Seismic activity increasing? Mystery booms from underground? Strange lights in the sky? Our eyes have been almost entirely on the Covid situation for the past year, but the next stage is brewing. Should we be concerned? What’s happening next?
MUST WATCH THIS – AMERICA SOMETHING BIG IS HAPPENING! Why Is Nobody Talking About This
world news 2022
Find more https://www.youtube.com/user/NoLife127 From strange earth-changing events in the past week with a dramatic fire in the middle of the ocean in this video we will analyze Jaw Dropping Phenomena that will chill you to the bone. These are the most strange events happening on Earth in the past month or so. In this video we see blind birds falling from the sky to loud booms being heard throughout the world. We must start preparing for what is happening now. There are countless myths and legends of strange creatures that live but almost none of them have been caught on tape. This and much more. We analyze the most mysterious and creepy videos for your entertainment. Everyone must watch this.
Martin comments: I’ve watched lots of these Starlink satellites passing overhead and they are quite a spectacle. I suspect they will do more than just beam cheap internet connection, however. Could they be tied in with Project Blue Beam?
Get your copy from our Online Store or your local book and magazine retailer
Australian Retail Locations » Uncensored Publications Limited
New Zealand Retail Locations » Uncensored Publications Limited
As censorship heats up and free thought becomes an increasingly rare commodity, we appeal to our readers to support our efforts to reach people with information now being censored elsewhere. In the last few years, Uncensored has itself been censored, removed from the shelves of two of our biggest NZ retailers – Countdown Supermarkets and Whitcoulls Bookstores – accounting for 74% of our total NZ sales.
You can help keep the Free Press alive by subscribing and/or gifting a subscription to your friends and relatives.
The solar system is at the galactic plane (said to occur more specifically in 1974), the Earth’s magnetic field is apparently weakening —perhaps going to flip—, and the Earth is at the end of this interglacial.
I suspect that earthquakes and volcanoes are electromagnetic in origin, i don‘t think that faults cause earthquakes but earthquakes cause faults, and lightning is associated with both earthquakes and volcanoes. I devised a technical way to cause artificial earthquakes some time ago, as the energypatterns (there are two different ones) of Earthquakes is that of acoustic energy (why one can hear them coming), and light (without matter) and electricity (within matter) are actually different aspects of the same densitous energypattern, this being identical to the normal one of acoustic energy which is one of the earthquake energypatterns (the other is an elliptically backwards-rotating energypattern, this being the most destructive). The *original* reporting of the epicentres and aftershocks of the Christchurch earthquakes looked highly suspicious as artificially caused, the epicentres within the central Christchurch area, and the aftershocks within the city boundary looking like having been carpetbombed (they claiming at the time that the earthquakes were because the Plains are alluvial!)—now they have rewritten history claiming that the epicentres were *not* in central Christchurch, and that the aftershocks were spread around the Canterbury Plains area. This is to the best of my knowledge.
Fundamental physics, whether quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, Bohmian physics, Einsteinian physics, partical physics, and whatever, are all false models due to the ideology of dualistic reductionism; these models being promulgated and taught to hide the true nature of existence. There is a nondualistic model: In the implicit there is no way of creating number, in the explicit by measurement we and other life create number and distinction; there being no dimension, no extent, no locality, and no time, these being aspects of measurement. Ah, i must stop there!
The Christchurch earthquakes of September 2010 and February 2011 were artificially triggered and you are communicating with the man who found the “smoking gun” evidence. It’s in the archives here.
As to the rest of your comments, yes the magnetosphere is weakening. The major effect of this (and the resultant magnetic pole reversal) will be to send our technology into chaos and potentially send us back into pre-internet days (perish the thought). Life appears to have continued through several polar flips unhindered although there is an increased likelihood of asteroid collision (“the shields are down, cap’n!” as Scotty would say).
The rest is probably better covered in a blog or article or this could become a very lengthy discussion!
They are not satellites but more likely very high altitude balloons, NASA puts them up there, being one of the largest users of helium, or high altitude aircraft. The Starlink ones are supposedly only around 200 km altitude in the lower thermosphere, not very far off of the Earth’s surface. I can‘t upload any images; however, these NASA balloons are VERY large and go at least into the lower thermosphere where there is sufficient atmosphere for them to keep rising, and there is gravity to rise against (otherwise they would float around). There were high altitude balloons into the thermosphere in the 1950s; nothing can orbit there as gravity would prevent this. Gravity doesn‘t reduce with the square of the distance, this being claimed by the flimflammer Einstein and has been repeated ever since.
Another thing, photovoltaic panels have a mean efficiency of around 25°C, and a limiting effective range of between 0°C and 50°C, and so can only work in the lower thermosphere; they are also limited by dust on them (i wonder how they cleen terrestrial arrays of them) and by cloud, and don‘t work in the rain.
Moreover, i see no more lights moving on a clear night than i did in the sixties and seventies, the lights that one sees moving are asteroids (as the Sun is setting one can see them tumbling by their flashing), the Earth being surrounded by them some being quite big. I have never seen a formation of lights, but i suspect that this is a show, a spectacle, by using high altitude aircraft, NASA having an enhanced U-2 called ER-2 (the U-2 should have been an R-2), and the U-2 is still being used under the U-2 designation.
I repeat: I have seen the Starlink satellites in their thousands forming an impressive train across the night sky.
Twice I have seen them now and there is no mistaking them for anything else. It takes a considerable length of time for them to pass.
If you can see no more lights moving in the night sky now than you did in the 60s and 70s you’re needing to look harder mate:)
I do not think the US possesses 40 thousand U2s and besides, U2s only reflected light in their early days of flying when they had a raw aluminum finish. Once the black anti-reflective paint was developed they became near invisible at night.
I know the difference between an asteroid and a manouvering spy satellite. I used to spend a fair bit of time tracking satellites at the Canterbury Astronomical Society observatory in West Melton.
Thanks for your comments as always, but on this occasion I respectfully disagree.
You seem to have been triggered.
Firstly, just in case anyone thinks this: i am not a flat Earther, i can easily prove the validity of the Earth being a spheroid. I don‘t really care whatever anyone believes in, as long as they don‘t try to force their beliefs onto me.
You *assume* that you see Starlink satellites…because you have been *told* that they are Starlink satellites. I didn‘t say that these lights have not been seen, even if i haven‘t seen them myself (always seems to be cloudy where i am when they are supposedly visible): i say that they are not what they are claiming them to be, as that geophysics, and that the physics of photovoltaic panels (in the broader claims of space-travel), deny that this is possible (i could go into other problems here, such as radiation above the ionosphere, and the around 220 dB of sound (also infrasound) that a rocket creates on launching and in the atmosphere). I doubt that anyone has seen 40,000 odd of these lights together either, the images that i have seen of them don‘t add up to anywhere near to 40,000. Have you heard of artificially lighting aircraft?—they don‘t have to be U-2s, and what altitude are they anyhow, can you actually know this? At 25,000 feet (the altitude that the bombers in WW2 flew, often 1000 of them together) an aircraft is invisible to the naked eye and one cannot hear them (why they flew at 25,000 feet)—unfortunately for that trick they sometimes created nonpersistent and-or persistent contrails making them visible.
I repeat, i have been observing the night-sky for decades, and i see no more moving night-sky-lights there now than i did when i was younger, so i don‘t need to look harder—being abusive is not a valid argument. Where i am there is no light-pollution, and this was normal in cities once before the excessive streetlighting.
I have astronomy software which give the supposed artificial satellites, most of them being supposedly Starlink ones, and they are given as moving in apparent random directions, none in straight lines. I don‘t know how any can be *manouvering* spy-satellites, how can they be powered to do this, where do they get the fuel? What i am saying is that Earth-orbiting asteroids are it seems being assigned as artificial satellites, as i see no actual evidence that there *are* any artificial satellites: i don‘t make the claim that they exist, should anyone make this claim then they have to prove the validity of their claim. Have you measured the supposed altitude relative to the Earth’s umbra at the time, that they should be visible by reflected light at all?—Earth-orbiting asteroids are much farther out. Take a photograph of *any* satellite (a near-Earth one should be photographable) with a 14” Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope at +600x magnification, and prove that *any* moving nightsky-lights are artificial satellites…please…i implore you…
Sorry Mongoose, I am very far from triggered. I just respectfully disagree. And no, I do not have to justify my observations to you regardless of how much you implore 🙂
I saw nmany thousands of Starlink satellites crossing the night sky from horizon to horizon in the company of family.
There were thousands of them, regardless of whether you believe in them or not.
You can always track satellites here:
https://www.n2yo.com/