Australia and the False Ukraine Narrative

Varying reports from the international Intel Community confirm that US-NATO-UN-Azov brigades continue the genocide in Ukraine, they commenced in 2014. 

by G Squared

The attacks have been specifically against innocents as women and children, and in settings as schools, hospitals, and public transport. 

American propaganda media has pushed the false narrative, along with crisis actor performances, that it was the Russian Liberation Forces conducting the genocide. 

The eight years of American Occupation, since the American Invasion of 2014, and the history in other places of the protagonists alone, would confirm the reality of the events. Including the false mass graves. Without even relaying the Lithuanian death camps and the Dombass Civil War, which prompted Russia to act. Apart from the blackmail discontinuation of utilities as power and water (damed Dneiper). Gas having been syphoned from a Russian line, for use by the occupying forces and Ukrainian connections.

Recently in The Russian Consulate in Sydney, Australia, a sign was posted Infront inferring the false narrative that Russia was at fault.

Boikov; a local Russian standing for federal election on 21/5/2022; protested concerning the sign and had it removed. Local and Australian Federal Police having postured falsely that the sign was not offensive, and the perpetrator had permission for the sign to be displayed. All of which was false. The reality being that state police had been complicit in the diplomatic affront.

After an hour or so of debate concerning the sign, and false political narratives that the state police had taken legal advice concerning the allowance for the sign, they themselves removed it. 

There was never any permission for the sign, and a prior sign in support of The Russian Liberation Forces in Ukraine, had been removed by the same police. 

The turn for the current sign eventuated; not because of a misreading of a local government ordinance, but because a call went out to flood the two local police stations with phone calls and email traffic.

I had contacted Boikov and suggested he ignore the sign. The consular security would themselves remove and confiscate it. Instead of it being carefully removed, rolled by police, and delivered to the paid protagonist to be reused.

Boikov would not the path of condemning the path of the proven American atrocities. Thereby confirming the false narrative, and which should cost him the election next month. Returning a most unsuitable sitting member, with whom I conducted an informal discussion two months ago.

Boikov has missed the focus of his domestic campaign and the relevance of those he would represent.

Being drawn into foreign narratives; albeit false; will not aid his campaign. 

There is a lot of domestic material concerning the two major parties and their lackeys with regard to corruption that could be ventilated, rather than chasing about the wilderness with a camera; in pyrrhic confrontational theatres. 

Boikov reminds me of Trump. When he failed to listen: he failed.