There is a well known song. Such an upbeat and catchy little pop song it is. But strip away the sound and read the lyrics, and it becomes a New World Order manifesto.
by Martin Harris
Take a pinch of white man
Wrap him up in black skin
Add a touch of blue blood
And a little bitty bit of red Indian boy
Oh like a Curly Latin kinkies
Oh Lordy, Lordy, mixed with yellow Chinkees, yeah
You know you lump it all together
And you got a recipe for a get along scene
Oh what a beautiful dream
If it could only come true, you know, you knowWhat we need is a great big melting pot
Big enough enough enough to take
The world and all its got And keep it stirring for a hundred years or more
And turn out coffee coloured people by the score
(Lyrics by Blue Mink)
What’s so wrong about this utopian ideal wrapped up as pop music, you may ask?
I ask you to think. The subject is “variety and diversity”. There is an old saying; Variety is the spice of life. It’s the reason we go on vacation and travel to other lands and experience cultures and places different from our own. We want to know all about how people live in other countries and nations. This doesn’t mean we want to become them, or even agree with them. But they may still have something unique to offer.
On a larger scale, most nations recognize that other nations have unique commodities, skillset specialities, or manufacturing focuses just as their own may have something to offer in return. This is International Trade, and it goes back at least as far as the Phoenecian/Carthaginian Empire if not further.
It has always been this author’s philosophy, then, that we should not just tolerate variety and diversity, we should embrace it and celebrate it.
Variety is the spice of life
Look again at those song lyrics.
The “dream” that is being promoted is the complete eradication of ethnic and cultural diversity. Why would anyone want that?
Perhaps if you were an Elite bent on total global control it might be a highly desirable goal.
However, the song Melting Pot was still a future eventuality several decades away when the man who might appreciate it’s lyrics the most was busy promoting his globalist vision. He preferred Beethoven. Especially a number called “Ode To Joy”.
I personally first encountered the connection between Ode To Joy and the Globalist New World Order while researching Canadian journalist Serge Monast’s infamous Project Blue Beam material. Rather bizarrely, he claimed that the alleged United Nations plot to stage a simulated “return of Christ” (in the form of The Meitreya, to ward off a simulated Alien attack!) would be accompanied by the heavenly strains of the aforenamed Beethoven composition.
Naturally curious as to why Monast would include such a strange detail, I soon discovered that the Ode To Joy had been proposed as the music to which a UN endorsed “European anthem” would be sung. So Monast’s claim had some credibility after all. Digging further, it seemed that the same classical piece had been promoted as the anthem of Pan-Europa, a forerunner to the EU, as early as the 1920s. Confirming that the composition is still associated with the EU and Globalism:
The individual associated with the concept and inception of the “Ode To Joy” European Anthem was one Count Richard Coudenhove Kalergi. Though Kalergi was a Beethoven fan, I have little doubt he would have dug Melting Pot.
Makes me wonder if Blue Mink had Kalergi in mind as the “pot stirrer” of their song?
In investigating the history of this Count Kalergi, it soon became apparent that there is considerable controversy surrounding the man and his ambitions. The controversy surrounds what is known as “The Kalergi Plan“. Described by Leftists (and by Wikipedia!) as a “Far Right conspiracy theory”, and labelled unsurprisingly therefore as “racist” and of course “Anti Semitic”, (though Kalergi himself viewed Semites favourably) and accused as being a gross misrepresentation of Kalergi’s real aims and beliefs. this alleged “plan” bears closer scrutiny, for it outlines an agenda that seems suspiciously close to the aims of the United Nations 2030 Agenda and it’s associated components. Take a look at the presentation in text link above and decide for yourself.
Now, let me state right here that I am no national or racial purist. Freedom of choice: Associate with, fall in love with, marry and breed with, whomsoever you wish. A quick check through history, family records and DNA databases will confirm that humans have happily interbred (without overarching plots) for millennia. What I am concerned with here is agendas that ultimately aim to take away your choices and freedoms and eradicate individuality. An entirely different matter I’m sure you’d agree.
So let’s look at what everyone can agree upon about Kalergi for starters
17 November 1894 Born in Tokyo to Austro-Hungarian father and Japanese mother
1919 Takes Czech nationality
1920 Attends the First Pan-European Congress in Berlin
1923 Publishes the “Pan-Europa” Manifesto
1924 Sets up the Pan-European Union
1939 Naturalised as French
Goes to America during the War where he meets Otto von Habsburg
Moves to Switzerland after the War
1947 Sets up the European Parliamentary Union
1948 Attends The Hague Congress: his idea of a European Assembly elected by national parliaments is accepted
1950 Begins corresponding with the Council of Europe about a European flag
18 May 1950 Receives the first Charlemagne prize
1955 Proposes the music (Beethoven’s Ode to Joy) that later becomes the European Anthem
1965 Leaves the European Movement
1972 Dies in Schruns, Austria
-Kalergi had an aristocratic upbringing and was beyond any doubt an Elitist. (As the “Count” title suggests).
-He was a supporter of Woodrow Wilson’s “14 Points”, the last of which was the suggestion that a “league” or council of Nations be formed. (Clearly the seed from which the UN grew).
-He was an enthusiastic Freemason, and a friend of Baron Louis De Rothschild, who acted as a conduit to financial support for his Pan-Europa movement, that ultimately paved the way for the European Union. (He did however remove himself from direct association with Freemasonry to avoid criticism in relation to Pan Europa).
-Politically, Kalergi described himself s a Social Democrat. (Which seems somewhat at odds with his Elitist views). Hitler was not a fan, describing Kalergi as a “rootless, cosmopolitan, and elitist half-breed”. The hatred seems to have been mutual.
-Despite supposedly being opposed to racism, racial theory, and bigotry, Kalergi asserted his the belief, shared with father, that Jews specifically are racially distinct. (And I thought Judaism was a religion, not a race..?). No wonder Hitler didn’t like him but Rothschild was his friend.
-Kalergi’s death is shrouded in controversy. A Masonic report alleges he died of a stroke. His secretary, however, claims that he actually committed suicide: a fact supposedly covered up to prevent disillusioning his devoted disciples.
We are experiencing the most dangerous revolution in world history: the revolution of the State against man. We are experiencing the worst idolatry of all time: the deification of the state.Count Richard_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi
One wonders if Kalergi finally realized that the very organization he had created would bring about this “most dangerous revolution in world history” and could no longer live with this knowledge? What could be more State-Deifying than composing a hymn to it’s glory?
The main goal of Kalergi’s plans was not just the abolition of the national states. He went much further than that, as he also wanted to erase the European nations, which would be replaced with the new kind of people, who would fit better into his vision of a future European super state. He described this new type of man in his above mentioned book, Practical Idealism:
»The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the current diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals. «
And it was precisely this vision of the future citizen of Europe that delighted the international elite of bankers, freemasons and other influential businessmen… a new population of mongrels, without a clearly defined identity, or a sense of belonging and loyalty to any particular culture or nation. And that is exactly the kind of population that would suit the international elites, because they are well aware that it is easier to control the masses of individuals. These elites crave total power over us, and they know that they could never achieve complete domination over the once homogenous nations of Europe, which would always stay loyal to their own tradition, culture and religion. So the only way for them to achieve total domination is by mixing different peoples and races into one human herd, which is exactly what Kalergi advocated in his plans.http://demokracija.eu/focus/kalergi-plan-and-the-hidden-interests-behind-mass-immigration.html
Is this what is actually happening today? Is this why refugees are being relocated according to predetermined quota system, as this document from 2010 seems to indicate?
So am I saying we should turn away the innocent victims of elite war games? No. These people are innocent pawns. They deserve our compassion and assistance. But here comes another old saying:
“When in Rome, do as The Romans do”
I speak as an immigrant myself. If one wishes to live in another country, then one learns the ways of that country and does the utmost to respect the local culture and adapt to the way of life. It seems to me though, that the situation is often the reverse. We are increasingly being asked to adapt and change to suit the culture of those to whom we offer refuge.
Something is clearly wrong with the picture. Unless eradication of national identity happens to be your motive.
Just as I doubt the pop group Blue Mink actually had a sinister agenda for global domination in mind with their Melting Pot song, I am happy to give Count Kalergi the same benefit of doubt. His mixed heritage and a multilingual upbringing no doubt had a profound influence upon his ideals. And that, I believe, sums Kalergi up: An idealist. Even his book outlining his vision was titled Practical Idealism. But how practical were his ideals?
Every great historical event began as a utopia and ended as a reality.Richard N. Coudenhove-Kalergi, Pan-Europa (Pan-Europe)
It doesn’t get much more idealistic, nor naïve, than that statement. History is rife with “great historical events” that have neither begun, nor ended, as a utopia, either in dream or reality. There are however, plenty of dystopian nightmares brewing, thanks to the dreams of naïve idealists with wealthy Elite financiers waiting to transform those dreams into a “reality” that benefits a few at the expense of many.
Perhaps, in 1972, Count Richard N. Coudenhove-Kalergi finally understood the difference between fantasy and reality, and preferred to leave the dystopian reality he unwittingly helped engineer.