As the number of vaccines for children increases every year, the number of autistic children is rising at an alarming rate. Despite all the evidence that vaccines can cause autism in some children, Big Pharma and the elites are still pushing mandatory vaccination more than ever.
After a court challenge questioning the scientific support behind the claim that “vaccines do not cause autism,” the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has removed that headline from its website.
The blockbuster change was made quietly last August, and went largely unnoticed, with no public announcement.
The CDC Vaccine-Autism page goes on to state in many different ways that parents should not be concerned about vaccines and autism, and “there is no link,” while at the same time acknowledging a link cannot be ruled out.
In a Question and Answer post, CDC says “more research is needed” on the question as to whether vaccines can trigger autism in children with “mitochondrial disorders.” Scientists say many people have mitochondrial disorders but do not know it.
More research is needed to determine if there are rare cases where underlying mitochondrial disorders are triggered by anything related to vaccines.
According to CDC, mitochondria are like tiny power houses of almost all cells in the body, turning sugar and oxygen into energy needed to function.
Read CDC vaccine safety information here.
CDC Immunization Safety Official Acknowledged Possible Vaccine-Autism Link
In an interview with me in 2014, CDC’s head of immunization safety, Dr. Frank DeStefano, acknowledged it’s possible that vaccines rarely trigger autism in some children, and said “somebody” should do research to identify why that might be. However, there is no easily-found record of CDC encouraging or funding any such research.
Listen to Dr. DeStefano’s interview here, and read a transcript.
CDC and The Department of Justice Secretly Settled and Paid a Landmark Vaccine-Autism Claim
In 2008, CDC secretly settled and paid a landmark vaccine-autism claim, acknowledging that vaccines triggered autism in a child named Hannah Poling, while publicly telling parents and the rest of the public there was no link. Poling’s father is a pediatric neurologist. In paying the claim, CDC demanded the case be sealed. But the news leaked out.
Hannah developed autism quickly after a doctor’s visit where she received five shots– – nine doses of vaccines. She quickly came down with a fever, seizures and severe health problems.
Read more about Poling’s story here
The Government’s Own Expert At The Time says Vaccines Can Cause Autism, After All
We only learned recently that the government’s own one-time lead expert in defending vaccine-autism claims in court, the world renowned pediatric neurologist Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, changed his expert opinion based on new science and concluded vaccines can– and do — cause autism, after all, in “exceptional” cases.
In a sworn affidavit, Dr. Zimmerman says that when he informed the government (through Department of Justice attorneys who defend vaccine companies in court) that vaccines can cause autism, the government fired him as an expert witness and misrepresented his opinion in court to use against cases alleging vaccine-autism injuries.
Dr. Zimmerman had treated Hannah Poling, the daughter of his colleague Dr. Jon Poling, and said the science he learned, in that case, was part of how he came to understand that vaccines can cause autism.
Read Dr. Zimmerman’s affidavit here.
CDC Senior Scientist Gave a Sworn Statement saying He and His Colleagues Committed Scientific Fraud to Coverup Vaccine-Autism Link
In 2014, a senior CDC scientist, Dr. William Thompson, blew the whistle and said he and his colleagues covered up a vaccine-autism association, particularly among African-American boys, identified in a study published in Pediatrics.
Thompson testified in a sworn statement that he was present when his CDC colleagues and coauthors met and literally threw some of the data into a trash can. He says he saved original copies and put them in a safe, believing they had committed a crime by destroying the material. Others at CDC deny it.
At the bottom of Table 7 it also shows that for the non-birth certificate sample, the adjusted race effect statistical significance was huge. All the authors and I met and decided sometime between August and September ’02 not to report any race effects for the paper. Sometime soon after the meeting, we decided to exclude reporting any race effects, the co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can. However, because I assumed it was illegal and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hard copies of all documents in my office and I retained all associated computer files. I believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings from the final draft of the Pediatrics paper.
From sworn statement by CDC’s Dr. William Thompson
After the controversy, CDC insiders say the agency quickly sought reanalyses to try to counter Dr. Thompson.
At the same time, propagandists who write on point with the vaccine industry, such as Seth Mnookin, Dr. Gorski of Scienceblogs.com (“Respectful Insolence”), and authors at Snopes, Vox, Wikipedia and even The Washington Post attacked and controversialized Dr. Thompson, implying the well-regarded CDC scientist was actually an anti-vaccine nut…