Jeff Wefferson points to an extraordinary “coincidence” of COVID lockdown scenarios, both stemming from the ineffective PCR test.
I am sharing these two practically identical stories, one from NT and one from NZ, one day apart. The specific details and even wording of the stories is so similar, not to mention the timing, it’s as if it’s all from the same script.
The ‘new’ implications with these ‘delta variants’ are that newer, harsher, more totalitarian methods need to be deployed as both of these people went through quarantine and tested negative to get out then still ‘got it’. Covid is becoming almost as wiley and supernaturally powerful as its evil twin climate change.
Both so incredibly evil that literally ANYTHING SHOULD BE DONE TO STOP THEM as long as it benefits world government and the destruction of life as we know her. Especially maintaining lock-downs to inhibit movement and keeping borders closed = the definition of what a prison is.
Both of these scenarios are the result of ONE PCR test (not even multiple ones to see if they got the same result) which is renowned for yielding false positives and according to its inventor, Kary Mullis, was designed only for laboratory analysis, and cannot detect infection or disease, only the presence of genetic materials.
“Even the PCR test itself is not a test for any virus or disease. The scientist who won a Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR test, Dr. Kary Mullis, went on TV to attack by name NIAID head Tony Fauci as incompetent for claiming the PCR tests could detect any pathogen or disease. It was not designed for that, but rather as a laboratory analytical tool for research. PCR tests cannot determine an acute infection, ongoing infectiousness, nor actual disease. The PCR test is not actually designed to identify active infectious disease, instead, it identifies genetic material, be it partial, alive, or even dead.
A January 21, 2020 published paper by two Germans, Corman and Drosten, was used to create the PCR test immediately adopted by the WHO to be the world standard to detect cases of the novel coronavirus from Wuhan. At that point a mere six persons had been identified having the novel coronavirus. In November 2020 a group of scientific external peers reviewed the Drosten paper and found an incredible number of major scientific flaws as well as brazen conflict of interest by Drosten and colleagues. The scientists noted the Drosten PCR design and paper suffered from, “numerous technical and scientific errors, including insufficient primer design, a problematic and insufficient RT-qPCR protocol, and the absence of an accurate test validation. Neither the presented test nor the manuscript itself fulfils the requirements for an acceptable scientific publication. Further, serious conflicts of interest of the authors are not mentioned. Finally… a systematic peer review process was either not performed here, or of problematic poor quality.” Yet the Drosten PCR design was immediately recommended by the WHO as the world corona test.
The PCR amplifies genetic material by using cycles of amplification until it reaches what is called Cycle threshold (Ct), the number of amplifications to detect genetic material before the sample becomes worthless. Mullis once said if you amplify by enough cycles you can pretty much find anything in anybody as our bodies carry huge numbers of different viruses and bacteria, most harmless. Even Dr. Fauci in a 2020 interviews stated that a CT at 35 or above is worthless. Yet the CDC is believed to recommend testing labs to use a CT of 37 to 40! At that level perhaps 97% of COVID positives are likely false.“
http://www.williamengdahl.com/englishNEO11August2021.php
*** NORTHERN TERRITORY 16 AUGUST
How exactly he picked up the virus is still under investigation.
“We just don’t know how he caught it,” Mr Gunner said.
“That’s a question that’s important to answer not just for us in the Territory but as a nation, it’s important to understand how and why he caught this.”
Mr Gunner said while he did not want to speculate before the exact cause was identified, if the man became infected during quarantine in Sydney or leaving the facility, NSW Health needed to know to make the “appropriate changes”.
Index case travelled by ‘approved means’
Firstly, the index case man has not broken any rules.
*** NEW ZEALAND 17 AUGUST
“We have seen what happens elsewhere if we fail to get on top of it,” Ardern said. “We only get one chance.”
She said Auckland, where the infected man lives, and Coromandel, where he had visited, would go into a full lockdown for seven days and the remainder of the country for three days while health experts tried to find the source of his infection.
Officials said they could not immediately find a connection between the man and the handful of people who have tested positive while isolating in quarantine after arriving from abroad. The border is seen as the most likely source of any outbreaks.
https://www.npr.org/2021/08/17/1028386932/covid-new-zealand-lockdown