Category: Corporate Corruption

Vitamin C: FDA Withholding Cancer And Diabetes Treatments

Image result for vitamin c intravenous

The following is a fascinating interview with health expert, Ronnie McMullen. We discussed the fact that there are cures for cancer and diabetes despite the fact that we haven’t seen any mainstream Big Pharma advances in almost 50 years. However, the alternative healthcare industry has exploded with effective means of treatment. And now, the FDA just legislated against intravenous Vitamin C even though there are no side-effects.

Watch the following YouTube video from The Health Ranger and feel free to share your thoughts:

The FDA Controlled By Big Parma Since Gov’t. Deal In 90’s

Image result for vitamin c intravenous

It’s been a while since we had anything on the Vitamin C subject.  Seems there’s a push against intravenous vitamin C by the FDA big pharma puppets:

The following is a fascinating interview with health expert, Ronnie McMullen. We discussed the fact that there are cures for cancer and diabetes despite the fact that we haven’t seen any mainstream Big Pharma advances in almost 50 years. However, the alternative healthcare industry has exploded with effective means of treatment. And now, the FDA just legislated against intravenesou Vitamin C even though there are no side-ffects.

This is a great interview which exposes a lot and should be widely circulated.

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2017/02/03/the-fda-withholding-cancer-and-diabetes-cures-ronnie-mcmullen/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-fda-withholding-cancer-and-diabetes-cures-ronnie-mcmullen

 

BIGGER

lBIGGER

By Martin Harris

For a while now, New Zealand has been the home-away-from-home for America’s celebrities and elite. First a trickle, now more and more, and it’s become front page news, with a strangely conspiracy oriented twist. Talk of bunkers, safe havens, apocalypse impending, and of course escape from Trump!

http://thecontrail.com/forum/topics/american-s-flock-to-nz-safe-haven

But why NZ?

Don’t they know what’s going on here? You want to escape the apocalypse you don’t come to Earthquake Central, do you?

No, I don’t think ignorance plays much part.

Antarctica. The real reason the upper echelon of the USA has such an interest in New Zealand.

Why Antarctica? I have a theory, a wild but interesting theory.

Kids. For so long they seem little babes, then one day you realise, “hey, did you grow six inches overnight?”

They have growth spurts, and sometimes it makes them a little clumsy as they adapt to their growing bodies. Sometimes they get growing pains.

My youngest boy, Caleb, is four years old as I write this.

He’s always wanting to try new things, and sometimes I say to him, “you can do this when you’re bigger”. The next day, he comes to me and says, “Dad, I’m bigger!”.

He’s recently progressed from obsession with excavating and digging, to obsession with dinosaurs. Reminds me of another little red haired boy many years ago.

As any good parents would, we have utilized his obsession as a learning tool, both online and through library books. And it’s amazing how our perception of dinosaurs has changed.

When I was a lad, we were taught that prehistoric reptiles were plodding, dumb brutes, and that they were so huge and heavy that they spent most of their time immersed in swamps and shallow rivers, unable to support their weight on dry land.

Image result for dinosaurs as swamp dwellers

In subsequent years, it has become the norm to portray most Dinos as highly active land roaming creatures. And larger ones are being discovered all the time. Likewise, the aircraft sized pterodactyl were assumed to be only capable of short glides. Now they are said to have soared for considerable distances.

Something always puzzled me though….

PUZZLE PIECE ONE:

The perceived nature of prehistoric animals has changed, but how did these titanic tyrannosaurus, spinosaurs and colossal sauropods support their bulk on dry land? Indeed recently, National Geographic proposed that the mega-size predator Spinosaurus (you guessed it) lived mostly in shallow rivers and lakes because it’s upper body was too bulky for land locomotion.

Is it that the experts are struggling to reconcile the logistics?

Could it be that the force of gravity was weaker millions of years ago?

PUZZLE PIECE TWO:

Then of course (so we are told) the dinosaurs were wiped out within a short space of time (or evolved into birds…. or both…?) and the mammals took centre stage. But this was the time of mammals that grew to huge size generally, compared to today’s species. The Mammoth, Cave Bear, Giant Sloth, Balichotherium and such like, reined for millions of years, then, suddenly, as recently as 12000 years ago give or take, they were wiped out.

We have a clearer picture of what happened at the conclusion of the last Ice Age, and it isn’t pretty. No wonder the legend of a “great flood” is imprinted in the minds of so many cultures around the globe. The smashed and battered remains of millions of animals are preserved in the permafrost of Siberia and Alaska, and even in the mud and clay of Europe and the American continent, beneath the sands of the deserts of the Middle East, and even at the bottom of the English Channel.

While the catastrophic meltdown that ended the so-called Ice Age is unquestioned, the mechanism that caused it remains disputed and uncertain. One of the most ingenious theories was proposed by Professor Charles Hapgood, who suggested that rather than the slow, uniform creep of continental drift being the sole mechanism at work on the Earth’s crust, the entire outer shell of the Earth is subject to suddenly (in geological terms) sliding over the molten liquid layer beneath, so that landmasses previously located in temperate locations would be relocated to the poles, and freezing conditions.

Hapgood provided some very compelling evidence for the Earth Crust Displacement Theory, and had the support of Albert Einstein. The theory was famously resurrected by Graham Hancock in his bestseller, Fingerprints of the Gods (Hancock proposed Antarctica as the potential site of an “elder culture”, an ancient lost civilisation responsible for many mysterious monuments around the world).

Einstein, however, as correspondence to Hapgood indicates, had reservations about Earth Crust Displacement. A suitable mechanism or lever was required to trigger the crustal movement. And since these bursts of extinction seemed to happen at intervals, the mechanism would have to be somehow cyclical in nature.

Both Hapgood and Hancock proposed  ice as the mechanism. Gradual growth of polar ice pressed down upon the rock beneath, deforming the land. Eventually the weight of the ice reaches a point where it begins to break off in shelves, resulting in a lessening weight and ‘isostatic rebound’. The uneven distribution of ice causes a wobble in the Earth’s rotation, like an off balance washing machine, until, bang! things start slipping and sliding around until balance is restored.

Nice idea, thought Einstein, but give me some hard figures on this. The math doesn’t add up.

So what mechanism caused such an extraordinary relocation of the continents?

PUZZLE PIECE THREE:

It intrigued me as a young boy, that looking at any world map, the Earth’s terrestrial landmasses all seemed shaped in such a way that they fit neatly together if the oceans were taken out of the equation.

were of course given an answer to this in the form of Continental Drift Theory. But this theory only allowed for slow, uniform change. There was no allowance for the obvious catastrophes and extinction events.

A modification called Punctuated Equilibrium went partway to an answer, but not enough.

PUZZLE PART FOUR:

After each catastrophic mass extinction event, the newly emerging dominant life forms were radically different. First we had creatures adapted mainly to life in warm shallow seas that covered much of the planet’s surface, then life suddenly went either onshore, or adapted to deeper, cooler seas. Then came the age of giant reptiles, and so on. In other words, conditions on the Earth went through a series of drastic changes to which life was forced to adapt. Life does not change unless the conditions force that change upon it.

And after each change, the general trend has been towards downsizing.

As if the Earth’s gravitational pull has increased over time.

PUZZLE  PART FIVE:

What about the asteroids? Weren’t the dinosaurs wiped out by an asteroid hitting the Earth?

Actually as we know the Earth is pockmarked with the craters of many asteroid and meteorite impacts, and what makes the dinosaur extinction tie-in is the KT layer after which no more dinosaur fossils are found.

Fossils, however, are NOT a normal state of affairs. When an animal dies, it’s body decomposes, the remains are picked over by predators and the bones scattered. Fossils are a snapshot in time that indicate a catastrophe in which animals were buried and sealed off from the elements rapidly. Same goes for the frozen remains in the permafrost. Evidence of disasters that visit the planet on a disturbingly regular basis.

As for meteorites and asteroids, every impact not only creates either a localised or planetary disaster of it’s own, it also contributes a little more material to the mass of the Earth.

And so it occurred to me a few years back, that looking at these puzzle pieces, the answer was actually staring us in the face.

The Earth’s gravitational pull is increasing over time because the Earth is gaining mass.

There is nothing controversial about this. Two space rocks smash together and make a bigger rock, the increased mass/gravity attracts more material and so on.

And we know for a fact that the planet continues to suck up space rocks and dust. Tons of it daily. It’s got to go somewhere.

I’m sure you know where this is going.

Watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiCMFzpMnZM

Read:

http://www.xearththeory.com/

And yes, even the dinosaur mystery fits into the picture:

http://www.dinox.org/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qw3HWjvIhVw

With the mass growing, it now explains why dinasaurs were so big.  Numerous engineers have pointed out that these gigantic creatures could not have survived in today’s gravity making it impossible to pump blood, walk, or survive today.  Here is a plot of the biggest creatures during life on earth and it points to a growing mass.

The plot of the largest creatures according to mainstream science.

http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/site/dehilster/2014/09/22/is-the-e…

So how come this interesting and apparently plausible theory hasn’t gained more acceptance in scientific circles then?

The answer lies with Expanding Earth’s most devoted promoter, Neal Adams. He isn’t a scientist. In fact his main claim to fame is as a very talented comic book artist. This may explain his exquisite animations of the planet expanding, but sadly it also explains why debunkers have such a field day with him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ

And to make matters worse, Adam’s explanations of the math and physics are easily attacked. Oh, and his universal view and beliefs don’t help his cause either.

Please don’t misunderstand me here, I think Neal’s a great guy , but, from a mainstream scientist’s POV…..?

http://goodmath.scientopia.org/2010/09/21/the-return-of-a-classic-n…

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?84708-The-Expanding-…

So, with all due thanks and respect to Neal Adams for his tireless devotion to the cause, we need to separate the man from the theory. And what we find is a surprising amount of support from the mainstream academia.

“The Expanding Earth Hypothesis goes back to at least 1933, a time when the Continental Drift Hypothesis was accorded the same sort of ridicule. Now, Continental Drift is enthroned; and ironically many of its strongest proponents are vehemently opposed to the Expanding Earth, ignoring the lessons of history.” — William R. Corliss, physicist, 1985.

http://oilismastery.blogspot.co.nz/2008/10/expanding-earth-outline….

(be sure to check out this link even if you ignore the others; it’s a beaut.)

Scientists measure the planet and tell us, no, the Earth isn’t growing. I would amend that to, no, it wasn’t growing last time we checked,

And that was apparently in 2011!

“Our study provides an independent confirmation that the solid Earth is not getting larger at present, within current measurement uncertainties,”

See NASA’s article below:

https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/earth20110816.html

. What I’m proposing is that the planet does not grow at a steady rate, but, like my children, in a series of spurts. These growth spurts are accompanied by growing pains in the form of sharp increases in seismic activity, cracks and sinkholes, tsunamis, and ultimately, upheavals of a more drastically catastrophic nature resulting in mass extinction events, relocation of continents and a requirement for survivors to rapidly adapt and evolve. I also thing the expansion happens unevenly, resulting in some areas spreading drastically, while other areas may actually be pushed together. This may explain the constant wandering of the magnetic poles perhaps?

So let’s take a look at the evidence of the fossil record that may give some credence to this theory.

These fish died by asphyxiating. They were suddenly left high and dry with nowhere to go. These are but a few of millions that died like this. Where did the shallow sea go that they swam in?

For an example we could examine the numerous fossils in a location known as The Red Sandstone, an area covering half of Scotland. Observers have described this region as an aquatic graveyard with thousands of different localities disclosing the same scene of destruction. The red sandstone deposit, that covers and area of approximately 10,000 square miles and over 150 feet in thickness screams with the evidence of a wide-scale catastrophe. Fossilized fish are found there contorted into abnormal shapes. Others died suddenly in swimming positions.

The identical picture can be found in northern Italy. Evidence there would indicate vast quantities of fish also perished suddenly. Fossilized skeletons of fish are found by the thousands in slate. In most case the fossils are packed together. Many of the fossils have been preserved with traces of the color of their skin impregnated into the surrounding material indicting that deposition had occurred before decomposition of the tissues

The Ichthyosaur died in the act of giving birth. The intact nature of the fossil indicates almost instantaneous death and burial.

Moving much further forward in time:

“There is evidence that Titicaca was once a saltwater sea. Its shoreline is littered with millions of fossilized seashells. The marine fishes and seahorses in the lake are all oceanic types found only in salt water.

Researchers are convinced that these 3 miles high ruins once lay at sea level. Therefore, an incredibly devastating earthquake could have torn the city asunder, lifting Tiwanaku and the lake to where they are now…..

What was Titicaca at one time? Has it always been just a freshwater lake with saltwater fauna? Or was it a great and sacred river flowing at nearly sea level, and leading to the sea?”

“Titicaca and Poopo, lake and salt-bed of Coipasa, salt beds of Uyuni———several of these lakes and salt—beds have chemical compositions similar to those of the ocean. He pointed out that Lake Titicaca is.. . . full of characteristic [saltwater] molluscs, such as Palude— strina and Ancylus, which shows that it is, geologically speaking, of relatively modern origin.
Hans S. Bellamy, who gave the problem of the salinity of this region very considerable thought, had the following to say:
The region in which the feeders of Lake Titicaca rise consist almost exclusively of old crystalline, and younger volcanic rocks; Triassic formations, from which salt is usually derived through extraction, are markedly absent.
Hence the presence of so much salt in the Bolivian Tableland can only be accounted for by postulating a former connection of the great lacustrine basin with the Ocean, and by assuming the eventual evaporation of this body of water when the connection with the Ocean was at last severed.”(source, blog.world link below)

http://www.viewzone.com/tiwan.

http://blog.world-mysteries.com/science/ancient-ruins-of-tiwanacu-a…

http://karlshuker.blogspot.co.nz/2016/12/fire-beasts-lightning-beas…

Note the land raised in stages in this image from NZ. Growth spurts?

Isn’t it logical, that life on earth began in the oceans and moved onto land, because originally most of the planet was covered in warm shallow oceans?

Something else that’s growing: Antarctica. Or more specifically, the Antarctic Ice sheet. Meanwhile, the Arctic ice is actually diminishing.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/05/05/sea-ice-news-volume-6-1-anta…

What does that mean? Take a look at the graphic at the start of this blog. Everything is moving outwards from Antarctica, like a balloon expanding.

“Take Antarctica for example. There is no subduction around Antarctica and yet it is expanding. It can’t get smaller.  What to do?  There is no answer from plate tectonics.  Also, the mainstream admits they need 70% more subduction for the earth’s radius to remain constant.  Truly a very big big problem…..

One complaint about earth expansion from plate tectonics is that they say you can’t have subduction with earth expansion or growth.  Yes you can.  And the reason is because the earth is not expanding equally all over.  In fact, the it is expanding much more in the southern hemisphere than in the upper.  Look at the map below.  Look at the expansion below and the land mass in the lower hemisphere.  There you find less land mass, and more expansion.ĵ

This makes the expansion in the northern hemisphere strained.  Take a look at the area in the blue oval.  That is the western coastline of the United States and Canada.  There, the earth is expanding, but unevenly given the expansion in the southern hemisphere is much greater.  This causes some subduction by forming almost a hinge at the bottom of Alaska.  There is subduction, but not in a way or in enough quantity to keep the earth at a fixed radius.”

UnequalEarthExpansion

http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/site/dehilster/2014/09/22/is-the-e…

Antarctica is an island of stability, and loaded with mineral resources. While oil and gas reserves are uncertain, coal, ore and metals are plentiful:

And speaking of oil and gas reserves:

“The same mechanism that is causing the earth to expand and grow, is creating methane, oil, gas, and water.  Oil is not from squashed dinosaurs.  It is abiotic (not from fossils). Water didn’t come from comets.  It is also coming from within the earth, pouring through the expanding fissures in the deep oceans.  And lately, how are we be finding more and more oil and gas so far down all over the world like in the Bakken in North Dakota, the Utica in Ohio, and many other new fields.  All this is being manufactured inside the earth.  This is not far-fetched given mainstream science says that atoms are made in the core of the sun.  The earth’s core is most likely much like the sun.  There you go.”

(same source as previous link)

And of course, most of the world’s potential fresh water supply, an increasingly valuable commodity, is locked up in the southern ice cap.

I doubt anyone would want to live permanently in Antarctica, (although it may not be as inhospitable as one might think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0x40A0sBL34

an “ark” would be a good safe haven until the planet settles down again. We may not be the first to take safe refuge in Antarctica if Hapgood, Hancock and co. are correct.

It is true that millions of years ago Antarctica was a virtual paradise, and portions may have been ice free until relatively recently.

Image result for piri reis map antarctica

, are the elite justified in making their home-away-from-home in the “Stepping stone to Antarctica” right now? I think so.

We know more or less the time frame in which mass extinctions occur, and we are due. Some would say justifiably that it has begun. Earthquakes are on the increase (even allowing for the artificially triggered ones). Sinkholes and great gaping cracks in the earth are on the news almost daily. And cosmic rays are increasing steadily.

Take a look at what happened in Kaikoura.

“Much of the northeastern coast of the South Island was uplifted during the 14th of November 2016 earthquake. We know this from photos of rock platforms covered in seaweed and marine animals such as crayfish and paua stranded above tide levels. Our records measured the tide gauge at Kaikoura was lifted up by 1 m, and continuous GPS monitoring sites at Kaikoura and Cape Campbell were also raised by 0.7-0.9 m. At this stage we can estimate that the coast was raised between 0.5 m and 2 m from about 20 km south of Kaikoura all the way north to Cape Campbell. Scientists plan to find out more about this coastal uplift.” (source, GNS).

Now take a look at these images, and remember the fossil fish earlier in this blog?

Frighteningly similar.

But, other than the obvious closeness to Antarctica, why NZ?

Let’s recap a Few points:

Most of the expansion occurs in the southern hemisphere.

As the earth grows, more “real estate” becomes available.

Logically, most of this new land will be at certain locations in the southern hemisphere. Witness what is happening in NZ especially Kaikoura.

New Zealand has been reported by the Oil Industry as “The Texas of the South…. literally leaking gas and oil”.

Metals, water and uranium from Antarctica, and oil and gas from New Zealand. An elitist-survivalist paradise?

Is it any wonder Christchurch was demolished to be rebuilt as a resilient Agenda 30 prototype city of the future?

“Events like the quake shut down industry in South force populations North and cleay way for bolt hole investors. With exception of local hapu who have to accept oil as local industry in face of destruction of local industry. Even drilling offers bugger all local jobs.
Meanwhile core industry including roads, cyber infrastructure, port development, defence, airport infrastructure, continue to pour into the Wanganui Manawatu region. There is a good case for noting an unprecedent, unexplained escalation in these areas prior to last years quake dating back circa 2010.
This is the same era the South Island, especialy its high country, started becoming a magnate for bolthole investors including Peter Thiel, Julian Robertson, James Covert, Richard V Allen. VIP,s with some fairly interesting backgrounds and interesting friends.”

(Ben Vigden, via email)

SO ALL THESE EARTHQUAKES ARE NATURAL THEN?

WHAT ABOUT HAARP AND GEO-ENGINEERING?

Here’s how I think HAARP technology fits into the big picture.

I touched earlier in this blog about questions regarding the true source of oil, that it may in fact be virtually limitless.

HAARP is capable of looking down into the earth’s crust and locating potential sources of oil and gas. It could surely also locate voids and fractures. HAARP also looks up at the ionosphere, and as we now know, in conjunction with satellites, we can detect ionospheric disturbances that are precursors to potential earthquakes.

Nature can be very fickle and unpredictable, so HAARP takes the uncertainty out of the equation, triggering (not generating) seismic activity in a targeted area that’s already under stress. Rather than waiting to see if nature does the job, they’re ensuring it happens.

They are trying to coax the earth into releasing it’s hidden reserves of oil. This is where the seismic exploration vessels are brought into play, to confirm wether or not the operation has succeeded. If it hasn’t, they keep it up until they get what they’re after.

What they are doing is not simply looking for undiscovered oil fields. They are attempting create new ones by shattering the crust.

Oil companies seeking permits in NZ have described this country as ” the Texas of the South” and “literally leaking oil and gas”.

This is all in the name of perpetuating the oil industry. It’s all about the money.

AND THE HOARD OF STASHED WEALTH IS ALSO GETTING BIGGER.

WHAT’S ALL THAT MONEY FOR?

Trillions of dollars in tax havens. New Zealand it seems, is one of those havens. What the hell are the elite going to do with all those trillions? It’s dead money that could be put to good use. One could solve the world’s problems several times over. Unless, that is, the elite believe that the world as we know it can’t be saved from an impending extinction event.

It has happened many times before. The evidence is plain to see. It happens at regular intervals. Asteroid collisions can’t account for all these successive extinction events, and a mechanism for earth crustal displacement has never been found. Only an expanding earth explains the sudden extinction and subsequent geological and climatic changes.

This blog has demonstrated that, if this theory is correct, the Antarctic is probably the safest place to be, and New Zealand is seen by the elite as their gateway to that continent if the shit hits the fan.

The reader may be interested in the relevant links below.

http://www.bbc.com/earth/bespoke/story/the-cracks-ripping-earth-apart/

http://www.stuff.co.nz/science/87647721/Scientists-find-evidence-th…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXADrXiZGc8

http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-just-released-some-incredibl…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb7EoGqaJdU

https://ottawarewind.com/2016/01/11/raiders-of-antarktika-secret-ww…

As always, remember a big dose of speculation is involved here, and it’s all open to question and constructive criticism. Think For Yourself, and do your research with an open and discerning mind.

Hope you enjoyed the blog and thanks for taking the time to read it.

Seth Rich: New Evidence Emerges

According to a new interview Wikileaks envoy Craig Murray and former British ambassador stated the he personally flew to the United States and was handed both the DNC emails and the Podesta emails.

Trump Unravels TPP Behemoth

From ghost hacked, http://thecontrail.com/forum/topics/the-trump-card?xg_source=activity

Guy is already making waves couple days into his role as POTUS.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/donald-trump-trade-nafta-1.3947989

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/23/politics/trans-pacific-partnership-tr…

CNN)President Donald Trump on Monday will start to unravel the behemoth trade deal he inherited from his predecessor, as he signed an executive action to withdraw from the negotiating process of the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

That executive action sends signals to Democrats and leaders in foreign capitals around the world that Trump’s rhetoric on trade during the campaign is turning into action. Trump vowed during the campaign to withdraw the US from the Pacific trade deal, commonly known as TPP, which he argued was harmful to American workers and manufacturing.

To sum it up, via executive order, pulls the US out of the Trans Pacific Partnership.

WOW!

Image result for trump tpp

 

 

 

How You Can Predict The Globalist’s Behaviour, by Brandon Smith.

Great article. This guy has it sussed: “Know thine enemy”!

By Brandon Smith

In my last article, ‘How Globalists Predict Your Behavior’, I outlined the primary method globalists use to measure public consent, or, public dissent. The use of macro-analytics and the hyper-monitoring of Web traffic is a powerful tool at the disposal of the establishment for gauging shifts in public consciousness in real-time.

For example, in early 2016 the elites were entirely aware of the rise of conservative and sovereignty movements in the U.S. and Europe. In fact, the dangers of growing “populism” were all that elitists and their publications talked about for the first six months of the year. At first, this notion seemed a little odd to me. Generally, when globalists are attempting to manage public opinion, they are careful not to reveal the slightest hint that conservative movements exist beyond an “extremist fringe.” They certainly never suggest that there is a massive undercurrent of nationalism ready to topple the globalist structure.

In fact, whenever such movements do arise the establishment is swift to obstruct them or co-opt them. I witnessed this first hand during the Ron Paul campaign in 2008 and 2012 – the mainstream deliberately refused to acknowledge Ron Paul’s existence, because attacking him repeatedly would have been a zero sum strategy that would have given him greater public attention and free publicity.

I saw it during the Neo-con co-option of the Tea Party, a movement that I was involved in long before Fox News latched onto it and long before mainstream RINO Republicans not only jumped on the bandwagon but hijacked the horse. In a matter of months the Tea Party became a defunct entity, a shell of its former self. Luckily, most liberty activists simply left it behind and started their own separate groups and projects rather than being absorbed into the Neo-con fold.

I also saw establishment interference on a local and state level during elections in Montana. An associate of mine was running for state office on a liberty platform and was doing rather well in the polls. He was approached by a contingent of political elites running as Republicans who told him in no uncertain terms that he could run on any platform and use any rhetoric he wanted, but if he won, he would be required to follow THEIR direction. They even encouraged him to continue arguing for constitutional government in his speeches and debates, because they felt this was the best way to “sell” his candidacy. But when all was said and done, he was supposed to stab his constituency in the back and take orders from the party leadership.

The point is, the elites dominate the political system. Nothing happens within it without their say. So, for those same elites to suddenly and openly suggest that “populist movements” were threatening to overtake the world and destroy the global economy was suspicious, to say the least.

In order to predict the behavior of globalists and the outcome of future economic and political events, it is important to understand certain dynamics. As just described, the establishment has a stranglehold on the political system. Party politics are a sham built around the false left/right paradigm. However, certain new dynamics are developing, and you must be able to track them.

The best way to do this is to watch what globalists say within their own publications. They often reveal their intentions directly or indirectly. In many cases I think in their arrogance they assume that the masses are too stupid to read these publications and grasp what is being said.

The most important element of predicting globalist actions is to know what they ultimately want; to know their ultimate goals. If you know the specifics of what any group or individual desperately wants, those people become highly predictable, because there are only so many useful paths to get to any goal.

I have used this method to great effect over the years, so I am not merely presenting a theory, I have concrete successes to back my position.

For example, just in the past couple of years I correctly predicted the Federal Reserve taper of QE, I predicted the inclusion of China in the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights years in advance, I predicted the exact timing of the first Fed rate hike, I predicted the success of the Brexit referendum when most of the world and the liberty movement said it was never going to happen, I predicted that the Saudi 9/11 bill would pass, that Barack Obama would veto it and that Congress would override his veto, I predicted that Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic candidate and that Donald Trump would be the Republican candidate for president of the U.S. and, I predicted that Donald Trump would win the 2016 election.

Except for the China SDR inclusion, I predicted all of these events many months in advance and received a heavy amount of criticism each time from people in the mainstream and even from people in the liberty movement. Hilariously, as soon as these predictions proved true, some of the same people that were fervently opposed came quickly out of the woodwork to claim they “saw it coming all along.” I suppose this is human nature, but it is a problem because it keeps people from learning how to better gauge globalist behavior and come to correct conclusions.

My goal in this article is to make EVERY liberty activist adept at predicting globalist driven events. So, here is a good place to start:

Learn To Play Chess

The elites are obsessed with chess and chess symbolism. Many of their strategies develop much like a game of chess develops. If you don’t know how to play chess, I suggest you learn. You don’t have to master the game, but you do need to understand the basic concepts of winning the game.

For example, if you know the target that your opponent is really pursuing, you can easily obstruct his efforts because all his movements will become predictable. If his goal is to take your Queen, and you know this, then he should never be able to take your queen. This is why the elites go to great lengths to distract their opponents (meaning us) from their true target. They want you to think they are going straight for your King, or your Knight; they want you focused elsewhere. They will use feints often.

Another core strategy of chess is the “forced sacrifice.” That is to say, the best chess players are very good at positioning one of their pieces so that it threatens two or more of your pieces. This forces you to sacrifice one piece for the sake of the others. If they do this often enough, before you know it you have sacrificed your way into defeat. The globalists ALWAYS have a primary target and a secondary target. There is always more than one move developing at any given time.

Knowing chess is key to knowing how the globalists think.

Get In Touch With Your Darker Side

Going by their behavior and their rhetoric when they are unguarded, most globalists display highly narcissistic character traits as well as sociopathy and psychopathy. It is not enough to research these traits in a clinical fashion, you have to tap into the darker side of your own psyche, and think as they think. This means being willing to entertain evil and malicious concepts. You must be willing to ask yourself – “If I were them, how would I go about getting what I want?”

Understanding devious and aberrant psychopathic intent goes a long way in making the globalists predictable. Remember, many psychopaths are actually highly intelligent and intuitive. They don’t have a moral compass and have lost the voice of conscience, but in order to adapt they have learned how to fake it. They are chameleons.

ALL people are inherently capable of evil actions, just as they are inherently capable of great good. You don’t have to become like the elites, but you do have to go to some ugly places in your own mind. An elitist is basically a person who went to those places and discovered that he liked it there.

Read Globalist Publications

As noted above, the globalists have their own media outlets in which they publish their “views,” such as Foreign Policy Magazine, The Economist, Bloomberg, Reuters, etc. Sometimes these views are honest and sometimes they are calculated propaganda. Again, if you know exactly what the elitist targets are, then you can better discern if what they are saying is legitimate or a feint to distract you.

I predicted the success of the Brexit and the Trump win based on the knowledge that:

1) The globalists need a large-scale crisis in order to drastically change public perceptions on society and governance. That is to say, they need to create a crisis so terrifying that people will be willing to accept a fully centralized global economic system and global governance as a solution.

2) The globalists have already set in motion an economic crisis that cannot be reversed. It is a crisis that they must avoid blame for at all costs once it accelerates.

3) Conservative and sovereignty principles are the primary threat to the dominance of globalism. As long as ideas of individualism, national sovereignty and decentralization exist, globalism can never truly prevail. Therefore, obstructing movements based on these principles is not enough. The globalists must also destroy any positive perceptions of our principles for generations to come.

4) As stated in the section on chess, the globalists like to use the strategy of forced sacrifice, in which they threaten two targets simultaneously, or kill two birds with one stone. I realized at the beginning of 2016 that all the rhetoric by globalists in their own publications on the “rise of populism” was staging the groundwork for the success of the Brexit and the success of Trump. What better strategy for the establishment than to allow conservative movements to take the helm of the political and economic ship just as that ship is about to sink? In this way, the globalists can have the crisis they need, while at the same time scapegoating conservatives and avoiding blame, and, destroying the image of conservative ideals, perhaps forever.

Have No Sacred Cows

This is a hard one for many people. We all have certain biases and these biases can blind us to reality. The overreaching bias within the liberty movement is a desire for heroic leadership. We have grown up on stories of heroes from George Washington to Thomas Jefferson – grand statesmen and military giants that crushed tyranny. The problem is, while men like Washington and Jefferson were indeed instrumental, they were nothing without the hundreds of thousands of unsung patriots working tirelessly for freedom on their own.

The founding fathers were not considered the founding fathers until long after the American Revolution was over. At the time, they were not thought of necessarily as heroes or even great leaders. They were just men, like many other men, gambling life and liberty on a cause that was uncertain at best.

Activists need to STOP looking around for mighty leaders and start taking leadership themselves in their own way. If we do end up with another Washington or Jefferson or Paine or Madison, etc., we will not know who they are until the fight is over and the history books are written.

The globalists take full advantage of the movement’s weakness in seeking out and artificially elevating heroes. Also, when people have this bias, they end up with blinders when examining such heroes with any skepticism. Obviously I am referring to Donald Trump, here.

Sacred cows prevent accurate predictions of major events because a person will refuse to consider them as a potential negative factor.

Moving Beyond Predictions

It is one thing to be able to predict the outcome of social and political events; it is another matter to do something about them. In my next article I will outline solutions liberty activists can pursue on their own and in groups to counter globalist activity. Predicting their tactics is essential, but acting to disrupt those tactics should be the ultimate goal.

The globalists believe that even if some of us do manage to decipher their activities and methods, we will have no means to do anything about them. They see themselves as the “history makers,” as the men who act. They see us as the “history watchers,” or the meaningless masses wafting about with geopolitical tides, helpless and incapable of determining our own destinies. I believe we will become history makers in due course. One weakness of the globalists that will sabotage them is their own hubris. They see people as pawns – but what happens when a piece walks off the chess board completely and acts in an unpredictable way? It is this potential alone that will destroy the globalists in the end.

You can read more from Brandon Smith at his website Alt-Market.com, where this article first appeared. If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here.  We greatly appreciate your patronage.

You can contact Brandon Smith at:

NZ Fluoridation Legislation: Take Action Now!

 

Legislation on Fluoridation 2017  

Legislation was introduced to Parliament on the 17th November 2016. This Legislation will shift responsibility from the local councils and give it to the District Health Boards. It is designed to make it virtually impossible to stop fluoridation in currently fluoridated areas, or to keep it out of places that do not have it – even if they have said “no” to it in the past. Local Councils will be required to do as the DHB dictates or face a fine of $200,000 and a further $10,000 per day of non-compliance.

Download Health Fluoridation of Drinking Water Amendment Bill

This Legislation does not allow for DHBs to consult with the community and it only allows a very narrow range for the DHBs to evaluate the subject as they will only be allowed to consider dental health in the community against the cost of fluoridation. They are being steered to only consider the 2009 Oral Health Survey rather than much more comprehensive data. They are not given any leeway to consider overall health effects.

Submissions close 2nd of February

As you will see from the transcript and related documents and the video footage of the MPs that spoke at the first Reading (5th of December 2016) – National, Labour and the Greens support the Bill. The Labour Party even want to strengthen the legislation by making it mandated by Central Government just in case a DHB tries to wriggle out of it. In a press release in December 2016, Labour also condemned the Maori Party for running a poll to find out what people think.

Progress on the Bill can be found here

You will also see that none of the speakers know very much about the subject. Health Select Committee Chair Simon O’Connor mistakenly credits his good teeth on taking fluoride tablets as a child. Unbeknownst to him, the Ministry of Health no longer recommends fluoride tablets because we now know fluoride doesn’t work by swallowing and fluoride tablets cause dental fluorosis!

Associate Health Minister Peter Dunne, who introduced the Bill, has called us “tin-foil hat wearing, UFO-abducted pseudo-scientists.” He mustn’t realise that he is insulting around half of the NZ population. Results from all referenda held in NZ show that people tend to vote status quo. As only half of the country is fluoridated (23 councils out of 67, not “27 councils have rejected fluoridation” as Peter Dunne incorrectly stated) which means that roughly half the population is opposed to fluoridation (or maybe more than half) and if a nationwide referendum was held tomorrow, we would have a good chance of winning.

The NZ First Party thinks the issue should be decided by local referendum. The Greens supported the Bill “at first Reading stage” as they, too, have concerns about local decision-making – but the Greens as a party do think fluoridation is safe and effective. It shows that most of them must only have read the Ministry of Health propaganda.

How to stop the Legislation

The Government is now giving until the 2nd of February for us to send in written feedback on the issue. The law allows everyone who gives feedback to have 10 minutes speaking time for individuals, and 15 minutes for organisations. At the Hamilton Tribunal in 2013, 1557 people put in a submission, 1385 opposed fluoridation and 130 people spoke at the hearing to support their submission. That required the councillors to sit through 3.5 days of oral submissions and the result was a 7 to 1 vote to stop fluoridation. Unfortunately, some Hamilton councillors who had excused themselves from the Tribunal Hearing because of a conflict of interest, and did not bother to attend the Hearing as part of the audience, subsequently worked to overthrow that decision. (See Hamilton page if you would like more information on that).

Therefore, we urge everyone to give written feedback, and do their utmost to speak to that submission in person. We have been advised that It is best to keep feedback to a page or two with around half a dozen really salient points. The Hearing will be in Wellington, which is likely to be in February or perhaps March next year..

Ways to give Feedback:

Use this Online Form If you don’t know what to say, a personal testimony is good, or attach an article already written (suggestions here) or list a few points as suggested above. Send hard copy to Health Select Committee, Parliament Buildings, Wellington. It is really good if you can also say you will speak to your submission. This can be done by Skype if you cannot make it to Wellington.

Fluoride Free New Zealand will be providing a comprehensive written submission where we will explain the ineffectiveness and dangers of fluoridation and details of public dental health programmes operating overseas that actually do reduce dental decay.

Please encourage your friends and family to help us now by sending feedback to the Committee and by informing everyone they know on the facts about fluoridation. The number of people that do this makes a difference! You can also help by posting respectful and informative comments on Facebook, liking posts and comments and joining the discussions, particularly on the Facebook pages of the Health Select Committee Members. See the list below.

Remember, this is election year. We need to let politicians know we will not vote for them if they introduce this draconian legislation.

Health Select Committee Members
Simon O’Connor, Chairperson, National Party, Tāmaki
email: 
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SimonOConnorMP/

Barbara Kuriger, Deputy-Chairperson, National Party, Taranaki-King Country
email: 
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BarbaraKurigerMP/

Jacqui Dean, Member, National Party, Waitaki
email: 
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JacquiDeanMP/

Julie Anne Genter, Member, Green Party, List
email: 
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JulieAnneGenterMP/

Annette King, Member, Labour Party, Rongotai
email: 
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/annette.king.127
https://www.facebook.com/annette.king.of.rongotai/

Shane Reti, Member, National Party, Whangarei
email: 
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/drshanereti/

Scott Simpson, Member, National Party, Coromandel
email: 
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/scottsimpsonmp/

Barbara Stewart, Member, NZ First, List
email: 
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/barbarastewartmp/

Poto Williams, Member, Labour Party, Christchurch East
email: 
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/poto.williams.7/

 

More Information

Local Government New Zealand’s response to amendments to the Act

Ministry of Health’s position statement on current proposed Legislation

Legislative Disclosure Statement from the Ministry of Health.

Trump To Shatter Big Pharma Monopoly

 

NaturalNews) In a welcome announcement during a press conference today, President-elect Donald Trump announced a plan to shatter the monopolistic pricing of Big Pharma that has been draining literally trillions of dollars from the government for the past two decades.

“Pharma has a lot of lobbyists and a lot of power,” said Trump. “There’s very little bidding on drugs. We’re the largest drug buyer in the world, and we’re going to start bidding. We’re going to start saving billions of dollars on drugs.” (RELATED: See more coverage of President Trump at Trump.news)

Trump is referencing the fact that all the former Presidents in recent memory — Clinton, Bush and Obama — have maintained what can only be called a “monopoly pricing drug cartel” in the United States, where the U.S. government pays outrageously high prices for prescription medications purchased via Medicare, federal health coverage plans and VA Hospital operations. The utter lack of competitive pricing has been kept in place by an army of pharma lobbyists “bribing” complicit lawmakers and bureaucrats to keep high prices in place and eliminate competitive bidding for prescription medication purchase contracts. (RELATED: See daily coverage of medicine news at Medicine.news)

$324.6 billion a year in overpriced prescription medications to appease Big Pharma lobbyists

As a result, the federal government is spending hundreds of billions of dollars on overpriced prescription drugs each year, dolling out a whopping $324.6 billion on prescription drugs in 2015 alone. “Spending on prescription drugs outpaced all other services in 2015,” says a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid report entitled National Health Expenditures: 2015 Highlights.

That same report reveals that U.S. health care spending has now reached $3.2 trillion annually, or nearly $10,000 per person. If this spending isn’t curtailed, it’s going to bankrupt America and will soon hit an astonishing 25% of GDP, meaning 1 out of every 4 dollars generated in the entire U.S. economy will be going to drug companies, cancer treatment centers, hospitals, doctors and medical device manufacturers.

High drug prices weaken U.S. worker competitiveness in global marketplace

Obviously, that rate of expenditure is unsustainable. It also makes U.S. workers far more expensive than workers in overseas regions, harming the economic competitiveness of U.S. companies. In order for U.S. workers to remain competitive, U.S. health care costs need to be drastically reduced… and that means finally forcing drug companies to compete on pricing rather than receiving “full retail” monopoly-priced reimbursements from the federal government.

Making America Great Again, in other words, means stopping the federal government from being ripped off by Big Pharma.

Notably, Hillary Clinton’s campaign accepted millions of dollars from Big Pharma sources, and there’s little question that Clinton, if she had won the election, would have maintained the status quo of monopoly prices. See “Hillary Clinton will not challenge FDA Monopoly” and “If you support Hillary Clinton, you support big pharma and mandatory vaccinations.” (RELATED: Find more news on Hillary Clinton at Clinton.news)

In contrast, Donald Trump is genuinely “draining the swamp” by eliminating waste, fraud and abuse across many sectors of the federal government. Big Pharma just got served: The era of easy profits and a compliant federal government writing unlimited fat checks is now coming to an end.

Every American fed up with unaffordable drug prices, outrageous health insurance premiums and the corruption and influence of lobbyists in Washington D.C. should applaud this announcement by Trump.

http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-01-11-donald-trump-announces-plan-to-attack-big-pharma-monopoly-profits-by-requiring-competitive-bidding-government-drug-purchases.html