No it isn’t satire or a hoax. We did a little digging and analysis on this one and share our observations about the alleged vaccine and traffic accident link! MH
Martin Harris 15/12/22
Original source of info is a video by Carl Vernon:
I went and read the actual study in The American Journal of Medicine, and It says:
“…A limitation of our study is that correlation does not mean causality because our data do not explore potential causes of vaccine hesitancy or risky driving” {Thus invalidating the claim made by MSM items on this study and making the study therefore totally unscientific. Martin]
“…Another limitation of our study is the lack of direct data on driving exposure in different groups.”
“…Our study has other limitations. The analysis does not correct for barriers in access to care or risk compensation that each bias results in the contrary direction.67 The analysis does not include minor crashes that do not lead to emergency care or deaths at the scene prior to reaching the hospital [So maybe there are more vaccinated people die at the scene of the crash? Martin] (Appendix).68 The data do not examine the long-term recovery, quality of life, and insurance costs for those who survive initial injuries. Many vehicle factors remain unexplored, including speed, spacing, configuration, location, weather, and distances driven. The study does not test the reliability of COVID vaccination as a proxy for COVID vaccine hesitancy [And that’s a big factor is it not? Martin].
The available data do not examine long-term trends, test at-fault liability, [Meaning that a vaccinated driver may well have caused the accident that affected the unvaccinated victim! Martin] or assess measurement error that biases results toward the null.58 These uncertainties are further opportunities for future science”
This study also uses the words “theorize”, “might”, “possibly” and “speculate” an awful lot.
Yes, by the author’s own admissions, this study is festering in a quagmire of ‘limitations”.
It the ends with an impressive looking but utterly meaningless graph with an explanation. I have italicized some notable words in this explanation: “possible” and “unmeasured”. Isn’t proven certainty and precise measurement the benchmark of scientific data, as opposed to speculation and a lack of measurement?
You can read the entire “study’ here:
COVID Vaccine Hesitancy and Risk of a Traffic Crash – The American Journal of Medicine (amjmed.com)
You may form your own conclusion. for what it’s worth, my conclusion is that the study is an attempt to validate a preconceived theory using speculation and limited data disguised with some impressive sounding wording and references. Martin
Kinda reminds me of this paper that blames “anti Vaxers” for causing undue stress in vaccine recipients which then leads to heart attacks!
https://www.biomedicinej.com/biomedicine/vol12/iss3/1/
We are living in a clown world!
There was also one that claimed that all “anti-vaxxers” come from troubled upbringings, which is news to me as I had a great childhood.
The only reason this is happening is due to the fact they have the ability to try and knock off people that are avoiding the new ingredients by taking control of the fully electrically brake and steering controlled vehicles. I can guarantee that the vehicles involved are all Bluetooth or wireless configured and they come in through your phone. and all have electric steering, braking and controls which encompass the entire operation of the vehicle. This is murder and is part of the world wide genocide reset/replacement. The vehicles involved need their systems audited after these events to properly investigate the event.
Thats an interesting perspective Corey. I hadn’t considered that possibility. I own two un-hackable vehicles myself one of which I will always keep.
https://uncensored.co.nz/2018/04/23/you-dont-own-me-evs-internal-combustion-and-freedom/?v=8e3eb2c69a18