It’s just a jump to the Left. And then a step to the Right. But was it all planned that way, and what will the outcome be?
Editor’s comment by Martin Harris
It’s tempting to think that the turning of the tide will bring respite from the madness of the past few years. We’re coming out from the COVID lockdown lunacy and mass jab-a-thons, and many of those who voted Left are having buyer’s regret. Now, on a national level here in New Zealand, we’ve just had our local council body elections, and up and down the country there is a stunning, but many would say predictable, swing to the Right.
“It would appear that we’re seeing around the country we’re experiencing a push against the establishment, whatever that looks like, and we are not immune to that. “
Local Government NZ president Stuart Crosby said the Labour government had a programme of significant reform which voters could be reacting to.
“That is quite upsetting to a large number of people. That’s not to be unexpected there is that shift in political thinking.”
“And it does lay a platform for the general election coming through this time next year as well.”
Local body elections: Changing of the guard across country | RNZ News
But how did we get so far to the Left in the first place? Something to do with the National government and our growing dis-satisfaction with Capitalist corruption and cronyism. Not to mention Prime Minister John Key’s creepy ponytail fetish.
Prior to the 2017 government elections, there seemed to be a very lackluster opposition, however. That is, until, right at the last moment when Labour unveiled its secret weapon. Jacinda Ardern. A shining star of Socialist idealism amidst a sea of old men in suits. And we fell for it. That’s how we got here.
On a global level, at least in the West, there seems to have been a suspiciously well-choreographed jump to the Left. In nations where The Right were technically at the helm, it appeared that Left Wing Wokesters were pulling the strings. Look at what happened to Boris in the UK. And now, it looks like the masses have had enough of this liberal-progressive radicalism and are turning back towards conservatism and Centre-Right values.
Taking the apparent choreography further, this all seemed to eventuate in perfect harmony with the SARS CoV-2 pandemic and its associated geopolitical response. A response that resulted in unprecedented protests and legal actions around the world.
As a so-called conspiracy theorist, I’ve never had so many “I told you so” moments, nor seen so many conspiracy theories become actual factual conspiracies in so small a space of time.
And speaking as a “conspiracy theorist” I have often thought, over the last two years, that it all seemed very planned and co-ordinated. It is tempting to celebrate the fall of the radical Left and celebrate the step to the Right by Doing the Time Warp, but I think I’ll pass on that dance. I think we are all being played.
Back in 2014 while surfing The Net, I stumbled over a curious and very interesting document. Prepared in 2010 by The Rockefeller Institute, it detailed four hypothetical, but highly probable, future social and geopolitical scenarios. One of these scenarios named “Clever Together” basically outlined the Socialist Utopia. Another would garner considerable attention in hindsight: “The Lock Step Scenario”. I doubt there is anyone reading this who isn’t familiar with it, nor with its uncanny accuracy in foreseeing the events that unfolded from 2019 through 2022.
“Scenarios are a medium through which great change cannot just be envisioned but also actualised”
The Rockefeller institute: Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-tNG7MjZUicS-wiJb/mode/2up
Now, this document was distributed among the movers and shakers of the world well before it entered the public domain. One can imagine the Socialist brigade drooling over “Clever Together”. Yes, I too was naive and idealistic in my younger days. However, Capitalism seems to attract the older and more pragmatic of us. As well as the more crafty and Machiavellian.
So if I were a crafty and Machiavellian Elite Capitalist, it would be the Lock Step scenario that would attract my attention. Especially the ending where the totalitarian, CCP-inspired measures employed ostensibly to combat viral spread, result in pushback from the masses who very quickly become weary of the heavy limitations on freedoms and rights, especially when the “poverty for all” economic austerity measures kick in.
I would consult with my fellow Elites and suggest we take measures to ensure this Lock Step Scenario proceeds. Put the Leftist loonies in charge; the more radical the better, and then let unleash the “Plandemic” and watch them fall on their own sword. Not only that, but Big Pharma makes a shitload of cash out of the whole thing. The Left does all the dirty work: the erosion of the Middle class (equal poverty for all) small businesses collapse in droves, and big businesses get bigger as Elite wallets get fatter.
The Elite capitalists never left the building, they just put the lunatics in charge of the asylum and watched them burn it down. Its not about the money, but who controls it.
Everybody look to the left
Price Tag
Everybody look to the right
Can you feel that, yeah
We’re paying with love tonight
It’s not about the money, money, money
We don’t need your money, money, money
We just want to make the world dance
Forget about the price tag
Song by Jessie J
I am reminded of the Faustian bargain that Emperor Ming offers Flash Gordon in the campy movie from the early 80s. In exchange for his loyalty, Ming offers Flash the Earth to rule over after he, the emperor, has finished visiting various plagues and engineered “natural” catastrophes upon it. The population, promises Ming, will be “Satisfied with less”.
Meanwhile back in the real world (increasingly difficult to distinguish from campy sci-fi) we’ve had a pandemic, lockdowns and mandates, unstable weather conditions, a double-whammy economic downturn (Covid and Ukraine-associated), a perception of nuclear threat in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and an uptick in seismic activity. All of which seem to have been utilised to soften us up. In heralding the return of the Right, will we too be “Satisfied with less” in the aftermath?
A jump to the left, then a step to the right. let’s do The Time Warp again.
Get your copy from our Online Store or your local book and magazine retailer
Australian Retail Locations » Uncensored Publications Limited
New Zealand Retail Locations » Uncensored Publications Limited
As censorship heats up and free thought becomes an increasingly rare commodity, we appeal to our readers to support our efforts to reach people with information now being censored elsewhere. In the last few years, Uncensored has itself been censored, removed from the shelves of two of our biggest NZ retailers – Countdown Supermarkets and Whitcoulls Bookstores – accounting for 74% of our total NZ sales.
You can help keep the Free Press alive by subscribing and/or gifting a subscription to your friends and relatives.
Yep! Uncensored is touching the bigger picture now; Let’s not forget that freemasonry and other dictators propaga(nda)te extremes like left vs right, presenting them as simple easy-understand/easy-fix reality (now incl. fake news…), whereas Nature tries to optimise in multitude of grey shades between extremes just like true democracies would — until her multiple regulation loops are cut with resulting catastrophies (eg. extinctions, floods, fires, earthquakes). Mucking around and promoting tribal self-isolation from this highly-organised totalitarian-dictatorship global 1%-rich-list-fascist society is helping such far-right (and far-left) implementing antidemocratic WEF policies — what is needed are constitutional democracy safeguards and thus constitutional regime changes. See Universal Democracy Constitution.
Greetings, Fritz Fehling
I have been unable to find a “Universal Democracy Constitution” which makes sense as Universal democracy and Constitutional Democracy are two differing ideologies 🙂
However there is plenty of material out there on the concept of Universal democracy and how it might work, for instance:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/41154428_A_Theory_of_Universal_Democracy
Please remember Fritz, that an article tagged “opinion” or “editor’s comment” represents the author’s views and thoughts, not those of Uncensored News, as we are staffed by individuals with differing views and opinions bound by mutual respect.
Thanks as always for your comments 🙂
I originally designed the Universal Democracy Constitution as a universal non-country-specific constitution for safeguarding a democracy, thus making democracy work. Its attached concise summary of democracy basis / facts / safeguards / history (esp. incl. voting methods) deals with Democracy Constitution / Constitutional Democracy (see drive.google.com/file/d/0B8X9NHu4eL0gYldmY1ZYN0hMbG8/view?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-bbw9ogwH-Uecx_IxQg9ozg ), and also explains the self-contradicting problems of democracy as the “rule by the people”, which throughout history prevented its everyday practicality. It does not even mention universal democracy! But later I realised that democracy can contain universal principles (esp. the creation and publishing of analytical problem-solving ideas, the free-thinking so disliked by dictatorships); A sort of universal democracy, because safeguarded constitutional democracy is the only universal long-term alternative to fascistic dictatorships (incl. monarchies), all with their own violent power safeguards from which we continue to fail to separate — a universal continuing failure, so to speak. I only need to read your valuable website articles to realise that we have nothing much left to lose beyond our lives… Let’s finally get started!
By the way: There is no such thing as total freedom in this universe with its infinite interdependencies and infinite regulation loops — Even mental freedom is limited by our conditioning and perception of reality…
Greetings, Fritz
I define freedom as the ability to think independently. We have certain restrictions to act on those thoughts that are agreed by consensus to be contrary to the general good. After that it gets complicated.
Therefore, another definition of “freedom” means the freedom to act on our independent thoughts within the confines of what is deemed acceptable (lawful or ethical) or within what is physically possible. In some ways the latter depends on what restrictions we impose upon ourselves.
“nothing much left to lose beyond our lives”? That’s a rather grim and desperate outlook Fritz. I have a great deal to lose besides my life.
You say you want a revolution, well, we’d all love to see your plan, but we might not all want to follow it. That’s what makes us human and why we are in the scenario we are in. And the more freedom we have, the more we are able to disagree. Quite a conundrum, isn’t it?
The required revolution consists of constitutionally safeguarding democracy; It is more of a mental revolution, but when Google a and Wikipedia deletes it, and everyone else refuses to even read the Universal Democracy Constitution with attached basic democracy facts, while requiring convenient youtube downpours of propagating Trump fakenews, then you’ll get WEF’s 95% population murder followed by total eradication through Nature. Did I leave anything out this time?
Nobody reads the Universal Democracy Constitution because hardly anyone has ever heard of it Fritz.
I tried looking for it on several search engines. you left a link in your earlier comment, but unfortunately it was a link to a document on your Google Drive which won’t link here.
The best way to make your work visible to the masses is by starting up a WordPress account (free) and then sending a link to all the media outlets you can think of. neither Google nor Wikipedia can censor it. Better still, send your blog out on a mailling list also.
Then you can complain that people “refuse to read it”.
Dear Martin!
I copied & pasted above (and below) Universal Democracy Constitution link into Google, and it worked even in the public library; I also distributed it several times over years to media and politicians worldwide via e-mail; Jon Eisen got it, too… My name is less relevant, as I am not an egocentric aiming for a political leadership / dictator role or gratifying olympic-world-record number of social-media comments — it would be inconsistent… Hence I am also not using social media. Let me know if this link is truly not working! It also appears under “Universal Democracy Constitution” Google search result as: scribd.com/document/341530102/Constitutional-Democracy-Universal-pdf , but nobody would type this instead of “Democracy Constitution”…
Thanks for your info; Greetings, Fritz
drive.google.com/file/d/0B8X9NHu4eL0gYldmY1ZYN0hMbG8/view?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-bbw9ogwH-Uecx_IxQg9ozg
The links you’ve dropped in the comments won’t activate. However by copying and pasting the scribd link scribd.com/document/341530102/Constitutional-Democracy-Universal-pdf into Google it appears without issue. Therefore anyone reading this and wanting to read Fritz’s constitution can do the same 🙂
However, to repeat, we can’t access your personal google Drive and attempting to capy and paste into a search engine yeilds nil result, as one would expect!