely on us for that.”
This is the great PR arch of national network news. “These facts are what’s really happening and we’re giving them to you.” The networks spend untold millions to convey that false assurance.
The anchor is the narrative voice of his time, for all people everywhere. The voice that replaces what is going on in the heads of his audience—all those doubts and confusions and objections in the heads of the great unwashed. The anchor will replace those and substitute his own plot line.
The network anchor is The Wizard Of Is. He keeps explaining what is. “Here’s something that is, and then over here we have something else that is, and now, just in, a new thing that is.” He lays down miles of “is-concrete” to pave over deeper, uncomfortable, unimaginable truth.
The anchor must become comfortable with having very little personality of his own. On air, the anchor is neutral, a castratus, a eunuch.
This is a time-honored ancient tradition. The eunuch, by his diminished condition, has the trust of the ruler. He guards the emperor’s inner sanctum. He acts as a buffer between his master and the people. He applies the royal seal to official documents.
Essentially, the anchor is saying, “See, I’m ascetic in the service of truth. Why would I hamstring myself this way unless my mission is sincere objectivity?”
All expressed shades of emotion occur and are managed within that persona of the dependable court eunuch. The anchor who can move the closest to the line of being human without actually arriving there is the champion.
The vibrating string between eunuch and human is the frequency that makes an anchor great. Think Cronkite, Chet Huntley, Edward R Murrow.
The public expects to hear that vibrating string. It’s been conditioned by many hard nights at the tube, watching the news.
There are other reasons for “voice-neutrality” of the anchor. Neutrality conveys a sense of science. “We did the experiment in the lab and this is how it turned out.”
Neutrality gives assurance that everything is under control.
Neutrality implies: we, the news division, don’t have to make money (a lie); we’re on a higher plane; we’re performing a public service; we’re like a responsible charity.
The other night, Lester Holt was the machine-like agent of the Cosmic Charity of All Souls dedicated to higher wisdom from an unimpeachable source. That was his role and he played it.
“I take no sides. I have no opinions. I am objectivity personified. I am…The Fact Checker.”
Use this link to order Jon’s Matrix Collections.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

Despicable! Clinton Foundation Caught Watering Down Aids Drugs

Site Icon -SmallThis has got to be damaging to the campaign. Ouch….!Clinton Foundation

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/despicable-clinton-foundation-caught-watering-down-aids-drugs-to-third-world-countries_092016

Watch on Youtube:

Ever wonder WHY mainstream media agencies ALL report the news with the SAME spin?

Ever wonder WHY mainstream media agencies ALL report the news with the SAME spin?

screenshot-223

The information below reflects the nepotism that exists between Government and Corporate Media…

Perhaps this is why both Trump and Bernie claim it is rigged!

 

ABC News executive producer Ian Cameron is married to Susan Rice, National Security Adviser.

 

CBS President David Rhodes is the brother of Ben Rhodes, Obama’s Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications.

 

ABC News correspondent Claire Shipman is married to former White House Press Secretary Jay Carney

 

ABC News and Univision reporter Matthew Jaffe is married to Katie Hogan, Obama’s Deputy Press Secretary

 

ABC President Ben Sherwood is the brother of Obama’s Special Adviser Elizabeth Sherwood

 

CNN President Virginia Moseley is married to former Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Secretary Tom Nides.

 

You think there might be a little bias in the news?

 

For Some REAL news, see the following links:

ANP: http://www.alternativenewsproject.org

 

Christopher Bollyn: http://www.bollyn.com 

 

Uncensored News Network:

http://uncensorednewsnetwork.com  

https://uncensoredpublications.com

http://uncensored.co.nz  

 

Dr. Horowitz & Sherri Kane-Revolution Television: 

http://www.waronwethepeople.com/portfolio/revolution-television-2/

http://www.drleonardhorowitz.com/bio.html

 

CLG: http://www.legitgov.org/

Site Icon -Small

Lunar Anomalies: The Vitally Object Analysed

Site Icon -SmallWHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON UP THERE….?

Image result for moon

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/02files/Moon_Images_A06.html

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/02files/Moon_Images_Menu.html

Take a good look at the links above and you will find a staggering resource of images that suggest everything is not as tranquil and barren on our lunar satellite as NASA would have us believe. For decades now, researchers like George H. Leonard, Colin Wilson and Richard Hoagland and more recently, David Ice, have been highlighting strange facts about the Moon and artificial looking objects photographed on the surface.

Issue #45 of Uncensored features one of the more obvious anomalies in the form of tracks made by some tall, highly reflective object (a boulder say NASA) that resolutely travels up and down hills, avoiding gullies, while other rocks remain unmoving. Bear in mind these pics were taken decades ago. Something of ours from a secret space program? Something extreterrestrial, from some other place or indigenous to the Moon?

Take a look, and share your thoughts and theories with us!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DON’T FORGET TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS: COMMENT AND BE IN TO WIN!

Are Ya Feelin’ Lucky?

 

 

GOOGLE DELETES PALESTINE? NOW SAY IT NEVER EXISTED!?

 

As reported in the latest issue of Uncensored Magazine, Google has ignited outrage by apparently deleting Palestine from Google Maps, but in subsequent developments, Google has defended itself by claiming Palestine was never labelled on Google Maps in the first place!

Google also  says that West Bank and Gaza were missing due to “a bug” that is being fixed (just gets better doesn’t it?).

Read more at these links:

http://www.wired.co.uk/article/google-palestine

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/aug/10/google-maps-accused-remove-palestine

And of course see the many links in the mag. Don’t have it? Just make a comment and be in to win a Year’s subscription!

Site Icon -Small

ZIKA: Judicial Remedy Urged, Researchers Decry Fraud

Researchers Decry ZIKA Fraud in “Crisis Capitalism” and Urge Judicial Remedy

 

Miami, FL (Sept. 21, 2016)—A team of experts investigating ZIKA fraud for a non-profit public health advocacy group in the United States has concluded that the spraying of toxic pesticides and release of government-approved genetically-modified (“GM”) mosquitoes to fight ZIKA has been schemed by a racketeering enterprise commercializing in bio-terrorism and “crisis capitalism.”

 

Experts from several fields filed a critical review of available intelligence for publication in Medical Veritas Journal evidencing a “high probability” of ZIKA fraud. The data identifies a criminal enterprise commercializing in bio-terrorism and crisis capitalism as the most probable cause of the costly and damaging ZIKA “emergency.”

 

According to the reviewers, politicians and the media are “selling” citizens on unproven methods of “disease control” in Florida and elsewhere. The experts also question the “mystery” of ZIKA’s emergence from a Brazilian vaccine experiment generating mutated viruses, and then promoting drugs, vaccines, pesticides and genetically-modified (“GM”) mosquitoes to combat the plague.

 

 

In conclusion, the professional group condemned “the creation of ‘alien species’ of microbes,” including ZIKA, as an “obvious man-made threat.” The MVI contributors wrote “this reckless disregard for life, nature, and the sanctity of intelligent design central to the physical sciences, is unconscionable.”

 

The group recommends the remedy advanced by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and IBM to regulate the medical industry applicable also to the judicial system to save costs, restrain corruption, reduce fraud, and discipline violators.

READ THE REST HERE: http://www.waronwethepeople.com/zika-fraud/Site Icon -Small

 

Liked the article? Got any comment or info to add, or maybe you think they’re barking up the wrong tree?

Make a comment and be in with a chance to win a free one year sub. to Uncensored Magazine!

Are Ya Feelin’ Lucky?

Monsanto To Be Held Accountable For It’s Crimes!

Corporate criminals beware . . .

Image result for monsanto evil

Just as the International Monsanto Citizens’ Tribunal is preparing to hold Monsanto accountable for its crimes in The Hague next month, comes this breaking news from the International Criminal Court (ICC).

The ICC, will for the first time in history prioritize crimes “committed by means of, or that result in the destruction of the environment, the illegal exploitation of natural resources or the illegal dispossession of land.”

What does this mean for the Monsanto Tribunal?

It means that the work we do there next month will form the foundation for prosecuting companies like Monsanto, Bayer, Dow and the rest of the corporate biotech criminals in the United Nations-backed international court, based in The Hague.

When we began planning for the Monsanto Tribunal, our intent was to draw international attention to Monsanto’s crimes—all of them.

We especially wanted to change the rules so that corporations like Monsanto could be prosecuted for crimes against nature or the environment, not just crimes against humanity.

That’s why this news from the United Nations-backed ICC is so breathtaking.

It means that finally, Monsanto and companies like it will have to answer for poisoning the world’s soils, water and air!

As we wrote earlier this week, the proposed takeover of Monsanto by Bayer doesn’t change the impact the Monsanto Tribunal will have.

A corporate criminal by any other name is still a corporate criminal.

Now, thanks to this breaking news from the ICC, and the work we’re doing on the Monsanto Tribunal, the world will be able to hold these corporate criminals accountable.

The Tribunal is just one of the projects OCA is working on. With Bayer’s proposed buyout of Monsanto, we will have to double down in 2017 on our work to expose Big Biotech’s efforts to monopolize seeds and the world’s food supply, and its rampant poisoning of our food, bodies and our environment.

The work of the grassroots is always challenging. But when Monsanto needs to be bought out in order to survive, and the ICC steps up to finally recognize corporate attacks on the environment as international crimes, it’s clear that the work you are supporting is shaking up the system.

Image result for international monsanto tribunal

If you’d like to help, you can make fully-tax-deductible donations online, by phone or by mail.  Click here for details

Thank you!

Ronnie Cummins International Director

 

The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization campaigning for health, justice, peace, sustainability and democracy. Donations to the OCA are tax-deductible to the fullest extent of the law.
6771 South Silver Hill Drive Finland, MN 55603 Phone: 218-226-4164 Fax: 218-353-7652

 

 

 

The Tide Is Turning!

The Tide is Turning: The Official Story Is Now The Conspiracy Theory — Paul Craig Roberts

The Tide is Turning: The Official Story Is Now The Conspiracy Theory
Paul Craig Roberts
In a few days it will be the 15th anniversary of 9/11, and this November 22 will be the 53rd anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas. These two state crimes against democracy destroyed American democracy, accountable government, and the Constitution’s protections of civil liberty.
Years after the damage done by these events the American people no longer believe the official stories. Neither does the government, but the government will never validate the distrust that Americans now share of the oligarchs’ government by acknowledging the truth.
The official explanation of the assassination of President Kennedy never made any sense. Videos of the assassination contradicted the official story, as did witnesses, and many credible people challenged the government’s story. The CIA was faced with the official explanation becoming unglued and launched its media program stigmatizing doubters as “conspiracy theorists.” See:
The CIA’s psych warfare against the public succeeded at the time and for a number of years during which witnesses had mysterious deaths and the trail grew cold. But by the late 1970s there was so much public skepticism of the official story that the US Congress took the risk of being labeled “conspiracy kooks.” The House Select Committee on Assassinations reopened the inquiry into JFK’s murder. The House Committee concluded that the Warren Commission’s investigation was seriously flawed, that there was more than one person firing at President Kennedy and that there was a conspiracy to assassinate JFK.
The corrupt US Department of Justice (sic) contradicted the House Select Committee’s report. However, the American people believed the Select Committee and not the corrupt Justice (sic) Department, which never tells the truth about anything.
By 2013 polls showed that most Americans are “conspiracy kooks” who do not believe the official government line on JFK’s assassination. So with regard to JFK’s assassination, the “conspiracy theorists” are in the majority. The minority are the Americans who cannot escape their brainwashing. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2013/11/20/poll-62-percent-believe-broader-plot-killed-kennedy/
In a few days it will be the 15th anniversary of the alleged al Qaeda attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, and we are witnessing the fading protection that the charge of “conspiracy theorist” provides for the officlal government story. Indeed, the official 9/11 story is collapsing before our eyes.
 
Europhysics, the respected publicaton of the European physics community has pubished an article by scientists who conclude that “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three [World Trade Center] buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.” Few American scientists can admit this, because their careers depend on US government and military/security complex research contracts. Independent scientists in the US are a vanishing breed, an endangered species.
The scientists say that in view of their findings, “it is morally imperative” that 9/11 “be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.” http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016-47-4.pdf
So now we are faced with a peculiar situation. The scientifically ignorant two-bit punk American presstitutes claim to know more than the editors of the journal of the European physics community and the scientists who did the investigation. Don’t you think it farfetched that ignorant, corrupt, and cowardly American journalists who lie for money know more than physicists, chemists, 2,700 high-rise architects and structural engineers who have called on the US Congress to launch a real investigation of 9/11, firefighters and first responders who were on the WTC scene, military and civilian pilots and former high government officials, all of whom are on record challenging the unbelievable and physically impossible official story of 9/11? What kind of a dumbshit moron does a person have to be to believe that the United States government and its media whores know better than the laws of physics?
The ability of the presstitutes to influence Americans seems to be on the decline. The media ganged up on Donald Trump during the Republican primaries, intending to deny Trump the nomination. But the voters ignored the presstitutes. In the current presidential campaign, Hillary is not the run-away winner that the presstitutes are trying to make her. And despite the propaganda ministry, the legs under the official 9/11 story are wobbly, to say the least.
Indeed, the official 9/11 story already has lost credibility with the American public. Last April a Rasmussen Poll found that “Americans doubt they’ve been told all the facts about the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States and strongly believe the government should come clean.”
A YouGov poll in 2013 found that 50 percent of Americans “have doubts about the government’s account of 9/11,” which shows that the public is far more intelligent and less corrupt than the presstitutes who are paid to lie to the public. This poll also found that as a consequence of the cover-up job performed by the American presstitutes, 46 percent of Americans were not even aware that a third WTC building, Building 7, collapsed on September 11. After viewing films of WTC 7’s collapse, 46 percent saw it as a controlled demolition. By a margin of two to one, poll respondants support a new investigation of Building 7’s collapse.
So, in America today “conspiracy kooks” outnumber those who believe the official lies. As the official lies are themselves conspiracy theories, Americans who disbelieve the official conspiracy theories outnumber Americans who believe official conspiracy theories. The question is: who are the real conspiracy kooks, the majority who disbelieve the official lies or the minority who believe the official lies?
It is curious that the CIA’s psych-op mind-controll has broken down in the cases of the JFK assassination and 9/11, but is still effective in more recently orchestrated events, such as San Bernardino, Orlando, Paris, and Nice. Perhaps this is because not enough time has passed for the public to pay attention to the vast difference between the stories and the evidence.
The Internet offers many refutations of the official accounts. With regard to Nice, France, the Nice police officials themselves are having problems with the official story. The French Anti-Terrorist Sub-Directorate in Paris has ordered the public authorities in Nice to delete the video recordings from security cameras of the “Nice Terror Truck Attack.” The Nice authorities refused on the grounds that this would be destruction of criminal evidence. This story has disappeared from the news. I have asked friends in France how this conflict was resolved and have not heard anything. The French like to live life well and faced with the refugees from Washington’s wars, they seem to be focused on living life well while it can be done. If I hear anything, I will pass it on. http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/07/22/french-anti-terrorist-police-demand-destruction-of-nice-evidence-paul-craig-roberts/print/
Apparently, the order to delete the video evidence of the “attack” was not sufficient for the French Ministry of the Interior. According to a senior Nice police officer, Sandra Bertin, the Interior Ministry pressured her to falsify her police report on the Nice “truck massacre.” Officer Bertin told the Journal du Dimanche that “he ordered me to put in [the report] the specific positions of the national police which I had not seen on the screen.” http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2016/07/25/476757/France-nice-police-woman-harassed-CCTV
The Interior Minister, Bernard Cazeneuve is suing the Nice police official for “defamation,” as if it is possible to defame any politician anywhere in the corrupt West. http://www.newsweek.com/french-interior-minister-bernard-cazeneuve-sue-police-officer-over-nice-attack-483595 Moreover, why would a senior Nice official make up a story about being ordered to change a report? It doesn’t make any sense, does it? Clearly, the central government is trying to hide the evidence against the official story. http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2016/07/25/476757/France-nice-police-woman-harassed-CCTV
It seems that the French media is disposing of the Nice police official by branding her a rightwing racist opposed to the current government. http://www.france24.com/en/20160725-french-government-hits-back-nice-security-allegations
Watch this video and ignore the narrator’s four-letter vocabulary. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytM-cYfLxzk What you will learn is that all those people you saw running in the presstitute TV reports had no idea why they were running. The presstitutes created the impression that they were running away from the truck. However, as the interviews show, they were running because other people were running, because the police told them “terrorists, run,” and because they heard shots (apparently police firing blanks). Those interviewed reported, “You run with them even though you have no idea what you are running from. You can’t help it, you run with them.” None of those running away ever saw a truck.
According to the foul-mouthed narrator, the film of the people running away was taken prior to the time the truck allegedly mowed down 185 people, killing 85 of them. The narrator appears to be correct if the time stamps on videos are correct. The narrator says the streets needed to be cleared for the crisis actors to put on their show that is used to control our minds about what happened.
I have pointed out that a truck that hit 185 people, killing 85 of them would be covered in blood and that bodies would be splattered all over the street with blood everywhere. Yet, the photos and videos that we are shown show no such evidence. The stopped truck on which police are directing gunfire is as white as snow.
Independently of the vast analysis online of the video evidence of the alleged “Nice attack,” I suspect the Nice “terror attack” for the same reason that the Pentagon attack is suspect. Despite all the contrary evidence against the official stories, the authorities refuse to release the video evidence that, if it shows what the authorities claim, would shut up the skeptics and prove the official story.
When a government claims it has video evidence that proves its official story but refuses to release it, indeed, demands the destruction of the video evidence, we know for an absolute fact that the video evidence totally contradicts the official story. That is the only possible conclusion.
My readers will write to me asking how the government expects to get away with its faked, and in the case of 9/11 false flag, terror orchestrations? The answer, perhaps, is that just as it took a long time for the JFK assassination and 9/11 lies to catch up with the government, the recent orchestrations will also take some time for a slowly awakening public to catch on. In the meantime the orchestrated events will serve the agendas that they are intended to serve, and by the time that the public sees through the orchestrations, a new situation will be in place with new orchestrations.
Keep in mind that the public thinks it is shown evidence. Newspapers need photos to give a visual dimension to their coverage, and TV needs videos of the events. News organizations are under a time pressure, and they have to use what they are handed or what is at hand. There is no time to scrutinize the visual material or to raise questions about it. Most of the public thinks that the photos and videos shown to them are evidence or would not be shown and accepts the visual evidence without question. In an earlier column I linked to the vast array of Nice photos provided in the UK Daily Mail. The photos show a calm situation. There are a few people lying in the street without any sign of bodily damage or blood and there are covered objects that the public assumes are dead people. But the streets are devoid of the splattered blood and mangled bodies that would be the consequence of a truck hitting 185 people. Similarly, we have been shown very few videos and their origin is unknown except for the one attributed to Richard Gutjahr who was apparently pre-positioned to film inconclusively both the Nice and German “terror attacks.” Online analysis of the videos shows that the videos are not evidence for the storyline. The real question is why the French Interior Minister has prevented the release and demanded destruction of the security camera videos that filmed the entire event, an order that brought the central government in Paris in conflict with the public authorities in Nice. There has been no US media interest whatsoever in this very strange event. It is not a “conspiracy theory” to ask why the public cannot see the video evidence that shows what actually happened.
What agenda is served by the Paris and Nice attacks? This is the question everyone should be asking and the media, if we had one, should be investigating. With the information currently available to me, my answer is this. Of all the peoples of Western Europe, the French are the most independently minded. French independence has taken a number of recent hits from Washington:
The largest French bank was forced to hand over $9 billion to Washington for doing business with a country on Washington’s disapproval list.
Washington forced France to cancel a lucrative ship-building program for Russia, to the detriment of French companies and shipyard workers.
Washington has forced France into a diplomatic conflict with Russia that the French do not want and into a looming military conflict which the French want even less, as the conflict would mean the vaporization of France. As one Russian SS-18 can wipe out three-fourths of the state of New York, how many do you think it would take to wipe France off of the face of the Earth? Not even a handful.
Keep in mind that in 1966 President Charles de Gaulle pulled France out of NATO on the grounds that it was necessary to preserve French independence in world affairs. France did not again submit to Washington’s control until 2009 when Washington-owned Nicolas Sarkozy, put into the French presidency by Washington’s money, followed his orders and rejoined NATO.
The Paris and Nice orchestrated events serve to scare France back into Washington’s arms. Dreams of independence become nightmares when independence leaves the French people at the mercy of both terrorists and Russians. Washington, who owns Sarkozy, who is once again Washington’s candidate for president of France, intends to keep France in NATO.
The article in Europhysics pointing out the impossibility of the official 9/11 story could possibly lead to a rebirth of skepticism among Europeans. Only a skeptical media willing to investigate government storylines can bring a halt to the staged terror events that serve secret agendas.

Keep in mind that the US government has plentiful video evidence of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon but refuses to release the evidence that it says support its story. Similarly, the French federal government has prohibited Nice authorities from releasing the security camera videos of the Nice truck attack and has ordered the video evidence destroyed. How can we believe governments that refuse to show us the hard evidence?

screenshot-215Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts’ latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West, How America Was Lost, and The Neoconservative Threat to World Order.
Newsletter Notifications Signup Form