Provisional Pfizer vaccine approvals, Astrazeneca risks, and COVID death figure counts. Listen carefully as Bloomfield speaks.
Martin Harris 11/11/21
Mistress Ardern keeps a tight leash when present at the iconic Podium of Propaganda for the daily COVID announcements. I stopped watching these regularly a long time ago, but whenever something of significance is on the schedule, I’ll pay attention. Especially when Bloomfield is off the leash.
Such was the case when two COVID cases were announced in Christchurch last week. Being an unvaxed resident of that city I was naturally curious as to what was being announced. It was something entirely different however, that really got my attention.
Hardly anyone I spoke to noticed it. The statement was eclipsed by the Christchurch announcement and the focus whether or not a lockdown would be enforced. But Bloomfield spelled it out loud and clear. He announced that Pfizer’s provisional approval had just been granted extension by Medsafe. Bloomfield emphasised the word provisional. But he wasn’t done there.
Bloomfield went on to say that he expected Pfizer to keep Medsafe informed of the progress of continuing trials scheduled for completion in 2023. I doubt Mistress would be impressed with such honesty about the provisional status of the vaccine-of-choice for NZ.
Yesterday as of the time of writing (10/11/21) on the day Mistress Ardern was away on a well-protected and carefully stage-managed visit to Auckland, Bloomfield dropped another truthbomb. See 3:26 in the video below.
He announced that the Ministry of Health is changing the way COVID deaths are counted. Directly attributable deaths are to separate from “COVID related” deaths as per the current practice:
Deceased | Includes all cases that died who were classified as an active case of COVID-19 at the time of death. In some of these cases, the underlying cause of death may have been unrelated to COVID-19. |
---|
Think on this. This has been one of the primary complaints of the Awakened since Day One of this media-hyped and inflated pandemic. Lumping direct cause and related deaths together has been one of the primary fear tools of this whole exercise.
People passing away due to old age, terminal illnesses, accidents…as long as the deceased had a positive result for Sars CoV-2, the tame and complicit MSM gladly (but with deadpan expression) reported their demise as a “COVID death”. In one extreme case, a lady who achieved the grand old age of 117 was reported as having been a victim of COVID. Things were getting to the stage where one either dies form COVID or achieves immortality.
Changing things now is rather closing the barn door after the horse has bolted, but I see it as being as close as we’ll get to an admission of deception. I for one, would love to see this “new” count method (which has always been used for deaths attributed for eg to seasonal influenza) applied retroactively. wouldn’t that be a revelation?
(Note. Those interested in the announcement regarding the availability of Astrazeneca may also note Bloomfield’s carefully worded statements at 34:29).
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OJFKBritLlc&list=PLsrCyC4w5AZ8F0xsD3_rzLcfxHbOBRX4W
If want to confirm that mRNA tech is actually cell and gene therapy marketed as a vaccine fast forward to the 1hr 37min mark.
This from 28 October
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VZbqT7400ds
At the 8min 10sec mark. Dr Bloomfield doesn’t mention the year 2023 but does say
“Supply ongoing data from its clinical trials around the world”
This from the EMA
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/rmp-summary/comirnaty-epar-risk-management-plan_en.pdf#page107
The list of trials from page 107 has all the end dates. Worth a look!
I’ll see if I can find the one where he mentions 2023 Richard. I know I heard him say it very clearly. Time is limited for me right now but I’ll hunt it down!
Cheers.