Study Raises More Serious Questions About The Christchurch Earthquake Who Knew It Was Coming And Why? Part Two

Let us now move on to why someone might want to trigger an artificial earthquake in Christchurch. Follow the money is usually a very useful thing to do if a potential crime has been committed. Who has benefitted financially from the earthquake? Let’s take a look at several potential motives.

By Peter Drew

(PART ONE HERE)

Motive

Firstly, the Christchurch rebuilding contracts and the privatisation of many public assets in Christchurch not only appears to be highly corrupt, but also enormously profitable for the New Zealand government and for certain large companies. The tendering process for rebuilding Christchurch was passed over to CERA (Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority) which is allegedly staffed entirely by employees of Fletchers. Fletchers then put in a bid (effectively to themselves) and was immediately awarded the contract the day it was submitted. The RBNZ (Reserve Bank of New Zealand) is by far the leading shareholder of Fletchers, with RBNZ owning 275 million shares and Fletchers themselves only owning 5000 shares. As the RBNZ is a State Owned Enterprise, the New Zealand government is effectively profiting from the Christchurch earthquake rebuild.
https://uncensored.co.nz/2011/06/03/what-is-going-on-in-christchurch-the-real-story/

The open letter and freedom of information request below, written to Mr Brownlee in 2013, provides some useful insights into some of the processes at play here. In particular the 15 questions put to Mr Brownlee at the end of this letter.
http://www.rebuildchristchurch.co.nz/blog/2013/11/an-open-letter-to-the-honourable-gerry-brownlee-minister-for-the-canterbury-earthquake-recovery

In addition to what seems to be an extremely corrupt situation, the New Zealand government is also gaining enormously through the ‘Red Zone’ crown reclamation, whereby members of the public with houses in a Red Zone are being hit with compulsory government acquisition unless they agree to a settlement offer. Add into this mix the biggest transfer of public assets in New Zealand history as the local infrastructure assets of Christchurch were privatised. http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1706/S00300/the-biggest-privatisation-of-state-assets-in-nz-history.htm?from-mobile=bottom-link-01

This all adds up to gigantic amounts of wealth, many billions, flowing from the people and the city council of Christchurch to large corporations and the New Zealand government. This article explores in more detail the potential corruption and other possible agendas of the Christchurch rebuilding processes.
https://uncensored.co.nz/2018/01/12/christchurch-booz-allen-hamilton-and-the-2030-agenda/

The Christchurch and Haiti earthquakes share many similarities. Massive profiting from what is termed ‘Disaster Capitalism’ is just one of the similarities. Just as the Christchurch disaster response strategies have been enormously lucrative for the companies involved and the New Zealand government, and have decimated the budget of the Christchurch City Council, the Clinton Foundation has taken in more than $14 billion through global fundraising for the Haiti earthquake, of which almost none has actually made it to the people of Haiti. In the video link below we see the then US President Barrack Obama, as well as George W Bush, and Bill Clinton line up in front of the world media to plead for money to support the Haiti earthquake victims. George W Bush’s comment is interesting eight years later in light of the major investigation and audit now being conducted into the missing billions donated to the Clinton Foundation for Haiti earthquake relief.

“The most effective way to help the people of Haiti is to contribute money. That money will go to organisations (the Clinton Foundation) who will be able to effectively spend it. A lot of people want to send blankets or water. Just send your cash” (George W Bush)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrL6lmSLArk&feature=youtu.be

Bill Clinton had been appointed UN Special Envoy to Haiti just a few months before the devastating Haiti earthquake struck, an earthquake that seems to have benefited the Clinton’s to the tune of many billions of dollars as they were then in perfect position to lead the global fundraising drive.
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/main/news-and-media/press-releases-and-statements/press-release-president-bill-clinton-appointed-united-nations-special-envoy-for.html

Did Bill Clinton somehow know that there was a highly lucrative opportunity coming up in Haiti? If so, how did he know that? Eight years later Haiti is still completely devastated and has no funds for rebuilding, despite the world having donated more than $14 billion for this.

With Donald Trump defeating Hillary Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential election, a major investigation and audit has now been launched into the alleged massive fraud of the Clinton Foundation.

With this in mind, one must ask the question as to whether Hillary Clinton’s team also sent the same “and on cue” e-mail when the Haiti earthquake struck. Especially when we know that Lieutenant General Ken Keen, who led the Haiti disaster response, was conveniently on hand in Haiti leading an emergency management training drill just as had happened with the Christchurch earthquake.

So, the Haiti and Christchurch earthquakes both appear to be potentially associated with massive ‘Disaster Capitalism’. Was that the only motive for the Christchurch earthquake or were other agendas involved as well?

A second motive may have been related to the highly controversial Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA). Were the TPPA negotiations somehow linked to the Christchurch earthquake, and the subsequent Kaikoura earthquake just up the coast in 2016? A major agenda item of the US-NZ Pacific Partnership Forum being held in Christchurch on the day of the earthquake was the TPPA. The TPPA is a proposed 12 nation trade agreement, led by the United States, which has enormous potential consequences for the 12 nations involved, including potentially giving big trans-national corporations the ability to have a hugely controlling influence over government policy-making of those 12 nations in favour of enormous corporate profit.

The TPPA has been a highly controversial issue for New Zealand, including the major implications for the Treaty of Waitangi. In 2015 the TPPA resulted in the largest signed petition in New Zealand history being delivered to New Zealand parliament in protest at the governments continuing push to sign off the TPPA.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11584458With the huge public protests and continuing questions raised that the TPPA was a breach of the Treaty of Waitangi, the New Zealand government had conceded that the TPPA was virtually dead in New Zealand. However, one day after the Kaikoura earthquake in November 2016, the New Zealand government suddenly ratified the TPPA and then completed the public signing off of it in February 2017.

When members of the US delegation in Christchurch in 2011 cut and ran for the airport just before the earthquake struck and relocated to John Key’s offices in Wellington, was the earthquake used as an eco-terrorism threat to the New Zealand government for them to be compliant towards the TPPA? Was the Kaikoura earthquake subsequently used as another eco-terrorism threat to force through the final ratification by the New Zealand government when the government had seemingly been overwhelmed by the massive public backlash against the TPPA?

Finally on possible motives for the Christchurch earthquake being an eco-terrorism event, we have oil. Perhaps the most significant and obvious motive was the enormous potential profit to be made from the New Zealand seabed drilling agreements. The sea beds surrounding New Zealand represent the 4th largest oil reserves in the world, which is why New Zealand is sometimes referred to as the ‘Texas of the South’. This map shows the current areas of seabed mining agreement which represent potentially trillions of dollars of oil reserves.

The signing off of those seabed agreements has been extremely controversial in New Zealand politics. Like the TPPA, it brings major complications with the Treaty of Waitangi, as well as large and very vocal environmental protest groups.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/9435423/Thousands-protest-deep-sea-oil-drilling

Once again, was the earthquake used as an eco-terrorism threat when those members of US Congress left Christchurch and relocated to John Keys offices where he and then signed off the seabed exploration agreement with Anadarko?

Why was John Key and the New Zealand government so aggressive in their subsequent efforts to ensure Anadarko would be able to achieve their oil drilling aspirations in New Zealand despite Anadarko oil drilling clearly being a huge environmental risk for the country, and in the face of extreme public protest? The article below describes how Anadarko was closely linked with the catastrophic Deep Water Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, and that Anadarko was making inaccurate or fraudulent claims about its experience and track record with deep water oil drilling. http://werewolf.co.nz/2013/05/risky-business/

Why did John Key state in 2013 that “This government is very clear, we won’t let cowboys operate here in New Zealand”, but then go ahead and do the exact opposite with Anadarko? Why did Energy Minister Simon Bridges then also go on to try to prevent anti Anadarko protests by implementing legislation which can only be described as extremely fascist? This legislation stated that anyone who attempted to interfere with or disrupt offshore oil and mining operations of Anadarko would face jail or a $50,000 fine, with fines of $10,000 for individuals who come within 500m of ‘no go’ zones, and fines of $100,000 for organisations who support such actions.

Why was John Key and the New Zealand government taking such an extremist approach to ensuring that Anadarko achieved its oil drilling programmes?

Who

If you want to unleash an eco-terrorism strike on a target country for the purposes of oil profit, there would likely need to be some strong connections between those who could provide and deliver the technology/weaponry for that eco-terrorism strike and those who will subsequently be mining the oil. As a point to note, HAARP is jointly funded by the US Air Force, the US Navy, and DARPA (Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency).

With that in mind, let’s have a look at some of the board members of Anadarko around the time of the Christchurch earthquake.

Paula Reynolds – Director of BAE, a defence contractor in advanced weapon systems, which has included building HAARP’s phase 2 upgrade. BAE had previously provided $35 million to HAARP research

Peter Geren – former secretary of the US Army and US Air Force (who jointly own HAARP)

General Kevin Chilton – previously Head of US Space Command and Head of US Strategic Air Command

Anadarko was certainly associated with some very high level, high tech military connections, and very closely linked with those who would be in control of HAARP technology if it was to be used as an eco-terrorism weapon. The Anadarko board in fact looks very much like a high level military board with very close HAARP links.

Adding to the Anadarko links, Gerry Brownlee was appointed by John Key to be the ‘Emergency Earthquake Relief Minister’ to lead on the earthquake response and rebuilding. Most likely under advisory support from Thad Allen and Tim Manning as the US professional experts. The special ‘emergency powers’ that Mr Brownlee was given certainly seemed to allow for some considerable levels of wealth and asset transfer, as previously outlined. But perhaps of most interest is that it was Gerry Brownlee who initiated the seismic exploration of the Canterbury Basin for oil and mineral reserves and he was instrumental in the initial luring of Anadarko to New Zealand. So Mr Brownlee has very close links to at least two of the possible motives outlined here. Another extraordinary coincidence.

Let us now turn our attention from Anadarko back to the large US delegation that was meeting in Christchurch on the day of the earthquake as part of the 2011 US-NZ Partnership Forum. Who was on the list of attendees that day?

Thad Allen – US disaster response expert, who just happened to be on site to take a key advisory role with the Christchurch disaster recovery process. What is Thad Allen’s background and do we see any connections that could be relevant here?

Thad Allen’s specialist field is disaster rehabilitation, resilience, and infrastructure and community rebuilding. He directed the US federal response to hurricanes Katrina and Rita, and he was the National Incident Commander of the Unified Command for the Deep Water Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. In November 2011 Allen was named a Senior Vice President at Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH). BAH works for US intelligence agencies and the majority of its contracts are with the US government, including a major contract with the NSA (National Security Agency). In 2016 Hillary Clinton/Clinton Foundation was the largest recipient of contributions from Thad Allen’s BAH.

So, it is fair to say that Thad Allen is extremely well connected with some very powerful agencies and individuals, including the Clintons who have such strong links to the Haiti Earthquake and alleged massive ‘Disaster Capitalism’.

Richard Armitage – former US Deputy Secretary of State and coordinator of the response to 9/11. He was also the author of the major US political planning document ‘Project for a New American Century’ which involves the US taking a much stronger and more controlling military role around the world through the 21st century.

Tim Manning – US Deputy Director of FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency)

Kurt Campbell – US Assistant Secretary of State for the Pacific and East Asian Affairs

All of these four people have significant military backgrounds, and Armitage, Manning, and Campbell also have Navy backgrounds. The US Navy is the prime operator of HAARP. So we certainly had some very powerful people in Christchurch with strong military links and very high level involvement in disaster response and international relations.

The Verdict

What should we make of all of this? It is impossible to say with absolute certainty what happened with the Christchurch earthquake and why. However, we know that triggering a man-made eco-terrorism earthquake is very possible and has been acknowledged as such by the United States government and others. The various physical and anecdotal evidences, and the various people connections, and coincidences make it very difficult to dismiss the likelihood of some nefarious activity at a high level in some way. We have an extremely ‘militarised’ and strongly HAARP connected board of Anadarko, and some extremely interesting personnel connections between Anadarko and high level military and ‘exotic’ weaponry. We also have extremely high level US military and US Navy personnel within the US delegation in Christchurch on the day of the earthquake.

Did these very powerful individuals, and others, help to oversee a HAARP eco-terrorism strike on Christchurch in 2011? Did they then cut and run just before it struck, relocate to John Key’s office where he then signed over the New Zealand seabed exploration rights to Anadarko’s very highly connected, highly militarised, and strongly HAARP connected board? This was subsequently followed by the New Zealand government implementing extremely fascist legislation to ensure that Anadarko’s deep sea oil drilling was not disrupted in any way by the people of New Zealand. Did Thad Allen and Tim Manning take on a vital advisory role with the recovery and rebuilding process of Christchurch, along with Gerry Brownlee, so that it could be steered in the right manner for achieving massive profit to the right people through ‘Disaster Capitalism’ in a similar way as occurred in Haiti the year before? Were the Clinton’s involved in some way with this, with Hillary’s team responding “and on cue” when they heard the news? Did the Clinton’s benefit from the Christchurch earthquake in some way like they seemingly have done on a massive scale from the Haiti earthquake, or were there different channels of ‘Disaster Capitalism’ in play for Christchurch?

We know that the Christchurch earthquake has now been shown by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission to be linked with an unexplained anomaly of the ionosphere in the days preceding the earthquake. An anomaly that could potentially have been created through the use of HAARP technology, which is a vital part of implementing a man-made earthquake using Tesla type processes. We have the main HAARP installation in Gakona showing significant activity around the time corresponding to the ionosphere anomaly. We also have several HAARP-like installations operating just outside Christchurch and funded by the Ministry of Defence, and we have global weapons giant Raytheon based at Christchurch Airport which is strongly linked to HAARP. We also have Anadarko’s HAARP capable ship sitting off the coast of Christchurch at the time, which the New Zealand government have tried to cover up. In addition to this, we have evidence supporting the huge atmospheric geo-engineering aspect of a man-made earthquake.

We have the incredible coincidence of Thad Allen and Tim Manning being on hand to advise on the recovery operation just as happened with the Haiti earthquake in 2010, and finally, just as the seabed exploration agreement was signed over immediately after the Christchurch earthquake, we have the TPPA agreement being ratified the day after the 2016 Kaikoura earthquake, despite it having previously been virtually dead and buried.

Since the Christchurch earthquake in 2011, New Zealand has changed in an immeasurable way. Not only is the city still in turmoil and changed forever, but New Zealand’s relationship with the United States, and in particular big corporate interests and big military links, have been radically altered, as have some significant human rights legislation. New Zealand is now dominated by big international energy interests, irrespective of potential environmental impact, and irrespective of the Treaty of Waitangi. New Zealand legislation and human rights have become much more ‘militarised’ and much more towards what you would associate with a police state. This includes New Zealand’s inclusion as one the five partner nations in the ‘Five Eyes’ US global surveillance system, as confirmed by Edward Snowden.

So, does this point towards extremely powerful forces using eco-terrorism to help drive through hugely profitable corporate agreements and to change the political fabric of New Zealand? The final verdict will have to be left to the reader and I would very much encourage people to do more of their own research into this subject area and other related subject areas. There is a huge amount of factual and critically important information out there that our mainstream news will simply not inform us about.

On February 22nd 2011 New Zealand had its heart and soul pierced by a giant spear. Perhaps on that day New Zealand in some way lost its innocence in this world. No one would ever attack beautiful, peaceful New Zealand. But that is perhaps what did happen on that day, and perhaps on subsequent days after that as well. Unknown to many around the world, we unfortunately live in a world today where national governments do not determine how countries are run, and our mainstream media does not tell us the truth. We live in a world today where covert, unaccountable, and immensely powerful forces (the ‘Military Industrial Complex’) control what countries do, and they instruct our media on what to tell us to think.

With that message in mind, I finish this article with a 5 minute audio clip below of a great and courageous speech by John K Kennedy in 1961. Perhaps one of the most significant political speeches ever made. It came after his predecessor, President Eisenhower, warned the world in his farewell Presidential speech in 1960, and then presumably gave President Kennedy a full briefing, about the imminent danger to the world of the rise of what he labelled the ‘Military Industrial Complex’. In President Kennedy’s 1961 speech, he tried to warn the world about exactly this, and he courageously tried to do something about it. A few decades later and many more people around the world are now aware of what Presidents Kennedy and Eisenhower both warned us about back then. That is a great piece of hope for the world.

Rest in peace the victims of the Christchurch earthquake, and may the people of New Zealand find the awareness and the courage to fight the global forces that are taking control of this amazing country.

Acknowledgements
New Zealand owes a huge debt of gratitude to the brilliant, resilient, and courageous people at The Contrail www.thecontrail.com. Their refusal to let this issue go, and their tenacity in seeking the truth and bringing the evidence forward has been incredible.

Huge thanks to Uncensored Magazine www.uncensored.co.nz who ran a number of articles immediately after the Christchurch earthquake bringing forward vital evidence around suspicious circumstances, and who also recently published the new evidence that has come from the New Zealand Earthquake Commission https://uncensored.co.nz/2018/01/04/christchurch-earthquake-smoking-gun-document/

https://uncensored.co.nz/2011/03/04/was-the-christchurch-earthquake-a-terrible-natural-disaster-or-was-it-a-terrible-man-made-disaster/

Thank you also to world renowned researcher and author Elana Freeland and her pioneering work in the area of HAARP and Geoengineering. (Martin’s note: Be sure to check out Elana’s new book, “Under An Ionized Sky”).

PETER DREW

Sharing rights
This article is free to be copied or distributed in whole or part, but may not be altered or modified in any way.

Watch out for more to follow on the Christchurch Earthquake subject!