NZ: Why Was The HUGE News About The Nano-Thermite Not On The Front Page of The NZHerald and On The TV News?


By Clare Swinneyb852

Danish scientist, Professor Niels Harrit, reported during a news item that aired on April the 6th in Denmark  that nano-thermite was responsible for the collapse of WTC 1 and 2  on 9/11, not planes controlled by hijackers.

This is HUGE news given all that was hinged on the official story.  However, in spite of the gravity of the finding, although Professor Harrit’s TV report was picked up by on the 14th of April, and therefore readily available to mainstream journalists in New Zealand, at the time of writing this post it had still not been canvassed by TVNZ, TV3 nor by the New Zealand Herald.

The big question is why not? Who does the mainstream media really serve in this country?

While TV3 played 9/11: In Plane Site in its entirety in 2006, a documentary which showed that the official story was a lie, TVNZ and the NZHerald have consistently sold the public the official story about Osama bin Laden and the 19 hijackers.

In covering up the truth, these media outlets are complicit in the crime.  They have a duty to correct this lie and tell the people the facts and what better place to start than by advising the public of the report about the nano-thermite?

Who thinks it is time to protest outside TVNZ and the New Zealand Herald and let them know that the people of New Zealand care about the truth?

What are other people’s thoughts and ideas?

Clare Swinney

Next Post

Was Ron Paul, tea party re-inventor, right all along?

Sat Apr 18 , 2009
LATIMES Ron Paul told us long ago. And so did the supporters of this one-time Libertarian presidential candidate. Maybe you remember about 16 months ago the 11-term Texas Republican representative, who’s now organized a new Campaign for Liberty, was raking in more political contributions each month than most other GOP […]

You May Like