A campaign group in Scotland had challenged the government’s attempts to allow transgender individuals into roles reserved for women
Source: rt.com; April 16, 2025; https://is.gd/uqMMiY
Via Nexusnewsfeed
Women’s rights campaigners celebrate British Supreme Court ruling on definition of ‘woman’ © Getty Images / Richard Baker; In Pictures
The UK Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that the term “woman” refers to biological sex, not gender identity, meaning that transgender individuals who were born male are not legally considered women for the purposes of single-sex protections.
The ruling comes after the For Women Scotland rights campaign challenged a Scottish Government law aimed at increasing the number of women on public boards, which included transgender women with legal recognition as female.
The group claimed this violated the UK-wide Equality Act 2010 – a law that protects people from discrimination based on characteristics like sex, race, and disability. They asked the UK Supreme Court to confirm that “woman” in the Act means biological female, not someone assigned female status through a gender recognition certificate.
In its judgment, the court stated that “the terms ‘women’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex,” adding that interpreting sex to include acquired gender “would lead to incoherence” in provisions protecting women on the basis of pregnancy, maternity, and other sex-specific criteria.
A government spokesperson, responding to the judgment, stated that the ruling “brings clarity and confidence, for women and service providers such as hospitals, refuges, and sports clubs.” The spokesperson added that “single-sex spaces are protected in law and will always be protected by this government.”
EU country enshrines two genders in constitution
Lord Hodge, one of the presiding justices, also noted that the court did not view the ruling as “a triumph” of one group over another and that it was simply necessary to provide legal clarity on the meaning of terms in existing legislation.
British author J.K. Rowling, one of the most prominent supporters of For Women Scotland, also hailed the court’s ruling.
“It took three extraordinary, tenacious Scottish women with an army behind them to get this case heard by the Supreme Court and, in winning, they’ve protected the rights of women and girls across the UK,” the writer said on X.
Some, however, have criticized the Supreme Court’s decision, claiming it could reduce legal recognition for transgender people. The Scottish Greens issued a statement slamming the ruling, calling it “deeply concerning for human rights.” LGBTQ+ charity Stonewall also expressed “deep concern at the widespread implications” of the move.
Martin comments: Every now and then, amidst the dark stormclouds of geopolitical lunacy, a gap appears, and a ray of sunshine penetrates the murk. A glimmer of sanity, a moment of clarity. A delicate blossom in a garden of weeds. And we can smile again and take comfort in the courage and tenacity of three real and very determined Scotswomen. A fine example to us all.
Get your copy from our Online Store or your local book and magazine retailer
Australian Retail Locations » Uncensored Publications Limited
New Zealand Retail Locations » Uncensored Publications Limited
As censorship heats up and free thought becomes an increasingly rare commodity, we appeal to our readers to support our efforts to reach people with information now being censored elsewhere. In the last few years, Uncensored has itself been censored, removed from the shelves of two of our biggest NZ retailers – Countdown Supermarkets and Whitcoulls Bookstores – accounting for 74% of our total NZ sales.
You can help keep the Free Press alive by subscribing and/or gifting a subscription to your friends and relatives.
