Category: Conspiracies

New Zealand: No Photo ID, No Entry to Ministry Of Social Development Sites

Image result for papers please nazi
From Morning Report7:50 am on 15 February 2017

Security guards must now stop anyone trying to enter a Work and Income office if they don’t have ID.

The changes are part of a new government policy being rolled out after two staff members were shot and killed at the Ashburton office in 2014.

But the guards’ union says it’s causing long queues and frustrations at the door.

Mike Treen of Unite Union said many of the people arriving for their appointments did not know about the policy.

He said guards were working outside, on their own, with an appointment list and dealing with a queue of people.

“The guards aren’t actually able to do their job of guarding the door because they’re busy looking up and down checking the names.

“So they’re not keeping their eye on the customers, not keeping an eye on what’s happening outside. They’re not able to do their job.”

He said customers were being made to stand aside while contact was made with somebody inside the office – but the guards could only do that by tapping on the door.

Mr Treen said the system was confusing, frustrating and dangerous. “In effect you’ve got WINZ making the guards carry out reception duties.”

In a statement, Ministry of Social Development associate national commissioner Te Rehia Papesch said it was an important part of security that they knew who was coming into their sites.

“Our security guards are having a conversation with people before they come into our offices to quickly discuss why a person is there, and helps to make sure we don’t admit anyone who might represent a risk to the safety of other clients or our staff.

“People will be asked for ID – any form of ID. But we know not everyone carries this at all times so I can reassure people that not having ID won’t mean people can’t come into a Work and Income office.”

Beneficiaries’ advocate Kay Brereton said the ministry had told her 21 people had so far been turned away for not having ID, but she suspected the true number was far higher.

Winston Churchill’s Lost Extra-terrestrial Essay Discovered

Image result for winston churchill ufo documents

Winston Churchill, British prime minister and one of history’s most influential statesmen, was undoubtedly a man with weighty questions on his mind. How best to save the British Empire? he must have mused. What will the postwar world look like? he surely wondered. But the legendary leader also focused his prodigious mind on less pragmatic questions. For instance: Is there life on other planets?

In fact, in 1939, Churchill penned a lengthy essay on this very topic, which was never published. Besides displaying a strong grasp of contemporary astrophysics and a scientific mind, he came to a breathtaking conclusion: We are probably not alone in the universe. The long-lost piece of Churchilliana has just floated up to the surface again, thanks to an article written by astrophysicist Mario Livio in this week’s edition of the journal Nature analyzing Churchill’s work.

thousands of nebulae, each containing thousands of millions of suns, the odds are enormous that there must be immense numbers which possess planets whose circumstances would not render life impossible,” Churchill concluded in his essay. He wrote these words on the eve of World War II—more than half a century before exoplanets were discovered.

Until last year, Churchill’s thoughts on the problem of alien life had been all but lost to history. The reason: His 11-page typed draft was never published. Sometime in the late 1950s, Churchill revised the essay while visiting the seaside villa of publisher Emery Reves, but the text still didn’t see the light of day. It appears to have languished in the Reves house until Emery’s wife Wendy gave it to the U.S. National Churchill Museum during the 1980s.

Last year, the museum’s new director, Timothy Riley, unearthed the essay in the museum’s archives. When astrophysicist Mario Livio happened to visit the museum, Riley “thrust [the] typewritten essay” into his hands, Livio writes in Nature. Riley was eager to hear the perspective of an astrophysicist. And Livio, for his part, was floored. “Imagine my thrill that I may be the first scientist to examine this essay,” he writes in Nature.

Churchill did his homework, Livio reports. Though he probably didn’t pore over peer-reviewed scientific literature, the statesman seems to have read enough, and spoke with enough top scientists—including the physicist Frederick Lindemann, his friend and later his official scientific adviser—to have had a strong grasp of the major theories and ideas of his time. But that wasn’t what left the deepest impression on Livio.

“To me the most impressive part of the essay—other than the fact that he was interested in it at all, which is pretty remarkable—is really the way that he thinks,” Livio says. “He approached the problem just as a scientist today would. To answer his question ‘Are we alone in the universe?’ he started by defining life. Then he said, ‘OK, what does life require? What are the necessary conditions for life to exist?’”

Churchill identified liquid water, for example, as a primary requirement. While he acknowledged the possibility that forms of life could exist dependent on some other liquid, he concluded that “nothing in our present knowledge entitles us to make such an assumption.”

“This is exactly what we still do today: Try to find life by following the water,” Livio says. “But next, Churchill asked ‘What does it take for liquid water to be there?’ And so he identified this thing that today we call the habitable zone.”

By breaking down the challenge into its component parts, Churchill ended up delving into the factors necessary to create what is now known as the “Goldilocks zone” around a star: that elusive region in which a life-sustaining planet could theoretically exist. In our own solar system, he concluded, only Mars and Venus could possibly harbor life outside of Earth. The other planets don’t have the right temperatures, Churchill noted, while the Moon and asteroids lack sufficient gravity to trap gasses and sustain atmospheres.

Turning his gaze beyond our own solar system raised even more possibilities for life, at least in Churchill’s mind. “The sun is merely one star in our galaxy, which contains several thousand millions of others,” he wrote. Planetary formation would be rather rare around those stars, he admitted, drawing on a then-popular theory of noted physicist and astronomer James Jeans. But what if that theory turned out to be incorrect? (In fact, it has now been disproven.)

“That’s what I find really fascinating,” Livio notes. “The healthy skepticism that he displayed is remarkable.”

Churchill suggested that different planetary formation theories may mean that many such planets may exist which “will be the right size to keep on their surface water and possibly an atmosphere of some sort.” Of that group, some may also be “at the proper distance from their parent sun to maintain a suitable temperature.”

The statesman even expected that some day, “possibly even in the not very distant future,” visitors might see for themselves whether there is life on the moon, or even Mars.

But what was Winston Churchill doing penning a lengthy essay on the probability of alien life in the first place? After all, it was the eve of a war that would decide the fate of the free world, and Churchill was about to become Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.

Such an undertaking was actually quite typical for Churchill, notes Andrew Nahum, Keeper Emeritus at the Science Museum, London, because it reflects both his scientific curiosity and his recurring need to write for money. It was skill with the pen that often supported Churchill and his family’s lavish lifestyle (recall that he won the 1953 Nobel Prize for Literature, with a monetary award of 175,293 Swedish Kroner worth about $275,000 today).

“One recent biography is entitled No More Champagne: Churchill And His Money,” Nahum says. “That was a phrase he put into a note to his wife about austerity measures. But he didn’t know much about austerity. He liked luxury so he wrote like crazy, both books and articles that his agent circulated widely.”

That’s not to say that Churchill was simply slinging copy about aliens for a paycheck. “He was profoundly interested in the sciences and he read very widely,” notes Nahum, who curated the 2015 Science Museum exhibition “Churchill’s Scientists.” Nahum relates the tale of how as Chancellor of the Exchequer, Churchill was once sent a book on quantum physics, and later admitted that it had occupied him for the better part of a day that should have been spent balancing the British budget.

He not only read scientific content voraciously, but wrote on the topic as well. In a 1924 issue of Nash’s Pall Mall Magazine, Churchill anticipated the power of atomic weapons. “Might not a bomb no bigger than an orange be found to possess secret power to destroy a whole block of buildings nay, to blast a township at a stroke?” he warned. In 1932, he anticipated the rise of test-tube meat in the magazine Popular Mechanics: “Fifty years hence, we shall escape the absurdity of growing a whole chicken in order to eat the breast or the wing, by growing these parts separately in a suitable medium,” he wrote.

In 1939 he authored three essays, tackling not just extraterrestrial life but the evolution of life on Earth and the popular biology of the human body. Two were published during 1942 by the Sunday Dispatch, Nahum discovered when reading Churchill’s papers at the University of Cambridge. It remains a mystery why his thoughts on alien life went unpublished.

In the rediscovered essay, Churchill admits that, because of the great distances between us and other planet-harboring stars, we may never know if his hunch that life is scattered among the vastness of the cosmos is correct. Yet even without proof, Churchill seems to have convinced himself that such a possibility was likely—perhaps by swapping his scientific mind for one more finely attuned to the human condition during the troubled 20th century.

“I, for one, am not so immensely impressed by the success we are making of our civilization here that I am prepared to think we are the only spot in this immense universe which contains living, thinking creatures,” he wrote, “or that we are the highest type of mental and physical development which has ever appeared in the vast compass of space and time.”

Seventy-five years after Churchill’s bold speculations, there’s still no proof that life exists on other worlds. But, as was often the case, his analysis of our own still seems prescient.
Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/winston-churchill-question-alien-life-180962198/#YYhwifmvXw2uWf0X.99

http://www.space.com/35713-winston-churchill-discusses-search-for-alien-life.html

Image result for winston churchill ufo documents

THIS IS VERY INTERESTING IN LIGHT OF THIS ITEM FROM 2010:

“government took the threat of UFOs so seriously in the 1950s that UK intelligence chiefs met to discuss the issue, newly-released files show.Ministers even went on to commission weekly reports on UFO sightings from a committee of intelligence experts.

The papers also include a wartime account claiming prime minister Winston Churchill ordered a UFO sighting be kept secret to prevent “mass panic”.

The files show reports of UFOs peaked in 1996 – when The X Files was popular.

The Joint Intelligence Committee is better known for providing briefings to the government on matters relating to security, defence and foreign affairs.

But the latest batch of UFO files released from the Ministry of Defence to the National Archives shows that, in 1957, the committee received reports detailing an average of one UFO sighting a week.

The files also include an account of a wartime meeting attended by Winston Churchill in which, it is claimed, the prime minister was so concerned about a reported encounter between a UFO and RAF bombers, that he ordered it be kept secret for at least 50 years to prevent “mass panic”.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-10853905

Of course, it’s also now known that both Hitler and Stalin  took note of  the panic caused by Orson Welles infamous War Of The Worlds radio broadcast and considered using a fake invasion scenario for psychological warfare purposes.

Inevitably this led to CIA infiltration of UFO investigative organisations for psy op and media manipulation purposes, and of course Carol Rosin’s claims about Von Braun and the alien invasion simulation plan, along with Serge Monast’s claims about Project Blue Beam.

As wild as it may seem, many high ranking political figures have taken an interest in the subject of extra-terrestrial life and possible contact, and intelligentce agencies are always seeking ways to utilize belief in extraterrestrials for psychological warfare purposes as well as to cover testing of clandestine earthly technology.

See also:

http://uncensored.co.nz/2015/09/27/why-is-hillary-clinton-talking-to-laurence-rockefeller-holding-a-book-about-extraterrestrials/

 

Is The NSA The Real President Of The USA?

 

WHO are the people running the NSA & ATS?

WHO do they report to?

WHO funds them?

Is the NSA the real president of the United States?

Is the NSA the real president of the United States?

By Jon Rappoport

The US intelligence community continues its war to kick Donald Trump to the curb and destroy his presidency.

Obviously, the NSA, the CIA, and their silent partners want to continue to run this country.

So they spy and leak, spy and leak.

We’ll get to the guts of the problem in a minute, but first a word from Bill Binney.

Breitbart: “William Binney, a former highly placed NSA official turned whistleblower, contended in an exclusive interview today that the National Security Agency (NSA) is ‘absolutely’ monitoring the phone calls of President Donald Trump.”

“Binney was an architect of the NSA’s surveillance program. He became a famed whistleblower when he resigned on October 31, 2001 after spending more than 30 years with the agency.”

“Asked whether he believes the NSA is tapping Trump, Binney replied: ‘Absolutely. How did they get the phone call between the president and the president of Australia? Or the one that he made with Mexico? Those are not targeted foreigners’.”

“Binney further contended the NSA may have been behind a data leak that might have revealed that Michael Flynn, Trump’s national security adviser, allegedly misled Vice President Mike Pence and other Trump administration officials about the contents of his phone calls with Russia’s ambassador to Washington.”

“Regarding Flynn’s case, Binney stated of the NSA”:

“‘If they weren’t behind it, they certainly had the data. Now the difference here is that FBI and CIA have direct access inside the NSA databases. So, they may be able to go directly in there and see that material there. And NSA doesn’t monitor that. They don’t even monitor their own people going into databases’.”

“So, they don’t monitor what CIA and FBI do. And there’s no oversight or attempted oversight by any of the committees or even the FISA court. So, any way you look at it, ultimately the NSA is responsible because they are doing the collection on everybody inside the United States. Phone calls. Emails. All of that stuff’.”

“Utilizing data provided by whistleblower Edward Snowden, the Guardian and Washington Post in June 2013 released a series of articles reporting that the NSA was collecting the telephone records of millions of Americans.”

“…’they [the NSA, Binney said]] are given too much money anyway. When they are given too much money, they get to do wild and crazy things. And this is wild and crazy. Violations of the Constitution’s 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments’.”

—end of Breitbart clip—

—Nearly two years ago, on April 19, 2014, I wrote: “Taking the overall [NSA] scheme to another level, consider this: those same [NSA] heavy hitters who have unfettered access to financial information can also choose, at opportune moments, to expose certain scandals [e.g., Michael Flynn] and crimes. In this way, they can, at their whim, cripple governments [e.g., the Trump administration]…”

Now we come to the guts of the problem. Here is my complete article from April 10, 2014:

The Surveillance State has created an apparatus whose implications are staggering. It’s a different world now. And sometimes it takes a writer of fiction to flesh out the larger landscape.

Brad Thor’s novel, Black List, posits the existence of a monster corporation, ATS, that stands alongside the NSA in collecting information on every move we make. ATS’ intelligence-gathering capability is unmatched anywhere in the world.

On pages 117-118 of Black List, Thor makes a stunning inference that, on reflection, is as obvious as the fingers on your hand:

“For years ATS had been using its technological superiority to conduct massive insider trading. Since the early 1980s, the company had spied on anyone and everyone in the financial world. They listened in on phone calls, intercepted faxes, and evolved right along with the technology, hacking internal computer networks and e-mail accounts. They created mountains of ‘black dollars’ for themselves, which they washed through various programs they were running under secret contract, far from the prying eyes of financial regulators.”

“Those black dollars were invested into hard assets around the world, as well as in the stock market, through sham, offshore corporations. They also funneled the money into reams of promising R&D projects, which eventually would be turned around and sold to the Pentagon or the CIA.”

“In short, ATS had created its own license to print money and had assured itself a place beyond examination or reproach.”

In real life, whether the prime criminal source is one monster- corporation or a consortium of companies, or elite banks, or the NSA itself, the outcome would be the same.

It would be as Thor describes it.

We think about total surveillance as being directed at private citizens, but the capability has unlimited payoffs when it targets financial markets and the people who have intimate knowledge of them.

“Total security awareness” programs of surveillance are ideal spying ops in the financial arena, designed to suck up millions of bits of inside information, then utilizing them to make investments and suck up billions (trillions?) of dollars.

It gives new meaning to “the rich get richer.”

Taking the overall scheme to another level, consider this: those same heavy hitters who have unfettered access to financial information can also choose, at opportune moments, to expose certain scandals and crimes (not their own, of course).

In this way, they can, at their whim, cripple governments, banks, and corporations. They can cripple investment houses, insurance companies, and hedge funds. Or, alternatively, they can merely blackmail these organizations.

We think we know how scandals are exposed by the press, but actually we don’t. Tips are given to people who give them to other people. Usually, the first clue that starts the ball rolling comes from a source who remains in the shadows.

What we are talking about here is the creation and managing of realities on all sides, including the choice of when and where and how to provide a glimpse of a crime or scandal.

It’s likely that the probe Ron Paul had been pushing—audit the Federal Reserve—has already been done by those who control unlimited global surveillance [NSA]. They already know far more than any Congressional investigation will uncover. If they know the deepest truths, they can use them to blackmail, manipulate, and control the Fed itself.

The information matrix can be tapped into and plumbed, and it can also be used to dispense choice clusters of data that end up constituting the media reality of painted pictures which, every day, tell billions of people “what’s news.”

In this global-surveillance world, we need to ask new questions and think along different lines now.

For example, how long before the mortgage-derivative crisis hit did the Masters of Surveillance know, from spying on bank records, that insupportable debt was accumulating at a lethal pace? What did they do with that information?

When did they know that at least a trillion dollars was missing from Pentagon accounting books (as Donald Rumsfeld eventually publicly admitted on September 10, 2001), and what did they do with that information?

Did they discover where billions of dollars, in cash, shipped to post-war Iraq, disappeared to?

When did they know the details of the Libor rate-fixing scandal? Press reports indicate that Barclays was trying to rig interest rates as early as January 2005.

Have they tracked, in detail, the men responsible for recruiting hired mercenaries and terrorists, who eventually wound up in Syria pretending to be an authentic rebel force?

Have they discovered the truth about how close or how far away Iran is from producing a nuclear weapon?

Have they collected detailed accounts of the most private plans of Bilderberg, CFR, and Trilateral Commission leaders?

For global surveillance kings, what we think of as the future is, in many respects the present and the past.

It’s a new world. These overseers of universal information-detection can enter and probe the most secret caches of data, collect, collate, cross reference, and assemble them into vital bottom-lines. By comparison, an operation like WikiLeaks is an old Model-T Ford puttering down a country road.

Previously, we thought we needed to look over the shoulders of the men who were committing major crimes out of public view. But now, if we want to be up to date, we also have to factor in the men who are spying on those criminals, who are gathering up those secrets and using them to commit their own brand of meta-crime.

And in the financial arena, that means we think of Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan as perpetrators, yes, but we also think about the men who already know everything about GS and Morgan, and are using this knowledge to steal sums that might make GS and Morgan blush with envy.

—end of 2014 article—

This is what we are dealing with. This is the way, for example, governments and administrations can be brought down.

It all depends on whom the NSA wants to support and whom it wants to get rid of.

The NSA is not only the swamp that needs to be drained, it is the agency looking at and probing the swamp and extracting crucial information for itself and its close friends.

To accumulate more power.

To forward its agenda of…security? Yes, if by security we mean endless conquest and Empire and control.

Ah, there they are. The NSA, the obsessed technocrats who believe they are masters of all they survey. And spy on.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

BIGGER

lBIGGER

By Martin Harris

For a while now, New Zealand has been the home-away-from-home for America’s celebrities and elite. First a trickle, now more and more, and it’s become front page news, with a strangely conspiracy oriented twist. Talk of bunkers, safe havens, apocalypse impending, and of course escape from Trump!

http://thecontrail.com/forum/topics/american-s-flock-to-nz-safe-haven

But why NZ?

Don’t they know what’s going on here? You want to escape the apocalypse you don’t come to Earthquake Central, do you?

No, I don’t think ignorance plays much part.

Antarctica. The real reason the upper echelon of the USA has such an interest in New Zealand.

Why Antarctica? I have a theory, a wild but interesting theory.

Kids. For so long they seem little babes, then one day you realise, “hey, did you grow six inches overnight?”

They have growth spurts, and sometimes it makes them a little clumsy as they adapt to their growing bodies. Sometimes they get growing pains.

My youngest boy, Caleb, is four years old as I write this.

He’s always wanting to try new things, and sometimes I say to him, “you can do this when you’re bigger”. The next day, he comes to me and says, “Dad, I’m bigger!”.

He’s recently progressed from obsession with excavating and digging, to obsession with dinosaurs. Reminds me of another little red haired boy many years ago.

As any good parents would, we have utilized his obsession as a learning tool, both online and through library books. And it’s amazing how our perception of dinosaurs has changed.

When I was a lad, we were taught that prehistoric reptiles were plodding, dumb brutes, and that they were so huge and heavy that they spent most of their time immersed in swamps and shallow rivers, unable to support their weight on dry land.

Image result for dinosaurs as swamp dwellers

In subsequent years, it has become the norm to portray most Dinos as highly active land roaming creatures. And larger ones are being discovered all the time. Likewise, the aircraft sized pterodactyl were assumed to be only capable of short glides. Now they are said to have soared for considerable distances.

Something always puzzled me though….

PUZZLE PIECE ONE:

The perceived nature of prehistoric animals has changed, but how did these titanic tyrannosaurus, spinosaurs and colossal sauropods support their bulk on dry land? Indeed recently, National Geographic proposed that the mega-size predator Spinosaurus (you guessed it) lived mostly in shallow rivers and lakes because it’s upper body was too bulky for land locomotion.

Is it that the experts are struggling to reconcile the logistics?

Could it be that the force of gravity was weaker millions of years ago?

PUZZLE PIECE TWO:

Then of course (so we are told) the dinosaurs were wiped out within a short space of time (or evolved into birds…. or both…?) and the mammals took centre stage. But this was the time of mammals that grew to huge size generally, compared to today’s species. The Mammoth, Cave Bear, Giant Sloth, Balichotherium and such like, reined for millions of years, then, suddenly, as recently as 12000 years ago give or take, they were wiped out.

We have a clearer picture of what happened at the conclusion of the last Ice Age, and it isn’t pretty. No wonder the legend of a “great flood” is imprinted in the minds of so many cultures around the globe. The smashed and battered remains of millions of animals are preserved in the permafrost of Siberia and Alaska, and even in the mud and clay of Europe and the American continent, beneath the sands of the deserts of the Middle East, and even at the bottom of the English Channel.

While the catastrophic meltdown that ended the so-called Ice Age is unquestioned, the mechanism that caused it remains disputed and uncertain. One of the most ingenious theories was proposed by Professor Charles Hapgood, who suggested that rather than the slow, uniform creep of continental drift being the sole mechanism at work on the Earth’s crust, the entire outer shell of the Earth is subject to suddenly (in geological terms) sliding over the molten liquid layer beneath, so that landmasses previously located in temperate locations would be relocated to the poles, and freezing conditions.

Hapgood provided some very compelling evidence for the Earth Crust Displacement Theory, and had the support of Albert Einstein. The theory was famously resurrected by Graham Hancock in his bestseller, Fingerprints of the Gods (Hancock proposed Antarctica as the potential site of an “elder culture”, an ancient lost civilisation responsible for many mysterious monuments around the world).

Einstein, however, as correspondence to Hapgood indicates, had reservations about Earth Crust Displacement. A suitable mechanism or lever was required to trigger the crustal movement. And since these bursts of extinction seemed to happen at intervals, the mechanism would have to be somehow cyclical in nature.

Both Hapgood and Hancock proposed  ice as the mechanism. Gradual growth of polar ice pressed down upon the rock beneath, deforming the land. Eventually the weight of the ice reaches a point where it begins to break off in shelves, resulting in a lessening weight and ‘isostatic rebound’. The uneven distribution of ice causes a wobble in the Earth’s rotation, like an off balance washing machine, until, bang! things start slipping and sliding around until balance is restored.

Nice idea, thought Einstein, but give me some hard figures on this. The math doesn’t add up.

So what mechanism caused such an extraordinary relocation of the continents?

PUZZLE PIECE THREE:

It intrigued me as a young boy, that looking at any world map, the Earth’s terrestrial landmasses all seemed shaped in such a way that they fit neatly together if the oceans were taken out of the equation.

were of course given an answer to this in the form of Continental Drift Theory. But this theory only allowed for slow, uniform change. There was no allowance for the obvious catastrophes and extinction events.

A modification called Punctuated Equilibrium went partway to an answer, but not enough.

PUZZLE PART FOUR:

After each catastrophic mass extinction event, the newly emerging dominant life forms were radically different. First we had creatures adapted mainly to life in warm shallow seas that covered much of the planet’s surface, then life suddenly went either onshore, or adapted to deeper, cooler seas. Then came the age of giant reptiles, and so on. In other words, conditions on the Earth went through a series of drastic changes to which life was forced to adapt. Life does not change unless the conditions force that change upon it.

And after each change, the general trend has been towards downsizing.

As if the Earth’s gravitational pull has increased over time.

PUZZLE  PART FIVE:

What about the asteroids? Weren’t the dinosaurs wiped out by an asteroid hitting the Earth?

Actually as we know the Earth is pockmarked with the craters of many asteroid and meteorite impacts, and what makes the dinosaur extinction tie-in is the KT layer after which no more dinosaur fossils are found.

Fossils, however, are NOT a normal state of affairs. When an animal dies, it’s body decomposes, the remains are picked over by predators and the bones scattered. Fossils are a snapshot in time that indicate a catastrophe in which animals were buried and sealed off from the elements rapidly. Same goes for the frozen remains in the permafrost. Evidence of disasters that visit the planet on a disturbingly regular basis.

As for meteorites and asteroids, every impact not only creates either a localised or planetary disaster of it’s own, it also contributes a little more material to the mass of the Earth.

And so it occurred to me a few years back, that looking at these puzzle pieces, the answer was actually staring us in the face.

The Earth’s gravitational pull is increasing over time because the Earth is gaining mass.

There is nothing controversial about this. Two space rocks smash together and make a bigger rock, the increased mass/gravity attracts more material and so on.

And we know for a fact that the planet continues to suck up space rocks and dust. Tons of it daily. It’s got to go somewhere.

I’m sure you know where this is going.

Watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiCMFzpMnZM

Read:

http://www.xearththeory.com/

And yes, even the dinosaur mystery fits into the picture:

http://www.dinox.org/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qw3HWjvIhVw

With the mass growing, it now explains why dinasaurs were so big.  Numerous engineers have pointed out that these gigantic creatures could not have survived in today’s gravity making it impossible to pump blood, walk, or survive today.  Here is a plot of the biggest creatures during life on earth and it points to a growing mass.

The plot of the largest creatures according to mainstream science.

http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/site/dehilster/2014/09/22/is-the-e…

So how come this interesting and apparently plausible theory hasn’t gained more acceptance in scientific circles then?

The answer lies with Expanding Earth’s most devoted promoter, Neal Adams. He isn’t a scientist. In fact his main claim to fame is as a very talented comic book artist. This may explain his exquisite animations of the planet expanding, but sadly it also explains why debunkers have such a field day with him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ

And to make matters worse, Adam’s explanations of the math and physics are easily attacked. Oh, and his universal view and beliefs don’t help his cause either.

Please don’t misunderstand me here, I think Neal’s a great guy , but, from a mainstream scientist’s POV…..?

http://goodmath.scientopia.org/2010/09/21/the-return-of-a-classic-n…

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?84708-The-Expanding-…

So, with all due thanks and respect to Neal Adams for his tireless devotion to the cause, we need to separate the man from the theory. And what we find is a surprising amount of support from the mainstream academia.

“The Expanding Earth Hypothesis goes back to at least 1933, a time when the Continental Drift Hypothesis was accorded the same sort of ridicule. Now, Continental Drift is enthroned; and ironically many of its strongest proponents are vehemently opposed to the Expanding Earth, ignoring the lessons of history.” — William R. Corliss, physicist, 1985.

http://oilismastery.blogspot.co.nz/2008/10/expanding-earth-outline….

(be sure to check out this link even if you ignore the others; it’s a beaut.)

Scientists measure the planet and tell us, no, the Earth isn’t growing. I would amend that to, no, it wasn’t growing last time we checked,

And that was apparently in 2011!

“Our study provides an independent confirmation that the solid Earth is not getting larger at present, within current measurement uncertainties,”

See NASA’s article below:

https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/earth20110816.html

. What I’m proposing is that the planet does not grow at a steady rate, but, like my children, in a series of spurts. These growth spurts are accompanied by growing pains in the form of sharp increases in seismic activity, cracks and sinkholes, tsunamis, and ultimately, upheavals of a more drastically catastrophic nature resulting in mass extinction events, relocation of continents and a requirement for survivors to rapidly adapt and evolve. I also thing the expansion happens unevenly, resulting in some areas spreading drastically, while other areas may actually be pushed together. This may explain the constant wandering of the magnetic poles perhaps?

So let’s take a look at the evidence of the fossil record that may give some credence to this theory.

These fish died by asphyxiating. They were suddenly left high and dry with nowhere to go. These are but a few of millions that died like this. Where did the shallow sea go that they swam in?

For an example we could examine the numerous fossils in a location known as The Red Sandstone, an area covering half of Scotland. Observers have described this region as an aquatic graveyard with thousands of different localities disclosing the same scene of destruction. The red sandstone deposit, that covers and area of approximately 10,000 square miles and over 150 feet in thickness screams with the evidence of a wide-scale catastrophe. Fossilized fish are found there contorted into abnormal shapes. Others died suddenly in swimming positions.

The identical picture can be found in northern Italy. Evidence there would indicate vast quantities of fish also perished suddenly. Fossilized skeletons of fish are found by the thousands in slate. In most case the fossils are packed together. Many of the fossils have been preserved with traces of the color of their skin impregnated into the surrounding material indicting that deposition had occurred before decomposition of the tissues

The Ichthyosaur died in the act of giving birth. The intact nature of the fossil indicates almost instantaneous death and burial.

Moving much further forward in time:

“There is evidence that Titicaca was once a saltwater sea. Its shoreline is littered with millions of fossilized seashells. The marine fishes and seahorses in the lake are all oceanic types found only in salt water.

Researchers are convinced that these 3 miles high ruins once lay at sea level. Therefore, an incredibly devastating earthquake could have torn the city asunder, lifting Tiwanaku and the lake to where they are now…..

What was Titicaca at one time? Has it always been just a freshwater lake with saltwater fauna? Or was it a great and sacred river flowing at nearly sea level, and leading to the sea?”

“Titicaca and Poopo, lake and salt-bed of Coipasa, salt beds of Uyuni———several of these lakes and salt—beds have chemical compositions similar to those of the ocean. He pointed out that Lake Titicaca is.. . . full of characteristic [saltwater] molluscs, such as Palude— strina and Ancylus, which shows that it is, geologically speaking, of relatively modern origin.
Hans S. Bellamy, who gave the problem of the salinity of this region very considerable thought, had the following to say:
The region in which the feeders of Lake Titicaca rise consist almost exclusively of old crystalline, and younger volcanic rocks; Triassic formations, from which salt is usually derived through extraction, are markedly absent.
Hence the presence of so much salt in the Bolivian Tableland can only be accounted for by postulating a former connection of the great lacustrine basin with the Ocean, and by assuming the eventual evaporation of this body of water when the connection with the Ocean was at last severed.”(source, blog.world link below)

http://www.viewzone.com/tiwan.

http://blog.world-mysteries.com/science/ancient-ruins-of-tiwanacu-a…

http://karlshuker.blogspot.co.nz/2016/12/fire-beasts-lightning-beas…

Note the land raised in stages in this image from NZ. Growth spurts?

Isn’t it logical, that life on earth began in the oceans and moved onto land, because originally most of the planet was covered in warm shallow oceans?

Something else that’s growing: Antarctica. Or more specifically, the Antarctic Ice sheet. Meanwhile, the Arctic ice is actually diminishing.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/05/05/sea-ice-news-volume-6-1-anta…

What does that mean? Take a look at the graphic at the start of this blog. Everything is moving outwards from Antarctica, like a balloon expanding.

“Take Antarctica for example. There is no subduction around Antarctica and yet it is expanding. It can’t get smaller.  What to do?  There is no answer from plate tectonics.  Also, the mainstream admits they need 70% more subduction for the earth’s radius to remain constant.  Truly a very big big problem…..

One complaint about earth expansion from plate tectonics is that they say you can’t have subduction with earth expansion or growth.  Yes you can.  And the reason is because the earth is not expanding equally all over.  In fact, the it is expanding much more in the southern hemisphere than in the upper.  Look at the map below.  Look at the expansion below and the land mass in the lower hemisphere.  There you find less land mass, and more expansion.ĵ

This makes the expansion in the northern hemisphere strained.  Take a look at the area in the blue oval.  That is the western coastline of the United States and Canada.  There, the earth is expanding, but unevenly given the expansion in the southern hemisphere is much greater.  This causes some subduction by forming almost a hinge at the bottom of Alaska.  There is subduction, but not in a way or in enough quantity to keep the earth at a fixed radius.”

UnequalEarthExpansion

http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/site/dehilster/2014/09/22/is-the-e…

Antarctica is an island of stability, and loaded with mineral resources. While oil and gas reserves are uncertain, coal, ore and metals are plentiful:

And speaking of oil and gas reserves:

“The same mechanism that is causing the earth to expand and grow, is creating methane, oil, gas, and water.  Oil is not from squashed dinosaurs.  It is abiotic (not from fossils). Water didn’t come from comets.  It is also coming from within the earth, pouring through the expanding fissures in the deep oceans.  And lately, how are we be finding more and more oil and gas so far down all over the world like in the Bakken in North Dakota, the Utica in Ohio, and many other new fields.  All this is being manufactured inside the earth.  This is not far-fetched given mainstream science says that atoms are made in the core of the sun.  The earth’s core is most likely much like the sun.  There you go.”

(same source as previous link)

And of course, most of the world’s potential fresh water supply, an increasingly valuable commodity, is locked up in the southern ice cap.

I doubt anyone would want to live permanently in Antarctica, (although it may not be as inhospitable as one might think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0x40A0sBL34

an “ark” would be a good safe haven until the planet settles down again. We may not be the first to take safe refuge in Antarctica if Hapgood, Hancock and co. are correct.

It is true that millions of years ago Antarctica was a virtual paradise, and portions may have been ice free until relatively recently.

Image result for piri reis map antarctica

, are the elite justified in making their home-away-from-home in the “Stepping stone to Antarctica” right now? I think so.

We know more or less the time frame in which mass extinctions occur, and we are due. Some would say justifiably that it has begun. Earthquakes are on the increase (even allowing for the artificially triggered ones). Sinkholes and great gaping cracks in the earth are on the news almost daily. And cosmic rays are increasing steadily.

Take a look at what happened in Kaikoura.

“Much of the northeastern coast of the South Island was uplifted during the 14th of November 2016 earthquake. We know this from photos of rock platforms covered in seaweed and marine animals such as crayfish and paua stranded above tide levels. Our records measured the tide gauge at Kaikoura was lifted up by 1 m, and continuous GPS monitoring sites at Kaikoura and Cape Campbell were also raised by 0.7-0.9 m. At this stage we can estimate that the coast was raised between 0.5 m and 2 m from about 20 km south of Kaikoura all the way north to Cape Campbell. Scientists plan to find out more about this coastal uplift.” (source, GNS).

Now take a look at these images, and remember the fossil fish earlier in this blog?

Frighteningly similar.

But, other than the obvious closeness to Antarctica, why NZ?

Let’s recap a Few points:

Most of the expansion occurs in the southern hemisphere.

As the earth grows, more “real estate” becomes available.

Logically, most of this new land will be at certain locations in the southern hemisphere. Witness what is happening in NZ especially Kaikoura.

New Zealand has been reported by the Oil Industry as “The Texas of the South…. literally leaking gas and oil”.

Metals, water and uranium from Antarctica, and oil and gas from New Zealand. An elitist-survivalist paradise?

Is it any wonder Christchurch was demolished to be rebuilt as a resilient Agenda 30 prototype city of the future?

“Events like the quake shut down industry in South force populations North and cleay way for bolt hole investors. With exception of local hapu who have to accept oil as local industry in face of destruction of local industry. Even drilling offers bugger all local jobs.
Meanwhile core industry including roads, cyber infrastructure, port development, defence, airport infrastructure, continue to pour into the Wanganui Manawatu region. There is a good case for noting an unprecedent, unexplained escalation in these areas prior to last years quake dating back circa 2010.
This is the same era the South Island, especialy its high country, started becoming a magnate for bolthole investors including Peter Thiel, Julian Robertson, James Covert, Richard V Allen. VIP,s with some fairly interesting backgrounds and interesting friends.”

(Ben Vigden, via email)

SO ALL THESE EARTHQUAKES ARE NATURAL THEN?

WHAT ABOUT HAARP AND GEO-ENGINEERING?

Here’s how I think HAARP technology fits into the big picture.

I touched earlier in this blog about questions regarding the true source of oil, that it may in fact be virtually limitless.

HAARP is capable of looking down into the earth’s crust and locating potential sources of oil and gas. It could surely also locate voids and fractures. HAARP also looks up at the ionosphere, and as we now know, in conjunction with satellites, we can detect ionospheric disturbances that are precursors to potential earthquakes.

Nature can be very fickle and unpredictable, so HAARP takes the uncertainty out of the equation, triggering (not generating) seismic activity in a targeted area that’s already under stress. Rather than waiting to see if nature does the job, they’re ensuring it happens.

They are trying to coax the earth into releasing it’s hidden reserves of oil. This is where the seismic exploration vessels are brought into play, to confirm wether or not the operation has succeeded. If it hasn’t, they keep it up until they get what they’re after.

What they are doing is not simply looking for undiscovered oil fields. They are attempting create new ones by shattering the crust.

Oil companies seeking permits in NZ have described this country as ” the Texas of the South” and “literally leaking oil and gas”.

This is all in the name of perpetuating the oil industry. It’s all about the money.

AND THE HOARD OF STASHED WEALTH IS ALSO GETTING BIGGER.

WHAT’S ALL THAT MONEY FOR?

Trillions of dollars in tax havens. New Zealand it seems, is one of those havens. What the hell are the elite going to do with all those trillions? It’s dead money that could be put to good use. One could solve the world’s problems several times over. Unless, that is, the elite believe that the world as we know it can’t be saved from an impending extinction event.

It has happened many times before. The evidence is plain to see. It happens at regular intervals. Asteroid collisions can’t account for all these successive extinction events, and a mechanism for earth crustal displacement has never been found. Only an expanding earth explains the sudden extinction and subsequent geological and climatic changes.

This blog has demonstrated that, if this theory is correct, the Antarctic is probably the safest place to be, and New Zealand is seen by the elite as their gateway to that continent if the shit hits the fan.

The reader may be interested in the relevant links below.

http://www.bbc.com/earth/bespoke/story/the-cracks-ripping-earth-apart/

http://www.stuff.co.nz/science/87647721/Scientists-find-evidence-th…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXADrXiZGc8

http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-just-released-some-incredibl…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb7EoGqaJdU

https://ottawarewind.com/2016/01/11/raiders-of-antarktika-secret-ww…

As always, remember a big dose of speculation is involved here, and it’s all open to question and constructive criticism. Think For Yourself, and do your research with an open and discerning mind.

Hope you enjoyed the blog and thanks for taking the time to read it.

Jon Rappoport: Solving Problems At Home

Image result for nationalism

Nationalism, Globalism, Empire, and the vision of self-sufficiency

Nationalism, Globalism, Empire, and the vision of self-sufficiency

by Jon Rappoport

January 24, 2017

Nationalism is not Empire. Nationalism is solving problems at home.

Globalism is the non-partisan effort to immerse nations in a regional and planetary management system; mega-corporations and banks steer the ship.

Freedom includes the ability to choose between Nationalism and Globalism.

Globalism is not an organic grass-roots movement. It is imposed from above. (See my work on the Rockefeller Trilateral Commission to gain a view of “above.”)

Empire here implies the effort by a government (e.g., the US, China) to extend its control over other nations and peoples. It is not an intrinsic part of Nationalism. Dick Cheney was intent on building an American Empire. A factory worker in Ohio isn’t.

Nationalism doesn’t mean the government is running a vast Welfare State. It isn’t running a charity without limits. It isn’t promising a utopia based on “share and care.”

Solving problems at home implies restoring jobs stolen by corporations who left the country and set up shop in foreign lands. They committed this deed under terms of Globalist trade treaties. The corporations weren’t exercising freedom. They were navigating loopholes designed by their friends in high places. The major loophole was:

“You can manufacture your products in a hell hole overseas with slave labor, and then you can export those products back to your former home country and sell them without paying a tariff.”

Solving problems at home implies the robust expansion of independent media, who become a watchdog on government, corporations, and major media.

Solving problems at home implies the eradication of a Surveillance State which, under the cover of protecting the citizenry against terrorism, is actually collecting massive amounts of information on all citizens.

Solving problems at home implies eliminating gangs who are holding millions of citizens in inner cities hostage in their own residences.

Solving problems at home implies securing the nation’s borders against incursion by people intent on committing crimes, collecting free money and services from the government, and subverting freedom.

Solving problems at home implies doing whatever can be done to encourage a culture in which individual freedom and vision and power motivates as many people as possible to invent their own futures, in order to fulfill their most profound desires.

Solving problems at home implies prosecuting, to the fullest extent of the law, companies that pollute and poison the land, sea, and air with their “by-products.” This effort does not require a return to some universal Pagan religion of Nature.

Solving problems at home implies prosecuting, to the fullest extent of the law, companies who manufacture and sell compounds that purport to cure disease, but actually destroy health and life.

Historically, the first time a banker or corporate leader was discovered to have financed an American war on both sides, he should have been tried and convicted of treason. That would have sent a suitable message.

And so forth and so on.

This is all common sense.

It is obscured by waves of mouthy propaganda, featuring high-flying generalities and ideals, which turn into demands and vicious attacks: “Everybody has to love one another right now and share everything for free, and if they don’t, we’ll blast them into the stratosphere.”

These waves are planned, organized, and funded by people like George Soros, and they are meant to disrupt nations and push them into the arms of the Globalist agenda.

The number of unconscious dupes and pawns in this operation is legion.

In his 1796 Farewell Address, President George Washington provided exceptional recommendations about nationalism:

“It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world…”

“But even our commercial [trade] policy [with foreign nations] should hold an equal and impartial hand…diffusing and diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing…constantly keeping in view that it is folly in one nation to look for disinterested favors from another; that it must pay with a portion of its independence for whatever it may accept under that character…There can be no greater error than to expect or calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion, which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard.”

“…Europe has a set of primary interests which to us have none; or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities.”

“Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest…?”

“With me a predominant motive has been to endeavor to gain time to our country to settle and mature its yet recent institutions, and to progress without interruption to that degree of strength and consistency which is necessary to give it, humanly speaking, the command of its own fortunes.”

Whenever Washington mentions Europe, he is essentially referring to any foreign country.

Nationalism: stay at home. Strengthen the home country. No Empire. No entangling alliances.

And certainly, no Globalism, which amounts to surrender of the home country to foreign interests.

What is wrong with George Washington’s policy? Nothing.

The policy has been called isolationism, which, via propaganda, has been given a nasty edge. It has no edge. It has concern for America.

Every country could learn from George Washington’s wisdom.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Utopian dreams aside, no country’s history is pure. Its governments and leaders have committed terrible crimes. But that fact doesn’t imply that the country should be destroyed or dismantled, or attached to some deceptive supra-national program of “harmony for all.”

Nationalism, in George Washington’s description of it, is a practical vision for realizing a degree of self-sufficiency no modern country has ever achieved.

The vision is still there to be pursued.

It has always been there, since the ancient nomads first settled down in sunlit valleys and began to grow their crops.

Self-sufficiency, freedom, prosperity.

Advanced technology has complicated matters. I’m not talking about instant communication among all points on Earth. I’m talking about a surfeit of weapons which can destroy life at the push of a button. But even there, leaders will be far more likely to negotiate and talk in good faith if they have the genuine interest of their own people at heart, where they live, in their home nations.

In a half-sane world, there would be, by now, courses in taught in every school, on the meaning of greed, avarice, meddling, and the obsession for minding everyone else’s business…

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Seth Rich: New Evidence Emerges

According to a new interview Wikileaks envoy Craig Murray and former British ambassador stated the he personally flew to the United States and was handed both the DNC emails and the Podesta emails.

Trump Unravels TPP Behemoth

From ghost hacked, http://thecontrail.com/forum/topics/the-trump-card?xg_source=activity

Guy is already making waves couple days into his role as POTUS.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/donald-trump-trade-nafta-1.3947989

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/23/politics/trans-pacific-partnership-tr…

CNN)President Donald Trump on Monday will start to unravel the behemoth trade deal he inherited from his predecessor, as he signed an executive action to withdraw from the negotiating process of the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

That executive action sends signals to Democrats and leaders in foreign capitals around the world that Trump’s rhetoric on trade during the campaign is turning into action. Trump vowed during the campaign to withdraw the US from the Pacific trade deal, commonly known as TPP, which he argued was harmful to American workers and manufacturing.

To sum it up, via executive order, pulls the US out of the Trans Pacific Partnership.

WOW!

Image result for trump tpp

 

 

 

How You Can Predict The Globalist’s Behaviour, by Brandon Smith.

Great article. This guy has it sussed: “Know thine enemy”!

By Brandon Smith

In my last article, ‘How Globalists Predict Your Behavior’, I outlined the primary method globalists use to measure public consent, or, public dissent. The use of macro-analytics and the hyper-monitoring of Web traffic is a powerful tool at the disposal of the establishment for gauging shifts in public consciousness in real-time.

For example, in early 2016 the elites were entirely aware of the rise of conservative and sovereignty movements in the U.S. and Europe. In fact, the dangers of growing “populism” were all that elitists and their publications talked about for the first six months of the year. At first, this notion seemed a little odd to me. Generally, when globalists are attempting to manage public opinion, they are careful not to reveal the slightest hint that conservative movements exist beyond an “extremist fringe.” They certainly never suggest that there is a massive undercurrent of nationalism ready to topple the globalist structure.

In fact, whenever such movements do arise the establishment is swift to obstruct them or co-opt them. I witnessed this first hand during the Ron Paul campaign in 2008 and 2012 – the mainstream deliberately refused to acknowledge Ron Paul’s existence, because attacking him repeatedly would have been a zero sum strategy that would have given him greater public attention and free publicity.

I saw it during the Neo-con co-option of the Tea Party, a movement that I was involved in long before Fox News latched onto it and long before mainstream RINO Republicans not only jumped on the bandwagon but hijacked the horse. In a matter of months the Tea Party became a defunct entity, a shell of its former self. Luckily, most liberty activists simply left it behind and started their own separate groups and projects rather than being absorbed into the Neo-con fold.

I also saw establishment interference on a local and state level during elections in Montana. An associate of mine was running for state office on a liberty platform and was doing rather well in the polls. He was approached by a contingent of political elites running as Republicans who told him in no uncertain terms that he could run on any platform and use any rhetoric he wanted, but if he won, he would be required to follow THEIR direction. They even encouraged him to continue arguing for constitutional government in his speeches and debates, because they felt this was the best way to “sell” his candidacy. But when all was said and done, he was supposed to stab his constituency in the back and take orders from the party leadership.

The point is, the elites dominate the political system. Nothing happens within it without their say. So, for those same elites to suddenly and openly suggest that “populist movements” were threatening to overtake the world and destroy the global economy was suspicious, to say the least.

In order to predict the behavior of globalists and the outcome of future economic and political events, it is important to understand certain dynamics. As just described, the establishment has a stranglehold on the political system. Party politics are a sham built around the false left/right paradigm. However, certain new dynamics are developing, and you must be able to track them.

The best way to do this is to watch what globalists say within their own publications. They often reveal their intentions directly or indirectly. In many cases I think in their arrogance they assume that the masses are too stupid to read these publications and grasp what is being said.

The most important element of predicting globalist actions is to know what they ultimately want; to know their ultimate goals. If you know the specifics of what any group or individual desperately wants, those people become highly predictable, because there are only so many useful paths to get to any goal.

I have used this method to great effect over the years, so I am not merely presenting a theory, I have concrete successes to back my position.

For example, just in the past couple of years I correctly predicted the Federal Reserve taper of QE, I predicted the inclusion of China in the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights years in advance, I predicted the exact timing of the first Fed rate hike, I predicted the success of the Brexit referendum when most of the world and the liberty movement said it was never going to happen, I predicted that the Saudi 9/11 bill would pass, that Barack Obama would veto it and that Congress would override his veto, I predicted that Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic candidate and that Donald Trump would be the Republican candidate for president of the U.S. and, I predicted that Donald Trump would win the 2016 election.

Except for the China SDR inclusion, I predicted all of these events many months in advance and received a heavy amount of criticism each time from people in the mainstream and even from people in the liberty movement. Hilariously, as soon as these predictions proved true, some of the same people that were fervently opposed came quickly out of the woodwork to claim they “saw it coming all along.” I suppose this is human nature, but it is a problem because it keeps people from learning how to better gauge globalist behavior and come to correct conclusions.

My goal in this article is to make EVERY liberty activist adept at predicting globalist driven events. So, here is a good place to start:

Learn To Play Chess

The elites are obsessed with chess and chess symbolism. Many of their strategies develop much like a game of chess develops. If you don’t know how to play chess, I suggest you learn. You don’t have to master the game, but you do need to understand the basic concepts of winning the game.

For example, if you know the target that your opponent is really pursuing, you can easily obstruct his efforts because all his movements will become predictable. If his goal is to take your Queen, and you know this, then he should never be able to take your queen. This is why the elites go to great lengths to distract their opponents (meaning us) from their true target. They want you to think they are going straight for your King, or your Knight; they want you focused elsewhere. They will use feints often.

Another core strategy of chess is the “forced sacrifice.” That is to say, the best chess players are very good at positioning one of their pieces so that it threatens two or more of your pieces. This forces you to sacrifice one piece for the sake of the others. If they do this often enough, before you know it you have sacrificed your way into defeat. The globalists ALWAYS have a primary target and a secondary target. There is always more than one move developing at any given time.

Knowing chess is key to knowing how the globalists think.

Get In Touch With Your Darker Side

Going by their behavior and their rhetoric when they are unguarded, most globalists display highly narcissistic character traits as well as sociopathy and psychopathy. It is not enough to research these traits in a clinical fashion, you have to tap into the darker side of your own psyche, and think as they think. This means being willing to entertain evil and malicious concepts. You must be willing to ask yourself – “If I were them, how would I go about getting what I want?”

Understanding devious and aberrant psychopathic intent goes a long way in making the globalists predictable. Remember, many psychopaths are actually highly intelligent and intuitive. They don’t have a moral compass and have lost the voice of conscience, but in order to adapt they have learned how to fake it. They are chameleons.

ALL people are inherently capable of evil actions, just as they are inherently capable of great good. You don’t have to become like the elites, but you do have to go to some ugly places in your own mind. An elitist is basically a person who went to those places and discovered that he liked it there.

Read Globalist Publications

As noted above, the globalists have their own media outlets in which they publish their “views,” such as Foreign Policy Magazine, The Economist, Bloomberg, Reuters, etc. Sometimes these views are honest and sometimes they are calculated propaganda. Again, if you know exactly what the elitist targets are, then you can better discern if what they are saying is legitimate or a feint to distract you.

I predicted the success of the Brexit and the Trump win based on the knowledge that:

1) The globalists need a large-scale crisis in order to drastically change public perceptions on society and governance. That is to say, they need to create a crisis so terrifying that people will be willing to accept a fully centralized global economic system and global governance as a solution.

2) The globalists have already set in motion an economic crisis that cannot be reversed. It is a crisis that they must avoid blame for at all costs once it accelerates.

3) Conservative and sovereignty principles are the primary threat to the dominance of globalism. As long as ideas of individualism, national sovereignty and decentralization exist, globalism can never truly prevail. Therefore, obstructing movements based on these principles is not enough. The globalists must also destroy any positive perceptions of our principles for generations to come.

4) As stated in the section on chess, the globalists like to use the strategy of forced sacrifice, in which they threaten two targets simultaneously, or kill two birds with one stone. I realized at the beginning of 2016 that all the rhetoric by globalists in their own publications on the “rise of populism” was staging the groundwork for the success of the Brexit and the success of Trump. What better strategy for the establishment than to allow conservative movements to take the helm of the political and economic ship just as that ship is about to sink? In this way, the globalists can have the crisis they need, while at the same time scapegoating conservatives and avoiding blame, and, destroying the image of conservative ideals, perhaps forever.

Have No Sacred Cows

This is a hard one for many people. We all have certain biases and these biases can blind us to reality. The overreaching bias within the liberty movement is a desire for heroic leadership. We have grown up on stories of heroes from George Washington to Thomas Jefferson – grand statesmen and military giants that crushed tyranny. The problem is, while men like Washington and Jefferson were indeed instrumental, they were nothing without the hundreds of thousands of unsung patriots working tirelessly for freedom on their own.

The founding fathers were not considered the founding fathers until long after the American Revolution was over. At the time, they were not thought of necessarily as heroes or even great leaders. They were just men, like many other men, gambling life and liberty on a cause that was uncertain at best.

Activists need to STOP looking around for mighty leaders and start taking leadership themselves in their own way. If we do end up with another Washington or Jefferson or Paine or Madison, etc., we will not know who they are until the fight is over and the history books are written.

The globalists take full advantage of the movement’s weakness in seeking out and artificially elevating heroes. Also, when people have this bias, they end up with blinders when examining such heroes with any skepticism. Obviously I am referring to Donald Trump, here.

Sacred cows prevent accurate predictions of major events because a person will refuse to consider them as a potential negative factor.

Moving Beyond Predictions

It is one thing to be able to predict the outcome of social and political events; it is another matter to do something about them. In my next article I will outline solutions liberty activists can pursue on their own and in groups to counter globalist activity. Predicting their tactics is essential, but acting to disrupt those tactics should be the ultimate goal.

The globalists believe that even if some of us do manage to decipher their activities and methods, we will have no means to do anything about them. They see themselves as the “history makers,” as the men who act. They see us as the “history watchers,” or the meaningless masses wafting about with geopolitical tides, helpless and incapable of determining our own destinies. I believe we will become history makers in due course. One weakness of the globalists that will sabotage them is their own hubris. They see people as pawns – but what happens when a piece walks off the chess board completely and acts in an unpredictable way? It is this potential alone that will destroy the globalists in the end.

You can read more from Brandon Smith at his website Alt-Market.com, where this article first appeared. If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here.  We greatly appreciate your patronage.

You can contact Brandon Smith at: