Subscriptions, Current Issue & Back Issues

Current Issue | Annual Subscriptions | Back Issues

The “Final” Report on WTC7 by NIST Is a Poorly Constructed Lie

Go to this 9/11 truth activist’s website to access the links.

The Final ‘Draft for Public Comment’ Report by NIST, which you can find in a 7.52 MB .pdf document here, is fundamentally flawed, and I am going to explain to you exactly why.

NIST did not conduct a comprehensive investigation into controlled demolition as the root cause for the destruction of WTC7. And yet, a controlled demolition is exactly what it looked like. Consequently, NIST did not even conduct a study using that video of WTC7… that video only surfaced on the Internet on Nov 1st, 2008.

The excuse NIST used for abandoning a comprehensive investigation into controlled demolition is that they did not have any recordings of its collapse that captured what they deemed to be a loud sound. As a Bachelor in Audio Production, I can tell you that this is a strange reason to abandon a scientific investigation.

As a side note, I’d like to point out that there ARE recordings available on the internet of “loud” sounding explosions on 9/11, for whatever that may or may not be worth. Additionally, multiple people have alleged to having heard explosions with respect to WTC7. There is even an account by Kevin McPadden, Air Force Reserve medic and 9/11 first responder, who witnessed what appeared to be a countdown to demolish WTC7.
Look, here is the nut of it. On page 62 (of 115) of the Draft for Public Comment, it is written: “However, the soundtracks from videos being recorded at the time of the collapse did not contain any sound as intense as would have accompanied such a blast (NIST NCSTAR 1-9, Chapter 5). Therefore, the Investigation Team concluded that there was no demolition-type blast that would have been intense enough to lead to the collapse of WTC7 on September 11, 2001.”

There you have it. Because they don’t have a tape with a loud noise on it, they ruled out controlled demolition. That is exactly what they are saying. Read the whole section about Hypothetical Blast Scenarios for your self if you want,… it starts on page 60 and is less than three pages long.

Now, Dr. Steven Jones has found physical evidence that thermite/thermate was used in the controlled demolition of WTC7. NIST did not investigate for this, nor did it conduct any research with respect to this kind of blast scenario. Additionally, a controlled demolition accomplished by thermite/thermate would not make the same kind of explosion sound as would be heard from a traditional Vegas-style demolition.

Equally important, and as proven quite starkly in this video, NIST did not account for evidence, both scientific and by eye witnesses, of the enormous amount of heat and the molten steel found beneath Ground Zero including WTC7, but rather denied it outright and refused to allow this information into their study. Had they taken these facts into account, their own proposed “reason” for the collapse would have been proven unworkable.

This is all far more than enough reason to re-open the entire investigation of 9/11. However, as shown here, and by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth here, here, and here, there are still other fundamental reasons why the NIST report on WTC7 is fundamentally wrong, and even outright lying, in its assertions and its conclusions.

“All war is based on deception.” – Sun Tzu
Now I want you to think about the implications of the fact that WTC7 came down as a result of controlled demolition and everything that the “War on Terror” has touched, raped, killed, and imprisoned. Everything that Obama is doing in Afghanistan is based on a lie. The compartmentalized government currently in control does not serve the American people, but rather it is an enormous black operation serving private foreign interests. A coup took place in America quite some time ago, and it carries on to this very day.

Comments are closed.