Uncritical Thinking In Support Of The Faith-Based Official 9/11 Myth

3

Buildings with small and asymmetric fires on a few floors DO NOT behave this way :

The official theory of the pivotal events of 9/11, the falls of the Twin Towers and WTC 7, has no credible verifiable scientific evidence to support it. As such, this theory is faith-based not science-based. Like other faith-based theories such as young Earth creationism, its proponents often resort to illogical or fallacious reasoning.

Let’s look at the most common fallacies and deceptive debating techniques the official 9/11 faithful use.

Article

3 thoughts on “Uncritical Thinking In Support Of The Faith-Based Official 9/11 Myth

  1. Yesterday the BBC published an article about the ongoing ReThink911 ad campaign in Ottawa. Featured on the BBC’s News homepage, the article was seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

    This piece marks the fifth mainstream news article about ReThink911’s Ottawa campaign since the announcement of the campaign on November 20. But unlike its Canadian counterparts, the BBC has a tendency for falseness and one-sidedness rivaled only by the likes of Fox News.

    Read the article: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-25370076

    Tell the BBC Editor Their Reporting Is a Journalistic Disgrace

    Please take 2 minutes right now to let the Editor of the BBC’s North America edition know how you feel about their reporting. Just copy-paste the letter below, or write your own. Please be sure to Bcc us at AE911Truth so that we can keep a count of how many emails are sent.

    Sample letter and email address here

  2. Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

    The Open Chemical Physics Journal

    The collapses of the three tallest WTC buildings were remarkable for their completeness,

    their near free-fall speed

    their striking radial symmetry,

    and the surprisingly large volume of fine toxic dust that was generated.

    In order to better understand these features of the destruction,

    the authors initiated an examination of this dust.

    Read paper

    here

  3. How to Debunk WTC Thermite by Kevin Ryan
    December 9, 2013

    The evidence for the presence of thermite at the World Trade Center (WTC) on 9/11 is extensive and compelling

    This evidence has accumulated to the point at which we can say that WTC thermite is no longer a hypothesis,

    it is a tested and proven theory.

    Therefore it is not easy to debunk it. But the way to do so is not difficult to understand.

    To debunk the thermite theory, one must first understand the evidence for it

    and then show how all of that evidence is either mistaken or explained by other phenomena.

    Here are the top ten categories of evidence for thermite at the WTC.

Comments are closed.

Next Post

The Pathology Of The Rich ~ Chris Hedges On Reality Asserts Itself ~ Part 1

Mon Dec 16 , 2013
%d bloggers like this: