California Legalises Child Prostitution

Beginning on Jan. 1, prostitution by minors will be legal in California. Yes, you read that right.

SB 1322 bars law enforcement from arresting sex workers who are under the age of 18 for soliciting or engaging in prostitution, or loitering with the intent to do so. So teenage girls (and boys) in California will soon be free to have sex in exchange for money without fear of arrest or prosecution.

This terribly destructive legislation was written and passed by the progressive Democrats who control California’s state government with a two-thirds “supermajority.” To their credit, they are sincere in their belief that decriminalizing underage prostitution is good public policy that will help victims of sex trafficking. Unfortunately, the reality is that the legalization of underage prostitution suffers from the fatal defect endemic to progressive-left policymaking: it ignores experience, common sense and most of all human nature — especially its darker side.

The unintended but predictable consequence of how the real villains — pimps and other traffickers in human misery — will respond to this new law isn’t difficult to foresee. Pimping and pandering will still be against the law whether it involves running adult women or young girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls. Immunity from arrest means law enforcement can’t interfere with minors engaging in prostitution — which translates into bigger and better cash flow for the pimps. Simply put, more time on the street and less time in jail means more money for pimps, and more victims for them to exploit.

As Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley, a national leader on human trafficking issues, told the media, “It just opens up the door for traffickers to use these kids to commit crimes and exploit them even worse.” Another prosecutor insightfully observed that if traffickers wrote legislation to protect themselves, it would read like SB 1322.

Minors involved in prostitution are clearly victims, and allowing our law enforcement officers to pick these minors up and get them away from their pimps and into custody is a dramatically better solution than making it legal for them to sell themselves for sex. That only deepens their victimization and renders law enforcement powerless to stop the cycle of abuse. SB 1322 is not simply misguided — its consequences are immoral.

Unfortunately for Californians, SB 1322 isn’t an outlier — it’s only the tip of the liberal iceberg. 2017 will see the Golden State subjected to wave after wave of laws taking effect that are well-intentioned but disastrous embodiments of progressive utopianism.

One such new Democratic-authored law throws open the door to even greater government dependency on the part of the poor by rolling back proven reforms. In 1996, welfare reform was one of the greatest social legislation achievements of the last century, ending the lifetime welfare system and putting millions of Americans on the road to self-reliance and self-respect. In its wake, California lawmakers passed a law barring increased payments to women who have more children while still on welfare, in order to encourage women to achieve independence before having more children.

It’s a tough provision that works — which was apparently irrelevant to Gov. Jerry Brown, who just signed a bill repealing that prohibition. Henceforth, no matter how many children someone has while on welfare, the state government will ratchet up payments with each child, with no limit. Incredibly, the Democratic author of this bill claims she wants to discourage women from having more children while on welfare — but instead passed legislation replacing that effective reform with a law that restarts the cycle of welfare dependency

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/california-democrats-legalize-child-prostitution/article/2610540?custom_click=rss#

2 comments on “California Legalises Child Prostitution

  1. WIlliam says:

    Earth shattering news if it was true, accurate, or the full story – however, it isn’t.

    https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-child-prostitution-california-20170111-story.html

    Moreover, the act is to provide social support for the minor in question, instead of shackling them with a criminal conviction.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-01/california-democrats-legalize-child-prostitution

    But really, can we trust a blog writer called Taylor Durden? Perhaps the writer hides behind the Fight Club pseudonym for a reason, it does though lack legitimacy, so let us look closer to the scene of the non-crime.

    The L.A. times has another offering to this story which is by far more important

    Quote:

    “Most of the proposals have focused on the trade of forced sex and reflect a cultural shift in the approach to prostitution that aims to divert victims forced into the industry away from the criminal justice system”

    https://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-sac-essential-politics-updates-california-decriminalizes-prostitution-1474918476-htmlstory.html

    And there is the essence of why this law was passed through. Victims forced into an industry and subsequently punished by the state for being victims of that industry. This is in essence the reserve engineering of the so-called amerikan dream “blame the victim, not the system”. The criminal system is a profit passed industry and one that is keen to keep its customers. This means not protection, not recuperation, and certainly no rehabilitation for these hapless children, it just means jail.

    If we are to break out the ‘C’ word here, it is the telling of a half story to distract people from the real sh*t that is hitting the fan. Pegging fake news on a political party who in not in power is a waste of message making. Lets not be distracted by this foolishness and focus where we must.

    • Martin Harris says:

      Thanks for your comments and info William. I think this an important issue not a distraction. Personally, I don’t think arresting child prostitutes is the answer either, but in an ideal world we wouldn’t have this terrible situation in the first place. What’s the alternative? Surely we do indeed need to address the blame, which as you point out, is the system: controlled by people who are doing their darnedest to erode traditional family values and leave youngsters ever more vulnerable to exploitation.
      Meanwhile, if arresting these kids is not the answer, which it isn’t, then how do we help them?
      I’ll let you ponder that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *