Sue Grey LLB(Hons), BSc, RSHDipPHI and specialist in emerging issues shares her thoughts and perspectives on the experimental Co-vax, body sovereignty, informed consent and your legal rights. This is not intended as legal advice but to help you ask questions and make mindful decisions.
Uncensored is being censored Get your copy from our Online Store or your local book and magazine retailer Australian Retail Locations » Uncensored Publications Limited New Zealand Retail Locations » Uncensored Publications Limited As censorship heats up and free thought becomes an increasingly rare commodity, we appeal to our readers to support our efforts to reach people with information now being censored elsewhere. In the last few years, Uncensored has itself been censored, removed from the shelves of two of our biggest NZ retailers – Countdown Supermarkets and Whitcoulls Bookstores – accounting for 74% of our total NZ sales. You can help keep the Free Press alive by subscribing and/or gifting a subscription to your friends and relatives.
Martin Harris
I have a lovely partner and 3 very active youngsters. We live in the earthquake ravaged Eastern Suburbs of Christchurch, New Zealand.
I began commenting/posting on Uncensored back in early 2012 looking for discussion and answers on the cause and agendas relating to our quakes.
I have always maintained an interest in ancient mysteries, UFOs, hidden agendas, geoengineering and secret societies and keep a close eye on current world events.
Since 2013 I have been an active member of theCONTrail.com community, being granted admin status and publishing many blogs and discussion threads.
At this time I'm now helping out with admin and moderation duties here at Uncensored where my online "life" began.
5 thoughts on “HEAR NZ LAWYER SUE GREY SPEAK ON INFORMED CONSENT & YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AROUND VACCINATION”
Thanks very much Sue. The sort of information we need in order to make a decision. I read somewhere the claim that the Nuremberg report doesn’t apply as the vaccines are not experimental!
We all know they are.
Sue Grey keeps referring to “COVID” as if SARS-COV2, the “virus” which causes it, has been proven to exist. It has not. Christine Massey and her team have made about 40 FOI requests to public health agencies in various countries, requesting proof that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated. Not one agency has records demonstrating isolation. And this includes New Zealand’s University of Otago, where they claimed in June last year to have “isolated the virus”.
In September last year, a colleague of Christine Massey’s submitted an Official information Act request seeking any records held by the University of Otago that described the isolation of “SARS-COV-2” and the University replied that they had no records of it.
As of February 18 Christine reported that no institutions have provided or cited any record describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation by anyone, anywhere, ever. See: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/freedom-of-information-reveals-public-health-agency-of-canada-has-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-performed-by-anyone-anywhere-ever/
Thanks for the links Clare.
As I’ve responded to a previous commenter, I do not think the existence or non-existence of “COVID-19” or the virus SARS CoV-2 is Sue Gray’s focus.
The argument for the existence of the virus is almost a distraction from what actually matters: There is a credible threat being used, either a real virus whose seriousness is being inflated, or a fictitious one. Maybe all the sicknesses are variants of influenza and common cold, it doesn’t matter.
What matters is that this virus, whether real or illusory, is being utilised for social engineering (2030 Agenda socialism/totalitarianism) and associated measures: DNA harvesting and tracking/tracing, and of course the all-important vaccine. The population at large is being scared into obedience.
What Sue Gray is doing, to those who are listening instead of pulling her up on irrelevancies, is HOW TO REFUSE A VACCINE when your employer tries to foist it upon you.
Now, I have a full time job working for a fairly large international corporation, and I can see this vaccine agenda coming, so I find Sue Gray’s advice very helpful, regardless of the reality or not of the virus.
Having got that off my chest, thanks again for the links, and in due course I may explore the “fake virus” topic as a blog or article.
Meanwhile, a quick search found this: https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/information-release/h202007836_18_nov_2020.pdf
Cheers.
Not a fan of people who still in 2021 talk about ” covdi19 ” as though its real. There is an absence of proof of ” covid19″ the lockups were unlawful why isn’t Sue Grey addressing the rights violations done ? You can’t be forced lawfully to take a PCR test …why is she not talking about that??!! The PCR test is being mis used the information about it is not being provided IE that it can’t even detect one whole transmissible virus. It can’t be used to create cases diagnose disease or infection!. https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/?#voices
The purpose of the PCR test is to obtain DNA for a global database. It isn’t so much being “mis-used” as it’s true function is being obscured from us. “COVID 19” is simply a name for a set of symptoms (a disease). There is a virus designated SARS CoV-2 associated with “COVID” symptoms. Soto say “COVID 19 doesn’t exist” is a bit misleading.
As for your questions about why Sue Grey isn’t talking about rights violations associated with lockdowns or PCR swabs, I’m guessing that’s because vaccination is her primary concern and area of interest/expertise.
Jacinda Ardern’s Kiwsaver Invests in Oil & Gas, Mining, Nuclear Power, Military Industries, Gambling and Alcohol. by Cam Slater February 19, 2021 Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is big on virtue signalling, and now that media have taken a look at her Kiwisaver accounts, that virtue signalling makes her look like the world’s biggest hypocrite. […]
Thanks very much Sue. The sort of information we need in order to make a decision. I read somewhere the claim that the Nuremberg report doesn’t apply as the vaccines are not experimental!
We all know they are.
Sue Grey keeps referring to “COVID” as if SARS-COV2, the “virus” which causes it, has been proven to exist. It has not. Christine Massey and her team have made about 40 FOI requests to public health agencies in various countries, requesting proof that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated. Not one agency has records demonstrating isolation. And this includes New Zealand’s University of Otago, where they claimed in June last year to have “isolated the virus”.
In September last year, a colleague of Christine Massey’s submitted an Official information Act request seeking any records held by the University of Otago that described the isolation of “SARS-COV-2” and the University replied that they had no records of it.
As of February 18 Christine reported that no institutions have provided or cited any record describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation by anyone, anywhere, ever. See: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/freedom-of-information-reveals-public-health-agency-of-canada-has-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-performed-by-anyone-anywhere-ever/
Thanks for the links Clare.
As I’ve responded to a previous commenter, I do not think the existence or non-existence of “COVID-19” or the virus SARS CoV-2 is Sue Gray’s focus.
The argument for the existence of the virus is almost a distraction from what actually matters: There is a credible threat being used, either a real virus whose seriousness is being inflated, or a fictitious one. Maybe all the sicknesses are variants of influenza and common cold, it doesn’t matter.
What matters is that this virus, whether real or illusory, is being utilised for social engineering (2030 Agenda socialism/totalitarianism) and associated measures: DNA harvesting and tracking/tracing, and of course the all-important vaccine. The population at large is being scared into obedience.
What Sue Gray is doing, to those who are listening instead of pulling her up on irrelevancies, is HOW TO REFUSE A VACCINE when your employer tries to foist it upon you.
Now, I have a full time job working for a fairly large international corporation, and I can see this vaccine agenda coming, so I find Sue Gray’s advice very helpful, regardless of the reality or not of the virus.
Having got that off my chest, thanks again for the links, and in due course I may explore the “fake virus” topic as a blog or article.
Meanwhile, a quick search found this:
https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/information-release/h202007836_18_nov_2020.pdf
Cheers.
Not a fan of people who still in 2021 talk about ” covdi19 ” as though its real. There is an absence of proof of ” covid19″ the lockups were unlawful why isn’t Sue Grey addressing the rights violations done ? You can’t be forced lawfully to take a PCR test …why is she not talking about that??!! The PCR test is being mis used the information about it is not being provided IE that it can’t even detect one whole transmissible virus. It can’t be used to create cases diagnose disease or infection!.
https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/?#voices
The purpose of the PCR test is to obtain DNA for a global database. It isn’t so much being “mis-used” as it’s true function is being obscured from us. “COVID 19” is simply a name for a set of symptoms (a disease). There is a virus designated SARS CoV-2 associated with “COVID” symptoms. Soto say “COVID 19 doesn’t exist” is a bit misleading.
As for your questions about why Sue Grey isn’t talking about rights violations associated with lockdowns or PCR swabs, I’m guessing that’s because vaccination is her primary concern and area of interest/expertise.